Visit Adherence and Visual Acuity in Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2).

PURPOSE: We quantify the association between visit adherence and visual acuity (VA) in retinal vein occlusions (CRVO). METHODS: The SCORE2 protocol included a visit every 4 weeks (every 28-35 days) during the first year. Visit adherence was measured as follows: number of missed visits, average and longest (avg and max days) visit interval, and average and longest (avg and max missed days) and unintended visit interval. Avg and max missed days were categorized as on time (0 days), late (>0-60 days), and very late (>60 days). The primary outcome was a change in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity letter score (VALS) between baseline study visit and last attended visit during Year 1, using multivariate linear regression models controlling for numerous demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: After adjustment, for each visit missed, patients lost 3.0 letters (95% CI: -6.2, 0.2) of vision (p = .07). On average, the 48 patients who missed at least 1 visit lost 9.4 letters (95% CI: -14.4, -4.3, p < .001) of vision after adjustment. Average days and maximal intervals between visits were not associated with changes in VALS (p > .22) for both comparisons. However, when a visit was missed, the average missed days between missed visits and the max missed interval were both associated with loss of VALS (both variables: 0 days missed as reference, late [1-60 days] -10.8 letters [95% CI: -16.9, -4.7], very late [>60 days] -7.3 letters [95% CI: -14.5, -0.2]; p = .003 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Visit adherence is associated with VALS outcomes in CRVO patients.

The association of stroke with herpes zoster ophthalmicus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Studies have reported an association between herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) and stroke. We sought to validate this association with rigorous controls for both medical comorbidities and social factors using a nationwide U.S. administrative medical claims database. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A two-step approach was taken: first a retrospective case-control study was performed, followed by a self-controlled case series (SCCS). For the case control study, cox proportional hazard regression with inverse proportional treatment weighting assessed the hazard for stroke. In the SCCS, incidence of stroke was compared prior to and after the diagnosis of HZO. RESULTS: For the case-control study, 25,720 cases and 75,924 controls met our eligibility criteria. 1712 (6.7%) and 4544 (6.0%) strokes occurred in the case and control groups respectively, conferring an 18% increased risk of stroke in the observed 1-year post-HZO period (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12-1.25, p < 0.001). SCCS analysis showed the risk for stroke was highest in the month immediately after HZO episode compared to any other time range (1-30 days after, relative risk 1.58, p < 0.001) and even higher when assessing time more distal time points prior to the HZO diagnosis (days 1-30 after HZO diagnosis had RR = 1.69 (95% CI: 1.38-2.07) and RR = 1.93 (95% CI: 1.55-2.39) compared with days -120 to -91 and -150 to -121 prior to index, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for stroke risk factors, our analysis confirms the association between HZO and stroke, with highest risk in the immediate month after an episode.

Risk Factors for Chalazion Diagnosis and Subsequent Surgical Excision.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with chalazion diagnosis and surgical excision. METHODS: Patients with an incident chalazion diagnosis from 2002 to 2019 were compared 1:5 with matched controls. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with diagnosis and surgical excision. RESULTS: Chalazion patients (n = 134,959) and controls (678,160) were analyzed. Risk factors for diagnosis included female sex, non-white race, northeast location, conditions affecting periocular skin and tear film (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, rosacea, pterygium), non-ocular inflammatory conditions (gastritis, inflammatory bowel disease, sarcoidosis, seborrheic dermatitis, Graves' disease), and smoking (p < .001 for all comparisons). Thirteen percent of patients with chalazion underwent subsequent surgical excision. Diabetes and systemic sclerosis diagnoses decreased odds of diagnosis (p < .001). Male sex, rosacea diagnosis, Black and Hispanic race, antibiotic use, and doxycycline use increased odds of surgery (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Female sex, non-white race, conditions affecting periocular skin and the tear film, several non-ocular inflammatory conditions, and smoking were risk factors for chalazion diagnosis. Male sex, rosacea diagnosis, Black and Hispanic race, antibiotic use, and doxycycline use were risk factors for surgical intervention for chalazion. Our results prompt further study of these variables and their relationship to chalazion diagnosis to understand physiology and improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the results of this study suggest early recognition and treatment of concomitant rosacea may serve an important role in the management of chalazion and in the prevention of surgical intervention.

Real-world socioeconomic determinants of corneal crosslinking in a national cohort.

