Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 237: 108163, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38359521

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess patient and surrogate understanding of and satisfaction with communication regarding acute stroke treatments of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS: In this single health-system prospective observational study, patients or their surrogates were interviewed within 72 h of acute stroke therapy. Respondent's satisfaction and self-reported understanding were rated on a Likert scale. Responses to open-ended questions were evaluated for recall of purpose and risks of treatment. RESULTS: Of 56 completed interviews (24 patients and 32 surrogates), 33 patients received IVT alone, 11 IVT and EVT, 12 EVT alone. Forty participants (71%) reported being extremely satisfied with their acute stroke care, 46 (82%) reported no difficulty understanding the purpose of treatment, while 36 (64%) reported no difficulty understanding risks. Two or more risks were verbalized by 8 (24%) participants for IVT, 2 (17%) for EVT, and 7 (64%) for both IVT and EVT. Brain bleeding was the most recalled risk for IVT and "lack of benefit" for EVT. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the participants were extremely satisfied and reported no difficulty understanding purpose and risks of acute stroke treatment, however only 30% were able to verbalize two or more risks associated with the treatment.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Terapia Trombolítica , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Satisfacción del Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Neurology ; 100(4): e408-e421, 2023 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Declines in stroke admission, IV thrombolysis (IVT), and mechanical thrombectomy volumes were reported during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a paucity of data on the longer-term effect of the pandemic on stroke volumes over the course of a year and through the second wave of the pandemic. We sought to measure the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volumes of stroke admissions, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), IVT, and mechanical thrombectomy over a 1-year period at the onset of the pandemic (March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021) compared with the immediately preceding year (March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study across 6 continents, 56 countries, and 275 stroke centers. We collected volume data for COVID-19 admissions and 4 stroke metrics: ischemic stroke admissions, ICH admissions, IVT treatments, and mechanical thrombectomy procedures. Diagnoses were identified by their ICD-10 codes or classifications in stroke databases. RESULTS: There were 148,895 stroke admissions in the 1 year immediately before compared with 138,453 admissions during the 1-year pandemic, representing a 7% decline (95% CI [95% CI 7.1-6.9]; p < 0.0001). ICH volumes declined from 29,585 to 28,156 (4.8% [5.1-4.6]; p < 0.0001) and IVT volume from 24,584 to 23,077 (6.1% [6.4-5.8]; p < 0.0001). Larger declines were observed at high-volume compared with low-volume centers (all p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in mechanical thrombectomy volumes (0.7% [0.6-0.9]; p = 0.49). Stroke was diagnosed in 1.3% [1.31-1.38] of 406,792 COVID-19 hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 infection was present in 2.9% ([2.82-2.97], 5,656/195,539) of all stroke hospitalizations. DISCUSSION: There was a global decline and shift to lower-volume centers of stroke admission volumes, ICH volumes, and IVT volumes during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the prior year. Mechanical thrombectomy volumes were preserved. These results suggest preservation in the stroke care of higher severity of disease through the first pandemic year. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This study is registered under NCT04934020.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , COVID-19 , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragias Intracraneales , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Volumen Sistólico , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Stroke ; 53(12): e496-e499, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36321458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in children of the United States is unknown, and it is uncertain how the burden of CVT hospitalizations in children changed over the last decade. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the State Inpatient Database and Kid's inpatient database. All new CVT cases in children (0-19 years) in the New York 2006 to 2018 State Inpatient Database (n=705), and all cases of CVT in the entire US contained in the 2006 to 2019 Kid's inpatient database (weighted n=6115) were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases (ICDs) codes. Incident counts were combined with census data to compute incidence. Between-group differences in incidence were tested using 2-proportions Z-test, and Joinpoint regression was used to trend incidence over time. RESULTS: Across the study period, 48.2% of all incident CVT cases and 44.6% of all CVT admissions nationally were in girls. Of all incident cases, 27.2% were infants and 65.8% of these infants were neonates. Average incidence across the study period was (1.1/100 000/year, SE:0.04) but incidence in infants (6.4/100 000/year) was at least 5 times the incidence in other age groups (1-4 years: 0.7/100 000/year, 15-19 years: 1.2/100 000/year). Incidence and national burden of CVT admissions was higher in girls in adolescents 15 to 19 years, but overall burden was higher in boys in other age groups. Age- and sex-standardized CVT incidence increased by 3.8% annually (95% CI, 0.2%-7.6%), while the overall burden of admissions increased by 4.9% annually (95% CI, 3.6%-6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: CVT incidence in New York and national burden of CVT increased significantly over the last decade.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis Intracraneal , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales , Trombosis de la Vena , Niño , Adolescente , Masculino , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Preescolar , Incidencia , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis Intracraneal/epidemiología , New York/epidemiología , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/epidemiología
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(5): 810-820, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35916117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device captures embolic debris during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact of CEP on stroke severity following TAVR remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether CEP was associated with reduced severity of stroke following TAVR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2839 consecutive patients (mean age: 79.2 ± 9.5 years, females: 41.5%) who underwent transfemoral TAVR at our institution between 2013 and 2020. We categorized patients into Sentinel CEP users and nonusers. Neuroimaging data were reviewed and the final diagnosis of a cerebrovascular event was adjudicated by a neurologist blinded to the CEP use or nonuse. We compared the incidence and severity (assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) of stroke through 72 h post-TAVR or discharge between the two groups using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity scores. RESULTS: Of the eligible patients, 1802 (63.5%) received CEP during TAVR and 1037 (36.5%) did not. After adjustment for patient characteristics by stabilized IPTW, the rate of overall stroke was numerically lower in CEP users than in CEP nonusers, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (0.49% vs. 1.18%, p = 0.064). However, CEP users had significantly lower rates of moderate-or-severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 6: 0.11% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.013) and severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 15: 0% vs. 0.29%, p = 0.046). Stroke following CEP use (n = 8), compared with stroke following CEP nonuse (n = 15), tended to carry a lower NIHSS (median [IQR], 4.0 [2.0-7.0] vs. 7.0 [4.5-19.0], p = 0.087). Four (26.7%) out of 15 patients with stroke following CEP nonuse died within 30 days, with no death after stroke following CEP use. CONCLUSIONS: CEP use may be associated with attenuated severity of stroke despite no significant difference in overall stroke incidence compared with CEP nonuse. This finding is considered hypothesis-generating and needs to be confirmed in large prospective studies.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Dispositivos de Protección Embólica , Embolia Intracraneal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embolia Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Intracraneal/epidemiología , Embolia Intracraneal/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...