Concurrent use of two dual-combination drenches containing monepantel/abamectin and oxfendazole/levamisole in sheep: effect on marker residues 21 and 28 days after administration.

AIMS: To determine the concentration, in comparison with the maximum residue limit (MRL), of anthelmintic marker residues in the target tissues (liver and fat) of sheep treated concurrently with two oral drenches, one containing monepantel and abamectin and the other oxfendazole and levamisole. METHODS: On day 0 of the study, 12 sheep (six male and six female; 8-9-months old) were dosed according to individual body weight determined the day prior. Zolvix Plus (dual-active oral drench containing 25 g/L monepantel and 2 g/L abamectin) was administered to all animals prior to administration of Scanda (dual-active oral drench containing 80 g/L levamisole hydrochloride and 45.3 g/L oxfendazole). Six sheep (three male and three female) were slaughtered 21 and 28 days after treatment and renal fat and liver samples were collected.Using validated methods, analyses for monepantel sulfone, abamectin, levamisole and oxfendazole (expressed as total fenbendazole sulfone following conversion of the combined concentrations of oxfendazole, fenbendazole and fenbendazole sulfone) were performed on liver samples while renal fat specimens were analysed for monepantel sulfone and abamectin residues only. Detected concentrations were compared to the established MRL in sheep for each analyte determined by the Ministry for Primary Industries. RESULTS: All residues detected in samples of liver and fat collected 21 and 28 days after treatment were below the MRL for each analyte. All liver samples collected on day 21 had detectable monepantel sulfone (mean 232 (min 110, max 388) µg/kg) and oxfendazole (mean 98.7 (min 51.3, max 165) µg/kg) residues below the MRL (5,000 and 500 µg/kg, respectively). Monepantel sulfone (mean 644 (min 242, max 1,119) µg/kg; MRL 7,000 µg/kg) residues were detected in 6/6 renal fat samples. Levamisole residues were detected in 3/6 livers (mean 40.0 (min 14.3, max 78.3) µg/kg; MRL 100 µg/kg), and abamectin residues in 1/6 livers (0.795 µg/kg; MRL 25 µg/kg) and 2/6 fat samples, (mean 0.987 (min 0.514, max 1.46) µg/kg; MRL 50 µg/kg) 21 days after treatment. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that concurrent administration of Zolvix Plus and Scanda to sheep is unlikely to result in an extended residue profile for any of the active ingredients, with all analytes measured being under the approved New Zealand MRL 21 days after treatment. This work was not completed in line with guidance for establishing official residue profiles, nor is it sufficient to propose a new withholding period.

Characterization of multiple life stages of two Australian Fasciola hepatica isolates in sheep.

Information on the susceptibility status of Fasciola hepatica isolates is lacking in the literature, even for those isolates considered to be laboratory reference strains. Four controlled efficacy studies were conducted on two Fasciola hepatica isolates from Australia, viz. 'Oberon' and 'Sunny Corner' with treatment at either 2, 6 or 10 weeks post-infection (wpi) as defined in each study. Fluke burdens and examination of livers occurred at necropsy in weeks 12 (Study 1) or 13 (Studies 2, 3 and 4) post-infection. The triclabendazole (TCBZ) resistance status of the Oberon isolate was confirmed in 6 and 10-week old F. hepatica, utilizing the drug alone (Fasinex; 71.5% and 31.1%, respectively) and in combination with oxfendazole (Flukazole C; 79.9% and 0%, respectively). The susceptibility of this isolate to albendazole, as well as salicylanilide and sulphonamide drugs was confirmed. The Sunny Corner isolate was confirmed as susceptible to TCBZ (>99% all stages) and closantel (>90% at ≥6 wpi).

Application of a coproantigen ELISA as an indicator of efficacy against multiple life stages of Fasciola hepatica infections in sheep.

