The interagency care team: A new model to integrate social and medical care for older adults in primary care.

To integrate management of social drivers of health with complex clinical needs of older adults, we connected patients aged 60 and above from primary care practices with a nurse practitioner (NP) led Interagency Care Team (ICT) of geriatrics providers and community partners via electronic consult. The NP conducted a geriatric assessment via telephone, then the team met to determine recommendations. Thirteen primary care practices referred 123 patients (median age = 76) who had high rates of emergency department use and hospitalization (28.9% and 17.4% respectively). Issues commonly identified included medication management (84%), personal safety (72%), disease management (69%), food insecurity (63%), and cognitive decline (53%). Referring providers expressed heightened awareness of older adults' social needs and high satisfaction with the program. The ICT is a scalable model of care that connects older adults with complex care needs to geriatrics expertise and community services through partnerships with primary care providers.

Participatory research to improve medication reconciliation for older adults in the community.

INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation, a technique that assists in aligning a care team's understanding of an individual's true medication regimen, is vital to optimize medication use and prevent medication errors. Historically, most medication reconciliation research has focused on institutional settings and transitional care, with comparatively little attention given to medication reconciliation in community settings. To optimize medication reconciliation for community-dwelling older adults, healthcare professionals and older adults must be engaged in co-designing processes that create sustainable approaches. METHODS: Academic researchers, older adults, and community- and health system-based healthcare professionals engaged in a participatory process to better understand medication reconciliation barriers and co-design solutions. The initiative consisted of two participatory research approaches: (1) Sparks Innovation Studios, which synthesized professional expertise and opinions, and (2) a Community Consultation Studio with older adults. Input from both groups informed a list of possible solutions and these were ranked based on evaluative criteria of feasibility, person-centeredness, equity, and sustainability. RESULTS: Sparks Innovation Studios identified a lack of ownership, fragmented healthcare systems, and time constraints as the leading barriers to medication reconciliation. The Community Consultation Studio revealed that older adults often feel dismissed in medical encounters and perceive poor communication with and among providers. The Community Consultation Studio and Sparks Innovation Studios resulted in four highly-ranked solutions to improve medication reconciliation: (1) support for older adults to improve health literacy and ownership; (2) ensuring medication indications are included on prescription labels; (3) trainings and incentives for front-line staff in clinic settings to become champions for medication reconciliation; and (4) electronic health record improvements that simplify active medication lists. CONCLUSION: Engaging community representatives with academic partners in the research process enhanced understanding of community priorities and provided a practical roadmap for innovations that have the potential to improve the well-being of community-dwelling older adults.

Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare.

The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) has consistently advocated for a healthcare system that meets the needs of older adults, including addressing impacts of ageism in healthcare. The intersection of structural racism and ageism compounds the disadvantage experienced by historically marginalized communities. Structural racism and ageism have long been ingrained in all aspects of US society, including healthcare. This intersection exacerbates disparities in social determinants of health, including poor access to healthcare and poor outcomes. These deeply rooted societal injustices have been brought to the forefront of the collective public consciousness at different points throughout history. The COVID-19 pandemic laid bare and exacerbated existing inequities inflicted on historically marginalized communities. Ageist rhetoric and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic further marginalized older adults. Although the detrimental impact of structural racism on health has been well-documented in the literature, generative research on the intersection of structural racism and ageism is limited. The AGS is working to identify and dismantle the healthcare structures that create and perpetuate these combined injustices and, in so doing, create a more just US healthcare system. This paper is intended to provide an overview of important frameworks and guide future efforts to both identify and eliminate bias within healthcare delivery systems and health professions training with a particular focus on the intersection of structural racism and ageism.

