Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bleeding and thrombotic complications compromise outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and/or microaxial flow pumps like the Impella™. Antithrombotic practices are an important determinant of the coagulopathic risk, but standardization in the antithrombotic management during pMCS is lacking. This survey outlines European practices in antithrombotic management in adults on pMCS, making an initial effort to standardize practices, inform future trials, and enhance outcomes. METHODS: This online cross-sectional survey was distributed through digital newsletters and social media platforms by the Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. The survey was available from April 17th to May 23rd, 2023. The target population were European clinicians involved in care for adults on pMCS. RESULTS: We included 105 responses from 26 European countries. Notably, 72.4% of the respondents adhered to locally established anticoagulation protocols, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) being the predominant anticoagulant (Impella™: 97.0% and V-A ECMO: 96.1%). A minority, 10.8% and 14.5%, respectively, utilized anti-factor-Xa assay with activated partial thromboplastin time in parallel for UFH monitoring during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support. Anticoagulant targets varied across institutions. Following acute coronary syndrome without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 54.0% and 42.7% administered dual antiplatelet therapy during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support, increasing to 93.7% and 84.0% after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial heterogeneity in antithrombotic practices emerged from participants' responses, potentially contributing to variable device-associated bleeding and thrombotic complications.

3.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(14): 1707-1720, 2023 07 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37495347

RESUMEN

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) are increasingly being used because of improved experience and availability. The Impella (Abiomed), a percutaneous microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term ventricular assist device, requires meticulous postimplantation management to avoid the 2 most frequent complications, namely, bleeding and hemolysis. A standardized approach to the prevention, detection, and treatment of these complications is mandatory to improve outcomes. The risk for hemolysis is mostly influenced by pump instability, resulting from patient- or device-related factors. Upfront echocardiographic assessment, frequent monitoring, and prompt intervention are essential. The precarious hemostatic balance during pVAD support results from the combination of a procoagulant state, due to critical illness and contact pathway activation, together with a variety of factors aggravating bleeding risk. Preventive strategies and appropriate management, adapted to the impact of the bleeding, are crucial. This review offers a guide to physicians to tackle these device-related complications in this critically ill pVAD-supported patient population.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemólisis , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Choque Cardiogénico
4.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 29(4): 392-396, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37306541

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a very challenging condition with high mortality, despite the advances in therapeutic options. Haematological complications, including coagulopathy and haemolysis, frequently arise in these critically ill patients in CS, especially if they need percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS), and impair the outcome. This stresses the urgent need for further advancement of this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we discuss the different haematological challenges during CS and additional pMCS. Furthermore, we propose a management strategy aiming for restabilization of this precarious haemostatic balance. SUMMARY: In this review, pathophysiology and management of coagulopathies during CS and pMCS are discussed, as well as the need for further studies in this field.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...