Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413.

PURPOSE: This trial tested the hypothesis that combined androgen suppression (CAS) and whole-pelvic (WP) radiotherapy (RT) followed by a boost to the prostate improves progression-free survival (PFS) by 10% compared with CAS and prostate-only (PO) RT. This trial also tested the hypothesis that neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (NCHT) improves PFS compared with adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) by 10%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility included localized prostate cancer with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 100 ng/mL and an estimated risk of lymph node (LN) involvement of 15%. Between April 1, 1995, and June 1, 1999, 1,323 patients were accrued. Patients were randomly assigned to WP + NCHT, PO + NCHT, WP + AHT, or PO + AHT. Failure for PFS was defined as the first occurrence of local, regional, or distant disease; PSA failure; or death for any cause. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 59.5 months, WP RT was associated with a 4-year PFS of 54% compared with 47% in patients treated with PO RT (P =.022). Patients treated with NCHT experienced a 4-year PFS of 52% versus 49% for AHT (P =.56). When comparing all four arms, there was a progression-free difference among WP RT + NCHT, PO RT + NCHT, WP RT + AHT, and PO RT + AHT (60% v 44% v 49% v 50%, respectively; P =.008). No survival advantage has yet been seen. CONCLUSION: WP RT + NCHT improves PFS compared with PO RT and NCHT or PO RT and AHT, and compared with WP RT + AHT in patients with a risk of LN involvement of 15%.

The management of locally advanced prostate cancer.

The current management of locally advanced prostate cancer generally involves treatment with radiotherapy, hormone therapy or a combination of both. Of particular importance when choosing the type and duration of treatment is the patient's risk category, which predicts the risk of subclinical metastases based on prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score and tumor stage. A breakout group at the PROstart 2002 workshop, charged with discussing this topic, concluded that hormone therapy is a recommended component of disease management and may improve survival, and that radiotherapy should be combined with neoadjuvant and or adjuvant hormone therapy.

Does hormonal therapy influence sexual function in men receiving 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) with or without hormonal therapy (HT) on sexual function (SF) in prostate cancer patients whose SF was known before all treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1996 and March 1999, 144 patients received 3D-CRT (median dose = 70.2 Gy, range 66.6-79.2 Gy) for prostate cancer and had pre- and post-therapy SF data. All SF data were obtained with the O'Leary Brief SF Inventory, a self-administered, multidimensional, validated instrument. We defined total sexual potency as erections firm enough for penetration during intercourse. Mean follow-up time was 21 months (SD +/- 11 months). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for significance of the change from baseline. RESULTS: Before 3D-CRT, 87 (60%) of 144 men were totally potent as compared to only 47 (47%) of 101 at 1-year follow-up. Of the 60 men totally potent at baseline and followed for at least 1 year, 35 (58%) remained totally potent. These changes corresponded to a significant reduction in SF (p < 0.05). Patients who had 3D-CRT alone were more likely to be totally potent at 1 year than those receiving 3D-CRT with HT (56% vs. 31%, p = 0.012); however, they were also more likely to be potent at baseline (71% vs. 44%, p = 0.001). Although these two groups had a significant reduction in SF from baseline, their change was not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that 3D-CRT causes a significant reduction in total sexual potency as compared to pretreatment baseline. The addition of HT does not appear to increase the risk of sexual dysfunction.

