Complicaciones asociadas a la nutrición parenteral en los enfermos con infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Parenteral nutrition-associated complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Introducción: se desconoce si los pacientes diagnosticados de infección respiratoria aguda por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) presentan más riesgo de complicaciones asociadas a la nutrición parenteral (NP). Objetivo: conocer la incidencia, los factores de riesgo y la mortalidad de las complicaciones asociadas a la NP en esta población. Métodos: estudio de cohortes prospectivo de 87 pacientes diagnosticados de infección por SARS-CoV-2. Se analizan la tasa de incidencia de las complicaciones y las odds ratio (OR) de diferentes factores. Resultados: la edad ≥ 65 años (OR: 2,52, IC 95 %: 1,16 a 5,46), los antecedentes de obesidad (OR: 3,34, IC 95 %: 2,35 a 4,33) y el tratamiento con propofol (OR: 2,45, IC 95 %: 1,55 a 3,35) o lopinavir/ritonavir (OR: 4,98, IC 95 %: 3,60 a 6,29) se asociaron al desarrollo de hipertrigliceridemia. Los pacientes con obesidad (OR: 3,11, IC 95 %: 1,10 a 8,75) o dislipemia (OR: 3,22, IC 95 %: 1,23 a 8,40) y los tratados con propofol (OR: 5,47, IC 95 %: 1,97 a 15,1) presentaron mayor riesgo de infección asociada al catéter (IAC). No se observó ningún factor de riesgo relacionado con el desarrollo de hiperglucemia. La mortalidad fue mayor en los pacientes con IAC (46,7 % vs. 10,8 %, p = 0,014). El riesgo de mortalidad fue superior en los enfermos de ≥ 65 años (OR: 2,74, IC 95 %: 1,08 a 6,95) o con IAC (OR: 3,22, IC 95 %: 1,23 a 8,40). Conclusiones: la incidencia de complicaciones asociadas a la NP en pacientes diagnosticados de infección por SARS-CoV-2 es elevada. El riesgo de mortalidad es superior en los enfermos mayores de 65 años o con IAC (AU)

Background: it is unknown whether patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19 are at greater risk of developing complications associated with parenteral nutrition (PN). Aim: to describe the incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of complications in patients with ARDS-COVID-19 receiving PN. Methods: a prospective cohort study of 87 patients with ARDS-COVID-19 infection. The incidence of complications and odds ratios of risk factors were analysed. Results: age ≥ 65 years (OR, 2.52, 95 % CI: 1.16 to 5.46), obesity (OR, 3.34, 95 % CI: 2.35 to 4.33) and treatment with propofol (OR, 2.45, 95 % CI: 1.55 to 3.35) or lopinavir/ritonavir (OR, 4.98, 95 % CI: 3.60 to 6.29) were risk factors for hipertriglyceridemia. Obesity (OR, 3.11, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 8.75), dyslipidemia (OR, 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.23 to 8.40) or treatment with propofol (OR, 5.47, 95 % CI: 1.97 to 15.1) were risk factors for intravascular catheter-related infection. No risk factors were described for hiperglycemia. Mortality was higher in patients with intravascular catheter-related infection (46.7 % vs 10.8 %, p = 0.014). Mortality risk was higher in older patients (OR, 2.74, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 6.95) or patients with intravascular catheter-related infection (OR, 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.23 to 8.40). Conclusions: the incidence of complications associated with PN in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS is frequent. The mortality risk is higher in older patients or those with catheter-related infection (AU)

AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIFFERENT EQUATIONS TO ESTIMATE OSMOLARITY OF PARENTERAL NUTRITION SOLUTIONS.

