Modified Radiation Lobectomy Strategy of Radioembolization for Right-Sided Unresectable Primary Liver Tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of using modified radiation lobectomy (mRL) to treat primary hepatic tumors located in the right hepatic lobe (Segments V-VIII) and to determine future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to include 19 consecutive patients (7 females, 12 males) who underwent single-session mRL for right-sided primary hepatic tumors: 15 received segmentectomy plus lobectomy (segmental dose of >190 Gy and lobar dose of >80 Gy); 4 were treated with the double-segmental approach (dominant segments of >190 Gy and nondominant segments of >80 Gy). Treated tumors included 13 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and 2 mixed-type HCC-CCA with a median dominant tumor size of 5.3 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7-7.3 cm). FLR of the left hepatic lobe was measured at baseline, T1 (4-8 weeks), T2 (2-4 months), T3 (4-6 months), and T4 (9-12 months). RESULTS: Objective tumor response and tumor control were achieved in 17 of the 19 (89.5%) and 18 of the 19 (94.7%) patients, respectively. FLR hypertrophy was observed at T1 (median, 47.8%; P = .025), T2 (median, 48.4%; P = .012), T3 (median, 50.4%; P = .015), and T4 (median, 59.1%; P < .001). Patients without cirrhosis demonstrated greater hypertrophy by 6 months (median, 55.8% vs 47.2%; P = .031). One patient developed a Grade 3 adverse event (ascites requiring paracentesis) at 1-month follow-up. Grade ≥2 serum toxicities were associated with worse baseline Child-Pugh Score, serum albumin, and total bilirubin (P < .05). Among 7 patients who underwent neoadjuvant mRL, 2 underwent resection and 1 received liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS: mRL appears safe and effective for treatment of right-sided primary hepatic tumors with the benefit of promoting FLR hypertrophy.

Selective internal radiation therapy using yttrium-90 microspheres for treatment of localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 for localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with localized iCCA treated with SIRT at a single institution. Overall survival (OS), local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were collected. Stratified analysis was performed based on surgical resection. Predictor analysis of OS was performed using the Fine-Grey regression analysis model with patients bridged to surgery regarded as competing events. RESULTS: A total of 28 consecutive patients with localized iCCA were treated with a total of 38 sessions of SIRT (17 segmental, 13 lobar, and 8 combined deliveries) and a mean dominant target dose per session of 238.4 ± 130.0 Gy. The cumulative radiologic response rate was 16/28 (57.1%) with a median PFS of 265 days. Median survival time (MST) was 22.9 months for the entire cohort with 1-year and 3-year survival of 78.4% and 45.1%, respectively. Ten patients (34.5%) were downstaged to surgical intervention (7 resection, 3 transplant) and showed longer OS (p = 0.027). The 1-year and 3-year OS for patients who received surgery were 100% and 62.5% (95% CI: 14.2-89.3%), respectively. Age (p = 0.028), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.030), and objective radiologic response (p=0.014) are associated with OS. Two ≥grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, and one pleuro-biliary fistula occurred post-SIRT. CONCLUSIONS: SIRT for localized iCCA is safe and effective in achieving radiological response, downstaging to surgery and transplant, and resulting in pathologic necrosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Selective internal radiation therapy should be considered for patients with localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: • The effectiveness of radioembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) can be underestimated given the inclusion of extrahepatic disease. • Radioembolization is safe and effective for local and locally advanced iCCA. Age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and radiologic response are associated with survival. • Radioembolization should be considered for patients with localized and locally advanced iCCA.

Segmental Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Using Glass Microspheres Greater than 400 Gray for the Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Preliminary Experience.

Radiation segmentectomy with a dose of >190 Gy using yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has been shown to be safe and effective. The present study further increased the dose to >400 Gy for treatment of iCCA as complete pathologic necrosis has been shown in hepatocellular carcinoma using this ablative approach. A total of 10 patients with 13 tumors (median size, 5.3 cm; range, 1.5-13.6 cm) at a single institution underwent >400-Gy segmental radioembolization. Objective response was achieved in all tumors (13 of 13, 100%). One patient developed a Grade 3 or greater major adverse event (stroke and hepatic decompensation). One patient was bridged to transplant (>95% pathologic necrosis), whereas another underwent resection (>99% necrosis). Contralateral hypertrophy was observed in 6 out of 6 patients treated with modified lobectomy dosing, with a functional liver reserve increase from a median of 31.5% to 57.1%. The present report suggests that segmental transarterial radioembolization with >400 Gy is feasible in terms of safety and effectiveness for treating iCCA.

