Impact of clinical pharmacokinetics on neuroleptic therapy in patients with schizophrenia.

This review covers some recent work on: 1. The effects of route of administration on the pharmacokinetics of fluphenazine and some of its metabolites; 2. The clinical pharmacokinetics of fluphenazine in acute patients medicated with oral fluphenazine; 3. The clinical pharmacokinetics of haloperidol in acute patients medicated with oral haloperidol; 4. The clinical pharmacokinetics of fluphenazine in the maintenance of individuals with chronic schizophrenia with fluphenazine decanoate; 5. A systematic dose reduction study in maintenance treatment refractory patients with oral haloperidol. A study in which plasma levels of fluphenazine and fluphenazine sulfoxide were measured in a group of DSM-III-R patients with schizophrenia before and after switching from oral fluphenazine to depot fluphenazine, decanoate revealed much higher levels of fluphenazine sulfoxide with oral medication compared with those found with depot fluphenazine. These data illustrate the effect of "first pass" metabolism after oral fluphenazine. Thus in a group of 33 patients randomly assigned to receive 5 mg, 10 mg or 25 mg oral fluphenazine daily, steady state plasma fluphenazine levels at each dose were significantly lower that those of fluphenazine sulfoxide or 7-hydroxy-fluphenazine, although there were no significant differences between the levels of fluphenazine and fluphenazine N4-oxide. On the other hand, plasma levels of the parent drug were significantly higher than those of any metabolite in a corresponding group of patients at steady state on depot medication. These observations underscore the importance of route dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics of fluphenazine which can lead to problems when switching patients from oral to depot neuroleptics. The concept of "disabling side-effects" is an important development in understanding relationships between plasma levels of neuroleptic drugs and clinical response in patients with schizophrenia. Risk-benefit analysis shows clearly that evaluation of relationships between plasma levels and clinical response must take into account the consequences of side-effects which the patient feels have a negating effect on therapy. Emerging data on putative therapeutic plasma level ranges in maintenance therapy are potentially important and may be particularly useful in the maintenance of patients on low dose therapy. It is noteworthy that in a carefully executed dose reduction study in treatment resistant patients under medication with haloperidol, the mean lowest effective dose (8.7 ng/mL) lay within the optimal therapeutic range (5 ng/mL to 12 ng/mL) found in acutely psychotic patients. The study showed that gradual dose reduction of neuroleptic was possible in chronic treatment resistant patients with schizophrenia who were originally thought by ward staff to require high doses of neuroleptic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Simultaneous determination of plasma haloperidol and its metabolite reduced haloperidol by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Plasma levels in schizophrenic patients treated with oral or intramuscular depot haloperidol.

A simple and highly sensitive liquid chromatographic method with electrochemical detection for the simultaneous determination of haloperidol and its metabolite reduced haloperidol in human plasma has been developed. The sample preparation for the analysis involves a simple one-step extraction procedure with 10% methylene chloride in pentane. The compounds were separated on a cyano column maintained at a temperature of 40 degrees C and were detected electrochemically by a flow-through analytical cell kept at +0.95 V. The standard curve is linear over the range of 0.1 to 15 ng/ml and the lower limit of quantitation is 0.1 ng/ml for haloperidol and 0.25 ng/ml for reduced haloperidol which is equivalent to approximately 40 pg on column when 1 ml of plasma was used for the analysis. The lower limit of quantitation for reduced haloperidol can be extended to 0.1 ng/ml if 2 ml of plasma is used in the analysis. The coefficient of variation of the determination of plasma levels by this method over the standard curve concentration range was less than 10%. Commonly co-administered drugs and other neuroleptics used in conjunction with haloperidol did not interfere in the determination of either haloperidol or reduced haloperidol. This method has been successfully used for the determination of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol in plasma and their levels in patients treated with various doses oral haloperidol or intramuscular haloperidol decanoate are reported.

Optimal drug and behavior therapy for treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients.

Thirteen treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients (10 men and three women) who were receiving more than 50 mg/day of haloperidol and who had been hospitalized for more than 1 year successfully tolerated a mean dose reduction of 63% with consequent improvement in psychopathology and side effects. The addition of intensive behavior therapy to the optimal dose of haloperidol yielded further improvements in functional behavior, such as self-care and social interaction.