BACKGROUND: our aim was to measure the osmolality of several PN formulas at different component concentrations to determine if equations described in literature to calculate osmolarity accurately predict osmolalality in other experimental conditions different than these used to develop them. METHODS: osmolality of 12 different types of PN solutions, 9 for central and 3 for peripheral perfusion were measured by using freezing point depression in cross-sectional study. We evaluated the agreement (Pearson correlation test) and differential bias between measured osmolality and calculated osmolarity for three different equations described in the literature: Pereira Da Silva, ASPEN Practice Manual and ASPEN guidelines. RESULTS: mean ± SD osmolality of PN solutions was 1789 ± 256 (range 1 540 - 2 372) and 751 ± 64 mOsm/kg (range 689 - 817) for central and peripheral infusion, respectively. The osmolality of PN formulations was mainly due to glucose (r = 0.975) and amino acids (r = 0.948). All studied equations had a good correlation in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.000). All equations had a trend to underestimate the osmolality compared with the measured value. However, ASPEN guidelines equation overestimated the osmolality for peripheral PN. CONCLUSIONS: measurement of osmolality of peripheral PN solutions is important to reduce the risk of phlebitis. The different equations described previously show a good correlation between them although in general underestimate the osmolality.

Objetivo: nuestro objetivo era medir la osmolaridad de varias fórmulas de nutrición parenteral (NP) compuestas por diferentes componentes para determinar si las ecuaciones para calcular la osmolaridad de la solución, descritas en la literatura, predicen su osmolalidad en la práctica clínica. Método: se midió mediante osmometría la osmolalidad de 12 fórmulas de NP diferentes: 9 para acceso venoso central y 3 para acceso periférico, en un estudio transversal. Se analizó el acuerdo (test de correlación de Pearson) y las diferencias entre la osmolalidad medida y la osmolaridad calculada mediante tres fórmulas diferentes: ecuación de Pereira Da Silva, ecuación del manual de práctica clínica de ASPEN y ecuación de las guías de ASPEN. Resultados: la media ± desviación estándar de las soluciones era 1.789 ± 256 (rango 1.540 ­ 2.372) y 751 ± 64 mOsm/kg (rango 689 ­ 817) para perfusión central y periférica, respectivamente. La osmolalidad era debida principalmente a la glucosa (r = 0,975) y a los aminoacidos (r = 0,948). Todas las ecuaciones presentaban una buena correlación en el análisis bivariante (p = 0,000). Todas las ecuaciones tendían a infraestimar la osmolalidad, en comparación con el valor medido. Sin embargo, la ecuación de las guías de la ASPEN sobreestimaba la osmolalidad de las NP periféricas. Conclusiones: conocer la osmolaridad de la solución de NP periférica es importante para reducir el riesgo de flebitis. Las diferentes ecuaciones descritas en la literatura muestran una buena correlación entre ellas, aunque en general infraestiman la osmolalidad.

Metabolic effects of L-carnitine on type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Carnitine is an endogenous metabolite and exogenous nutrient with a pivotal role in lipid metabolism. Plasma levels of carnitine are reduced in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The aim was to evaluate the metabolic effects of the administration of L-carnitine in T2DM. METHOD: A systematic review was performed. Relevant randomized, controlled-trials trials were searched in Pubmed, Trip Database and Cochrane Library, and selected when they had enough methodological quality assessed with the Jadad scale. Article search strategy included "Carnitine" OR "L-carnitine" AND "Diabetes -Mellitus" OR "Diabetes mellitus, type 2" OR "Noninsulindependent-diabetes mellitus". Meta-analysis was performed, and the difference of means calculated with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the Q statistic. RESULTS: The systematic review included 4 trials with 284 patients. Oral L-carnitine lowered fasting plasma glucose [-14.3 mg/dl (CI95% - 23.2 to -5.4); p=0,002], total cholesterol [-7.8 mg/dL (95%CI -15.5 to -0.1); p=0.09], low density lipoprotein [-8.8 mg/dl (CI95% -12.2 to -8.5), p<0.0001], apolipoprotein-B100 [-7.6 mg/dl (CI95% -13.6 to -1.6); p=0.013] and apolipoprotein-A1 [-6.0 mg/dl (CI95% -10.5 a -1.5); p=0.523]. There was no significant heterogeneity. The changes in triglycerides, lipoprotein (a) or HbA(1c) were not significant. CONCLUSION: The administration of L-carnitine in type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with an improvement in glycaemia and plasma lipids.

Parenteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the study is to evaluate if the administration of glutamine in parenteral nutrition (PN) solution reduces the need for antibiotics, the risk of liver disease and the duration of hospital stay in bone marrow transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in 68 adult patients undergoing a bone marrow transplantation who required PN for mucositis. Of these patients, 40 were given PN with 2,063 +/- 294 kcal/day and 98.6 +/- 13.9 g of amino acids/day, supplemented with Lglutamine (13.5-27 g/day), and 28 were given isocaloric (1,966 +/- 307 kcal/day) and isonitrogenated (92 +/- 16.3 g of amino acids/day) PN with standard glutamine-free amino acid solution. Antibiotic consumption and duration of hospital stay were analysed. Of the total cohort, hepatic profile was studied at the beginning and on day 7 of PN in 50 patients without liver disease at the start of PN. RESULTS: There were no differences between both groups with regard to total number and duration of antibiotics prescribed or hospital stay. Of the 50 patients without hepatic alterations at the beginning of PN, 2 patients in the control group and 5 in the glutamine group developed a hepatic profile compatible with liver disease secondary to PN. Comparing both groups, there were no differences in hepatic enzyme values. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with PN glutamine does not improve the variables studied, but the actual clinical use of glutamine in this haematological treatment should be studied further and its potential advantages identified.

[Insulin therapy at the hospital setting]. / Insulinoterapia en el medio hospitalario.

Hyperglycemia is defined in different studies as a poor prognostic factor relating with higher risk for post-surgical infections, neurological complications, increased hospital staying, and admission to intensive care units. Appropriate use of insulin therapy is one of the key factors assuring the best management of hospitalized patients. The aim of this review was to discuss the most important aspects of insulin use at the hospital setting. We analyzed the different types of insulin commercially available and the factors determining their efficacy, as well as the different regimens and administration routes available at the hospital according to the type of patient and the type of feeding or exogenous intake of carbohydrates. The fear of inducing hypoglycemic episodes at the hospital contributes to an inappropriate prescription of the programmed insulin doses, the use of flexible rapid insulin doses in monotherapy, and setting excessively high glycemia levels. Currently, individualized management of hospital hyperglycemias should replace obsolete insulin regimens in order to reach more stringent glycemia goals and decreasing the number of complications in the hospitalized patient.

[Types of insulin therapy]. / Tipos de insulinoterapia.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease associated with a series of long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications that requires continuing therapeutic control. In recent years, the pharmaceutical industry has developed new types of insulin and administration systems in order to more closely mimic human insulin secretion. In this way, insulin therapy is divided into conventional and intensive regimens according to their complexity. In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, the treatment of choice is the one which achieves intensive glycemic control. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, we can start with a simplified conventional regimen which could progress into an intensive one similar to that of T1DM treatment. Both types of diabetes require an individualized treatment prescription based on the needs and characteristics of each patient.

[Should hydration and artificial nutrition be accepted as a palliative care?]. / Se considera la hidratación y la nutrición artificial como un cuidado paliativo?

BACKGROUND: Ethical considerations are becoming more and more common in clinical practice. There is no unanimous agreement on which measures should be deemed as basic care, specially regarding hydration and artificial nutrition. AIM: To know the opinion of lay people and health professionals, stratified according to their university degree, about which palliative measures, including hydration and artificial nutrition, should be judged as palliative care. METHODS: A descriptive transversal study has been designed to know the opinion of 256 subjects: 91 users of the National Health System (NHS), 80 nurses, 47 pharmacists and 38 physicians. A questionnaire examined which of the following measures should be considered as palliative care: hygiene, analgesia, pressure ulcer care, position change, sedation, oxygen administration, urinary catheter, hydration, enteral and parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: More than 50% of the participants think that all the proposed measures can be considered as a palliative care, except parenteral nutrition. There is unanimous agreement to accept analgesia, pressure ulcer care, position change and enteraL nutrition as basic care, but there is disagreement in relation to hygiene (p = 0.000), sedation (p = 0.005), oxygen administration (p = 0.007), urinary catheter (p = 0.011) and parenteral nutrition (p = 0.000). There were not differences of opinion after adjusting for age, sex, religious beliefs, and length of professional experience among the individuals that answered the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: There is no agreement on which measures should be considered as palliative care. Opinions differ regarding hygiene, sedation, oxygen administration, urinary catheterisation and parenteral nutrition. In comparison to enteral nutrition, many responders believe that parenteral nutrition is a therapeutic option. The opinions shown in this questionnaire were independent from the demographic characteristics of the subjects that answered it.