Sildenafil citrate effectively reverses sexual dysfunction induced by three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the response of sildenafil citrate in patients with prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) whose sexual function (SF) was known prior to therapy initiation. METHODS: From March 1996 to April 1999, 24 men with median age of 68 years (range 51 to 77) had 3DCRT for localized prostate cancer (median prescribed dose to the planning target volume of 70.2 Gy). These men started taking sildenafil for relief of sexual dysfunction at a median time of 1 year after completing 3DCRT. We used the self-administered O'Leary Brief Sexual Function Inventory to evaluate in series SF and overall satisfaction at three time points. These points were (a) before initiation of all therapies (3DCRT or hormonal treatment [HT]) for prostate cancer, (b) before starting sildenafil (50 mg or 100 mg) but after completion of all therapies, and (c) at least 2 months afterward. Rates of SF were based on the number of men responding to a given question. We tested for significance of these two interventions to change SF by applying the Wilcoxon sign rank test. RESULTS: Prior to all treatments, 20 (87%) of 23 men were sexually potent, with 8 (36%) of 22 fully potent (little or no difficulty for penetration at intercourse). After 3DCRT with or without HT and prior to sildenafil use, 13 (65%) of the 20 potent patients remained potent, with only 2 (11%) of 19 being fully potent. The use of sildenafil citrate resulted in 21 (91%) of 23 men being potent, with 7 (30%) being fully potent. In 16 men responding to the satisfaction question, 10 (63%) and 12 (75%) were mixed to very satisfied with their sex life before 3DCRT with or without HT and after sildenafil citrate use, respectively. This response corresponded to potency and satisfaction scores significantly decreasing and subsequently increasing on average by one unit after 3DCRT and sildenafil citrate use, respectively (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In men receiving 3DCRT for prostate cancer, these data indicate that sildenafil citrate is effective for restoring SF and associated satisfaction back to baseline before treatment.

Dosimetric analysis of urinary morbidity following prostate brachytherapy (125I vs. 103Pd) combined with external beam radiation therapy.

The purpose of this analysis was to correlate isotope selection with the urinary symptoms of patients who received a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and a transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) boost with either a (103)palladium ((103)Pd) or a (125)iodine ((125)I) radioisotope. Postimplant dosimetry was performed to evaluate both urethral dose and implant quality. The American Urologic Association (AUA) scores in both the (125)I and (103)Pd groups were similar initially. However, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, the mean AUA scores for the (125)I and (103)Pd patients were 18 +/- 6 vs. 11 +/- 9, 17 +/- 7 vs. 11 +/- 7, 10 +/- 3 vs. 9 +/- 4, and 14 +/- 8 vs. 7 +/- 5, respectively (P < 0.01). The only significant difference between the postimplant dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the (125)I and (103)Pd implants was the minimum dose that 90% of the urethra received (D(90)). The increased AUA score of the (125)I group was weakly correlated (R(2) = 0.20) with the D(90) dose but that of the (103)Pd patients was not (R(2) = 0.00). This suggests that the higher AUA score of the (125)I patients was not necessarily the result of the higher D(90) dose. Thus, patients who received (103)Pd experienced less urinary morbidity than those implanted with (125)I. We recommend further validating these findings in prospective studies in which the quality of the (125)I and (103)Pd implants can be evaluated.

The multidisciplinary clinic approach to prostate cancer counseling and treatment.

The optimum management for an individual patient with prostate cancer is not well defined. Patients with localized disease may be offered options ranging from observation, hormonal therapy, cryotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery. Each option may have unique aspects to consider when counseling a patient often leading to multiple physician visits over an extended period of time. Since 1996, the Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University has offered newly diagnosed urologic cancer patients the opportunity to be evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic. Here, multiple physician consultative visits, including pathologic and radiologic evaluation and protocol evaluation, are provided during the session. Herein we report on our experience with this multidisciplinary approach for patients with prostate cancer.

Durable efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy for prostate cancer: will the benefit last?

Radical prostatectomy can be an effective therapy for men with organ-confined disease. However, extension beyond the confines of the prostate (pT3) can be found in many men, and this is often associated with longterm prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. Not all patients will progress with pT3 disease. The identification of additional adverse prognostic features (high Gleason score, PSA greater than 10 ng/mL, and seminal vesical invasion) can help identify those men at highest risk of progression following definitive surgery. The role of postoperative therapy in patients with high-risk features is often controversial. The lack of long-term survival benefit, toxicity, and cost are often cited. We reviewed our experience with a unified approach to this patient population and performed matched-pair analysis of patients with similar adverse prognostic features treated with and without postoperative radiation therapy. For our series, the results indicate that the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with a significantly reduced risk of PSA recurrence. The 5-year bNED rate after adjuvant radiation therapy was 89% (95% CI: 76% to 100%) compared with 55% (95% CI: 34% to 79%) after surgery alone (P = .002). This benefit also appears to hold true for men with pathological involvement of their seminal vesicles. A dose-response curve was observed with improved disease control above a level of 61.2 Gy. Appropriate patient selection and delivery of an adequate dose of radiation can improve the PSA recurrence of most patients with pT3 disease.

