Time of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is not associated with outcome in a metropolitan area: A multicenter cohort study.

AIM: Whether time of day influences survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. We compared outcomes after OHCA between day and night and explored whether characteristics of pre-hospital advanced life support (ALS)-quality varied by time of day. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of individuals that suffered a non-traumatic OHCA in the city of Vienna between August 2013 and August 2015 and who received resuscitative efforts by EMS. We compared clinical outcomes between day and night, defined as 7:00 pm-7:00 am based on EMS shift time including rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 30-day survival and favourable neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2). ALS quality measures included time to first medical contact, time to first shock, total dose of epinephrine, and multiple ALS performance measures. RESULTS: We included 1811 patients (37% female) with a mean age of 67 ± 16 years in our analyses. Rates of ROSC and 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome did not differ between day or night (30% vs 28%, p =  0.33; 12% vs. 11%, p =  0.51, respectively). These results remained unchanged after multivariate adjustment for ROSC (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3, p = 0.19) and 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5, p =  0.10). The quality of ALS did not differ between day and night. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, there was no significant difference in sustained ROSC rates and 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome after OHCA between day and night in the city of Vienna. This is likely due to nearly identical high bystander CPR rates and identical ALS performance provided by EMS personnel irrespective of time of the day.

[Acute abdomen : What the clinician wants to know from the radiologist]. / Akutes Abdomen : Was will der Kliniker vom Radiologen wissen?

CLINICAL ISSUE: Acute abdominal pain is a prevalent problem in the emergency department. The work-up has to include a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses, which should be narrowed down with respect to frequent diagnoses without overlooking rare but potentially even more severe pathologies. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The radiological method of choice for the initial work-up after sonography is computed tomography, which has demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity for most findings. Plain film radiographs of the abdomen rarely contribute to the final diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is reserved for selected cases, which are described in this article. ASSESSMENT: The clinical decision trees and recommendations, which need to be in the report depending on the diagnosis, are of relevance for every radiologist who deals with patients with acute abdominal presentations. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Knowledge of the clinical diagnostic approach in patients with acute abdomen is an unavoidable prerequisite for optimal cooperation between clinicians and radiologists in acute situations.

Transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation may not be futile.

BACKGROUND: Despite it being generally regarded as futile, patients are regularly brought to the emergency department with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Long-term outcome and its predictors in patients who were transported during ongoing CPR were evaluated in an observational study. Adult patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine of a tertiary-care facility after transport with ongoing chest compression were retrospectively analysed. Multivariate analysis of epidemiological variables, treatment, blood gas values on admission, cause of arrest, and location of arrest was performed to find factors that were predictive for favourable long-term outcome (6-month survival, best cerebral performance category 1 or 2). RESULTS: Over 15 yr (1991-2006), a total of 2643 patients were treated after cardiac arrest. Of these, 327 patients received chest compressions during transport and were analysed (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: n=244, in-hospital: n=83; the remaining 2316 patients were either stabilized before transport or suffered their arrest in our department). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 31% of patients (n=102). Of these, 19 (19%) had favourable long-term outcome (6% of total). Independent predictors of good outcome were age, witnessed arrest, amount of epinephrine, and initial shockable rhythm. Among the patients with cardiac origin of arrest, 11 out of 197 patients (6%) survived; pulmonary origin, 4 out of 46 patients (9%); hypothermic arrest, 1 of 10 patients (10%); and intoxications, one out of nine patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Post-resuscitation care in patients who receive CPR during transport is not futile. Once restoration of spontaneous circulation is established, one out of five patients will have good long-term outcome.