Management of Massive Flank Hernia After Lateral Lumbar Fusion: Preoperative Botulinum Toxin Injections and Open Repair - A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Incisional flank hernias represent a complication after lateral lumbar spine surgery. Given the increasing rate of lateral lumbar interbody fusions, the rate of incisional flank hernias will increase. Since there are no reports of open massive flank hernia repair utilizing preoperative botulinum injections, we sought to publish this technique to provide surgeons with an innovative method for preoperatively treating patients with massive flank hernias. CASE REPORT A 75-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and abdominal hernia repair presented for evaluation of left lateral abdominal and left lower back bulging for 5 months. The symptoms began after an L2-L4 lateral lumbar spinal fusion. Physical examination revealed a left posterior lateral flank bulge. Computed tomography (CT) showed a fat-containing left posterolateral abdominal hernia. The patient was scheduled for CT-guided lateral abdominal wall botulinum injections, followed by open flank hernia repair. He tolerated the surgery well, was admitted for pain control, and discharged on day 2. Repeat imaging with CT at 3 months showed no evidence of patient's prior hernia defect. CONCLUSIONS Open flank hernia repair, in conjunction with preoperative botulinum toxin injections, allows for optimal visualization and re-approximation of the myofascial components of flank hernia defects. Failure to achieve adequate myofascial and skin closure, along with mesh reinforcement, in open flank hernia repair can result in various surgical site complications, including incisional flank hernia recurrence. We recommend further investigation on the benefits of botulinum injections as an adjunct in management of massive flank hernias.

Resilience and Value: Pediatric Trauma Care in Safety Net Hospitals.

Background: In the setting of limited funding and high expectations for quality care, safety net hospitals play a crucial role in treating pediatric trauma patients. This study aimed to compare outcomes and hospitalization costs of pediatric trauma patients in safety net hospitals across the United States. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2016-2020 was queried for all patients under the age of 18 years hospitalized for traumatic injury. Patients admitted to safety net hospitals were propensity matched 1:1 to all other patients. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes were readmission within 1-year, mean length of stay (LOS), total charges, and total hospitalization costs including readmissions. Results: There were 176,325 patients meeting inclusion criteria, and 30,869 were admitted to safety net hospitals. All safety net patients were successfully matched across predictors, and 61,738 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 1.4% (n = 834), and the mortality risk was similar in safety net hospitals (OR 1.11 [.96-1.27] P = .15). The overall readmission rate, mean LOS, and mean total cost were similar for safety net hospitals when compared to all hospitals. However, the overall mean total charge was $78,724 (±$224,884) and was lower in safety net hospitals ($76,575 [±$198,342], P = .02). Discussion: Safety net hospitals deliver comparable outcomes as other health care facilities when caring for pediatric trauma patients. Notably, these hospitals appear to undercharge for their services, despite incurring similar costs in the process. These results shed light on the resilience of safety net hospitals in delivering quality and cost-effective care.

Closure of a Gastropleural Fistula Using Advanced Endoscopy.

Gastropleural fistulas are rare complications with significant mortality and morbidity. There are limited reports on the successful management of gastropleural fistulas with advanced endoscopic procedures. The following case of a 75-year-old woman with a history of recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei secondary to ruptured low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm status post cytoreductive surgery highlights the successful treatment of a gastropleural fistula with endoscopic suturing.

US Initiative to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health: The Impact on the Outcomes of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in New Jersey.

Background In 1998, President Clinton launched a federal initiative to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities. The impact on the outcomes of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has not been well studied. Methods and Results ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes from 1994 to 2015 were studied in 7942 Black, 27 665 Hispanic, and 88 727 White patients with first admission of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. Logistic regressions were used to assess mortality adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and interventional procedures. There was an overall rise from 1994 to 2015 in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions in all 3 groups. Before 1998, White patients received more percutaneous coronary interventions compared with Black and Hispanic patients (P<0.05). After 1998, the disparity in use of percutaneous coronary interventions in Black and Hispanic patients was greatly reduced compared with White patients, and the difference reversed in favor of Hispanic patients after 2005 (P<0.05). There was an overall downward trend of in-hospital mortality without evidence of disparity among Black, Hispanic, and White patients. A linear regression model was used with a change point in 1998. Before 1998, the slope of 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was not statistically significant. After 1998, the mortality showed negative slopes for all 3 groups, however, with lower overall crude mortality for Hispanic patients compared with Black and White patients (P<0.0001). Conclusions The initiative launched in 1998 may have contributed to a reduction in percutaneous coronary intervention usage disparity in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Short- and long-term mortality decreased in all 3 groups, but more in the Hispanic population.

