Case studies for implementing MCDA for tender and purchasing decisions in hospitals in Indonesia and Thailand.

BACKGROUND: A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach has been suggested for helping purchasers in low- and middle-income countries in an evidence-based assessment of multi-source pharmaceuticals to mitigate potential adverse consequences of price-based decisions on patient access to effective medicines. Six workshops for developing MCDA-instruments for purchasing were conducted in Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, and Kuwait in 2017-2020. In Indonesia and Thailand, two pilot-initiatives aimed to implement the instruments for hospital drug purchasing decisions. OBJECTIVE: By analysing and comparing the experiences and progress from the MCDA-workshops and the two case-examples for hospital implementation in Indonesia and Thailand, we aim to gain insights, which will support future implementation. METHODS: The selection of criteria and their average weight were compared quantitatively across the MCDA-instruments developed in all four countries and settings. Implementation experiences from two case-examples were studied, which included (1) testing the instrument across a variety of drugs in seven hospitals in Thailand and (2) implementation in one specialty hospital in Indonesia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via web-conferences with four diverse stakeholders in the pilot implementation projects in Thailand and Indonesia. The open responses were evaluated through qualitative content analysis and synthesis using grounded theory coding. RESULTS: Drivers for implementation were making 'better' decisions, achieving transparency and a rational selection process, reducing drug shortages, and assuring consistent quality. Challenges were seen on the technical level (definition or of criteria, scoring methods, access to data) or change-related challenges (resistance, perception of increased workload, lack of competencies or capabilities, lack of resources). The comparison of the MCDA instruments revealed high similarity, but also clear need for local adaptations in each specific case. CONCLUSION: A set a of measures targeting challenges related to utility, methodology, data requirements, capacity building and training as well as the broader societal impact can help to overcome challenges in the implementation. Careful planning of implementation and organizational change is recommended for ensuring commitment and fit to local context and culture. Designing a collaborative change program for each application of MCDA-based purchasing will enable healthcare stakeholders to maximally benefit in terms of quality and effectiveness of care and access for patients.

Economic Evaluation of Intravenous Immunoglobulin plus Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Steroid-Resistant Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy in Thailand.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been recommended for steroid-resistant chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The treatment, however, is very costly to healthcare system, and there remains no evidence of its economic justifiability. This study aimed to conduct an economic evaluation (EE) of IVIG plus corticosteroids in steroid-resistant CIDP in Thailand. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes for IVIG plus corticosteroids in comparison with immunosuppressants plus corticosteroids in steroid-resistant CIDP patients from a societal perspective. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from clinical literature, meta-analyses, medical record reviews, and patient interviews. Cost data were obtained from list prices, an electronic hospital database, published source, and patient interviews. All costs [in 2015 US dollars (US$)] and outcomes were discounted at 3 % annually. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In the base-case, the incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of IVIG plus corticosteroids versus immunosuppressants plus corticosteroids were US$2112.02 and 1.263 QALYs, respectively, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$1672.71 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the utility value of disabled patients was the greatest influence on ICER. At a societal willingness-to-pay threshold in Thailand of US$4672 per QALY gained, IVIG plus corticosteroids had a 92.1 % probability of being cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: At a threshold of US$4672 per QALY gained, IVIG plus corticosteroids is considered a cost-effective treatment for steroid-resistant CIDP patients in Thailand.

Hospitalizations of Diabetes Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition - Universal Coverage Scheme at a Referral Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand: Five-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Universal coverage (UC) scheme covers most of the population in Thailand (76.3%) and diabetes (DM) was the most prevalent ambulatory disease in most health care centers. Rajavithi Hospital is designated as one of the top referral hospital in Bangkok. Objective: To examine the trend of avoidable hospitalization related to diabetes in the UC patients who registered at Rajavithi Hospital. Results: This cross-sectional study collected data from electronic medical record from Rajavithi Hospital and the National Health Security Office (NHSO). DM and related diseases based on a list of diagnosis codes (ICD-10) were selected as an ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSC) to reflect the avoidable hospitalization. Outpatient and inpatient data between 2007 and 2011 were studied. The ACSC rate was calculated by number of hospitalizations on DM and related conditions divided by number of the DM patients visited as ambulatory care. Conclusion: The avoidable hospitalization for DM patients registered at Rajavithi Hospital was stable during the five years of the study. Future study on avoidable hospitalization should cover admissions to other hospitals and DM related conditions. Further studies should investigate the reasons of avoidable hospitalization.

Cost-utility analysis of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of steroid-refractory dermatomyositis in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been shown to be effective in treating steroid-refractory dermatomyositis (DM). There remains no evidence of its cost-effectiveness in Thailand. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the cost utility of IVIG as a second-line therapy in steroid-refractory DM in Thailand. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the relevant costs and health benefits for IVIG plus corticosteroids in comparison with immunosuppressant plus corticosteroids in steroid-refractory DM from a societal perspective over a patient's lifetime. The effectiveness and utility parameters were obtained from clinical literature, meta-analyses, medical record reviews, and patient interviews, whereas cost data were obtained from an electronic hospital database and patient interviews. Costs are presented in $US, year 2012 values. All future costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated treatment under IVIG plus corticosteroids to be cost saving compared with immunosuppressant plus corticosteroids, where the saving of costs and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were $US4738.92 and 1.96 QALYs, respectively. Sensitivity analyses revealed that probability of response of immunosuppressant plus corticosteroids was the most influential parameter on incremental QALYs and costs. At a societal willingness-to-pay threshold in Thailand of $US5148 per QALY gained, the probability of IVIG being cost effective was 97.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVIG plus corticosteroids is cost saving compared with treatment with immunosuppressant plus corticosteroids in Thai patients with steroid-refractory DM. Policy makers should consider using our findings in their decision-making process for adding IVIG to corticosteroids as the second-line therapy for steroid-refractory DM patients.

Iron-chelating therapies in a transfusion-dependent thalassaemia population in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: ß-Thalassaemia is a major public health problem in Thailand. Use of appropriate iron-chelating agents could prevent thalassaemia-related complications, which are costly to the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) in Thai transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia patients from the societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was used to project the life-time costs and outcomes represented as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Data on the clinical efficacy and safety of all therapeutic options were obtained from a systematic review and clinical trials. Transition probabilities were derived from published studies. Costs were obtained from the Thai Drug and Medical Supply Information Center, Thai national reimbursement rate information and other Thai literature sources. A discount rate of 3% was used. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were presented as year 2009 values. A base-case analysis was performed for thalassaemia patients requiring regular blood transfusion therapy, while a separate analysis was performed for patients requiring low (i.e. symptom-dependent, less frequent) blood transfusion therapy. A series of sensitivity analysis and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed. RESULTS: Compared with DFO, using DFP was dominant with lifetime cost savings of $US91 117. Comparing DFX with DFO, the incremental cost was $US522 863 and incremental QALY was 5.77 with an ICER of $US90 648 per QALY. When compared with DFP, the ICER of DFX was $US106 445 per QALY. A cost-effectiveness analysis curve showed the probability of DFX being cost effective was 0% when compared with either DFO or DFP, based on the cost-effectiveness cut-off value of $US2902 per QALY. When compared with DFP, DFX was cost effective only if the DFX cost was as low as $US1.68 per 250 mg tablet. The results of the analysis in patients requiring low blood transfusion therapy were not different from those of the base-case analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that using DFP is cost saving when compared with conventional therapy, while using DFX is not cost effective compared with either DFO or DFP in Thai patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia. Policy-makers and clinicians may consider using such information in their decision-making process in Thailand.