Lobular and non-lobular breast cancers differ regarding axillary lymph node metastasis: a cross-sectional study on 4,292 consecutive patients.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 8-14% of all breast cancers and carries distinct prognostic and biologic implications. The goal of our study was to investigate the impact of lobular histology on axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement. This is a cross-sectional study of 4,292 consecutive patients surgically treated for breast carcinoma at the University Hospitals Leuven. Logistic regression analysis was used to relate ILC to lymph node involvement while controlling for the following clinicopathologic features: tumor size, multifocal disease, tumor grade, lobular subtype and the combined steroid, and Her-2 status. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIS) were computed. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients that underwent a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure. The observed incidence of ILC was 13%. ILCs were larger, were more often grade II, multifocal, steroid receptor positive and Her-2 negative, and tended to be present in older patients. Incidence of ALN involvement was 42.0% for ILCs versus 38.3% for other tumors (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.40). For the SLN subgroup, ILCs were less often ALN positive than non-ILCs (20.5% versus 28.3%, OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-1.00). In the multivariable analysis, the lobular subtype was identified as less likely to have ALN involvement (adjusted OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.82). The analysis for the SLN subgroup showed comparable results (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.78). This study has demonstrated that the lobular subtype is an independent predictor of lymph node involvement with ILC having a lower incidence of involved lymph nodes. The mildly higher incidence of ALN metastasis in lobular cancers in univariable analysis is not due to the lobular subtype, but due to confounding factors that interact with lymph node involvement.

Prediction of lymph node involvement in breast cancer from primary tumor tissue using gene expression profiling and miRNAs.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether lymph node involvement in breast cancer is influenced by gene or miRNA expression of the primary tumor. For this purpose, we selected a very homogeneous patient population to minimize heterogeneity in other tumor and patient characteristics. First, we compared gene expression profiles of primary tumor tissue from a group of 96 breast cancer patients balanced for lymph node involvement using Affymetrix Human U133 Plus 2.0 microarray chip. A model was built by weighted Least-Squares Support Vector Machines and validated on an internal and external dataset. Next, miRNA profiling was performed on a subset of 82 tumors using Human MiRNA-microarray chips (Illumina). Finally, for each miRNA the number of significant inverse correlated targets was determined and compared with 1000 sets of randomly chosen targets. A model based on 241 genes was built (AUC 0.66). The AUC for the internal dataset was 0.646 and 0. 651 for the external datasets. The model includes multiple kinases, apoptosis-related, and zinc ion-binding genes. Integration of the microarray and miRNA data reveals ten miRNAs suppressing lymph node invasion and one miRNA promoting lymph node invasion. Our results provide evidence that measurable differences in gene and miRNA expression exist between node negative and node positive patients and thus that lymph node involvement is not a genetically random process. Moreover, our data suggest a general deregulation of the miRNA machinery that is potentially responsible for lymph node invasion.

Prevalent breast cancer patients with a homozygous mutant status for CYP2D6*4: response and biomarkers in tamoxifen users.

Retrospective studies suggest that single nucleotide polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) gene predict reduced tamoxifen metabolism, better tolerance and worse treatment outcome. We hypothesized that women with this genotype lack tamoxifen-induced endometrial and biochemical changes in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). We identified 56 breast cancer patients attending the follow-up clinic with a homozygous mutant (HM) status for the CYP2D6*4 null variant. Here, we report a detailed assessment of tamoxifen activity in 19 CYP2D6 HM women, while they were using tamoxifen either for metastatic (n = 5) or for early disease (n = 14). We assessed response to tamoxifen in metastatic disease. Endometrial appearances and serum levels of FSH and SHBG were assessed from retrospective and prospective testing. Our findings do suggest that the presence of two CYP2D6*4 alleles does not exclude a durable response of tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer. The transvaginal ultrasonographic appearance of the endometrium in CYP2D6*4/*4 patients on tamoxifen is similar as seen in the normal population of tamoxifen users. The endometrium is increased in thickness with subepithelial cysts and endometrial polyps. Serum levels of FSH and SHBG in CYP2D6*4 HM tamoxifen users were in the range of what would be expected during tamoxifen treatment in the general population. Our findings do show CYP2D6*4/*4 carriers to have activity of tamoxifen on breast cancer, endometrium and serum levels of FSH and SHBG. They support clinical trials prospectively testing the effect of CYP2D6 genetic variability in response to tamoxifen before denying this drug to breast cancer patients only based on their CYP2D6*4 status.