Is there a role for antibiotic prophylaxis in transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy?

PURPOSE: There are few data to guide the physician on the use of prophylactic antibiotic(s) for prostate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) rate after performing transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) in conjunction with cystoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred twenty-five patients underwent TIPPB and cystoscopy. All patients received intravenous perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. No postimplant antibiotic medication was prescribed. All patients were evaluated at 1-month follow- up for symptomatic UTI. No screening (U/A, C+S) was performed for asymptomatic patients. Any UTI within 1 month of TIPPB was considered a complication and scored as an infection. RESULTS: Of 125 patients who underwent TIPPB and cystoscopy, one patient (1%) developed a symptomatic UTI. In our study, a one-time perioperative intravenous dose of cefazolin (Ancef) without additional postoperative antibiotics resulted in an overall symptomatic UTI rate of 1%. Hence, additional postoperative antibiotics may not be warranted, thus providing a cost saving (500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally, two times a day for 5 days at a cost of $44.95) and reducing the potential risk of antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: When cystoscopy is used in conjunction with TIPPB, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. However, due to the low infection rate expected from TIPPB, postimplant antibiotic use is not recommended. As a result of the low infection rate anticipated from TIPPB and cystoscopy, a large multiinstitutional trial is needed to determine the necessity of antibiotic prophylaxis for TIPPB and cystoscopy.

Changes in the size and location of kidneys from the supine to standing positions and the implications for block placement during total body irradiation.

PURPOSE: The use of total body irradiation (TBI) as a conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation often calls for partial transmission kidney blocks. These blocks are frequently designed based on the location of the kidneys during the abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan. At our institution, TBI patients are treated in the standing position. As the kidneys can shift with different patient positions, a study was undertaken to evaluate the magnitude of the changes in the size and location of the kidneys from the supine CT position to the upright treatment position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intravenous contrast was administered to 15 patients. The patients were initially positioned supine on a simulator table and then positioned upright immediately in front of the image intensifier. PA radiographs were obtained with the patients in both positions. Changes in the size of the kidneys and their location relative to the vertebral bodies were noted. RESULTS: In going from the supine to upright position, all the kidneys shifted inferiorly between 0.5 cm and 7.5 cm with an average of 3.6 cm. Most of the kidneys also shifted in the transverse dimension and incurred a change in width. The range of the transverse shift was from 0.9 cm in the lateral direction to 4.9 cm medially. The maximum width broadening was 1.2 cm and the maximum decrease in width was 1.8 cm. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the supine position, patients in the upright position show a dramatic inferior shift of the kidneys with other obvious, but less predictable, changes. For TBI treatments delivered in the upright position, kidney blocks should not be designed on the basis of supine abdominal CT scans.

The efficacy of early adjuvant radiation therapy for pT3N0 prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.

PURPOSE: This study examines the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) on outcome in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer and makes comparisons to a matched control group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At our center, 149 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were found to have pT3N0 prostate cancer, had an undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and had no immediate hormonal therapy. Fifty-two patients received adjuvant RT within 3 to 6 months of surgery. Ninety-seven underwent radical prostatectomy alone and were observed until PSA failure. From these two cohorts, we matched patients 1:1 according to preoperative PSA (<10 ng/ml vs. >10 ng/ml), Gleason score (<7 vs. > or =7), seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margin status. Seventy-two patients (36 pairs) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up time was 41 months. We calculated a matched-pairs risk ratio for cumulative risk of PSA relapse (a rise above 0.2 ng/ml). RESULTS: After controlling for the prognostic factors by matching, there was an 88% reduction (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-93%) in the risk of PSA relapse associated with adjuvant RT. The 5-year freedom from PSA relapse rate was 89% (95% CI: 76-100%) for patients receiving adjuvant RT as compared to 55% (95% CI: 34-79%) for those undergoing radical prostatectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that adjuvant RT for pT3N0 prostate cancer may significantly reduce the risk of PSA failure as compared to radical prostatectomy alone. Its effect on clinical outcome awaits further follow-up.