Low Threshold for Laparoscopic Exploration in Dementia Patients With Unexplained Abdominal Pain and Risk Factors for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. There are limited studies on the presentation and management of elderly dementia patients with AMI. The following case of an 88-year-old female with dementia presenting with AMI highlights the challenges in the care of elderly dementia patients with AMI, the importance of identifying risk factors and hallmarks of acute mesenteric ischemia early in the clinical course, and suggests that aggressive workup with diagnostic laparoscopy is crucial to timely diagnosis and effective care.

Short-term and intermediate outcomes of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest are life-threatening emergencies with high mortality rates. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (e-CPR) provide viable options for life sustaining measures when medical therapy fails. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization and outcomes of VA ECMO and eCPR in patients that require emergent cardiac support at a single academic center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was performed at an academic institution from January 1st, 2018 to June 30th, 2020. All consecutive patients who required VA ECMO were evaluated based on whether they underwent traditional VA ECMO or eCPR. The study variables include demographic data, duration on ECMO, length of stay, complications, and survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were placed on VA ECMO for cardiac support with 44.4% (40) of these patients undergoing eCPR secondary to cardiac arrest and emergent placement on ECMO. A majority of the patients were male (n = 64, 71.1%) and the mean age was 58.8 ± 15.8 years. 44.4% of patients were transferred from outside hospitals for a higher level of care and 37.8% of patients required another primary therapy such as an Impella or IABP. The most common complication experienced by patients was bleeding (n = 41, 45.6%), which occurred less often in eCPR (n = 29, 58% vs. n = 12, 30%). Other complications included infections (n = 11, 12.2%), limb ischemia (n = 13, 14.4%), acute kidney injury (n = 17, 18.9%), and cerebral vascular accident (n = 4, 4.4%). The length of stay was longer for patients on VA ECMO (32.1 ± 40.7 days vs. 17.7 ± 18.2 days). Mean time on ECMO was 8.1 ± 8.3 days. Survival to discharge was higher in VA ECMO patients (n = 23, 46% vs. n = 8, 20%). CONCLUSION: VA ECMO provided an effective rescue therapy in patients in acute cardiogenic shock with a survival greater than the expected ELSO guidelines of 40%. While the survival of eCPR was lower than expected, this may reflect the severity of patient's condition and emphasizes the importance of careful patient selection and planning.

Monotherapy treatment with chlorthalidone or amlodipine in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT).

This post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) examined the performance of chlorthalidone (C) versus amlodipine (A) monotherapies. ANOVA was used to analyze the differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response between C and A. Logistic regression was used to examine monotherapy failure (adding a second antihypertensive agent or switching to a different antihypertensive agent) rates. Four hundred ninety-one participants were treated with C monotherapy (n = 210, mean dose = 22 mg/day) or A monotherapy (n = 281, mean dose = 7 mg/day). There was a significant difference in mean SBP reduction between the C and A monotherapies at the third visit (higher reduction with A, adjusted p = .018). Unadjusted analysis showed a higher failure with C in the standard treatment group. Although the average SBP at failure was higher and above the 140 mm Hg cutoff that indicated monotherapy failure with A (142.60) compared with C (138.40), more participants on C failed despite having SBP below the 140 cutoff. This was probably due to decisions made by the investigative teams to change the antihypertensive regimen, because, in their opinion, the clinical picture required it. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, C had higher failure than A only in the standard treatment group (1.64 odds ratio [OR], 95% CI 1.06-2.56, p = .028). A sub-analysis including participants who had never used antihypertensive treatment before randomization had similar results (2.57 OR, 95% CI 1.34-5.02, p = .004). Overall, in SPRINT chlorthalidone was associated with higher monotherapy failure than amlodipine in the standard treatment group because of decisions of the investigative teams.