Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or nonselective NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents: what to prescribe in daily clinical practice?

BACKGROUND: Two strategies for prevention of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events for nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (nsNSAID) users are replacement of the nsNSAID by a cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor (coxib) or co-prescription of a gastroprotective agent (GPA). AIM: To identify whether and in whom either of these strategies should be preferred in daily practice. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using three European primary care databases. We selected a cohort including all naive nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% GPA adherence) and coxib users (without GPA use) aged ≥50 years. Cases with an UGI event (i.e. symptomatic UGI ulcer or bleeding) were matched to cohort members without an UGI event on age, sex and number of individual UGI risk factors (i.e. UGI event history, age ≥65 years, concomitant use of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or glucocorticoids) and calendar time. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI, while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Within the NSAID cohort (n = 617,220), 398 UGI cases were identified. The risk of UGI events was equivalent for coxib and nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) users (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 0.77-1.37). In concurrent glucocorticoid users, the risk of UGI events was significantly elevated for nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) compared with coxib users (OR: 9.01; 95%CI: 1.61-50.50). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of UGI events was similar in nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) and coxibs users. In patients concurrently using glucocorticoids, a significant increase in the risk of UGI events for nsNSAID+GPA users was observed and coxibs should be preferred.

Prescription of nonselective NSAIDs, coxibs and gastroprotective agents in the era of rofecoxib withdrawal - a 617,400-patient study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroprotective strategies are recommended for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users at risk of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) complications. AIM: To compare the use of gastroprotective strategies in NSAID users in three countries, and the subsequent impact of rofecoxib withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study in three general practice (GP) databases: (i) United Kingdom's (UK) GP Research Database (1998-2008); (ii) Italy's (IT) Health Search/CSD Longitudinal Patient Database (2000-2007); and (iii) the Dutch (NL) Integrated Primary Care Information database (1996-2006). Study cohorts comprised incident NSAID users ≥50 years. Preventive strategies included: (i) co-prescription of gastroprotective agents; or (ii) cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor use. Under-use was defined as no gastroprotection in patients with ≥1 UGI risk factor (history of UGI event, age ≥65 years, concomitant use of anticoagulants, antiplatelets or glucocorticoids). Interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess the impact of rofecoxib withdrawal on preventive strategies. RESULTS: The study populations consisted of 384 649 UK, 177 747 IT and 55 004 NL NSAID users. In UK, under-use of preventive strategies fell from 91% to 71% [linear trend (lt) P = 0.001], in NL from 92% to 58% (lt P < 0.001) and in IT from 90% to 76% (lt P = 0.38) in high-risk NSAID users. In 2000 and 2006, under-use was significantly lower in NL compared with UK and IT (P < 0.001) in high-risk users. After rofecoxib's withdrawal, under-use increased significantly in UK and NL. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of gastropreventive strategies followed a similar pattern across countries. Despite a temporary negative effect of rofecoxib withdrawal on under-use, improvement of gastroprotection with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was observed.

Risk of recurrent myocardial infarction with the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The association between myocardial infarction (MI) and co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel remains controversial. AIM: To quantify the association between concomitant use of PPIs and clopidogrel and occurrence of recurrent MI. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study within a cohort of acute MI patients in PHARMO Record Linkage System (1999-2008). The cases were patients readmitted for MI. PPI exposure was categorized as current (3-1 days before MI), past (30-3 days before MI), or no use (>30 days before MI). We used conditional logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 23 655 patients hospitalized following MI, we identified 1247 patients readmitted for MI. Among clopidogrel users, current PPI use was associated with an increased risk of recurrent MI (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.27) when compared with no PPI use, but not when compared with past PPI use (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.38-2.41). Among clopidogrel non-users, current PPI use was associated with an increased risk of recurrent MI (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.18-1.61) when compared with no PPI use. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent association between recurrent MI and use of PPIs with clopidogrel depends on the design, and is affected by confounding by indication. The association is not present when (un)measured confounding is addressed by design.

Time-trends in gastroprotection with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

BACKGROUND: Preventive strategies are advocated in patients at risk of upper-gastrointestinal complications associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). AIM: To examine time-trends in preventive strategies. METHODS: In a study population comprising 50 126 NSAID users > or =50 years from the Integrated Primary Care Information database, we considered two preventive strategies: co-prescription of gastroprotective agents and prescription of a cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor. In patients with > or =1 risk factor (history of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding/ulceration, age >65 years, use of anticoagulants, aspirin, or corticosteroids), correct prescription was defined as the presence of a preventive strategy and under-prescription as the absence of one. In patients with no risk factors, correct prescription was defined as the lack of a preventive strategy, and over-prescription as the presence of one. RESULTS: Correct prescription rose from 6.9% in 1996 to 39.4% in 2006 (P < 0.01) in high-risk NSAID users. Under-prescription fell from 93.1% to 59.9% (P < 0.01). In the complete cohort, over-prescription rose from 2.9% to 12.3% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Under-prescription of preventive strategies has steadily decreased between 1996 and 2006; however, 60% of NSAID users at increased risk of NSAID complications still do not receive adequate protection.