[Cardiorenal syndrome by heart failure]. / Kardiorenální syndrom u srdecního selhání

Cardiorenal (CR) syndrome is defined for the purposes of the following text mainly as primary cardiac dysfunction with a consequent failure of renal haemodynamics. Heart failure leads to a decrease in cardiac output and to the activation of vasoconstrictors; this gradually precipitates a decrease in the level of renal perfusion, the vasoconstriction of renal vessels and a decrease in glomerular filtration with a gradual development of renal failure. The following paper analyses the pathophysiological mechanisms, the characteristics of the patients, the role of medication during CR syndrome, the relationship between proteinuria and anaemia during CR syndrome and the application of bio-markers and pulmonary hypertension in the prognosis of patients with CR syndrome.

Neurohumoral activity, heart failure and prognosis in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal failure treated by regular hemodialysis is frequently accompanied by chronic heart failure; the mortality of both is high. AIM: To evaluate the role of markers of neurohumoral activation for the prognosis of patients treated with regular dialysis. PATIENTS: 99 patients with end-stage renal disease were followed up for 3 years. METHODS: Clinical evaluation, echocardiography, biochemistry including NT-proBNP and big endothelin (Big-ET). RESULTS: The incidence of heart failure was 97% and the 3-year mortality was 50%. The sensitivity of NT-proBNP and Big-ET level for the prediction of death was 0.712 and 0.824, respectively, and specificity 0.642 and 0.695, respectively. The cut-off points were NT-proBNP > or = 2,000 pg/ml and Big-ET > or = 1.55 pmol/l. Neither NT-proBNP nor Big-ET could be incorporated in the multivariate model for overall survival, which means that although both parameters significantly influenced overall survival as single risk factors, they were not effective in competition with the other significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Overall survival seems to be influenced namely by age, hemoglobin, left atrium diameter or pulmonary congestion class on chest X-ray, while probability of early risk was associated with Big-ET, history of diabetes mellitus, C-reactive protein, uric acid and hemoglobin. The only intersection of the models is hemoglobin as a thoroughly significant predictor.

[The importance of determination of Nt-proBNP and big endothelin in diagnosing chronic heart failure in patients on regular haemodialysis treatment]. / Význam stanovení Nt-proBNP a big endotelinu pro diagnostiku chronického srdecního selhání u nemorných v pravidelném hemodialyzacním programu.

We have followed 99 patients with end stage renal failure, treated by regular haemodialysis. Chronic renal failure is frequently accompanied by chronic heart failure (over 50%), especially by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Patients treated by regular haemodialysis had a tendency to cardiomegaly (51%), mild systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle (mean LVEF 53%) and diastolic dysfunction (88%) of the hypertrophic left ventricle. They had also activated endothelin and neurohumoral system. Only 3% of the patients had normal values of Nt-proBNP and big endothelin. The plasma level of Nt-proBNP in haemodialysed patients correlated with cardiothoracic ratio and with ejection fraction. The plasma level of big endothelin correlated only with cardiothoracic ratio.

[Variability of plasmatic levels of big endothelin and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure in a chronic haemodialysis programme]. / Variabilita plazmatických hladin big endotelinu a NT-proBNP u nemocných se srdecním selháním v chronickém hemodialyzacním programu.

Inter-dialysis variability in levels of big endothelin and NT-proBNP in plasma were studied in 22 patients with established systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of the left cardiac ventricle assigned to a chronic haemodialysis programme. The plasmatic level of NT-proBNP in all patients was practically unchanged. There was a falling trended between haemodialysis treatments but this was not statistically significant and in absolute values clinically insignificant. Fluctuations were found between individuals but on average all values were stable and high in the pathological range. No significant changes in the plasmatic level of big endothelin were found either. The average levels were again stable and insignificant and the indicated trend did not achieve clinical or statistical significance. The values were once again high in the pathological range. Plasmatic levels of NT-proBNP and big endothelin do not vary according to the phase of the dialysis cycle and mainly reflect the long-term condition of endothelium failure and long-term stress in the left ventricle. Concentrations are not affected by changes in volume or uraemia between dialysis treatments and the suggested trend towards a fall in NT-proBNP and a rise in big endothelin does not have a clear explanation. In any case, this trend remained within the pathological range and is probably not clinically significant.