PURPOSE: To characterize recent socioeconomic trends in patients with keratoconus/corneal ectasias undergoing corneal crosslinking (CXL). SETTING: A deidentified administrative medical claims database comprised commercial and Medicare Advantage health claims from across the United States. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This study identified 552 patients with keratoconus/corneal ectasia who underwent CXL and 2723 matched controls who did not undergo CXL based on Current Procedural Terminology coding from a U.S. national insurance claims database from 2016 to 2020. For each patient, characteristics, including sex, race, age, household net worth, education level, insurance plan type, and geographic region, were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to determine the odds of undergoing crosslinking. RESULTS: Age 30 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, P < .001) was associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing CXL. Sex, race, education, and patient income were not associated with odds of undergoing CXL. Patients with health maintenance organization insurance had lower odds of undergoing CXL (OR, 0.64, P = .047). Geographically, patients on the east coast (OR, 0.37, P < .001) and Lower Midwest (OR, 0.31, P < .001) had statistically lower odds of undergoing crosslinking. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify socioeconomic determinants of CXL, and it highlights that geographic location and insurance type may limit accessibility to patients.

SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors affect progression of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared to standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared subjects enrolled in a commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database who filled a prescription for a SGLT2 inhibitor between 2013 and 2020 to unexposed controls, matched up to a 1:3 ratio. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled for less than 2 years in the plan, had no prior ophthalmologic exam, had no diagnosis of NPDR, had a diagnosis of diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), had received treatment for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), or were younger than 18 years. To balance covariates of interest between the cohorts, an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score for SGLT2 inhibitor exposure was used. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for VTDR, PDR, or DME relative to SGLT2 exposure. RESULTS: A total of 6065 patients who initiated an SGLT2 inhibitor were matched to 12,890 controls. There were 734 (12%), 657 (10.8%), and 72 (1.18%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, in the SGLT2 inhibitor cohort. Conversely, there were 1479 (11.4%), 1331 (10.3%), and 128 (0.99%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, among controls. After IPTW, Cox regression analysis showed no difference in hazard for VTDR, PDR, or DME in the SGLT2 inhibitor-exposed cohort relative to the unexposed group [HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15 for VTDR; HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14 for DME; HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.67 for PDR]. CONCLUSION: Exposure to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with progression of NPDR compared to patients receiving other diabetic therapies.

Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents and the Risk of Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: Animal studies have suggested that Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) may increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related retinopathies, but this effect is unclear in humans. This study evaluates the risk of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), defined as either diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), in patients exposed to an ESA. METHODS: Two analyses were performed. First, a retrospective matched-cohort study was designed using a de-identified commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database. The ESA cohort of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients who were new users of an ESA from 2000 to 2022 was matched to controls up to a 3:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria included less than 2 years in the plan, history of VTDR or history of other retinopathy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse proportional treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to assess the hazard of developing VTDR, DME, and PDR. The second analysis was a self-controlled case series (SCCS) evaluating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) of VTDR during 30-day periods before and after initiating an ESA. RESULTS: After inclusion of 1502 ESA-exposed patients compared with 2656 controls, IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios found the ESA cohort had an increased hazard of progressing to VTDR (HR = 3.0 95%CI:2.3-3.8;p < .001) and DME (HR = 3.4,95%CI:2.6-4.4,p < .001), but not PDR (HR = 1.0,95%CI:0.5-2.3,p = .95). Similar results were found within the SCCS which demonstrated higher IRRs for VTDR (IRRs = 1.09-1.18;p < .001) and DME (IRRs = 1.16-1.18;p < .001), but not increased IRRs in PDR (IRR = 0.92-0.97,p = .02-0.39). CONCLUSION: ESAs are associated with higher risks for VTDR and DME, but not PDR. Those studying ESAs as adjunctive therapy for DR should be cautious of possible unintended effects.