At present diagnosis of true resistance and determination of drug efficacy in Fasciola hepatica infection rely solely on terminal experiments. The coproantigen ELISA (cELISA) has been reported previously as a sensitive and specific tool appropriate to detect treatment failure, and potentially drug resistance. Two studies were conducted to determine whether the cELISA was appropriate for on-farm efficacy and resistance testing in Australian Merino sheep. In Study 1 sheep were infected orally with 50 F. hepatica metacercariae on three occasions, twelve, six and two weeks prior to a single flukicide treatment with triclabendazole, closantel or albendazole. Sheep were sampled weekly for a further seven weeks prior to necropsy. Following effective treatment, no faecal antigen was detected from 1 week. When immature stages (≤6 weeks) survived treatment, coproantigen reappeared from 6 weeks post-treatment. Therefore, cELISA conducted 1-4 weeks after treatment will demonstrate obvious treatment failure against adult F. hepatica, but is not sufficiently sensitive to detect survival of immature fluke until these reach maturity. In study 2, fluke burdens of sheep necropsied 13 weeks post single infection were compared to fecal worm egg counts (FWEC) and cELISA at necropsy. Regression analysis demonstrated that cELISA correlated strongly with fluke burden, whilst FWEC correlated weakly with cELISA. The correlation between FWEC and fluke burden was also weak, although stronger than that of FWEC with cELISA. The cELISA is an appropriate tool for monitoring effectiveness of treatments against Fasciola hepatica if an adult infection is present, however when immature stages of the parasite are present it is not as reliable. Where immature parasites are present it is recommended that initial cELISA be followed with a secondary cELISA at least 6 weeks after treatment to ensure resistance to immature stages is detected. Further testing is justified for monitoring the effectiveness of control programs by detecting adult populations that have survived a treatment regime.

Effective control of a suspected cyromazine-resistant strain of Lucilia cuprina using commercial spray-on formulations of cyromazine or dicyclanil.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the protection of Merino sheep from flystrike by Lucilia cuprina with cyromazine or dicyclanil in an implant study and in the field. METHODS: In the implant study, sheep were treated with cyromazine or dicyclanil and implanted with 1st-stage larvae from a newly isolated field strain of L. cuprina (CYR-LS) or a reference strain (DZR50), then assessed over 3 days and compared with the implants on untreated control sheep. In the field study, weaner lambs were treated with cyromazine or dicyclanil and monitored weekly for flystrike over 18 weeks of grazing on the same farm from which the L. cuprina were isolated. RESULTS: Implant study: cyromazine (6%) provided effective protection against CYR-LS and DZR50 L. cuprina for a minimum of 13 and 10 weeks, respectively. Dicyclanil (5%) provided at least 18 weeks' protection against both strains. Field study: only 1 of 386 lambs in the cyromazine-treated group was struck in the first 14 weeks of the trial. No strikes occurred in the 198 sheep treated with dicyclanil (5%). Rainfall, temperature and flytrap data indicated consistent fly pressure during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of these studies, there was no evidence of reduced susceptibility to cyromazine or dicyclanil and the periods of protection of sheep against L. cuprina were unaffected and consistent with the registered label claims.

Clinical field study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the amino-acetonitrile derivative, monepantel, compared with registered anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of monepantel, a developmental compound from the amino-acetonitrile derivative class of anthelmintics, against field infections of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. PROCEDURES: Comparisons of efficacy (using standard faecal worm egg count reduction tests) and safety (on the basis of visual observations) were made in a large-scale field study in Australia, between groups of sheep treated with either an oral solution of monepantel or a registered anthelmintic. The sheep were naturally infected with the major gastrointestinal nematode genera present in Australia. RESULTS: The post-treatment efficacy results for monepantel were: at 7 days (+/-1 day) efficacy was >98%; at 14 days (+/-1 day) it was generally close to or >99%; and at 21 days (+/-1 day) efficacy was consistently >99%. A high proportion of the targeted nematode populations were confirmed as being resistant to one or more of the currently available anthelmintic classes. CONCLUSIONS: Monepantel when used under field conditions at a minimum dose rate of 2.5 mg/kg was highly effective against mixed-genus natural field infections of the major gastrointestinal nematode genera including Haemonchus, Teladorsagia (Ostertagia), Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Chabertia and Oesophagostomum. This result included efficacy against some populations resistant to the currently available broad-spectrum anthelmintics. Few Cooperia spp. were present to allow confirmation of efficacy against this genus. On no occasion after treatment did any commercial anthelmintic-treated groups have significantly lower faecal egg counts than the monepantel-treated groups. Monepantel was safe for the target animals and human operators when used in a field situation.

Safety of an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), monepantel, in ewes and their offspring following repeated oral administration.

