Translating Data From an Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration System Into Knowledge: Application to Doctor-Nurse Time Discrepancy in Antibiotic Ordering and Administration.

BACKGROUND: Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) systems are being widely implemented to facilitate medication safety improvement. However, translating the resulting big data into actionable knowledge has received relatively little attention. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to use routinely collected EPMA data in the study of exact time discrepancy between physicians' order and nurses' administration of systemic antibiotics. We evaluated first and follow-up dose administration and dose intervals and examined multifactorial determinants in ordering and administration explaining potential discrepancy. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of electronic health records for all medical patient stays with antibiotic treatment from January to June 2018 (n=4392) in a large Belgian tertiary care hospital. Using an EPMA system with Barcode Medication Administration, we calculated time discrepancy between order and administration of first doses (n=6233), follow-up doses (n=87 960), and dose intervals. Multiple logistic regression analysis estimated the association between time discrepancy and various determinants in ordering and administration. RESULTS: Time discrepancy between physician order and nurse administration was <30 minutes for 48.7% of first doses and 61.7% of follow-up doses, with large variation across primary diagnoses. Greater dose intervals, oral versus intravenous administration, and order diversion from regular nurse administration rounds showed strongest association with less timely administration. CONCLUSIONS: EPMA systems show huge potential to generate actionable knowledge. Concerning antibiotic treatment, having physicians' orders coincide with regular nurse administration rounds whenever clinically appropriate, further taking contextual factors into account, could potentially improve antibiotic administration timeliness.

Validation of the Child HCAHPS survey to measure pediatric inpatient experience of care in Flanders.

The recently developed Child HCAHPS provides a standard to measure US hospitals' performance on pediatric inpatient experiences of care. We field-tested Child HCAHPS in Belgium to instigate international comparison. In the development stage, forward/backward translation was conducted and patients assessed content validity index as excellent. The draft Flemish Child HCAHPS included 63 items: 38 items for five topics hypothesized to be similar to those proposed in the US (communication with parent, communication with child, attention to safety and comfort, hospital environment, and global rating), 10 screeners, a 14-item demographic and descriptive section, and one open-ended item. A 6-week pilot test was subsequently performed in three pediatric wards (general ward, hematology and oncology ward, infant and toddler ward) at a JCI-accredited university hospital. An overall response rate of 90.99% (303/333) was achieved and was consistent across wards. Confirmatory factor analysis largely confirmed the configuration of the proposed composites. Composite and single-item measures related well to patients' global rating of the hospital. Interpretation of different patient experiences across types of wards merits further investigation. CONCLUSION: Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for systematic and cross-national assessment of pediatric inpatient experiences. Sharing and implementing international best practices are the next logical step. What is Known: • Patient experience surveys are increasingly used to reflect on the quality, safety, and centeredness of patient care. • While adult inpatient experience surveys are routinely used across countries around the world, the measurement of pediatric inpatient experiences is a young field of research that is essential to reflect on family-centered care. What is New: • We demonstrate that the US-developed Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for international benchmarking of pediatric inpatient experiences with care through parents and guardians. • Our study findings show considerable variation in experiences for types of pediatric services. Support to share good practices and launch quality improvement initiatives can be obtained by organizing regular two-way feedback sessions with clinicians to place the findings in context.

Reallocation of operating room capacity using the due-time model.

BACKGROUND: Demand for surgical treatment is rising while operating room (OR) resources are limited. Requests for more resources therefore can only be partly met by repartitioning the existing sparse resources. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to define a method to allocate OR block times among surgical disciplines in such a way that patients can be treated within an acceptable time after the need for surgery is established. In this paper, we introduce and explore the potential of the concept of the individual patient deviation from the optimal due time (DT) as a potential driver for OR (re-) allocation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Using retrospective data for abdominal and gynecologic surgery, we analyzed DT deviation and 3 additional modifiers. From this analysis, a reallocation of OR time to the different (sub-) specialties was calculated using a simple model. RESULTS: The results show the capability of measuring and visualizing relative overcapacity versus undercapacity of OR resources with respect to this patient-centered metric of DT. The reallocation results from the model show a potentially significant shift between programs. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the "due-time" concept as a valid measure to quantify OR resource use. The use of a DT-based model provides a transparent, acceptable system for regular reallocation of OR times between and within specialties.

Portal hypertension after combined liver and intestinal transplantation, a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge?

A widely accepted technique to transplant the liver-bowel bloc is first to perform a piggyback anastomosis of the donor suprahepatic vena cava to the recipient vena cava; second to restore the arterial blood supply through an aortic interposition graft; and third to ensure venous drainage of the native foregut. The venous drainage of the native foregut can be restored through an end-to-end portocaval anastomosis between the donor infrahepatic vena cava and the recipient portal vein. Stenosis of this anastomosis can lead to portal hypertension presenting with upper GI congestion, bleeding, and hypersplenism. We report the successful treatment of this complication using an e-PTFE-covered stent inserted following balloon angioplasty.

Long-term outcome of transcatheter embolotherapy for acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the safety, short- and long-term efficacy, and durability of transcatheter embolization for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (LGH) unresponsive to endoscopic therapy and to analyze the overall survival of the embolized patients. METHODS: Between January 1997 and January 2008, 122 patients were referred for angiographic evaluation to control major LGH. Overall, 43 patients (35.3%) presented with angiographic signs of contrast extravasation. In 39 patients (26 men, 13 women; mean age 67.7 years), a transcatheter embolization was performed to stop the bleeding. RESULTS: In all 39 patients, no contrast extravasation could be depicted on completion of angiography after embolization. Rebleeding occurred in eight patients (20%), in six of them within the first 30 days after embolization. Ischemic intestinal complications requiring surgery occurred in four patients (10%) within 24 h after embolization. Long-term follow-up depicted estimated survival rates of 70.6, 56.5, and 50.8% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter embolotherapy to treat lower gastrointestinal bleeding is very effective, with a relatively low rebleeding and ischemic complication rate, mostly occurring within the first month after the embolization. Long-term follow-up shows a very low late rebleeding rate, and half of the embolized patients survive more than 5 years. This study shows that the majority of patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal bleeding, unresponsive to endoscopic therapy, do not benefit from transcatheter embolization. In cases of angiography extravasation, a good immediate clinical outcome-defined as high immediate success with acceptable rebleeding-and ischemic complication rate may be obtained.

Barriers to evidence-based nursing: a focus group study.

AIM: This paper reports a study to explore the barriers to evidence-based nursing among Flemish (Belgian) nurses. BACKGROUND: Barriers obstructing the call for an increase in evidence-based nursing have been explored in many countries, mostly through quantitative study designs. Authors report on lack of time, resources, evidence, authority, support, motivation and resistance to change. Relationships between barriers are seldom presented. METHODS: We used a grounded theory approach, and five focus groups were organized between September 2004 and April 2005 in Belgium. We used purposeful sampling to recruit 53 nurses working in different settings. A problem tree was developed to establish links between codes that emerged from the data. FINDINGS: The majority of the barriers were consistent with previous findings. Flemish (Belgian) nurses added a potential lack of responsibility in the uptake of evidence-based nursing, their 'guest' position in a patient's environment leading to a culture of adaptation, and a future 'two tier' nursing practice, which refers to the different education levels of nurses. The problem tree developed serves as (1) a basic model for other researchers who want to explore barriers within their own healthcare system and (2) a useful tool for orienting change management processes. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that the problem tree presented is context-specific for Flanders (Belgium), it gives an opportunity to develop clear objectives and targeted strategies for tackling obstacles to evidence-based nursing.