Endovascular thrombectomy and repair of suprarenal inferior vena cava thrombosis: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to document the combined use of catheter-based thrombectomy/thrombolysis with endovascular repair of high-risk segments of the inferior vena cava in the setting of iatrogenic and traumatic injuries. While the use of endovascular techniques to treat caval thrombosis is well documented and often preferred due to its minimally invasive nature, there is still little literature that focuses on the nuances related to injury of high mortality areas of the IVC as a result of major trauma, transplant, and other surgical interventions. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing IVC thrombectomy was performed at a single tertiary care academic center between January 2018 and July 2021. Cases were subsequently selected based on those who underwent primary mechanical thrombectomy followed by endovascular stenting (or angioplasty). Among this cohort, four patients who underwent this procedure in the context of iatrogenic and traumatic injuries were included. RESULTS: All four patients undergoing primary mechanical thrombectomy followed by endovascular stenting (or angioplasty) due to IVC thrombus and/or stenosis were technically successful with immediate positive clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy in conjunction with IVC recanalization via stenting may be a useful intervention with promising technical success and positive clinical outcomes for occlusive thrombosis and IVC stenosis.

Combination of transarterial radioembolization with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for intermediate and advanced staged hepatocellular carcinoma: A preliminary report of safety and feasibility.

Purpose: The IMbrave150 Phase III trial demonstrated the superiority of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) over sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility of TARE in combination with Atezo/Bev for the treatment of intermediate and advanced staged HCC. Methods: A retrospective review at a single institution was performed between May 2021 and December 2022. Patients who received TARE using yttrium-90 (Y90) with concomitant or sequential Atezo/Bev systemic treatment were included. The following outcomes were retrieved: overall survival (OS), radiologic tumor response, progression-free survival, technical adverse events related to TARE, and toxicity based on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: Ten consecutive patients with intermediate (n â€‹= â€‹4) and advanced stage HCC (n â€‹= â€‹6) were treated with TARE and sequential/concomitant Atezo/Bev. Tumor control was achieved in all TARE-treated target lesions (100%). Overall disease progression occurred in 4 patients with PFS of 78.8% and 66.7% at 6- and 12- months, respectively. Two patients died at follow-up, with 6-month and 12-month OS rates of 90.0% and 77.1%, respectively. Three (75%) patients with intermediate stage disease were downstaged into Milan criteria. One patient developed grade 3 transaminitis and hypoglobulinemia, while Atezo/Bev was switched to Lenvatinib in another patient due to immunotherapy related myositis. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the initial safety and feasibility of combined TARE with Atezo/Bev for intermediate/advanced stage HCC. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable, Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Before PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21-1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20-1.32; P = .167). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.

Safety and efficacy of repeat Y90 radioembolization to the same hepatic arterial territory.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of repeat transarterial radioembolization (TARE) to similar hepatic arterial territories. METHODS: Between 3/2011 and 4/2019, 26 patients (25 males and 1 Female, Mean Age: 65 yo, SD: 11.7 yo, Range: 18-83.0 yo) received TARE with Y90 glass microspheres to treat recurrent or residual primary disease in similar hepatic arterial lobe or segments. Tumor response was evaluated by imaging using the modified-RECIST criteria. Incidence of RILD and adverse events were categorized by a standardized scale using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS: Mean cumulative activity after the first treatment was 2.50 GBq (SD:1.04 GBq, Range:0.61-4.93 GBq) and second treatment was 2.27 GBq (SD:1.01 GBq, Range:0.92-5.46 GBq). Mean interval time between initial and repeat treatments was 9.6 months (Range: 1-53 months). Tumor responses were complete, partial, or progression in 73% (n = 19/26), 23% (n = 6/26), and 4% (n = 1/26) in repeat treatment patients, respectively. The incidence of RILD was 0%. Toxicity after first and second treatment was seen in 19% (n = 5/26) & 23% (n = 6/26) patients, respectively, and were all of CTCAE Grade 2. No significant predictors of treatment toxicity for repeat treatment were identified except increased MELD score (p = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with repeat treatment showed a median survival of 15.0 months (95% CI 8.8-21.1 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI 8.1-29.9 months) in patients who only received one treatment with a p value of 0.485. CONCLUSION: Repeat TARE with glass microspheres was an effective and safe treatment strategy for disease management in patients with residual or recurrent disease to the similar hepatic arterial territories without any major treatment related toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Although safety and efficacy of repeat radioembolism has been studied, no study has focused on repeat treatment to similar hepatic arterial territories. The current study shows that repeat treatment to the same hepatic arterial territory is as safe as single treatment to the same territory.