Variation of clinical target volume definition in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Currently, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) planning relies on the interpretation of computed tomography (CT) axial images for defining the clinical target volume (CTV). This study investigates the variation among multiple observers to define the CTV used in 3D-CRT for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven observers independently delineated the CTVs (prostate +/- seminal vesicles [SV]) from the CT simulation data of 10 prostate cancer patients undergoing 3D-CRT. Six patients underwent CT simulation without the use of contrast material and serve as a control group. The other 4 had urethral and bladder opacification with contrast medium. To determine interobserver variation, we evaluated the derived volume, the maximum dimensions, and the isocenter for each examination of CTV. We assessed the reliability in the CTVs among the observers by correlating the variation for each class of measurements. This was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with 1.00 defining absolute correlation. RESULTS: For the prostate volumes, the ICC was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.96). This changed to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99) with the use of contrast material. Similarly, the maximal prostatic dimensions were reliable and improved. There was poor agreement in defining the SV. For this structure, the ICC never exceeded 0.28. The reliability of the isocenter was excellent, with the ICC exceeding 0.83 and 0.90 for the prostate +/- SV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In 3D-CRT for prostate cancer, there was excellent agreement among multiple observers to define the prostate target volume but poor agreement to define the SV. The use of urethral and bladder contrast improved the reliability of localizing the prostate. For all CTVs, the isocenter was very reliable and should be used to compare the variation in 3D dosimetry among multiple observers.

Durable efficacy of early postoperative radiation therapy for high-risk pT3N0 prostate cancer: the importance of radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the durable efficacy of early postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer who were at an increased risk of biochemical failure. We also evaluated the long-term benefit derived from using higher RT doses. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with pathologic Stage T3N0 prostate cancer and high-risk postoperative features underwent RT within 6 months after surgery. No patient received prior hormonal therapy. Fifty-nine patients had positive surgical margin, 29 had pathologic seminal vesicle invasion, and 27 had persistently elevated postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Freedom from biochemical relapse (bNED) was defined as an undetectable (less than 0.2 ng/mL) PSA level. Median follow-up time was 39 months, and the median radiation dose was 64.8 Gy. All patients were followed for at least 2 years to be considered biochemically controlled. RESULTS: Patients receiving adjuvant RT for an undetectable pre-RT PSA level had a 3-year bNED rate of 90%, compared with 44% for those receiving salvage RT for a detectable level (P < 0.0001). In the group of adjuvant patients, RT doses more than 61.2 Gy resulted in a 3-year bNED rate of 90% compared with 64% for those receiving a lower dose (P=0.015). The salvage patients irradiated with a dose of 64.8 Gy or greater had a 3-year bNED rate of 52% compared with 18% for those irradiated with lower doses (P=0.048). Severe late RT-related complications were infrequent and did not correlate with dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-risk pT3N0 prostate cancer, an RT dose response may exist. Although some studies suggest limited durable efficacy for early postoperative RT, our data suggest that RT doses of 64.8 Gy or more appear superior to prevent future biochemical failures. A prospective randomized study evaluating a postoperative RT dose response is warranted.

Effect of higher radiation dose on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for PT3N0 prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The appropriate radiation dose has not been determined for postoperative radiation therapy (RT) of prostate cancer. Postoperative PSA level is a useful marker of local residual disease, and may allow evaluation of RT dose-response after radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1989 and 1996, 86 consecutive patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer who did not receive prior hormonal therapy or chemotherapy were irradiated postoperatively. All patients received 55.8 to 70.2 Gy (median = 64.8 Gy) to the prostatic/seminal vesicle bed. Patients were judged to be free of biochemical failure (bNED) if their PSA remained undetectable or decreased to undetectable level (< 0.2 ng/ml). The median follow-up time was 32 months from time of irradiation. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables showed that the preRT PSA level was the most significant predictor of improved bNED survival (p < 0.001). Actuarial analyses of radiation dose grouped with preRT PSA levels found higher radiation dose to be significant (p < 0.05). For the 52 patients with an undetectable preRT PSA level, the 3-year bNED rate was 91% for patients irradiated to 61.5 Gy or more and 57% for those irradiated to lower doses (p = 0.01). For the 21 patients with preRT PSA level > 0.2 and < or = 2.0 ng/ml, the 3-year bNED rate was 79% for patients irradiated to 64.8 Gy or more and 33% for those irradiated to a lower dose (p = 0.02). No other preRT PSA interval or radiation dose level was associated with a dose-response function. CONCLUSION: In patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, a radiation dose-response function may be present and depends on the preRT PSA value. Patients with high postoperative PSA levels (> 2.0 ng/ml) may be less likely to benefit from higher doses of RT, and should be considered a group for which systemic therapy should be tested.

Stage T3 prostate cancer: a nonrandomized comparison between definitive irradiation and induction hormonal manipulation plus prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: At our institution, a Phase II trial using androgen suppression followed by surgery was completed for men with Stage T3 disease and negative laparoscopic nodal dissection. We recently reported the unfavorable biochemical outcome of that experience. Because that analysis did not include a control group of irradiated patients, the current project was undertaken to compare that Phase II experience with clinical Stage T3 patients treated at our institution with definitive irradiation during an overlapping period of time. METHODS: The Phase II trial included 21 patients with T3 tumors and negative laparoscopic nodal dissections treated by 4 months of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (leuprolide +/- flutamide) prior to radical prostatectomy. Patients who declined to participate in the study or those judged ineligible by virtue of poor surgical risk were treated with definitive irradiation (n = 29). Although the radiation portals were shaped with multileaf collimation, no attempt was made to design "conformal fields." The median dose was 68 Gy (range 66 to 72) delivered in conventional fractionation. Biochemical failure after prostatectomy was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels exceeding 0.2 ng/mL. Biochemical failure after irradiation was defined as a rise in absolute level of PSA greater than 1.5 ng/mL, or two consecutive elevations of PSA on sequential measurements, even if the absolute level was less than 1.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: In univariate comparison, the freedom from biochemical relapse rate at 3 years was 41% for irradiated patients and 23% for those treated by hormones combined with surgery (P <0.05). In a multivariate regression model controlling for the prognostic factors of baseline PSA, age, clinical substage, Gleason score, and treatment modality (induction androgen suppression + prostatectomy versus radiotherapy), only low baseline PSA independently predicted improved freedom from biochemical recurrence (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of induction hormonal treatment followed by radical prostatectomy offered no advantage over irradiation alone in this single institutional experience. Notwithstanding, the majority of men treated by definitive radiotherapy manifested biochemical failure. More innovative strategies such as conformal irradiation (either alone or combined with androgen ablation) and radiation dose escalation should be pursued to optimize outcome for this unfavorable group of patients.

Pathologic seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate carcinoma: effect of early adjuvant radiation therapy on biochemical control.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the effect of postoperative radiation therapy on freedom from biochemical failure (bNED) in men with prostate carcinoma who had pathologic seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy and negative pelvic lymph node dissection (pT3cN0). METHODS: Between 1989 and 1995, 375 men underwent radical prostatectomy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Fifty-three men (13%) had pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and were the subject of this analysis. Men in whom prostate specific antigen (PSA) could not be detected were deemed free of biochemical failure. RESULTS: Of the 53 men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma, 18 had an elevated PSA immediately after surgery and received salvage radiation therapy (RT). The 3-year bNED rate for this group was only 38%. At 3 months, PSA could not be detected in the other 35 men. Fifteen of those 35 men underwent early adjuvant RT, and the other 20 were observed for biochemical failure. The 3-year bNED rate for the 15 patients treated with immediate adjuvant RT was 86%, compared with 48% for the 20 men who were observed (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that early adjuvant RT for men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and no detectable PSA postoperatively reduces the likelihood of future biochemical failure. Men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and a persistently elevated postoperative PSA level are less likely to benefit from RT and should be considered for systemic therapy.

