Soaking up the oil: Biological impacts of dispersants and crude oil on the sponge Halichondria panicea.

Used during an oil spill to minimise the formation of an oil slick, dispersants have negative biological effects on marine model organisms. However, no study has investigated the impacts of dispersants on adult sponge individuals. Here, we examine the effects of water accommodated oil fraction (WAF - oil in seawater), chemically enhanced WAF (CEWAF - oil and dispersant in seawater) and Benzo[A]Pyrene on sponge Halichondria panicea at physiological and molecular levels. Sponge clearance rate decreased sharply when exposed to WAF and CEWAF but the oil loading at which the clearance rate was reduced by 50% (ED50) was 39-fold lower in CEWAF than in WAF. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a homogenous molecular response with the greatest number of differentially expressed genes identified in CEWAF samples (1,461 genes). Specifically, genes involved in stress responses were up-regulated. This study presents evidence that the use of dispersants should be considered carefully in areas where sponges are present.

Clarification of Governance Relevant to the Sustainable Management of Marine Species and Habitats within the United Kingdom: An Overview of Regional, National and International Authorities, Advisories, Legislation and Designation Types with Summary Schematic Tool.

Marine management developments are occurring across the United Kingdom with the major aim to ensure economic growth and security of marine resources via the provision of legislative guidelines for sustainable management of activities within the marine environment. Many of these directives also provide guidance for maintaining ecologically valuable and/or endangered species and habitats that exist alongside, and may also support, marine activities/use. Marine governance is largely guided by several key directives laid out and implemented by governing authorities of Europe, the United Kingdom and those countries comprising the United Kingdom, and in line with several international conventions. The directives set out by each authority or convention may act discretely but more often tend to overlap, which can lead to confusion about the relevant marine conservation requirements and objectives that must be fulfilled for a given region, site or feature. Additionally, management objectives driven by the same legislation may oppose one another, adding further complexity to the matter. This article aims to provide an overview of governance that holds relevance to managing marine habitats and species, especially those deemed sensitive, ecologically valuable and/or endangered. A general overview and summary schematic tool of the marine governance, legislation and designations within each level of authority for the United Kingdom are provided. Additional consideration of the implications for legislation upon the United Kingdom leaving the EU is briefly discussed and a comparative case study of two marine habitats of high conservation value is provided to demonstrate how different sites/features may have considerably different management requirements.

KEL*02 alleles with alterations in and around exon 8 in individuals with apparent KEL:1,-2 phenotypes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibodies to antigens in the Kell blood group system, especially anti-KEL1, are involved in both haemolytic disease of the newborn and foetus and haemolytic transfusion reactions. Correct typing results are important and discrepancies between serologic and genetic typing must be resolved. Here, we describe the investigation of three healthy individuals who were initially phenotyped as KEL:1,-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antigen typing was performed by standard serological techniques and by flow cytometric analysis. The KEL*01/02 polymorphism was tested by an allele-discrimination TaqMan assay as well as by PCR with allele-specific primers and PCR-RFLP. DNA sequencing of the KEL coding region was also performed. RESULTS: Two KEL*02N alleles with mutated splice sites around exon 8 were identified: intron 7 -1g>c (novel) and intron 8 +1g>t (previously reported in one case of K(0)). In the third sample, a missense mutation in exon 8, 787G>A (novel) predicting Gly263Arg, was detected on a KEL*02 allele and associated with dramatically weakened KEL2 antigen expression. CONCLUSION: Resolution of discrepant phenotype/genotype results identified silencing mutations in or around exon 8. A combination of molecular and serologic methods has the potential to improve the quality of test results and was required to ensure both the accurate KEL2 antigen status and KEL*01 zygosity of these individuals.