Phrenic nerve injury after catheter ablation: should we worry about this complication?

INTRODUCTION: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is a complication that can occur with catheter ablation. METHODS: Data from 17 patients with PNI following different catheter ablation techniques were reviewed. PNI was defined as decreased motility (transient) or paralysis (persistent) of the hemi-diaphragm on fluoroscopy or chest X-ray. Patient's recovery was monitored. Normalization of chest images and sniff test would be considered as complete clinical recovery. RESULTS: Out of the 17 PNI patients (16 right, 1 left), 13 (11 persistent, 2 transient) occurred after pulmonary veins isolation with or without superior vena cava ablation. Three patients had persistent PNI after sinus node modification and one other patient experienced PNI after epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation. Ablation was performed with different energy source including radiofrequency (n = 13), cryothermal (n = 1), ultrasound (n = 2) and laser (n = 1). Patient's symptoms varied broadly from asymptomatic to dyspnea, and even to respiratory insufficiency that required temporary mechanical ventilation support. Two patients with transient PNI resolved immediately after the procedure and the other 15 persistent PNI patients resolved within a mean time of 8.3 +/- 6.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: PNI caused by catheter ablation appears to functionally recover over time regardless of the energy sources used for the procedure.

Early EPS/ICD strategy in survivors of acute myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction on optimal beta-blocker treatment. The BEta-blocker STrategy plus ICD trial.

AIMS: This multicentre prospective randomised trial was undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) strategy in patients at high risk of sudden death (SD) early after myocardial infarction (MI). Previous studies have shown the benefits of such a strategy only in high-risk patients late after MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 143 survivors of acute MI (<1 month) with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% and either frequent (> or =10/h) premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), or depressed heart rate variability (SDNN < 70 ms) or abnormal signal-averaged ECG, who were able to tolerate optimised beta-blocker therapy (68 +/- 40 mg/day of metoprolol). Of these, 138 were randomised, in a 2:3 ratio, to two therapeutic strategies: conventional (CONV) strategy (n = 59) or EPS-guided/ICD strategy (n = 79). The latter resulted in ICD implantation in 24 inducible patients and in CONV therapy in the remaining 55. During a mean follow-up of 540 +/- 378 days, 26 patients (19%) died: nine (6.5%) SD, nine (6.5%) non-SD, and four (3%) non-cardiac death; in four patients (3%) the cause of death was unknown. The actuarial overall mortality for the CONV and EPS-guided/ICD arms was 18% vs 14% after 1 year and 29.5% vs 20% after 2 years, respectively (P = 0.3 and 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimal therapy, mortality remains significant in high-risk patients following MI. Although there is a trend in favour of EPS-guided/ICD, our data are insufficient to demonstrate a survival benefit of this strategy early after MI.