[Should the therapeutic effort in artificial nutrition be limited?]. / Se debe limitar el esfuerzo terapéutico en nutrición artificial?

BASIS: There exists general agreement among the experts in Bioethics in order not to maintain a treatment if it is considered that it is useless. However, there is no unanimity about if serotherapy, enteral nutrition (EN), and parenteral nutrition (PN) are really therapeutic measures or else they are measures that they are part of the concept of palliative care. OBJECTIVE: Know the opinion of users and health workers of National Health System (NHS) in these issues. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. AREA: Primary and specialized care. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 219 individuals (84 users of the NHS, 135 health workers), that it included sociodemographic parameters, the opinion on different aspects of ethics and nutritional support, and the measures regarded as palliative care. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents think that the EN (70.8%; 95% IC: 64.2-76.8) and PN (54.8%; 95% IC: 47.9-61.6) are part of the basic care, with differences between the health personnel and the users of the NHS. 50.2% considers that there are no differences between applying or removing nutritional support. 71.3% of the health professionals answer that this decision depends on the medical, 60.5% of the users of the NHS thinks that it depends on the patient himself and/or its family members. All the evaluated measures are regarded as basic care, regardless of the characteristics of the respondent. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial nutrition is understood as a basic care, regardless of the situation and quality of life of the patient. While the health professionals think that the decision to initiate/to retire artificial nutrition depends on the physician, the users of the NHS consider that it depends on the patient/family in case of disability of this.

[Pediatric parenteral nutrition: are standard solutions better than individualized ones?]. / Nutrición parenteral en pediatría: 'soluciones normalizadas mejor que individualizadas?

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) in Spain has traditionally been prescribed and made up on an individual basis. This practice entails daily indication of the quantity of each of the components of the PN bag as well as precise calculations for its formulation and preparation. The main advantages of individualized prescriptions are their flexibility and precise biochemical control. The aim of this study was to determine whether pediatric PN can be standardized in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the composition of all the pediatric PN bags prepared in our hospital from 1.1.1996 to 31.12.1998. Each individual prescription was compared with a standard PN fulfilling the following criteria: a) Holiday-Segar equation for volume; b) 1 kcal/ml (10 %), and c) macronutrient distribution: 8-15 % amino acids, 55-65 % dextrose; 30-35 % lipids. The results of this comparison were used to estimate the number of bags fulfilling all three criteria and those that fulfilled only the third. We also reviewed the distribution of PN bags prepared according to the protocol used in our center which allows three options: standard PN, individualized prescription, and individualized prescription except electrolytes, supplied in fixed concentrations per liter of PN. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-four patients received 7,921 PN bags. The mean duration of PN was 14.3 days and the mean number of PN per day was 7.2. Only 4.5 % fulfilled all three criteria but 16.2 % satisfied at least the last criterion. If the three criteria for standardization were applied, only one PN bag/day could be prepared. Analysis of the application of our protocol revealed that of all the PN bags prepared only 27.9 % were partially or totally standardized. However, exclusion of neonates increased this figure to 53.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: If rigid standardization criteria are applied, only a small number of PN bags can be prepared in a tertiary hospital. Combining both standard and tailored PN could reduce pharmacy workload and costs while maintaining flexibility.

[Nutritional management of oncologic patients]. / Tratamiento nutricional en el paciente oncológico.

Malnutrition is a common complication in the oncological patient, and this affects his or her quality of life and survival. The majority of these patients show nutritional problems in their evolution, especially anorexia and weight loss. The most severe picture is called neoplastic cachexia. The causes hereof are many and some are not well known as they are related to the tumor metabolism itself, the metabolic response to the release of cytokines, or even to the treatment: surgery, chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The nutritional support will not cure the cancer; the malignant cells must be eradicated by the anti-tumor therapies, but nutrition is a therapy that is complementary to the basic treatment, however, with nutritional intervention we can avoid a greater deterioration of the patient, improve some nutritional and immunological parameters, avoid complications, and improve the quality of life. The nutritional action plan should be based on the knowledge of the specific situation of each patient, assessing his or her nutritional status, type of tumor, expected response to treatment, and the capacity to handle the situation. As in any patient, the access route of the nutritional support may be oral, enteral, or parenteral, depending on the clinical situation. The oral route, supervised by an experienced team, is the safest and the most effective, but this requires an adequately functioning digestive system and that the patient be able to maintain an adequate caloric and proteineic ingestion. When oral feeding is impossible or insufficient, it is necessary to resort to enteral or parenteral nutrition, depending on the functionality of the digestive apparatus. Special attention should be paid to those patients in whom the failure of the oncological therapy leads to an expected fatal outcome. Within the palliative care the nutritional intervention is simple, cheap, and effective with regard to the improvement of the quality of life. Dietary advice and at home enteral nutrition may be of great help.

