Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Water Res ; 45(20): 6661-7, 2011 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22030084

RESUMEN

A long-term performance of a packed-bed bioreactor containing sulfur and limestone was evaluated for the denitrification of drinking water. Autotrophic denitrification rate was limited by the slow dissolution rate of sulfur and limestone. Dissolution of limestone for alkalinity supplementation increased hardness due to release of Ca(2+). Sulfate production is the main disadvantage of the sulfur autotrophic denitrification process. The effluent sulfate concentration was reduced to values below drinking water guidelines by stimulating the simultaneous heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification with methanol supplementation. Complete removal of 75 mg/L NO(3)-N with effluent sulfate concentration of around 225 mg/L was achieved when methanol was supplemented at methanol/NO(3)-N ratio of 1.67 (mg/mg), which was much lower than the theoretical value of 2.47 for heterotrophic denitrification. Batch studies showed that sulfur-based autotrophic NO(2)-N reduction rate was around three times lower than the reduction rate of NO(3)-N, which led to NO(2)-N accumulation at high loadings.


Asunto(s)
Procesos Autotróficos , Desnitrificación , Agua Potable/microbiología , Procesos Heterotróficos , Sulfatos/análisis , Azufre/metabolismo , Purificación del Agua/métodos , Álcalis/análisis , Reactores Biológicos/microbiología , Dureza , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Cinética , Oxidación-Reducción , Oxígeno/análisis , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos
2.
J Hazard Mater ; 171(1-3): 901-6, 2009 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19608339

RESUMEN

Precipitation of metals from acid mine drainage (AMD) using sulfide gives the possibility of selective recovery due to different solubility product of each metal. Using sulfate reducing bacteria to produce sulfide for that purpose is advantageous due to in situ and on-demand sulfide production. In this study, separate precipitation of Cu and Zn was studied using sulfide produced in anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). ABR fed with ethanol (1340 mg/L chemical oxygen demand (COD)) and sulfate (2000 mg/L) gave a stable performance with 65% sulfate reduction, 85% COD removal and around 320 mg/L sulfide production. Cu was separately precipitated at low pH (pH<2) using sulfide transported from ABR effluent via N(2) gas. Cu precipitation was complete within 45-60 min and Zn did not precipitate during Cu removal. The Cu precipitation rate increased with initial Cu concentration. After selective Cu precipitation, Zn recovery was studied using ABR effluent containing sulfide and alkalinity. Depending on initial sulfide/Zn ratio, removal efficiency varied between 84 and 98%. The low pH of Zn bearing AMD was also increased to neutral values using alkalinity produced by sulfate reducing bacteria in ABR. The mode of particle size distribution of ZnS and CuS precipitates was around 17 and 46 microm, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Cobre/aislamiento & purificación , Minería , Sulfuros/química , Purificación del Agua/métodos , Zinc/aislamiento & purificación , Reactores Biológicos , Cobre/química , Etanol/química , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Metales/química , Nitrógeno/química , Tamaño de la Partícula , Solubilidad , Factores de Tiempo , Zinc/química , Compuestos de Zinc/química
3.
Bioresour Technol ; 100(19): 4354-60, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19428238

RESUMEN

The applicability of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) was investigated for the treatment of acidic (pH 4.5-7.0) wastewater containing sulfate (1000-2000 mg/L) and Zn (65-200mg/L) at 35 degrees C. The ABR consisted of four equal stages and lactate was supplemented (COD/SO(4)(2-)=0.67) as carbon and energy source for sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB). The robustness of the system was studied by decreasing pH and increasing Zn, COD, and sulfate loadings. Sulfate-reduction efficiency quickly increased during the start-up period and reached 80% within 45 days. Decreasing feed pH, increasing feed sulfate and Zn concentrations did not adversely affect system performance as sulfate reduction and COD removal efficiencies were within 62-90% and 80-95%, respectively. Although feed pH was steadily decreased from 7.0 to 4.5, effluent pH was always within 6.8-7.5. Over 99% Zn removal was attained throughout the study due to formation of Zn-sulfide precipitate.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos/química , Reactores Biológicos , Sulfatos/aislamiento & purificación , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos , Purificación del Agua , Zinc/aislamiento & purificación , Álcalis/química , Anaerobiosis , Biodegradación Ambiental , Precipitación Química , Electrones , Ácidos Grasos Volátiles , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Oxidación-Reducción , Oxígeno/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA