How to get over with medication errors underestimation? Improving indices of medication errors with focus on intravenous medications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting; a direct observation study.

BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous (IV) medications is a technically complicated and error-prone process. Especially, in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) setting where toxic drugs are frequently used and patients are in critical immunocompromised conditions, medication errors (ME) can have catastrophic reactions and devastating outcomes such as death. Studies on ME are challenging due to poor methodological approaches and complicated interpretations. Here, we tried to resolve this problem using reliable methods and by defining new denominators, as a crucial part of an epidemiological approach. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study. A total of 525 episodes of IV medication administration were reviewed by a pharmacist using the disguised direct observation method to evaluate the preparation and administration processes of 32 IV medications in three HSCT wards. We reported errors in 3 ratios; 1) Total Opportunities for Error (TOE; the number of errors/sum of all administered doses observed plus omitted medications), 2) Proportional Error Ratio (the number of errors for each drug or situation/total number of detected errors) and, 3) Corrected Total Opportunities for Errors (CTOE; the number of errors/ Sum of Potential Errors (SPE)). RESULTS: A total of 1,568 errors were observed out of 5,347 total potential errors. TOE was calculated as 2.98 or 298% and CTOE as 29.3%. Most of the errors occurred at the administration step. The most common potential errors were the use of an incorrect volume of the reconstitution solvent during medication preparation and lack of monitoring in the administration stage. CONCLUSION: Medication errors frequently occur during the preparation and administration of IV medications in the HSCT setting. Using precise detection methods, denominators, and checklists, we identified the most error-prone steps during this process, for which there is an urgent need to implement effective preventive measures. Our findings can help plan targeted preventive measures and investigate their effectiveness, specifically in HSCT settings.

Factors Affecting the Incidence and Severity of Oral Mucositis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Background: Patients who receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience several complications that oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent symptom. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis and treatment strategies for established OM. Materials and Methods: We included 173 adult patients who received autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in this study. The World Health Organization oral toxicity scale was used to assess the severity of OM. Patients received two prophylactic regimens: regimen 1 contained nystatin, chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and amphotericin B. Regimen 2 contained nystatin and povidone iodine. 70 patients (40.5%) received the first prophylaxis regimen, 89 patients (51.4%) received the second prophylaxis regimen and the remaining 14 patients (8.1%) were not adherence to the use of the mouthwashes and were excluded from the analysis. Results: OM was detected in 60.7% of patients with mean (SD) age of 38.1±14.6 years. Multivariate analysis showed that only the female gender and the prophylactic regimen were the significant predictors of OM. Conclusion: We found that addition of amphotericin B and chlorhexidine, to the nystatin and povidone iodine resulted in a significant beneficial effect in prevention OM.