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Utilization and Skeletal Fragility Among Non-Infectious Uveitis Patients Exposed to Oral Glucocorticoids.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, little is known regarding bone health surveillance for glucocorticoid-exposed non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients or their baseline risks of skeletal fragility outcomes. METHODS: Using claims data, we calculated rates of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening for glucocorticoid-exposed NIU and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Separately, we compared risks of skeletal fragility metrics amongst NIU patients, RA patients, and controls, independent of glucocorticoid use. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of NIU patients to have a DXA scan was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.65; p < .001) compared to RA patients. The aHR for any skeletal fragility outcome amongst NIU patients was 0.97 (p < .02) compared to normal controls, while RA patients had excess risk (aHR, 1.15; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: NIU patients are 36% less likely to receive a DXA scan after high-dose glucocorticoid exposure compared with RA patients. No elevated risk of osteoporosis for NIU patients was found compared to normal controls.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use is associated with reduced risk for glaucoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists regulate blood glucose and are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent work showed that treatment with the GLP-1R agonist NLY01 decreased retinal neuroinflammation and glial activation to rescue retinal ganglion cells in a mouse model of glaucoma. In this study, we used an insurance claims database (Clinformatics Data Mart) to examine whether GLP-1R agonist exposure impacts glaucoma risk. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients who initiated a new GLP-1R agonist was 1:3 age, gender, race, classes of active diabetes medications and year of index date matched to patients who initiated a different class of oral diabetic medication. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used within a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model to test the association between GLP-1R agonist exposure and a new diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma, glaucoma suspect or low-tension glaucoma. RESULTS: Cohorts were comprised of 1961 new users of GLP-1R agonists matched to 4371 unexposed controls. After IPTW, all variables were balanced (standard mean deviation <|0.1|) between cohorts. Ten (0.51%) new diagnoses of glaucoma were present in the GLP-1R agonist cohort compared with 58 (1.33%) in the unexposed controls. After adjustment, GLP-1R exposure conferred a reduced hazard of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.36 to 0.89, p=0.01), suggesting that GLP-1R agonists decrease the risk for glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1R agonist use was associated with a statistically significant hazard reduction for a new diagnosis of glaucoma. Our findings support further investigations into the use of GLP-1R agonists in glaucoma prevention.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor/Histamine-2 Blocker Use and Ocular Toxoplasmosis: Findings from a Large US National Database.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. DESIGN: Retrospective, matched case-control study using data from 2000 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ocular toxoplasmosis and controls were matched 5:1 for age, sex, and race, with the eligibility date ± 3 months from the index date of exposed match. Patients aged < 18 years with congenital toxoplasmosis, having < 2 years in the insurance plan before the index date, and without ≥ 1 visit to an eyecare provider before the index date were excluded from the study. METHODS: Patients with ocular toxoplasmosis were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, and PPI use or diseases highly associated with PPIs were identified using national drug codes from an administrative medical claims database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was defined as having a prescription for a PPI or histamine-2 (H2) blocker. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, controlling for demographic and systemic health variables. RESULTS: A total of 4069 cases and 19 177 controls met the eligibility criteria. Of the 4069 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis, 989 (24.3%) were on PPI/H2 blockers compared with 3763 of 19 177 (19.2%) controls. The adjusted logistic regression model demonstrated 1.28 greater odds of PPI/H2 blocker use in cases of ocular toxoplasmosis than matched controls (95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.40; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitor/H2 blocker exposure was associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with ocular toxoplasmosis, corroborating findings from a prior case series. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Systemic disease associations with angioid streaks in a large healthcare claims database.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To assess systemic associations of angioid streaks (AS) using a large US healthcare database. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of patients diagnosed with AS in a large, national US insurer from 2000-2019. Cases were matched 1:5 to controls. The prevalence rates of established associated disease states and other systemic diseases were calculated and compared using logistic regression. Additionally, the rate of anti-VEGF treatment was assessed as a proxy for the incidence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred fifty-two cases of AS and 9028 matched controls were included. The rates of association between AS and the well-characterized conditions included: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE)-228 patients (12.3%), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-18 patients (1.0%), Paget's disease-6 patients (0.3%), hemoglobinopathies-30 patients (1.6%), and idiopathic-1573 patients (84.9%). There was a statistically higher prevalence of the following less classically associated diseases among patients with AS compared to controls: hereditary spherocytosis (1.7% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), connective tissue disease (1.0% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001) and non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (33.9% vs 10.6%, p < 0.001). Among 1442 eligible cases analyzed, 427 (29.6%) received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection with 338 (23.4%) patients having the injection after their AS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest collection of AS patients to date, the classical teaching of systemic disease associations occur at rates far, far lower than previously reported. The association of AS with other less reported diseases highlights new potential associations and may contribute to the understanding of AS formation.

