The use of imaging in the early development of neuropharmacological drugs: a survey of approved NDAs.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of imaging in the development of neuropharmacological drugs. All New Drug Applications (NDAs) approved from 1995 through 2004 in the Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products at the Food and Drug Administration were surveyed for imaging studies. Imaging literature was also reviewed with respect to antipsychotics and antidepressants. One hundred and six NDAs (35 new molecular entities (NMEs)) were approved; 15 of these NDAs (10 NMEs) had imaging studies. The primary imaging modality was positron emission tomography. Imaging was primarily conducted for drugs used in schizophrenia, depression, multiple sclerosis, and migraine. The majority evaluated receptor occupancy or proof of concept. Examples (including literature) are discussed as pertinent to dosage, efficacy, safety, or further development of a drug or class of drugs. Imaging contributes to optimal clinical development of central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Opportunities are available for its broader use, contributing to improved understanding of the clinical pharmacology of CNS-active drugs.

In vivo drug-drug interaction studies--a survey of all new molecular entities approved from 1987 to 1997.

Ninety-eight new molecular entities applications approved between 1987 to 1991 (period I) and 193 applications for new molecular entities between 1992 to 1997 (period II) were surveyed for drug-drug interaction studies. In period I (used as a comparator), 32 applications contained drug-drug interaction studies for a total of 117 studies. In period II, 106 applications reported drug-drug interaction studies, and the number of studies per new molecular entity ranged from 0 to 15. Most studies (77%) were performed in healthy subjects, with 44% using crossover designs, 7% using parallel designs, and the remaining using fixed sequence designs. The most common dosing scheme for new molecular entities/interacting drug was multiple dose (47%), whereas single dose/multiple dose was used in 31% of studies, and single dose/single dose was used in 18% of studies. Of the 540 drug-drug interaction studies submitted in period II, 80 (15%) resulted in clinically significant labeling statements. Submissions for new molecular entities to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research divisions most likely to include drug-drug interaction studies were neuropharmacology, cardiorenal, antiviral, and antiinfective drugs. Some drug classes such as oncology drug products and radioimaging products were least likely to include drug-drug interaction studies in their submissions. We conclude that the use of drug-drug interaction studies in the drug development process has increased between the two periods.

Evaluation of "external" predictability of an in vitro-in vivo correlation for an extended-release formulation containing metoprolol tartrate.

The purpose of this study was to examine the external predictability of an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for a metoprolol hydrophilic matrix extended-release formulation, with an acceptable internal predictability, in the presence of a range of formulation/manufacturing changes. In addition, this report evaluated the predictability of the IVIVC for another formulation of metoprolol tartrate differing in its release mechanism. Study 1 examined the scale up of a matrix extended-release tablet from a 3-kg small batch (I) to a 50-kg large batch (II). The second study examined the influence of scale and processing changes [3-kg small batch with fluid bed granulation and drying (III); 80-kg large batch with high shear granulation and microwave drying (IV), and a formulation with an alternate release mechanism formulated as a multiparticulate capsule (V)]. In vitro dissolution of all formulations (I-V) was conducted with a USP apparatus I at pH 6.8 and 150 rpm. Subjects received the metoprolol formulations, and serial blood samples were collected over 48 h and analyzed by a validated HPLC assay using fluorescence detection. A previously developed IVIVC was used to predict plasma profiles. Prediction errors (PE) were <10% for C(max) and area under the curve (AUC) of concentration versus time for I, II, and IV. The C(max) for III was slightly underestimated (11.7%); however, the PE of the AUC was <10%. Formulation V displayed a PE for C(max) > 20% and an AUC within 5% of observed values. The low PEs for C(max) and AUC observed for I-IV strongly suggest that the metoprolol IVIVC is externally valid, predictive of alternate processing methods (IV), scale-up (II, III), and allows the in vitro dissolution data to be used as a surrogate for validation studies. However, the lack of predictability for V supports the contention that IVIVCs are formulation specific.

In vitro metabolic interaction studies: experience of the Food and Drug Administration.

A total of 194 new molecular entities approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1992 and 1997 were surveyed to determine the role of in vitro metabolic interactions in the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies and to examine the methods used in these studies. Approximately 30% of the submissions were found to have in vitro metabolism-based interaction studies, most of which were inhibitory in nature. Chemical inhibition was the most commonly used approach in studying drug interactions in vitro. In this article, an attempt to assess the quality of the chemical inhibition approach was made. Four areas were found to be often overlooked: (1) incubation time and concentrations of the drug, (2) the difference between inhibition constant (k(i)) and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, (3) the substrate-dependent inhibition potential, and (4) the metabolic genotype or phenotype of the liver donor. We discuss the pitfalls in estimating drug interactions when these four areas are overlooked.