Importance of the formulation in the skin delivery of topical diclofenac: not all topical diclofenac formulations are the same.

Purpose: The current study aimed to compare 2 topical diclofenac products (diclofenac diethylamine [DEA] 1.16% emulsion and diclofenac sodium [Na] 5% gel). The quantitative evaluation of skin permeability and the qualitative evaluation of their physical characteristics were performed. Methods: The skin permeability of diclofenac DEA 1.16% emulsion and diclofenac Na 5% gel was compared in vitro using Franz diffusion cells following a single, fixed, 10 mg/cm2 dose of product applied to a 0.64 cm2 area of the stratum corneum surface of ex vivo human skin samples. The physical characteristics of the 2 formulations were assessed by rheological measurement and microscopy observation. Results: Diclofenac DEA 1.16% emulsion exhibited a statistically significant higher permeation through human skin at 24 hrs than diclofenac Na 5% gel (554 vs 361 ng/cm2, respectively; ratio of adjusted geometric means, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.14-2.07]). When expressed as a percentage of the applied dose of diclofenac that permeated through human skin, a 7-fold difference was observed between the diclofenac DEA 1.16% emulsion (0.54%) and the diclofenac Na 5% gel (0.077%). Qualitative composition and physical characterization showed differences between the formulations that may explain some of the permeation data observed. Based on rheological assessments, diclofenac Na 5% gel had a higher viscosity (24.82 Pa.s) than diclofenac DEA 1.16% emulsion (10.29 Pa.s). Conclusion: A topical diclofenac product with a higher concentration of the active ingredient does not necessarily lead to greater absorption relative to a product with lower concentration of the active ingredient but different characteristics. These observations highlight the importance of considering parameters beyond drug concentration, such as composition, which may influence the solubility of the drug and permeation of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Pharmacological characterization of 7-(4-(Piperazin-1-yl)) ciprofloxacin derivatives: antibacterial activity, cellular accumulation, susceptibility to efflux transporters, and intracellular activity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pharmacological properties (antibacterial activity; accumulation in phagocytic cells; activity against intracellular bacteria; susceptibility to fluoroquinolone efflux transporters) of ciprofloxacin derivatives modified at C-7 of the piperazine ring. METHODS: N-acetyl- (1), N-benzoyl- (2), N-ethyl- (3), and N-benzyl- (4) ciprofloxacin were synthesized. MICs against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were determined following CLSI guidelines. Cellular accumulation, subcellular distribution, and intracellular activity (towards S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes) were determined in J774 mouse macrophages. Efflux in bacteria (NorA [S. aureus], Lde [L. monocytogenes]) and in macrophages (Mrp4) was assessed using the corresponding inhibitors reserpine and gemfibrozil, respectively. RESULTS: All derivatives were active, though less than ciprofloxacin. 2 and 3 accumulated 2-3 fold more than ciprofloxacin in mouse macrophages but remained substrates for efflux by Mrp4. 4 was insensitive to NorA and Lde, accumulated approx 50-fold more than ciprofloxacin in macrophages, was barely affected by Mrp4, localized in the soluble fraction of cells, and was equipotent to ciprofloxacin against intracellular bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Benzyl substitution at C7 markedly affects the pharmacological profile of ciprofloxacin with respect to recognition by efflux transporters and cellular accumulation. N-benzyl-ciprofloxacin may serve as basis for designing molecules with higher intrinsic activity while remaining poorly susceptible to efflux.

Characterization of Abcc4 gene amplification in stepwise-selected mouse J774 macrophages resistant to the topoisomerase II inhibitor ciprofloxacin.

Exposure of J774 mouse macrophages to stepwise increasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin, an antibiotic inhibiting bacterial topoisomerases, selects for resistant cells that overexpress the efflux transporter Abcc4 (Marquez et al. [2009] Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2410-2416), encoded by the Abcc4 gene located on Chromosome 14qE4. In this study, we report the genomic alterations occurring along the selection process. Abcc4 expression progressively increased upon selection rounds, with exponential changes observed between cells exposed to 150 and 200 µM of ciprofloxacin, accompanied by a commensurate decrease in ciprofloxacin accumulation. Molecular cytogenetics experiments showed that this overexpression is linked to Abcc4 gene overrepresentation, grading from a partial trisomy of Chr 14 at the first step of selection (cells exposed to 100 µM ciprofloxacin), to low-level amplifications (around three copies) of Abcc4 locus on 1 or 2 Chr 14 (cells exposed to 150 µM ciprofloxacin), followed by high-level amplification of Abcc4 as homogeneous staining region (hsr), inserted on 3 different derivative Chromosomes (cells exposed to 200 µM ciprofloxacin). In revertant cells obtained after more than 60 passages of culture without drug, the Abcc4 hsr amplification was lost in approx. 70% of the population. These data suggest that exposing cells to sufficient concentrations of an antibiotic with low affinity for eukaryotic topoisomerases can cause major genomic alterations that may lead to the overexpression of the transporter responsible for its efflux. Gene amplification appears therefore as a mechanism of resistance that can be triggered by non-anticancer agents but contribute to cross-resistance, and is partially and slowly reversible.

Modulation of the expression of ABC transporters in murine (J774) macrophages exposed to large concentrations of the fluoroquinolone antibiotic moxifloxacin.

Long-term exposure to pharmacological agents can select for cells that overexpress efflux transporters. We previously showed that mouse J774 macrophages cultivated for a prolonged period of time with toxic concentrations of the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin overexpress the efflux transporter Mrp4 and display a reduced accumulation of this antibiotic, but no change in the accumulation of moxifloxacin, a closely related molecule (Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. [2006] 50, 1689-1695 and [2009] 53, 2410-2416). Because of this striking difference between the two fluoroquinolones, we have now examined the modifications in the expression of ABC efflux transporters induced by the prolonged exposure of J774 macrophages to high concentrations of moxifloxacin. The resulting cell line showed (i) no difference in the accumulation of moxifloxacin but an increased accumulation and decreased efflux of ciprofloxacin; (ii) an overexpression of the multidrug transporters Abcb1a (P-gp), Abcc2 (Mrp2) and Abcg2 (Bcrp1), and a decreased expression of Abcc4 (Mrp4). While P-gp and Bcrp1 were functional, they did not modify the cellular accumulation of fluoroquinolones. The data show that exposing cells to high concentrations of a drug that is not affected by active efflux can trigger a pleiotropic response leading to a modulation in the expression of several transporters. These changes, however, are not sufficient to protect cells against the toxicity that fluoroquinolones may exert at large concentrations. They could also cause unanticipated drug interactions in vivo, should the drug exposure grossly exceed what is anticipated from its current registered use.

Cellular accumulation of fluoroquinolones is not predictive of their intracellular activity: studies with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of uninfected and infected macrophages.

Fluoroquinolones enter eukaryotic cells but the correlation between cellular accumulation and activity remains poorly established. Gemifloxacin is known to accumulate to a larger extent than most other fluoroquinolones in tissues. Using murine J774 macrophages and human THP-1 monocytes, we show that gemifloxacin accumulates more than ciprofloxacin and even moxifloxacin. Whilst showing indistinguishable kinetics of accumulation in J774 macrophages, gemifloxacin was released at an approximately two-fold slower rate than ciprofloxacin and its release was only partial. Gemifloxacin was also a weaker substrate than ciprofloxacin for the efflux transporter Mrp4 active in J774 macrophages. In cells infected with Listeria monocytogenes or Staphylococcus aureus (typical cytoplasmic and phagolysosomal organisms, respectively), gemifloxacin was equipotent to moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in concentration-dependent experiments if data are normalised based on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in broth. Thus, larger cellular concentrations of gemifloxacin than of moxifloxacin or ciprofloxacin were needed to obtain a similar target effect. Fractionation studies showed a similar subcellular distribution for all three fluoroquinolones, with approximately two-thirds of the cell-associated drug recovered in the soluble fraction (cytosol). These data suggest that cellular accumulation of fluoroquinolones is largely a self-defeating process as far as activity is concerned, with the intracellular drug made inactive in proportion to its accumulation level. Whilst these observations do not decrease the intrinsic value of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of intracellular infections, they indicate that ranking fluoroquinolones based on cell accumulation data without measuring the corresponding intracellular activity may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding their real potential.