Concomitant irradiation and dose-escalating carboplatin for locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an updated report.

The combination of radiotherapy and carboplatin is associated with high response rates among women who have cervical cancer. To improve control rates for patients who have locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix, oncologists have explored combinations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Carboplatin is an analogue of cisplatin, with similar efficacy against cervix cancer and a toxicity profile that is theoretically appealing for this group of patients because it is not nephrotoxic. Fifteen women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IB2 through IIIB or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix were treated with megavoltage irradiation and weekly intravenous carboplatin (7 women, 60 mg/m2; 8 women, 90 mg/m2). Response was documented among all patients treated at 60 mg/m2 (three complete responses, four partial responses) and in 6 women treated with 90 mg/m2 (four complete responses, two partial responses). The two nonresponders in the series presented with recurrent glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix. All patients completed the planned course of therapy without the need for treatment interruption. At 60 mg/m2, one dose of carboplatin was withheld because of grade 2 thrombocytopenia. At 90 mg/m2, one case of grade 2 leukopenia was documented. The leukocyte counts remained within normal limits for all 3 patients who were irradiated through extended portals that encompassed the paraaortic nodes (2 women, 60 mg/m2; 1 woman, 90 mg/m2). To date, 2 of 7 patients treated at the lower dose level have died of disease (one local progression and distant failure at 11 months, one distant failure alone at 6 months). The remaining patients treated at 60 mg/m2 are alive at a median of 24 months (range, 21-37 months). Among those treated at the higher dose level, 1 patient is alive with local and distant failure at 14 months, and 1 woman succumbed to local and distant disease at 4 months. The remainder are alive at a median follow-up of 6 months (range, 2-10 months). The regimen was unsuccessful in salvaging women with recurrent glassy cell carcinoma. We conclude that the combination of radiotherapy and carboplatin can be safely delivered at both of the chemotherapy schedules studied. The regimen should not be offered to women who have recurrent glassy cell tumors. To prove the efficacy of this approach, phase III testing should be considered that compares the combination of agents to irradiation alone.

A prospective, randomized study addressing the need for physical simulation following virtual simulation.

PURPOSE: To accurately implement a treatment plan obtained by virtual or CT simulation, conventional or physical simulation is still widely used. To evaluate the need for physical simulation, we prospectively randomized patients to undergo physical simulation or no additional simulation after virtual simulation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From July 1995 to September 1996, 75 patients underwent conformal four-field radiation therapy planning for prostate cancer with a commercial grade CT simulator. The patients were randomized to undergo either port filming immediately following physical simulation or port filming alone. The precision of implementing the devised plan was evaluated by comparing simulator radiographs and/or port films against the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) for x, y, and z displacements of the isocenter. Changes in beam aperture were also prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to undergo physical simulation and first day port filming, and 38 had first day treatment verification films only without a physical simulation. Seventy-eight simulator radiographs and 195 first day treatment port films were reviewed. There was no statistically significant reduction in treatment setup error (>5 mm) if patients underwent physical simulation following virtual simulation. No patient required a resimulation, and there was no significant difference in changes of beam aperture. CONCLUSIONS: Following virtual simulation, physical simulation may not be necessary to accurately implement the conformal four-field technique. Because port filming appears to be sufficient to assure precise and reliable execution of a devised treatment plan, physical simulation may be eliminated from the process of CT based planning when virtual simulation is available.

National trends in the surgical staging of corpus cancer: a pattern-of-practice survey.

