Evaluation of bioactive saponins and triterpenoidal aglycons for their binding properties on human endothelin ETA and angiotensin AT1 receptors.

Different types of triterpenes including saponins and aglycons were evaluated for their ability to inhibit [3H] BQ-123 and [3H] angiotensin II binding to the human endothelin 1 ETA and angiotensin II AT1 receptors, respectively. Selectivity for only one of the two receptors was exhibited by asiatic acid and its saponins (ETA) and oleanolic acid (AT1). To a lesser extent betulinic acid, beta-amyrin and friedelin also showed selectivity for the ETA receptor. To address the question whether the effect of saponins on cell membranes might interfere with the normal binding of specific radioligands to their receptors, the activity of saponins with different haemolytic properties were compared. Highly haemolytic saponins such as alpha-hederin and beta-escine showed partial (60%) inhibition of radioligand-binding to the ETA receptor and complete inhibition (100%) to the AT1 receptor. Moreover, the haemolytically inactive kryptoescine, at the same concentration, caused complete inhibiton of radioligand-binding to both receptors, indicating that inhibition of receptor binding was not related to the membrane-interacting properties of saponins.

AT1 receptor antagonists.

Type 1 receptors (AT1) for the peptide hormone angiotensin II play a crucial role in the cardiovascular homeostasis. In this regard, several selective, orally active non-peptide antagonists have been developed for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Pre-clinically, they have been routinely tested for their ability to inhibit angiotensin II induced contraction of rabbit aorta strips. This led to the distinction between surmountable antagonists, which only produce a parallel rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration- induced response curve, and insurmountable antagonists that also decrease the maximal response. The molecular mechanism that is responsible for insurmountable antagonism has been extensively investigated in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells transfected expressing the human AT1 receptor. These experiments revealed that all biphenyltetrazole-countering AT1 receptor antagonists are competitive with angiotensin II and that the insurmountable behaviour of some of them is related to the formation of a long lasting/tight binding state of the antagonist-receptor complex. This may contribute to their long lasting clinical effect. This paper also focuses on the influence of a number of methodological approaches used to study AT1 receptor antagonists on their observed in vitro receptor binding properties.

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists: new tools to investigate disorders characterized by cortisol hypersecretion.

Increased cortisol levels have been observed in patients suffering from a number of metabolic and psychiatric disorders. In some of these disorders a causal relationship has been suggested between the increased cortisol secretion and the observed clinical phenomena. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists which block cortisol effects might have a benefit in both the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. Selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonists with in vivo potency have not been described thus far, partly due to the similarity between the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. In the present studies, we report on three different chemical classes derived from the glucocorticoid/progestagen antagonist RU486. Selected compounds from the classes 11-monoaryl steroids, 11,21-bisaryl steroids and 11-aryl, 16-hydroxy steroids proved to be selective glucocorticoid receptor binders with in vivo antagonistic activity. Most compounds were able to pass the blood-brain barrier. These compounds offer the opportunity to investigate and possibly treat patients with a disturbed hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis without side effects caused by an antiprogestagenic action.

New insights in insurmountable antagonism.

Antagonists that produce parallel rightward shifts of agonist dose-response curves with no alteration of the maximal response are traditionally classified as surmountable, while insurmountable antagonists also depress the maximal response. Although the longevity of the antagonist-receptor complex is quoted in many studies to explain insurmountable antagonism, slowly interconverting receptor conformations, allosteric binding sites, and receptor internalization have been evoked as alternative explanations. To complicate matters even further, insurmountable antagonism is not only drug-related; it may also depend on the tissue, species and experimental design. For the sake of drug development, it is important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of insurmountable antagonism. New experimental approaches, such as intact cell studies and the use of computer-assisted simulations based on dynamic receptor models, herald the advent of better insight in the future.