Hybrid angiography-CT for transarterial radioembolization: a pictorial essay.

Although hybrid angiography-CT (Angio-CT) has a long history of use for interventional oncology procedures, its applications for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are not as well described in the literature. This pictorial essay demonstrates a single-institution experience with the utilization of an Angio-CT system for TARE treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Procedural images and clinical data for twenty-four patients who underwent initial angiographic mapping with hepatopulmonary shunt fraction assessment and or administration of Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres using the Angio-CT system to date were reviewed. Cases were reviewed for examples that highlight the specific utility of Angio-CT. Three representative TARE cases were selected which illustrate unique advantages and applications of the Angio-CT system when performing TARE. These include the ability to optimally delineate hepatic vascular anatomy, accurately calculate liver volumes for dosimetry, and improve the detection and characterization of equivocal lesions. Angio-CT has unique advantages which can be applied to TARE treatment of patients with HCC. The technology has potential to be an especially effective tool for those who aim to be at the cutting edge of the rapidly growing field of interventional oncology.

Comparing outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy drain placement between patients within and outside of Tokyo guidelines diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy drain placement based on presence or absence of Tokyo Guidelines diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Chart review was performed to identify the presence or absence of Tokyo Guidelines diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis in 146 patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy between 2012 and 2015. Those who met criteria were compared to those who did not in terms of demographics, laboratory values, drain indwelling time, treatment response, eventual surgical management, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: 94 patients (64%) met Tokyo Guidelines diagnostic criteria, while 52 did not (36%). Patients within criteria had a shorter mean length of stay (13.5 days vs 18.9 days), were more likely to have a positive gallbladder fluid culture (64.5% vs 28.6%), demonstrated greater response to treatment (87.2% vs 32.7%), and had lower 30-day mortality (6.4% vs 37.8%). There was no significant difference in terms of ICU requirement (38.3% vs 38.9%), mean drain indwelling time (58.8 days vs 65.3 days), eventual laparoscopic cholecystectomy (40.4% vs 25.0%), or open cholecystectomy performed (9.5% vs 9.6%). CONCLUSION: Patients outside of Tokyo Guidelines diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis were less likely to respond to treatment with percutaneous cholecystostomy and had worse outcomes. Further research may be indicated to better define the indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy placement in this group.

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Therapy for Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using glass microspheres for the treatment of mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) in a propensity-matched study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 10 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC received TARE of a targeted territory using glass microspheres as a primary initial treatment. Baseline demographics in addition to tumor distribution, Child Pugh score, and BCLC were recorded. Tumor response was assessed according to modified RECIST criteria. The HCC-CC cohort was matched to the HCC cohort, and objective response and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: In the HCC-CC cohort, patients had a 70% objective response rate (ORR), and in the HCC cohort, patients had a 90% ORR after matching (p = 0.54). The median overall survival (OS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for HCC patients was 11.6 months (95% CI: 2.53-19.3 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.94). The median transplant-free survival (TFS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median TFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: While outcomes of combined HCC-CC are poor and optimal treatment remains undefined, TARE appears to represent an effective locoregional treatment with survival outcomes similar to that of HCC treated by TARE.

Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the safety and effectiveness of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement in the setting of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), Pubmed and Cochrane Library were queried to identify all clinical studies evaluating IVCF placement in patients with massive and submassive PE from database establishment to December 2019. The rate of recurrent PE, PE-related mortality, adverse events, IVCF type, additional treatment intervention, DVT status, and follow-up length were retrieved. Recurrent PE, mortality, and complication rates were pooled. Meta-analysis was performed to compare mortality rates between groups with and without IVCF placement. Subgroup analysis was performed based on whether catheter-directed therapy was used for PE intervention. Fifteen observational studies with a total of 232 patients who received IVCF for submassive or massive PE were included. The pooled overall recurrent symptomatic PE and mortality rates were 1.4% and 5.5%, respectively. A lower mortality rate among patients with IVCF was observed than those without (6.8% vs 26.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.275 [95% confidence interval] 0.090 to 0.839], I2 = 30.6%, p = 0.023). Patients who received concurrent catheter-directed therapy demonstrated a lower recurrent PE (0% vs 2.8%) and mortality rate (3.4% vs 7.8%) than those who did not. The cumulative IVCF-related complication rate was 0.63%. In conclusion, based on a limited amount of low-quality evidence, IVCF placement is associated with low recurrent PE and PE-related mortality rates among patients with massive and submassive PE, suggestive of a potential clinical benefit in this scenario. Prospectively designed studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

A Single-Institutional Comparative Analysis of Advanced Versus Standard Snare Removal of Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

PURPOSE: To investigate differences in procedure time, radiation exposure, and periprocedural complications associated with advanced inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval compared with standard snare retrieval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 378 patients underwent standard or advanced IVC filter retrieval over a 5-year period. Technical success, retrieval techniques, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and complications were analyzed. All retrieval procedures with techniques other than a "snare-and-sheath" method were categorized as advanced, including failed standard attempts requiring intraprocedural conversion to advanced techniques. RESULTS: A total of 462 filter retrieval attempts were made in 378 patients (57% female). Success rates for standard and advanced retrieval attempts were 86.8% (317 of 365) and 91.8% (89 of 97), respectively. The rate of periprocedural complications was significantly higher in the advanced retrieval group (P = .006). Complication rates for standard and advanced retrievals were 0.6% (2 of 318; all minor) and 5.2% (5 of 97; 3 minor [3.1%] and 2 major [2.1%]), respectively. The 2 major complications during advanced retrievals included filter fracture and embolization. Average fluoroscopy time for advanced retrievals was significantly higher than for standard retrievals (23.1 min vs 4.3 min; P < .001). Average radiation dose for advanced retrievals was also significantly higher than for standard retrievals (557.2 mGy vs 156.9 mGy; P < .001). Use of general anesthesia was also significantly more common in advanced retrievals compared with standard retrievals (6.2% vs 0.9%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced filter retrieval results in a similarly high rate of technical success compared with standard snare retrieval but is associated with greater fluoroscopy time, anesthesia requirements, and radiation exposure.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Evaluation and Management for the Diagnostic Radiologist: A Comprehensive Review Including Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Complications and PRESERVE Trial Filters.

Inferior vena cava filters are commonly encountered devices on diagnostic imaging that were highlighted in a 2010 Food and Drug Administration safety advisory regarding their complications from long-term implantation. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) trial is an ongoing after-market study investigating the safety and utility of commonly utilized filters in practice today. While most of these filters are safe, prompt recognition and management of any filter-associated complication is imperative to prevent or reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with them. This review is aimed at discussing the appropriate utilization and placement of inferior vena cava filters in addition to the recognition of filter-associated complications on cross-sectional imaging. An overview of the PRESRVE trial filters is also provided to understand each filter's propensity for specific complications.

Update on Preoperative Embolization of Bone Metastases.

Management of patients with bone metastasis is complex and should include different specialties. Goals of therapy should be identified for each individual patient prior to the start of treatment. Preoperative embolization has generally been considered a safe and effective means of reducing intraoperative blood loss with recent studies and advances in technique reported. Update on indications, contraindications, technique, and efficacy, as well as prognostic factors and complications of preoperative embolization of bone metastases will be reviewed. New trends such as transradial arterial access and usage of liquid embolic agents will be discussed. Large tumor size, increased preprocedural tumor vascularity, longer embolization-to-surgery interval, and radical surgical procedures are associated with greater intraoperative blood loss and prolonged operative time. An accurate, noninvasive method to evaluate tumor vascularity prior to angiography is needed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from preoperative embolization. Particular attention will be paid to skeletal metastases and spinal metastases as each has its own set of complexity.

