RESUMEN
Background: Abatacept (ABT) is known to lower infection risk than other biologics and is effective and safe in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there were inconsistent reports on the impact of ABT on malignancies which are more common in the elderly and strongly related to prognosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT in patients with RA with previous malignancy in clinical practice. Design: A multicenter, retrospective study. Methods: Patients who received ABT for RA in two hospitals in Yokohama until May 2022 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a history of malignancy (no previous malignancy: NP group, previous malignancy: PM group). The collected parameters were compared between the groups using propensity score matching. Results: In this study, 312 patients were included, of whom 73 had previous malignancies when starting ABT. The age at ABT initiation was significantly higher in the PM group, the rate of methotrexate use was significantly lower in the PM group, and the Steinbrocker stage was significantly higher in the PM group. After matching these 3 factors, 68 patients were selected from each group. No significant differences in the ABT continuation rate, and malignancy incidence were observed between the two groups after ABT initiation. In addition to these factors, when matched for smoking history, interstitial lung disease, disease duration, sex, and inflammatory status, which are known risk factors for malignancy in RA, 40 patients were selected from each group. No significant differences in the ABT continuation rate, and malignancy incidence were observed between the two groups after ABT initiation. Conclusion: In our clinical practice, ABT was as effective and safe in patients with a history of malignancy as in those without.
RESUMEN
Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a life-threatening disease that primarily affects patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Antifungal therapy with antiretroviral treatment (ART) usually leads to the clinical remission of CM; however, in some cases, these treatments exacerbate intracranial inflammation because of paradoxical inflammatory reaction or immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Here we report two CM cases that presented atypical clinical courses attributed to paradoxical inflammatory reactions. The first case was a 43-year-old man with headache and vertigo diagnosed with CM and HIV. The patient's CM not only was refractory to the antifungal combination therapy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and fluconazole (FLCZ) but suddenly worsened because of a paradoxical inflammatory reaction after 18 days of treatment. He passed away from brain herniation on day 23. The second case was a 43-year-old man diagnosed with CM and HIV. After receiving antifungal therapy and ART, the patient's status was stable for more than 3 years with undetectable HIV-RNA. He suddenly presented with brain inflammation and was diagnosed with IRIS due to CM (CM-IRIS). His brain lesions were migratory and refractory to various antifungal therapies such as L-AMB, FLCZ, flucytosine, and intrathecal amphotericin B. Although the cryptococcal antigen in the patient's cerebrospinal fluid gradually diminished after continuous antifungal therapies, his cognitive function declined, and right hemiparesis persisted. These two cases of CM presented atypical clinical courses, presumably because of paradoxical inflammatory reactions. It should be noted that the onset of CM-IRIS may not necessarily depend on the timing of ART initiation.