Association of Treatment Type and Loss to Follow-up With Tractional Retinal Detachment in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: The association of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) interventions of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal injections (IVIs) with tractional retinal detachment (TRD) is unclear. Objectives: To determine whether different treatment types or a 6-month or longer period of loss to follow-up (LTFU) is associated with TRD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study included data from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2021, of patients with PDR. Those who progressed to TRD were matched to non-TRD controls up to a 5:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria included 2 or fewer years in the plan, history of nondiabetic retinopathy, vitreous hemorrhage, previous RD, or any other surgically indicated diagnosis. Patient data were obtained from a deidentified commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database. Statistical analysis was performed from January to May 2022. Exposures: Primary exposures of interest were prior treatment (PRP, IVI, both) and any period of 6 months or longer in which the patient received no eye care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds ratios (ORs) of IVI only compared with PRP and 6-month or longer LTFU on development of TRD. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 214 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [12.4] years; 115 female [53.7%]) with PDR and TRD were matched to 978 controls (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [11.3] years; 507 female [51.8%]) with only PDR. Among patients with TRD, 69 (32.2%) were treated with laser only, 17 (7.9%) were treated with injection only, 39 (18.2%) were treated with both, and 89 (41.6%) had no prior treatment. Among patients in the PDR-only group, 207 (21.2%) received laser only, 83 (8.5%) received injection only, 57 (5.8%) received both, and 631 (64.5%) received no treatment. After adjusted analysis, no difference in odds of TRD for patients who received injection only compared with patients who received laser only was found (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-1.14). Patients who received both treatments had higher odds of TRD compared with those who received laser only (aOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.21-4.48), and patients who had no treatment had lower odds of TRD (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.71; P < .001 for treatment category). Similarly, no difference was seen in the odds of TRD between those with LTFU for 6 months or longer and those without LTFU (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49-1.07; P = .11). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this case-control analysis suggest that there is no increased risk of TRD associated with IVI-only treatment or with 6-month or longer periods of LTFU, which supports the findings of other investigations. Nonetheless, LTFU rates continue to remain high in patients with PDR, which can contribute to substantial vision loss regardless of treatment regimen.

Association of Fenofibrate Use and the Risk of Progression to Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may progress from nonproliferative DR (NPDR) to vision-threatening DR (VTDR). Studies have investigated fenofibrate use as a protective measure with conflicting results, and fenofibrate is not typically considered by ophthalmologists in the management of DR currently. Objective: To assess the association between fenofibrate use and the progression from NPDR to VTDR, proliferative DR (PDR), or diabetic macular edema (DME). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study used medical claims data from a large US insurer. Cohorts were created from all patients with NPDR 18 years or older who had laboratory values from January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2019. Exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of PDR, DME, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, or treatment used in the care of VTDR. Patients were also excluded if they had a diagnosis of VTDR within 2 years of insurance plan entry, regardless of when NPDR was first noted in the plan. Exposures: Fenofibrate use. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were a new diagnosis of VTDR (a composite outcome of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually. A time-updating model for all covariates was used in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to determine hazards of progressing to an outcome. Additional covariates included NPDR severity scale, systemic illnesses, demographics, kidney function (based on estimated glomerular filtration rate level), hemoglobin A1c, hemoglobin, and insulin use. Results: A total of 5835 fenofibrate users with NPDR at baseline (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [10.4] years; 3564 [61.1%] male; 3024 [51.8%] White) and 144 417 fenofibrate nonusers (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [12.3] years; 73 587 [51.0%] male; 67 023 [46.4%] White) were included for analysis. Of these, 27 325 (18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4086 (2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22 750 (15.1%) progressed to DME. After controlling for all covariates, Cox model results showed fenofibrates to be associated with a decreased risk of VTDR (hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.98]; P = .01) and PDR (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.90]; P = .001) but not DME (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.03]; P = .27). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, fenofibrate use was associated with a decreased risk of PDR and VTDR but not DME alone. These findings support the rationale for additional clinical trials to determine if these associations may be representative of a causal relationship between fenofibrate use and reduced risk of PDR or VTDR.

Statin use and the risk of progression to vision threatening diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effect of statins on progression from nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Two cohort studies using a U.S. medical claims database from 2002 to 2019 including NPDR patients 18 years or older. A risk factor analysis performed a time-updating cox regression model assessing statin usage. A second new-user active comparator design analysis replicating a previously published study. Main outcomes included a new diagnosis of VTDR (composite of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually for the risk factor study and included additional outcomes of new DR, NPDR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) for the new user study. RESULTS: Risk factor analysis included 66 617 statin users with NPDR at baseline and 83 365 nonstatin users. Of these, 27 325 (18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4086 (2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22 750 (15.1%) progressed to DME. After multivariable analysis, no protective effect of statin use was found for progression to VTDR, PDR, or DME (HR = 1.01-3, p >0.33 for all comparisons). Replicated new user design analysis also showed no protective effect for statins on risk of development of DR (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, p = 0.13), PDR (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-1.02, p = 0.09), DME (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.21), VH (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16, p = 0.99), and TRD (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.89-1.38, p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Statin use was found not to be protective for progression of DR regardless of study methodology. These results suggest that the specifics of the population studied rather than differing study methodology are important in assessing the effect of statins on DR progression.