AIM: To demonstrate the clinical and reproductive safety in ewes and their offspring of repetitive oral doses of monepantel, an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), when administered at three times the proposed maximum recommended dose (MRD) over an entire reproductive cycle. METHODS: A randomised controlled blinded study design was used. One hundred and twelve primi- or multi-parous ewes and 28 rams were randomly allocated into control and treated groups (n=56 for groups of ewes, n=14 for groups of rams). Two control ewes and two treated ewes were randomly selected to form 28 subgroups. A control or treated ram was then randomly allocated to each subgroup, to form control ram/treated ewe, control ram/control ewe, treated ram/treated ewe, and treated ram/control ewe 'treatment/mating' units. Control animals were treated with saline, and treated animals given three times the MRD (11.25 mg/kg) of monepantel. Treatments were administered orally every 5 days during an entire reproductive cycle, including oestrus and mating, gestation, and post-lambing to weaning. Detailed recording at multiple time points were made of veterinary examinations; observations for adverse events; bodyweight measurements; faecal scores; and haematology, clinical chemistry and coagulation variables. Reproductive indices determined included percent pregnant, number of failed embryos, abortion percentage, number of lambs with teratogenic defects, length of gestation, percentage of stillbirths, number of ewes experiencing reproductive problems, lambing percentage, and pre-weaning mortality. Post-mortem examination, including measurement of organ weights, was performed on randomly selected ewes (n=40) and lambs (n=40) at the completion of the study. RESULTS: All ewes treated with monepantel and those in the control group thrived and behaved normally to the end of the study. No treatment-related, toxicologically relevant adverse events, clinical observations or gross post-mortem changes were observed. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in bodyweight or organ weights, and haematological, clinical chemistry or coagulation variables between ewes treated with monepantel and control ewes. No significant differences were observed in any of the reproductive indices measured. No significant clinical differences were noted between lambs born from treated ewes and those from controls. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Repeated oral administration of monepantel at three times the MRD every 5 days over an entire reproductive cycle was not associated with any treatment-related adverse effects on the reproductive performance of ewes nor on the viability of their offspring, and was systemically very well tolerated. This study demonstrated that this population of ewes could tolerate accidental overdoses of up to three times the MRD of monepantel or prolonged repetitive administration of overdoses. Thus, those so treated entering a breeding programme would have normal reproductive indices, mating behaviour, and health, and their lambs would suffer no ill effects.

Reproductive safety of an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), monepantel, in rams following repeated oral administration.

AIM: To demonstrate the clinical and reproductive safety in rams of repetitive oral doses of monepantel, an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), when administered at three times the proposed maximum recommended dose (MRD) over an entire spermatogenic cycle and during mating with ewes. METHODS: A randomised controlled blinded study design was used with 28 rams randomly divided into two groups. The control group was treated with saline, and the other group was given three times the MRD (11.25 mg/kg) of monepantel. Treatments were administered orally every 5 days, for 100 days, during an entire spermatogenic cycle and subsequent mating period. Detailed recording at multiple time points were made of veterinary examinations; observations for adverse events; bodyweight measurements; faecal scores; haematology, clinical chemistry and coagulation variables; semen indices; evaluation of serving capacity; and gross pathology (including measurement of organ weights) performed on 10 rams from each group at the completion of the study. RESULTS: All rams treated with monepantel and those in the control group thrived and behaved normally to the end of the study. No treatment-related, toxicologically relevant adverse events, clinical observations or macroscopic changes were observed. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in bodyweight or organ weights, and haematological, clinical chemistry or coagulation variables between rams treated with monepantel and control rams. No significant changes were observed in any semen variable measured in any rams, and the serving capacity of rams mated to ewes was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Repeated oral administration of monepantel at three times the MRD every 5 days over an entire spermatogenic cycle and during mating was not associated with any treatment-related adverse effects on the reproductive performance of rams and was systemically very well tolerated. This study demonstrated that this population of rams could tolerate accidental overdoses of up to three times the MRD of monepantel or prolonged repetitive administration at overdoses. Thus, those so treated entering a breeding programme would have normal sperm indices, mating behaviour, and health.

Performance characteristics of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay performed in milk for the detection of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection in cattle.

AIM: To determine the performance characteristics of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) in bovine milk. METHODS: Serum and milk from liver fluke infected and non-infected cattle was assayed in a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum test results were used to determine the "gold standard" infection status of cattle and milk ELISA results assessed by ROC analysis. RESULTS: ROC analysis suggested changes to the ELISA protocol, arriving at milk dilutions assayed considerably higher than those suggested by the manufacturer. With those changes, the ELISA performed with high sensitivity and specificity, 95 and 98.2%, respectively, for individual bovine milks (relative to sera). For bovine tank milks, sensitivity was lower, with bulk milks only testing positive if 60% or more of cattle milking in the herd were infected. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the ELISA's performance when used on individual bovine milks demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. ROC analyses optimised the assay conditions and cut-off point suggested by the manufacturer for this commercial diagnostic assay. This would help with the identification and control of fasciolosis, enabling simpler sample collection.