Fluphenazine vs placebo supplementation for prodromal signs of relapse in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: We studied the effectiveness of treating patients with low doses of fluphenazine decanoate and supplementing them with oral fluphenazine when there was evidence of prodromal symptoms of psychotic exacerbations. METHODS: Eighty schizophrenic patients who were receiving 5 to 10 mg of fluphenazine decanoate every 2 weeks were monitored for prodromal symptoms using an idiosyncratic prodromal rating scale. When patients met our criteria for a prodromal episode, they were randomly assigned to a double-blind comparison of oral fluphenazine hydrochloride (5 mg twice daily) or a placebo for the current and future prodromal episodes. We compared rates of psychotic exacerbations in the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (45%) met the criteria for a prodrome at some point during the trial and were randomized to drug or placebo. Using survival analysis during the entire 2 years, we did not find a significant difference between fluphenazine and placebo in the likelihood that a prodrome would continue to an exacerbation. Survival analysis beginning at the start of the second year of treatment did indicate a significant reduction in exacerbation risk for patients receiving drug supplementation (P = .032). Similarly, there was no difference between the two groups in the proportion of time at risk spent in exacerbation during the first year, but patients receiving active drug supplementation spent less time in an exacerbated state in the second year (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment strategy appeared to be effective for some patients, particularly those who were able to remain in the study beyond the first year. Although the occurrence of a prodrome was a fairly good marker that a patient was at high risk of ultimate exacerbation with our low-dose maintenance protocol, prodromes were not highly sensitive indicators of imminent exacerbation.

Radioimmunoassay for 7-hydroxy metabolite of fluphenazine and its application to plasma level monitoring in schizophrenic patients treated long term with oral and depot fluphenazine.

Immunization of New Zealand white rabbits with a bovine serum albumin conjugate of 7-hydroxy-N-carboxyethyl-N-deshydroxyethylfluphenazine produced highly specific antisera for 7-hydroxyfluphenazine (7-OHFLU). A radioimmunoassay (RIA) was developed using antisera from one of the rabbits that enabled for the first time the determination of plasma levels of 7-OHFLU, an active metabolite of fluphenazine (FLU), in patients treated with oral FLU dihydrochloride or i.m. FLU decanoate. The assay method provided sufficient sensitivity to determine accurately 20 pg of 7-OHFLU in 200 microliters (0.1 ng/ml) of plasma with a coefficient of variation of < 10%. The antiserum used in the RIA for 7-OHFLU demonstrated negligible cross-reactivity with FLU and its metabolites such as FLU sulfoxide, N-deshydroxyethylFLU, FLU N4'-oxide, N-deshydroxyethyl-7-OHFLU, and 7-O-glucuronide of FLU and also with other antipsychotic agents and commonly coadministered drugs. The 7-OHFLU was present in measurable amounts in all plasma samples obtained at 4-week intervals from patients receiving a daily oral dose of 5 (n = 10), 10 (n = 13), or 20 (n = 14) mg of FLU dihydrochloride. Large interindividual variations in the plasma level of FLU and 7-OHFLU were noted and the mean plasma levels ratios of 7-OHFLU/FLU at these doses were 2.07 +/- 1.08, 2.07 +/- 1.13, and 2.02 +/- 0.82, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Schizophrenia.

The pharmacologic treatment of the schizophrenic patient has remained substantively unchanged during the last 35 years. It is evident that as our knowledge of neuropharmacology has grown--the notion of schizophrenia being merely caused by a hyperdopaminergic state may be too simplistic. Multiple neurotransmitter systems may be involved in the manifestations of this illness. Conventional neuroleptics--the mainstay of antipsychotic treatment--have proved to be only partially effective and their untoward side effects have led to notorious patient noncompliance and iatrogenic morbidity. The demonstration that clozapine possesses both increased efficacy and reduced neurotoxicity, however, has forever altered the conventional wisdom that held all antipsychotics to be equally efficacious and uniformly neurotoxic. The pharmacologic legacy of clozapine promises to provide clinicians with biologic therapies that are at once safe, effective, and easy to administer.

Clinical perspectives of some neuroleptics through development and application of their assays.

Attempts to investigate relationships between plasma levels of neuroleptics and therapeutic outcome in schizophrenic patients have been hampered due to such factors as the chemical nature of these drugs, their metabolism, and the very heterogeneous nature of the disease states. Two clinical studies are described that investigate the relationship between plasma levels of fluphenazine (FLU) and its metabolites and therapeutic outcome in schizophrenic patients. In the first of these studies the levels of FLU and fluphenazine sulfoxide (FLUSO) in schizophrenics receiving either 5 or 25 mg of fluphenazine decanoate (FLUD) intramuscularly every 2 weeks were monitored. Patients given 25 mg of FLUD required 3 months to reach plasma level steady state. The results suggest that such patients, when being switched from the oral to the depot formulation of FLU, should continue to receive oral supplementation during the 1st 3 months after conversion. The relationship between log-transformed plasma levels at 26 and 38 weeks with subsequent psychotic exacerbation was investigated with the use of logistic regression and survival analysis. Both demonstrated significant relationships between FLU plasma levels and a risk of psychotic exacerbation at 26 and 38 weeks. The possibility of any correlations between neurological side effects and plasma concentrations were also investigated, with statistically significant correlations between FLU levels and akinesia found at 2 and 26 weeks. In the second of these studies the levels of FLU, FLUSO, 7-hydroxyfluphenazine (7-OHFLU), and fluphenazine N4'(-)-oxide (FLUNO) in schizophrenics receiving 5, 10, or 20 mg of oral fluphenazine dihydrochloride daily for 4 weeks were monitored. The relationships between log-transformed plasma levels, disabling side effects, and global improvement were examined by logistic regression for the 4-week period. The study showed a significant correlation between increases in both plasma levels and disabling side effects such that at a plasma level of 2.7 ng/ml, approximately 90% of acutely ill patients experienced disabling side effects. Conversely, the study also showed that at a plasma level of 0.67 ng/ml, 48% of patients experienced improvement without the development of disabling side effects. When relationships between metabolite levels, disabling side effects, and global improvement were examined by logistic regression, a stronger correlation between disabling side effects and FLUNO levels than between side effects and FLU levels was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Determination of risperidone in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection: application to therapeutic drug monitoring in schizophrenic patients.