Challenges in Elucidating Ophthalmology's Standards of Care: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: Defining a standard of care is difficult, and physicians don't always agree on what it means in specific contexts. This is, in part, owing to constantly changing treatment patterns; but at the same time, the underlying framework that determines standards of care is continuously evolving. This situation presents clear challenges for all practicing physicians, including ophthalmologists. OBSERVATIONS: Complicating the issue of defining a standard of care are the confusing origins and lexicon used to describe 3 related yet distinct ideas: standard of care, practice guidelines, and gold standards. Indeed, each of these terms is defined and influenced by many stakeholders both inside and outside the health care system. The term standard of care is one example that, although used frequently as a medical term, is often decided by courts and industry. Ophthalmology itself has provided one of the most influential cases in standard-of-care law history (Helling v Carey), which standardized the routine use of tonometry after the plaintiff lost vision because of a delayed glaucoma diagnosis. But even the courts' current view of standard of care is far different than it was at that defining moment in eye care history. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Today, health care professionals typically equate standard of care with best clinical practices, and yet the law specifies a standard of minimal competence when determining standard of care. These competing definitions are, at best, misleading and, at worst, counterproductive. This narrative review examines how medical guidelines are developed, formalized, communicated, and adopted in the United States. It seeks to clarify ophthalmologists' understanding of the related but distinct ideas of standard of care, practice guidelines, and gold standards. Last, this review argues that quality of care must be distinguished from standard of care and outlines how legal definitions of standards of care can set exceedingly low benchmarks, discouraging innovation without reducing frivolous litigation.

Recent Practice Patterns in Acute Retinal Artery Occlusions in the United States.

PURPOSE: To determine how to practice patterns for work-up of incident retinal artery occlusion (RAO) compare to the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines. METHODS: In this cohort study, patients receiving a new diagnosis of RAO, either central (CRAO) or branch (BRAO), were identified between 2002 and 2020 from a large US medical claims database. Claims were reviewed for diagnostic tests specified by the AAO as essential components of an RAO work-up including carotid ultrasound, echocardiogram, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and emergency department (ED) referral. Outcomes included rates of and time to completion of work-up. RESULTS: 18697 new outpatient diagnoses of RAO (11348 BRAO, 7349 CRAO) were analyzed. 15.9% and 30.4% of patients received carotid ultrasounds within 7 and 30 days, respectively. 9.4% and 21.1% of patients received echocardiograms within 7 and 30 days, respectively. 4.9% and 8.1% of patients received a brain MRIs within 7 and 30 days, respectively. Only 4.1% of patients were referred to the ED within a day of diagnosis. Ophthalmologists diagnosed the majority (78.7%) of RAOs compared to neurologists (0.6%). Patients diagnosed by ophthalmologists were significantly more likely to have carotid ultrasound within 7 days, but those diagnosed by neurologists were more likely to have echocardiogram, MRI, and ED referral (p < .01 for all comparisons). The rates of adherence to the AAO care guidelines increased significantly between 2002 and 2020 (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The referral and work-up practices demonstrated in this new RAO diagnosis patient cohort have improved with time but are still far below the standard recommended by the AAO.

Risk of non-infectious uveitis or myasthenia gravis in patients on checkpoint inhibitors in a large healthcare claims database.

AIM: To determine if checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) confer an increased risk of non-infectious uveitis or myasthenia gravis (MG) compared to patients on non-checkpoint inhibitor (N-CPI) chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in a large commercial and Medicare advantage database exposed to CPI compared to N-CPI. All patients who initiated a CPI (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab and durvalumab) were eligible. Date of earliest CPI in the exposure group and N-CPI chemotherapy in the comparator group was considered the index date. Exclusion occurred in both cohorts for any history of uveitis or MG diagnosis and having <1 year in the insurance plan prior to the index date, and <6 months in plan following the index date. Every exposed patient was matched up to 1:10 based on demographics and index year to patients on N-CPI chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was performed. RESULTS: For evaluation of incidence of non-infectious uveitis, 26 (0.3%) of 8678 patients on CPI and 123 (0.2%) of 76 153 N-CPI comparators were found to have non-infectious uveitis. After multivariate analysis, CPIs showed an increased hazard for uveitis compared to N-CPI (HR=2.09; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.22, p=0.001). For the MG analysis, 11 (0.1%) of 9210 patients developed MG in the CPI group and 36 (0.04%) of 80 620 comparators. The CPI cohort had a higher hazard of developing MG (HR=2.60; 95% CI 1.34 to 5.07, p=0.005) compared to controls in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to CPI confers a higher risk for non-infectious uveitis and MG compared to N-CPI chemotherapy.