Senior PharmAssist: Less Hospital Use with Enrollment in an Innovative Community-Based Program.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in acute health services use of Senior PharmAssist participants. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Community-based, nonprofit program in Durham County, North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 60 and older with income of 200% of the federal poverty level or less who enrolled in the Senior PharmAssist program (N = 191) between August 1, 2011, and March 15, 2017. INTERVENTION: Medication therapy management (MTM), customized community referrals, Medicare insurance counseling, and medication copayment assistance provided by Senior PharmAssist. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were self-reported emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions in the previous year, assessed at baseline and every 6 months for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Mean number of ED visits declined over time (0.83 visits per year at baseline to 0.53 visits per year at 24 months, P = .002), as did the percentage of participants reporting an ED visit in the past year (49% at baseline to 31% at 24 months, P = .003). Mean hospital admissions also decreased (0.56 admissions per year at baseline to 0.4 admissions per year at 24 months, P = .02). There was no significant change in percentage of participants reporting a hospital admission in the past year (33% at baseline to 25% at 24 months, P = .23). CONCLUSION: Older adults who enrolled in a community-based program that helps them manage medications, connect with community resources, and overcome barriers to medication access experienced reductions in acute health services use. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2394-2400, 2018.

Medicare's Variation in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Prescriptions: The Irrational Examples of In-Hospital Observation and Home Infusion.

The Medicare program pays for prescription drugs using several different-and often complicated-methods. As hospital-based treatment continues to shift from inpatient care to outpatient observation status, and as intravenous infusions continue to shift from hospitals and provider offices into the home, understanding Medicare's prescription drug benefits is increasingly confusing to providers and beneficiaries. Not only is it sometimes difficult to determine whether coverage is provided under Medicare Part A, Part B, or Part D, but this determination also has consequences for Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket spending, which may be higher in certain situations. Although Medicare may be a single payer, the "system" of payment varies depending on where beneficiaries receive treatment; what their income and assets are; whether they are receiving inpatient, outpatient, or hospice services; and whether they are enrolled in original Medicare or a Medicare Advantage managed care plan. Policies are needed to address these anomalies in the design of Medicare prescription drug benefits and reduce the unjustified variation in out-of-pocket costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2249-2253, 2018.

The Health of Older Americans: A Primer on Medicare and a Local Perspective.

Our work with older adults, particularly those with limited incomes, has provided significant insight into the complexities of Medicare and the U.S. healthcare system. This article provides a brief history and overview of Medicare; describes the array of insurance choices Medicare beneficiaries face; and considers the effect of income, race, and health literacy on an individual's ability to navigate Medicare. We discuss how health is more than healthcare service delivery and that it takes community efforts to ensure that older adults not only understand their insurance, but also have access to other important resources that influence their health such as safe, affordable housing; food security; and transportation.

Medication Access in America and Medicare Part D: Prescription Shopping Saves but May Be Costly.

This article is a reflection of some of the changes we have witnessed in pharmacy over the years, including the rise in medication use and prices and the transformation of how medicines are paid for in the United States, with growing concern over pricing transparency. We discuss the complex Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit, how enrollees can save by comparing plans annually, and the influence of preferred pharmacies. We review options for medication assistance other than Part D and share our belief that, although Medicare Part D has dramatically improved access to medicines, more needs to be done to decrease Medicare's and individuals' out-of-pocket spending and, as importantly, to ensure that medicines are doing more good than harm.

The other yearly checkup: your Medicare drug plan.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify seniors' potential savings for switching to a new prescription drug plan (PDP) for 2011 and to assess predictors of which seniors could save most by reviewing their PDPs annually. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis included 404 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older who selected PDPs at Senior PharmAssist (SPA), a pharmacist-led nonprofit in Durham, NC. RESULTS: Seniors had a mean potential savings of $348 for the year. The 62% of beneficiaries who could save by switching plans had a mean potential savings of $559. None of the factors examined predicted whether seniors would have potential savings. Among those with any potential savings, individuals taking more medications ( P = 0.003), people with no low-income subsidy ( P = 0.0002), and first-time consulters ( P = 0.03) had greater potential savings. CONCLUSION: Some seniors can realize substantial cost savings by changing PDPs annually. Pharmacists can help patients save money, reduce sources of nonadherence, and earn appreciation as professionals by alerting patients to these potential savings and referring them to help in selecting a plan.