A validation of the body compassion scale in females.

Body compassion bridges together the constructs of body image and self-compassion and refers to the relationship people have with their bodies, encompassing defusion, common humanity and acceptance. The purpose of the current study was to validate the 23-item Body Compassion Scale (BCS), in a female sample, and to determine the distinctiveness of body compassion from the similar construct of self-compassion. A total of 513 females completed an online cross-sectional survey examining body compassion, self-compassion, body image, and psychological health. Results supported the validation of the three-factor structure of the BCS, with the subscales of defusion and acceptance being more strongly associated with measures of body image than self-compassion. The BCS subscale of common humanity revealed lower associations with body image compared to self-compassion. The findings suggest that body compassion is a body-specific construct relating to body image concerns and while related, is distinct, from the construct of self-compassion.

Physical and psychological correlates of self and body compassion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

This international cross-sectional study examined the level and potential correlates of self and body compassion in women (n = 227) with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Participants completed an online survey examining quality of life, psychological health, body image and self and body compassion. Low levels of self and body compassion were found, with depression and body image concern identified as negative correlates of self and body compassion. Physical health was identified as a positive correlate of body compassion. The findings identify the important relationship between body image, psychological health and self and body compassion in women with PCOS.

Emotional intimacy, empathic concern, and relationship satisfaction in women with endometriosis and their partners.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first study to explore relationship satisfaction through a dyadic lens in couples living with endometriosis. This is timely and important given that endometriosis is a shared experience within the couple rather than an isolated experience occurring for the individual members of a couple. METHODS: Sixty couples completed online measures assessing emotional intimacy, empathic concern, psychological health, and relationship satisfaction. RESULTS: Emotional intimacy was associated with one's own relationship satisfaction and partner emotional intimacy was associated with the woman's relationship satisfaction in couples living with endometriosis. Women's empathic concern was unrelated to their own and their partners' relationship satisfaction. However, partner empathic concern was associated with both their own and the woman's relationship satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers are encouraged to engage partners of women diagnosed with endometriosis in education and treatment processes. This engagement could be used to ascertain, and improve where needed, the emotional intimacy and empathic concern experienced by the couple.