Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 180: 70-78, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086166

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the practice patterns and quality of care for uterine cancer on a national level in Belgium, including trends in practice over the period 2012-2016. METHODS: Quality indicators were measured using the EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment (EFFECT) database. Multivariable logistic mixed regression was used to test for associations between the quality indicators and year of diagnosis, adjusted for potential confounders and intra-cluster correlations. RESULTS: The EFFECT database includes 4178 patients diagnosed with uterine cancer in the period 2012-2016. Minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) was applied in 61.6% of patients who had surgery for clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma (EC), increasing from 52.9% in 2012 to 66.4% in 2016. At least pelvic lymph node staging was performed in 69.0% of patients with clinical stage I, high-grade EC; and in 63.9% of patients with clinical stage I-II serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma or carcinosarcoma. The latter increased from 48.8% in 2012 to 77.2% in 2016. Adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam and/or brachytherapy) was offered to 33.5% of patients who had surgery without lymph node staging for pathological stage I EC at high-intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 64.4% of patients with pathological stage III-IVA EC. CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate an overall good quality of care for patients with uterine cancer in Belgium. Treatment areas with potential room for improvement include the use of minimally invasive surgery, comprehensive surgical staging and adjuvant therapy, which confirms the remaining controversies in uterine cancer treatment and the need for further research.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras , Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Endometriales , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Braquiterapia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Histerectomía
2.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 600, 2022 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the aim of obtaining more uniformity and quality in the treatment of corpus uteri cancer in Belgium, the EFFECT project has prospectively collected detailed information on the real-world clinical care offered to 4063 Belgian women with primary corpus uteri cancer. However, as data was collected on a voluntary basis, data may be incomplete and biased. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the completeness and potential selection bias of the EFFECT database. METHODS: Five databases were deterministically coupled by use of the patient's national social security number. Participation bias was assessed by identifying characteristics associated with hospital participation in EFFECT, if any. Registration bias was assessed by identifying patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with patient registration by participating hospitals, if any. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: EFFECT covers 56% of all Belgian women diagnosed with primary corpus uteri cancer between 2012 and 2016. These women were registered by 54% of hospitals, which submitted a median of 86% of their patients. Participation of hospitals was found to be biased: low-volume and Walloon-region centers were less likely to participate. Registration of patients by participating hospitals was found to be biased: patients with a less favorable risk profile, with missing data for several clinical-pathological risk factors, that did not undergo curative surgery, and were not discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board were less likely to be registered. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its voluntary nature, the EFFECT database suffers from a selection bias, both in terms of the hospitals choosing to participate and the patients being included by participating institutions. This study, therefore, highlights the importance of assessing the selection bias that may be present in any study that voluntarily collects clinical data not otherwise routinely collected. Nevertheless, the EFFECT database covers detailed information on the real-world clinical care offered to 56% of all Belgian women diagnosed with corpus uteri cancer between 2012 and 2016, and may therefore act as a powerful tool for measuring and improving the quality of corpus uteri cancer care in Belgium.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Neoplasias Uterinas , Bélgica/epidemiología , Sesgo , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Sesgo de Selección , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...