Percutaneous treatment of IVC obstruction due to post-resection hepatic torsion associated with IVC thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Migration of the left hepatic lobe into the potential space following right lobe resection can result in torsion and hepatic venous outflow obstruction with compromised venous return from the IVC. If untreated, significant morbidity and mortality can develop. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 29-year-old female with Lynch syndrome who underwent right lobe resection for a metastatic hepatic tumor. There was subsequent migration of the liver remnant, torsion of the IVC, and impaired hepatic outflow, successfully treated with thrombectomy and stenting. CONCLUSION: Following right hepatectomy, hepatic venous outflow obstruction should be consdered in the setting of hepatorenal failure and hemodynamic instability. Endovascular stenting is a viable treatment option.

Utility of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of the Reasons for Nonretrieval of Filters with Temporary Indications.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in the current practice and analyze the causes of filter left in situ despite initial plans for retrieval. METHODS: A systematic search of all English-language studies of retrievable IVC filters was conducted, including clinical trials and observational studies published between January 1984 and March 2016. RESULTS: A total of 103 studies were identified, including 10 filter models in 20,319 patients. Placement indications were reported for 11,128 (54.8%) patients, including therapeutic (n = 6270; 56.3%) and prophylactic (n = 4858; 43.7%) indications. A total of 13,224 (65.1%) filters were left as permanent devices; 7095 (34.9%) filters were removed. The reasons for filter nonretrieval among the 5308 (40.1%) reported cases were primary permanent indication (21.2%; 1127/5308), death (19.4%; 1031/5308), ongoing pulmonary embolism (PE) protection (19.0%; 1011/5308), failed retrieval (13.7%; 725/5308), loss to follow-up (13.0%; 689/5308), discontinued care (4.4%; 235/5308), physician oversight (4.0%; 213/5308), patient morbidity (2.8%; 149/5308), and patient refusal (2.4%; 128/5308). A total of 7820 patients presented for filter retrieval, and 7095 filters (90.7%) were successfully removed, with a mean indwelling time of 106.6 ± 47.3 days. Breakthrough PE was reported in 2.1% (191/9169) of patients. Filter tilt, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, penetration, IVC thrombosis, migration, and fracture occurred in 7.7% (798/10,348), 7.1% (362/5092), 5.4% (379/7001), 3.9% (345/8788), 1.4% (160/11,679), and 0.5% (50/9509) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of retrievable filters were not retrieved even though more than 85% of the filters were initially intended for temporary use. The major reasons for filter left in situ despite initial plans for retrieval were death, need for ongoing PE protection, failed retrieval, loss to follow-up, discontinued care, and physician oversight.

Complications and Retrieval Data of Vena Cava Filters Based on Specific Infrarenal Location.

PURPOSE: Although recommended placement of IVC filters is with their tips positioned at the level of the renal vein inflow, in practice, adherence is limited due to clinical situation or IVC anatomy. We seek to evaluate the indwelling and retrieval complications of IVC filters based on their specific position within the infrarenal IVC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single institution study of 333 consecutive infrarenal vena cava filters placed by interventional radiologists in patients with an average age of 62.2 ± 15.7 years was performed between 2013 and 2015. Primary indication was venous thromboembolic disease (n = 320, 96.1%). Filters were classified based on location of the apex below the lowest renal vein inflow on the procedural venogram: less than 1 cm (n = 180, 54.1%), 1-2 cm (n = 96, 28.8%), and greater than 2 cm (n = 57, 17.1%). Denali (n = 171, 51.4%) and Celect (n = 162, 48.6%) filters were evaluated. CT follow-up, indwelling complications, and retrieval data were obtained. RESULTS: Follow-up CT imaging performed for symptomatic indications occurred for 38.3% of filters placed < 1 cm below the lowest renal vein, 27.1% of filters placed 1-2 cm, and 36.8% placed > 2 cm (p = .16). There was no difference in caval strut penetration, penetration of adjacent viscera, time to penetration, filter migration, or tilt (p = .15, .27, .41, .57, .93). No filter fractures occurred. There was no difference in the incidence of breakthrough PE or complex filter retrieval (p = .83, .59). Only one retrieval failure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests filter apex location within the infrarenal IVC, including placement > 2 cm below the level of the renal vein inflow, is not associated with differences in indwelling or retrieval complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 non-randomized controlled follow-up study.