The role of microscopic bone marrow examination and [123I]MIBG scintigraphy in detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with neuroblastoma.

OBJECTIVES: For the detection of bone marrow (BM) metastases in patients with neuroblastoma, microscopic BM examination and [123I]MIBG scintigraphy are advised. The aims of this study were to assess the concordance of [123I]MIBG and microscopic BM examination (aspirate and biopsy) in detecting BM involvement and to compare invasive disease in BM biopsies and aspirates, both at diagnosis and before autologous stem cell collection (ASCC). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with stage 4 or stage 4S disease were included, and 37 of them received an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The concordance rate was measured and paired binary data were analysed by the McNemar test to look for a systematic difference between diagnostic tests. RESULTS: At diagnosis and before ASCC, we found acceptable concordance rates for [123I]MIBG versus microscopic BM examination (77.1% and 85.3% respectively). Discordant results were found in both directions and at both time points. The concordance rate for biopsy versus aspirate at diagnosis was 80.6%, however, before ASCC a much higher concordance rate between both microscopic examinations was found (94.1%). While none of the aspirates showed neuroblastoma cells before ASCC, two biopsies still showed tumor invasion. CONCLUSION: For patients with neuroblastoma, a [123I]MIBG scintigraphy and a microscopic examination of BM aspirate and its biopsy should be used as complementary tools in the evaluation of BM involvement, and this both at diagnosis and during treatment (before ASCC).

Bacteremia and complicated parapneumonic effusion caused by Bordetella holmesii in an elderly patient.

We describe a case of bacteremia and a complicated parapneumonic effusion caused by Bordetella holmesii, in an elderly patient with underlying chronic hepatitis C infection.

Fertility Preservation Is Safe for Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the overall survival (OS) and progression-free interval and the influence of fertility-preserving surgery (FPS) versus radical surgery (RS) in patients with serous borderline ovarian tumor (BOT). METHODS: Clinical parameters of patients with serous BOT treated between 1993 and 2013 in one institution were retrospectively investigated. All tumors were examined by one pathologist with experience in gynecological pathology. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with serous BOT (inclusive 16 microinvasive) were analyzed (45% were ≤40 years), with a median follow-up of 6 years. Thirty-two percent (42/132) of the patients received FPS; 14% (18/132) relapsed (invasive or borderline). The 5-year progression-free survival was 89%. The risk of recurrence was higher in patients 40 years or younger (P = 0.019), after FPS (P = 0.002), in patients with a higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P = 0.016), for bilateral BOT (P = 0.0132), and for the micropapillary variant (P = 0.067). The OS at 5 years was 97%. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between FPS and RS [all (6 of 90) patients, except for 1, with RS died]. One patient died of relapsed BOT. Among the recurrences, low-grade invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in 4 patients. Three of these 4 patients were originally operated radically, 2 had a micropapillary variant FIGO stage III, and 1 had a papillary pattern FIGO stage II with microinvasion; all 3 had noninvasive implants and are alive. One patient with a micropapillary variant, FIGO stage IIIC with microinvasion and invasive implants, received FPS and died of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is higher after FPS compared with RS; however, no influence on OS was observed. This was because most of the patients relapsed as BOT. Fertility preservation is justified in young patients with serous borderline tumors.