Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter is not a predictor of functional outcomes in ICH Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) may serve as an early marker of increasing intracranial pressure resulting from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We investigated if changes in ONSD can predict 90-day functional outcomes in ICH patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized ERICH (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage), a prospective, multi-center, case-control study of 3000 patients. We included patients with baseline and follow-up head CT with available outcomes. We measured change in ONSD from baseline and follow-up CT within a 6 (±1) hour window. Our primary outcome was the 90-day Modified Rankin (mRS) score. We compared patients with good (mRS 0-3) versus poor outcomes (mRS 4-6) to presence of significant change in ONSD using univariate analysis. We did an analysis of variance to assess for differences in ONSD. RESULTS: Of 93 ICH patients who fit the inclusion criteria, the mean age was 64.1 (SD +/- 14.6), with 36.6 % being females. Forty-nine patients (47.1 %) had significant ONSD change between baseline and follow-up CT. ONSD change in the poor outcome group was not significantly different than that of the good outcome group in both the right and left hemispheres (p = 0.21 and p = 0.63 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that early change in the ONSD within the first 6 h of presentation in patients with ICH does not predict functional outcomes at three months.

Higher blood glucose is associated with the severity of hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular therapy for stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcome in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, with mechanism for this effect unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used our prospective, multicenter, observational study, Blood Pressure After Endovascular Stroke Therapy (BEST), of anterior circulation LVO stroke undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) from 11/2017-7/2018 to determine association between increasing blood glucose (BG) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Our primary outcome was degree of ICH, classified as none, asymptomatic ICH, or symptomatic ICH (≥4-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] at 24 h with any hemorrhage on imaging). Secondary outcomes included 24 h NIHSS, early neurologic recovery (ENR, NIHSS 0-1 or NIHSS reduction by ≥8 within 24 h), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) using univariate and multivariable regression. RESULTS: Of 485 enrolled patients, increasing BG was associated with increasing severity of ICH (adjusted OR, aOR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.02-1.1, p < 0.001), higher 24 h NIHSS (aOR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.11-1.34, p < 0.001), ENR (aOR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.82-1.00, p < 0.002), and 90-day mRS (aOR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03-1.09, p < 0.001) when adjusted for age, presenting NIHSS, ASPECTS, 24-hour peak systolic blood pressure, time from last known well, and successful recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: In the BEST study, increasing BG was associated with greater odds of increasing ICH severity. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment of will decrease ICH severity following EVT.

In-Hospital Amantadine Does Not Improve Outcomes After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An 11-Year Propensity-Matched Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Disruption of dopamine neurotransmission is associated with functional impairment after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). This has prompted the study of dopamine agonists, such as amantadine, to assist recovery of consciousness. Randomized trials have mostly addressed the posthospital setting, with inconsistent findings. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of early amantadine administration on recovery of consciousness after sTBI. METHODS: We searched the medical records of all patients with sTBI admitted to our hospital between 2010 and 2021 who survived 10 days postinjury. We identified all patients receiving amantadine and compared them with all patients not receiving amantadine and a propensity score-matched nonamantadine group. Primary outcome measures included discharge Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score, length of stay, mortality, recovery of command-following (CF), and days to CF. RESULTS: In our study population, 60 patients received amantadine and 344 did not. Compared with the propensity score-matched nonamantadine group, the amantadine group had no difference in mortality (86.67% vs. 88.33%, P = 0.783), rates of CF (73.33% vs. 76.67%, P = 0.673), or percentage of patients with severe (3-8) discharge Glasgow Coma Scale scores (11.11% vs. 12.28%, P = 0.434). In addition, the amantadine group was less likely to have a favorable recovery (discharge Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score 5-8) (14.53% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.001), had a longer length of stay (40.5 vs. 21.0 days, P < 0.001), and had a longer time to CF (11.5 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.011). No difference in adverse events existed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the early administration of amantadine for sTBI. Larger inpatient randomized trials are necessary to further investigate amantadine treatment for sTBI.

Predicting traumatic brain injury outcomes using a posterior dominant rhythm.

OBJECTIVE: Predicting severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) outcomes is challenging, and existing models have limited applicability to individual patients. This study aimed to identify metrics that could predict recovery following sTBI. The researchers strived to demonstrate that a posterior dominant rhythm on electroencephalography is strongly associated with positive outcomes and to develop a novel machine learning-based model that accurately forecasts the return of consciousness. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors assessed all intubated adults admitted with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8) from 2010 to 2021, who underwent EEG recording < 30 days from sTBI (n = 195). Seventy-three clinical, radiographic, and EEG variables were collected. Based on the presence of a PDR within 30 days of injury, two cohorts were created-those with a PDR (PDR[+] cohort, n = 51) and those without (PDR[-] cohort, n = 144)-to assess differences in presentation and four outcomes: in-hospital survival, recovery of command following, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score at discharge, and GOS-E score at 6 months post discharge. AutoScore, a machine learning-based clinical score generator that selects and assigns weights to important predictive variables, was used to create a prognostic model that predicts in-hospital survival and recovery of command following. Lastly, the MRC-CRASH and IMPACT traumatic brain injury predictive models were used to compare expected patient outcomes with true outcomes. RESULTS: At presentation, the PDR(-) cohort had a lower mean GCS motor subscore (1.97 vs 2.45, p = 0.048). Despite no difference in predicted outcomes (via MRC-CRASH and IMPACT), the PDR(+) cohort had superior rates of in-hospital survival (84.3% vs 63.9%, p = 0.007), recovery of command following (76.5% vs 53.5%, p = 0.004), and mean discharge GOS-E score (3.00 vs 2.39, p = 0.006). There was no difference in the 6-month GOS-E score. AutoScore was then used to identify the 7 following variables that were highly predictive of in-hospital survival and recovery of command: age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, pupil reactivity, blood glucose, and hemoglobin (all at presentation), and a PDR on EEG. This model had excellent discrimination for predicting in-hospital survival (area under the curve [AUC] 0.815) and recovery of command following (AUC 0.700). CONCLUSIONS: A PDR on EEG in sTBI patients predicts favorable outcomes. The authors' prognostic model has strong accuracy in predicting these outcomes, and performed better than previously reported models. The authors' model can be valuable in clinical decision-making as well as counseling families following these types of injuries.

White Matter Lesion Severity is Associated with Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and white matter lesion (WML) severity are associated with higher rates of death and disability in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A prior report identified an increased risk of IVH with greater WML burden but did not control for location of ICH. We sought to determine whether a higher degree of WML is associated with a higher risk of IVH after controlling for ICH location. METHODS: Utilizing the patient population from 2 large ICH studies; the Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Stroke (GERFHS III) Study and the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage study, we graded WML using the Van Swieten Scale (0-1 for mild, 2 for moderate, and 3-4 for severe WML) and presence or absence of IVH in baseline CT scans. We used multivariable regression models to adjust for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Among 3023 ICH patients, 1260 (41.7%) had presence of IVH. In patients with IVH, the proportion of severe WML (28.6%) was higher compared with patients without IVH (21.8%) (P < .0001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that moderate-severe WML, deep ICH, and increasing ICH volume were independently associated with presence of IVH. We found an increased risk of IVH with moderate-severe WML (OR = 1.38; 95%Cl 1.03-1.86, P = .0328) in the subset of lobar hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe WML is a risk for IVH. Even in lobar ICH hemorrhages, severe WML leads to an independent increased risk for ventricular rupture.