Outcome of Biological Therapies and Small Molecules in Ulcerative Proctitis: A Belgian Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several advanced therapies (biologic therapies and small molecules) have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The registration trials for these agents typically excluded patients with isolated proctitis, leaving an evidence gap. We evaluated efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with active UP (Mayo endoscopy subscore of ≥2, rectal inflammation up to 15 cm) initiating advanced therapy, after failing conventional therapy. The primary end point was short-term steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1). In addition, drug persistence and relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were assessed. Both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 167 consecutive patients (52.0% female; median age 41.0 years; 82.0% bionaive) underwent 223 courses of therapy for UP (38 adalimumab, 14 golimumab, 54 infliximab, 9 ustekinumab, 99 vedolizumab, 9 tofacitinib). The primary end point was achieved with 36.3% of the treatment courses, and based on multivariate analysis, more commonly attained in bionaive patients (P = .001), patients treated with vedolizumab (P = .001), patients with moderate endoscopic disease activity (P = .002), and a body mass index <25 kg/m2 (P = .018). Drug persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with vedolizumab (P < .001) and patients with a shorter disease duration (P = .006). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced therapies are also efficacious and safe in patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum. Therefore, the inclusion of patients with UP in future randomized-controlled trials should be considered.

Early Mucosal Healing Predicts Favorable Outcomes in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Golimumab: Data From the Real-life BE-SMART Cohort.

Background: Golimumab (GOL) is registered for moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Data on the use of GOL in daily clinical practice are limited. Currently, it is unclear which factors are predictive of a favorable outcome. The goals of this study were to evaluate the mid-term outcome of GOL (week 26) in patients with moderate to severe UC and to determine predictors of favorable outcome. Methods: Patients included in the SMART study (NCT02155335) were evaluated for their mid-term outcome. Demographic data, disease characteristics, and medical history were recorded retrospectively. Data on disease activity based on total Mayo score, previous and concomitant medication, GOL dosing, mucosal healing (Mayo 0 or 1), adverse events (colectomy, hospitalization), and biomarkers (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, hemoglobin, and albumin) were collected at baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, 26, and 52. GOL was dosed at 200 and 100 mg at weeks 0 and 2, respectively, and 50 mg (<80 kg body weight) or 100 mg (≥80 kg body weight) every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was steroid-free GOL continuation at week 26. Results: From the 91 evaluable patients (42% female; median age, 42 years; median disease duration, 5 years), 4% were active smokers, 25% had extensive colitis, and 38% had an endoscopic Mayo score of 3 at baseline. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline Mayo score was 9 (8-10). Although 75% of patients had previously failed immunomodulators (IMMs), the majority (87%) were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naïve. GOL was started in combination with IMM in 40% and steroids in 64%. The median (IQR) duration of GOL therapy during follow-up was 35.7 (11.4-105.7) weeks. Twenty-six weeks after GOL induction, 37 patients (41%) were steroid-free and still on GOL, of whom 8 (21.6%) required GOL dose optimization. Short-term mucosal healing (STMH) at week 14 was evaluated in 60% of the patients. Considering the whole cohort, only 40% achieved STMH. No predictors could be retained of short-term treatment outcome. In multivariate analysis, STMH was predictive of steroid-free GOL continuation at week 26 (odds ratio [OR], 5.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-16.29; P = 0.002) and week 52 (OR, 9.38; 95% CI, 2.68-32.84; P < 0.001). In patients continuing GOL after week 14, STMH was predictive of intervention-free survival (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.86; P = 0.026) and discontinuation-free survival (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.58-7.58; P = 0.002). During follow-up, 78% needed an intervention, 68% discontinued GOL, and 3 patients needed a colectomy. Conclusions: Real-life data confirm the moderate effectiveness of GOL on the mid-term in active UC, but therapeutic interventions are frequently needed. Short-term mucosal healing predicts a favorable outcome. 10.1093/ibd/izy219_video1izy219.video15798038438001.

Incidence and Predictors of Success of Adalimumab Dose Escalation and De-escalation in Ulcerative Colitis: a Real-World Belgian Cohort Study.

Background: Adalimumab (ADM) has been shown efficacious in ulcerative colitis (UC). In randomized controlled trials, dose escalation from 40 mg ADM every other week to 40 mg every week was required in 20%-25% of patients within 1 year. Real-life data suggest higher escalation rates. Attempts for dose de-escalation have not been studied yet. We assessed the need for, outcome of, and predictors of dose escalation and de-escalation in a large retrospective cohort of UC patients treated with ADM. Methods: We included 231 consecutive patients from 10 Belgian centers initiating ADM treatment for active UC before September 1, 2015 (follow-up ≥1 year in each patient). We performed detailed chart review to identify variables associated with short-term clinical benefit (based on physician global assessment and absence of rectal bleeding at week 10), success of dose escalation, and dose de-escalation. Backward Cox regression and Wald Logistic regression were used to identify predictive variables. Results: Short-term clinical benefit was achieved in 101 patients (44%) and was less frequent in infliximab failures [37% vs 50%, Odds ratio 0.57 (95% CI 0.34-0.97), P = 0.038]. After a median of 2.8 (1.7-5.1) months, 164 patients (71%) needed ADM discontinuation (n = 35, 15%) or dose escalation (n = 129, 56%). Dose escalation was successful in 77/129 (60%). Dose de-escalation was attempted in 71% (55/77) after a median of 4.3 (2.9-7.2) months and was successful in 80% (43/54). Conclusions: In this cohort, 56% of patients with UC required ADM dose escalation with a 60% success rate. Of note, most patients could be successfully de-escalated later on.