A highly sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method with electrochemical detection for the determination of risperidone in plasma has been developed. Remoxipride is used as an internal standard. A simple one-step extraction with 25% methylene dichloride in pentane is used to isolate the drug from the plasma. This is followed by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis on a cyano column with electrochemical detection. Under the experimental conditions described here, commonly coadministered drugs and other antipsychotic drugs did not interfere with the analysis of either risperidone or the internal standard. Also, the available two metabolites of risperidone did not interfere in the assay. This method has sufficient sensitivity to quantitate risperidone accurately at 0.1 ng/mL, when 1 mL of plasma was used for the analysis, with a coefficient of variation of < 9%. This method has been successfully used in the determination of plasma levels of risperidone in schizophrenic patients treated with 4-, 6-, and 8-mg oral doses per day.

Systematic dosage reduction in treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients.

Thirteen treatment-resistant, chronically institutionalized schizophrenic patients on high-dose neuroleptic (the equivalent of at least 50 mg of haloperidol (HPL) daily) were transferred to a special research ward for a trial of systematic dosage reduction. In these 13 patients, it was possible to reduce the dose of HPL from 63.1 mg/day (SD +/- 12.5, range = 50-80 mg/day) to 23.1 mg/day (SD +/- 16.3, range = 0-65 mg/day) over a mean period of 32 weeks (SD +/- 9.6, range = 15-46 weeks). Their total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores were improved (p = .04), they definitely experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects (p = .01), and 6 of the patients showed global improvement. On several behavioral rating scales there was, if anything, an improvement in negativistic behavior. The substantial dosage reduction was paralleled by a comparable drop in plasma levels. HPL plasma levels at baseline were 38.8 ng/mL (SD +/- 17.8, range = 21.5-69.5 ng/mL) and at the lowest effective dose were 12.4 ng/mL (SD +/- 10.3, range = 0-43.4 ng/mL).

Haloperidol plasma levels and clinical response: a therapeutic window relationship.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between plasma haloperidol and clinical response. METHOD: Sixty-nine newly admitted drug-free schizophrenic men were randomly assigned to receive haloperidol, 5, 10, or 20 mg daily for 4 weeks, and clinical response was measured at the end of the fixed-dose period. Haloperidol was assayed by a sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The authors found a curvilinear relationship between clinical response and plasma haloperidol during fixed-dose treatment, with an apparent optimum between 5 and 12 ng/ml. When plasma levels above 12 ng/ml were lowered to the 5-12 ng/ml range, all patients improved to varying degrees and no patient deteriorated. When plasma levels of nonresponders within this therapeutic window were raised above 12 ng/ml (as in routine practice), they, on balance, deteriorated in that they became more dysphoric. With the 20-mg dose, half the patients had plasma levels above 12 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of newly admitted schizophrenic men, optimal clinical response occurred with a plasma haloperidol range of 5-12 ng/ml.

Serum prolactin as a correlate of clinical response to haloperidol.

The rise in serum prolactin concentration in patients treated with neuroleptic drugs is well documented, but attempts to relate this rise to clinical response have yielded conflicting results. These conflicting results could be explained by design flaws in those studies attempting to relate prolactin to clinical response. Seventy-three newly (re)admitted drug-free schizophrenic men were randomly assigned to receive haloperidol either 5, 10, or 20 mg daily for 4 weeks. Prolactin levels post-treatment were significantly (p less than 0.02) related to global outcome by logistic regression. A serum prolactin level may be a useful guide to the lowest effective dose of haloperidol in newly treated schizophrenic men. Above a plasma prolactin level of approximately 30 ng/ml there was very little increase in response. Patients on the 5, 10, and 20 mg daily haloperidol doses had mean prolactin levels of 16, 32, and 34 ng/ml, respectively.

Plasma levels of fluphenazine in patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate. Relationship to clinical response.

