Ineffective esophageal motility assessment in patients with and without pathological esophageal acid reflux.

ABSTRACT: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), defined as minor esophageal motility disorder, is also the most common esophageal motility disorder. The relationship between gastro-esophageal reflux disease is still controversial. Our aim in this study is to evaluate whether there are differences in terms of demographic, endoscopic, or motility findings between IEM patients with pathological esophageal acid reflux and physiological reflux.Patients diagnosed with IEM according to the Chicago classification v3 with high-resolution manometry (HRM) before acid monitoring constituted the study group of our investigation. The patients were divided into 2 groups as patients with pathological esophageal reflux and patients with physiological reflux according to 24-hour acid monitoring. Demographic data, endoscopic findings, and HRM findings were compared between 2 groups.A total of 62 patients who were diagnosed with IEM according to the Chicago classification v3 were included in the study. Patients in the physiological reflux group were 7 years younger on average than the pathological reflux group. Esophagitis rates were significantly higher in the pathological reflux group (P = .033). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, integrated relaxation pressure, and the presence of hernia were found to be similar in the 2 groups (P = 392, P = 182, P = 657, respectively). The rate of severe IEM was also similar between the 2 groups (P = .143).The fact that the physiological reflux patient group is younger may suggest that the IEM develops in the early period and then reflux accompanies the picture with advancing age.

Investigation of the effect of web-based diabetes education on metabolic parameters in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The study was done experimentally to test the effect of diabetes on body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose. METHODS: In the randomization performed, with 80 percent power, 80 people with Type 2 diabetes were found to be suitable for sampling. Personal data forms were filled in by conducting a face-to-face interview with both the experimental and control groups for randomization purposes. In the study, monitoring of BMI, LDL, HDL, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose were used as outcome measures. Parameters were monitored pre-trial and at the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months. Data from the experimental group were collected online while data belonging to the control group were collected by the researcher from patientsâ¿¿ medical records in the Endocrinology Outpatient Clinic. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was performed to analyze pre-trial, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th-month data. RESULTS: BMI, LDL, HDL, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting and postprandial blood glucose average of the experimental group at 12 months were proven to be ameliorated compared to the average values at the start of the study (month 0). CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic data of the experimental group, who had web-based diabetes education, significantly improved between the start of the study (month 0) and the 12th month. In this era of technology, the importance of web-based monitoring of diabetes patients was once again proven.