[Liver complications associated with short-term parenteral nutrition in children]. / Complicaciones hepáticas asociadas a nutrición parenteral de corta duración en niños.

OBJECTIVE: Liver dysfunction (LD) with abnormalities in biochemical liver function tests is the most common metabolic complication of parenteral nutrition (PN). The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of LD in children receiving short-term PN and to identify risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were gathered retrospectively during a 2-year period. Ninety-four children older than 28 days received PN (mean age 5.4 +/- 5.1 years). PN related LD was defined as when serum levels of one or more of the following liver function tests were increased: ALT > or = 80 IU/L, GGT > or = 120 IU/L and total bilirubin > or = 1.8 mumol/L. Children with previous liver disease were excluded (n = 17), as well as those with incomplete data (n = 16). RESULTS: LD was present in 33 children (54%). The incidence rate was 5.8 cases/100 patient days of PN. It started 9.8 +/- 6.9 days after beginning PN. The nadir appeared during the second week of PN. The following variables did not appear to significantly influence the presence of PN: age, gender, nutritional status, PN caloric load or composition and underlying disease. Length of PN (9.6 +/- 4.4 vs 19.5 +/- 10.5 days; p < 0.001) and presence of sepsis (21% vs 55%, p = 0.014) were the only variables associated with LD. It was not necessary to discontinue PN because of LD in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Early LD is present in more than 50% of our children on PN. In preventing LD we should try to avoid infection and to reduce the time on PN.

[Temperature of refrigerated parenteral nutrition solutions at the end of 2 infusion systems]. / Temperatura de las soluciones de nutrición parenteral refrigeradas al final de dos sistemas de infusión.

It is common practice to let parenteral nutrition bags that are kept refrigerated stand at room temperature before administration. In this study the temperature of the mixtures administration. In this study the temperature of the mixtures flowing at the end of a conventional system (Intrafix 145 cm long) and at the end of a flow-control system (Dial-a-flow 226 cm long) were measured. Mixture temperatures within the parenteral nutrition bag were recorded upon removal from the refrigerator, at the end of the infusion system after purging the system with the fastest flow rate possible (time 0), and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes, after sustaining continuous flow at 100 cc/hour. The conventional system showed no statistically significant differences (P less than 0.05) between room temperature (23.7 +/- 0.5) and mixture temperature at the end of the infusion line at 15 minutes of infusion (23.0 +/- 0.9). The Dial-a-flow system showed no statistically significant differences between room temperature (24.5 +/- 0.9) and mixture temperatures at the end of the system (time 0: 23.7 +/- 2.2; 5 minutes, 24.1 +/- 0.8; 10 minutes, 24.3 +/- 0.7; 15 minutes, 24.4 +/- 0.7) (p less than 0.05). Therefore, the results indicate that refrigerated parenteral nutrition bags can be administered directly to the patient without waiting for the mixture to warm up, anytime the length of the infusion system is over 145 cm. Occasional reactions observed at the onset of parenteral nutrition therapy cannot be attributed to low mixture temperature, and as such, other reasons must be searched for.

[Essential fatty acid deficiency in enteral nutrition]. / Déficit de ácidos grasos esenciales durante nutrición enteral.

A case is presented of a 57-year-old patient who developed a clinical picture compatible with linoleic acid deficit while on a diet with 6.4 g of this fatty acid (2.8% of total calories). The factors involved in essential fatty acid requirements, and the need of some patients for up to 50 g of linoleic acid in order to reach normal serum levels are discussed. It was concluded that some commercial diets should be supplemented with additional linoleic acid.