The levels of fluphenazine and fluphenazine sulphoxide in schizophrenic patients who were randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg or 25 mg of fluphenazine decanoate every two weeks were monitored. Patients treated with 25 mg of fluphenazine decanoate required three months to reach a steady-state plasma level, indicating that those patients who are being converted from oral to depot fluphenazine should continue to receive oral supplementation during the first three months of treatment with fluphenazine decanoate. Plasma levels of fluphenazine sulphoxide were lower than levels of fluphenazine. At six and nine months following randomisation, there was a statistically significant relationship between lower fluphenazine plasma levels and an increased risk of psychotic exacerbations. A relatively weak relationship was found between fluphenazine plasma levels and akinesia, but non-significant relationships between fluphenazine levels and other neurological side-effects including akathisia, retardation, and tardive dyskinesia. Monitoring the plasma levels may be helpful to clinicians who are attempting to treat stabilised patients with the lowest effective dose of fluphenazine decanoate.

Drug treatment of schizophrenia. Overview of recent research.

The authors review recent research findings on the drug treatment of schizophrenia. A number of studies emphasize that neuroleptic medications are severely limited by neurological side effects that include acute extrapyramidal syndromes and tardive dyskinesia. Studies comparing neuroleptic doses in both acute and maintenance therapy have encouraged clinicians to evaluate methods for treating patients with the lowest effective dose. Other studies, but not all, indicate that plasma level measurement may be helpful in decision making about drug dosage. The management of schizophrenic patients with illnesses that are refractory to conventional neuroleptics is also discussed. Clozapine, an atypical neuroleptic, may be more effective than other available neuroleptics for severely ill, treatment refractory patients or patients who are unable to tolerate the neurological side effects of typical neuroleptics.

Early prediction of relapse in schizophrenia: an application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods.

We compared different methods of identifying prodromal periods with regard to their ability to predict relapse in schizophrenia. Fifty stabilized schizophrenic patients, who received a low dose of schizophrenic patients, who received a low dose of fluphenazine decanoate (5 to 10 mg every 2 weeks) were monitored with weekly evaluations to determine whether they met criteria for nonpsychotic prodromal episodes. We evaluated three different scales: (1) the Anxious-Depression subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); (2) a modification of the patient self-report Early Signs Questionnaire and (3) the Idiosyncratic Prodromal Scale (IPS). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods for comparing the different instruments as methods for predicting whether patients would or would not demonstrate a psychotic exacerbation in the 4 weeks following the assessment. Both the IPS and the BPRS cluster scores were better than chance at correctly identifying periods of vulnerability to psychotic exacerbation. The ROC analyses suggest that relatively small changes in the signs and symptoms of chronic schizophrenic patients in maintenance treatment may be clinically meaningful.

Plasma fluphenazine levels and clinical response in newly admitted schizophrenic patients.

Seventy-two newly readmitted, drug-free men with the diagnosis of schizophrenia by DSM-III were assigned randomly to receive fluphenazine hydrochloride at 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg daily for 4 weeks. Fluphenazine (FLU), fluphenazine sulfoxide, 7-hydroxyfluphenazine, and fluphenazine N-oxide were measured by highly specific and sensitive radioimmunoassays. Data were analyzed by logistic regression using the Clinical Global Impressions Disabling Side Effects and Global Improvement as the outcome measures. Disabling side effects were defined as "side effects that significantly interfered with patient's functioning" or "side effects that outweigh therapeutic effects" (National Institute of Mental Health 1985, p. 839). Higher plasma FLU levels (up to 4.23 ng/mL) were significantly (p = .015) associated with a higher rate of global improvement. However, close to 90 percent of these acute patients had disabling side effects at a plasma FLU level of 2.7 ng/mL. At least in the patient's view, these disabling side effects negated or compromised the improvement in psychosis. Fluphenazine N-oxide may be a toxic metabolite in that it was more powerfully associated with side effects than was the parent FLU.

Neuroleptic plasma levels.

There is enormous variation in plasma levels of most neuroleptics in patients on the same dose. Much of the past research on the relation between plasma levels of antipsychotic drugs and clinical change, however, has been difficult to interpret. It does appear that decreased bioavailability, at least in public institutions, is rarely the cause of treatment failure. Aberrantly low plasma levels are more likely due to surreptitious noncompliance or drug interactions with enzyme inducers such as carbamazepine. Therapeutic plasma level ranges, in which good antipsychotic effect occurs without undue side effects, have been tentatively identified for perphenazine, haloperidol, fluphenazine, and chlorpromazine. The extent to which aberrantly high plasma levels are associated with inferior antipsychotic response is unclear. Antipsychotic plasma levels may be most useful when the distinction between side effects and worsening psychosis is unclear. The utility of high neuroleptic plasma levels in the treatment-resistant patient is unclear.