OBJECTIVE: To survey general gynecologists regarding the nature of surgical staging of corpus cancer as practiced in the United States. METHODS: A survey tool was designed to ascertain issues related to surgical staging of corpus cancer among gynecologists in the United States. The survey elicited data pertaining to the demographics and practice characteristics of the respondents. The questionnaire was sent to 700 practicing gynecologists selected randomly from the ACOG membership list. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 227 physicians; however, only 193 could be analyzed. Most of the respondents classified themselves as general gynecologists (93%) and nonacademicians (90%). In a typical year, 60% evaluated fewer than five patients with corpus cancer. A minority of respondents carry out surgical staging of their patients, which includes total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAHBSO), removal of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, and cytologic evaluation of peritoneal fluid. No uniformity was observed regarding the numeric definition of an appropriate "sampling" (median 5, range 1-25) or "dissection" (median 10, range 1-40) of lymph nodes. Most respondents would not return a corpus cancer patient to the operating room to carry out lymph node dissection if a referring colleague had performed TAHBSO but had not removed the nodes. In such a scenario, private practitioners were approximately three times less likely to reoperate on lymph nodes than academic physicians. CONCLUSION: Complete surgical staging is not performed by most physicians caring for women with corpus cancer. The relatively high proportion of nonresponders and nonevaluable responses suggests that these results should be corroborated by other investigators.

Palliative irradiation for focally symptomatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma: support for dose escalation based on a biological model.

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma has traditionally been regarded as a radioresistant cancer, yet controversy continues as to whether escalation of the palliative radiation dose can overcome the inherent resistance of such tumors when they metastasize. Recently, the linear quadratic model has emerged as a paradigm to assess biologically effective dose of radiotherapy. This study was undertaken to determine the ability of radiotherapy to palliate focally symptomatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma and to assess whether the delivery of higher biologically effective dose was more likely to bring about a palliative response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1966 and 1995, 107 patients with renal cell metastases at 150 sites were irradiated with palliative intent. Sites irradiated included bone (89), soft tissue (16), brain (20), spinal cord (9) and pulmonary (16). To determine dose effectiveness the biologically effective dose was calculated according to the formula, Gy10 = total dose (1 + fractional dose/alpha-beta), using an alpha-beta of 10. RESULTS: For the entire group 86% of patients derived a palliative response after treatment with irradiation, while 49% derived a complete palliative response. The median duration of palliation was 6 months (range 1 to 150). With respect to overall (that is, complete and partial) response rates, those presenting with high Karnofsky performance status were most likely to respond (status 70 or greater versus less than 70, 88% versus 78%, p < 0.04). With respect to the rate of complete palliative response, performance status (status 70 or greater versus less than 70, 55% versus 31%, p < 0.03) and the use of higher biologically effective doses of irradiation (Gy10 50 or greater versus less than 50, 59% versus 39%, p = 0.001) were associated with a statistically significant increased rate of response. The independent prognostic value of performance status and higher biologically effective doses of irradiation were maintained in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevailing concept that renal cell carcinoma is generally resistant to radiotherapy, the overwhelming majority of patients seen at our institution in whom metastatic renal cell carcinoma developed were palliated with radiotherapy. A complete palliative response is more likely when higher biologically effective doses of irradiation are delivered, especially to patients with a relatively high performance status.

Efficient CT simulation of the four-field technique for conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma relies on contouring of individual CT slices for target and normal tissue localization. This process can be very time consuming. In the present report, we describe a method to more efficiently localize pelvic anatomy directly from digital reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with prostate carcinoma underwent CT simulation (the spiral mode at 3 mm separation) for conformal four-field "box" radiotherapy. The bulbous urethra and bladder were opacified with iodinated contrast media. On lateral and anteroposterior DRRs, the volume of interest (VOI) was restricted to 1.0-1.5 cm tissue thickness to optimize digital radiograph reconstruction of the prostate and seminal vesicles. By removing unessential voxel elements, this method provided direct visualization of those structures. For comparison, the targets of each patient were also obtained by contouring CT axial slices. RESULTS: The method was successfully performed if the target structures were readily visualized and geometrically corresponded to those generated by contouring axial images. The targets in 9 of 10 patients were reliable representations of the CT-contoured volumes. One patient had 18 mm variation due to the lack of bladder opacification. Using VOIs to generate thin tissue DRRs, the time required for target and normal tissue localization was on the average less than 5 min. CONCLUSION: In CT simulation of the four-field irradiation technique for prostate carcinoma, thin-tissue DRRs allowed for efficient and accurate target localization without requiring individual axial image contouring. This method may facilitate positioning of the beam isocenter and provide reliable conformal radiotherapy.