RESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) is commonly used in the outpatient setting with increasing use in hospitalized patients. However, there is limited literature describing its use in critically ill populations. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to report the practices of buprenorphine prescribing among ICU teams. We also assessed the effect of a novel initiation strategy on opioid requirements in the ICU and the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. DESIGN SETTING PARTICIPANTS: Single-center, retrospective, descriptive study of patients receiving buprenorphine in the ICU. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was to describe the use of buprenorphine in ICU patients through indication, initiation strategy, dosing information, and time from ICU admission to the first dose. We also detailed the incidence of precipitated withdrawal overall and the difference in opioid requirements before and after a low-dose induction strategy (buprenorphine initiated while receiving full agonist opioids [5-d titration from 150 µg to 4 mg four times daily]). RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included. Most patients (86.3%) received buprenorphine for treatment of OUD. Of the 75 patients taking buprenorphine before admission, 46 (61%) had it restarted within 24 hours of ICU admission. Among 95 patients requiring buprenorphine induction, 57 (60%) underwent standard induction and 38 (40%) underwent low-dose induction, with only one instance of precipitated withdrawal. Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of concomitant full agonist opioids in patients completing low-dose induction decreased from 1057.5 mg to 262.5 mg in the 24 hours before initiation compared with the 24 hours after target buprenorphine dose was reached (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Use of sublingual buprenorphine was most often in patients with OUD. Timely continuation of home buprenorphine in the ICU was suboptimal. Both standard and low-dose induction strategies appear to be safe with a low risk of precipitating withdrawal. When implemented appropriately, low-dose buprenorphine induction may lead to significant reduction in full agonist opioids in critically ill patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis (MS) experience a wide range of symptoms requiring pharmacologic management, and many do not achieve adequate symptom control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of medical cannabis (MC) as part of a comprehensive treatment plan for patients with MS. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of 141 patients with MS receiving MC for symptom management was conducted. Data were collected for up to 4 follow-up appointments after initiation of MC. Outcomes included changes in MS symptoms, medication changes, adverse events, and changes in cognition and mobility. RESULTS: Patients experienced extensive MS symptom improvement after initiation of MC, with alleviation of pain (72% of patients) and spasticity (48% of patients) and improvement in sleep (40% of patients) the most common. There was a significant reduction in concomitant opioid use after initiating MC as evidenced by a significant decrease in daily morphine milligram equivalents among patients prescribed opioid analgesics (P = .01). Decreases in muscle relaxant use and benzodiazepine use did not reach significance (P > .05). The most common adverse reaction to MC was fatigue (11% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: In many patients with MS, MC was well tolerated, eased pain and spasticity, improved sleep and other symptoms, and reduced use of concomitant opioid analgesics. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate the role of MC in the treatment of patients with MS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following the expiration of brand name exclusivity of Plavix® in 2012, generic clopidogrel bisulfate was approved. As a widely prescribed medication with significant inter-patient pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, data regarding the impact of switching to generic clopidogrel bisulfate on patients is needed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether generic clopidogrel bisulfate is as efficacious as Plavix® for the inhibition of platelet aggregation. METHODS: Patients treated with Plavix® monotherapy (n = 254) or generic clopidogrel bisulfate monotherapy (n = 185) were included in this retrospective review. Confounding factors previously found to affect clopidogrel responsiveness (diabetes, female sex, and smoking) were assessed, as well as medications classified as substrates, inducers, and inhibitors of enzymes involved in clopidogrel metabolism. Whole blood impedance aggregometry was used to measure platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate. Patients were tested after ≥2 weeks of treatment and designated as non-responders if aggregation response exceeded sensitivity thresholds of 6 ohms of impedance. RESULTS: The introduction of generic clopidogrel bisulfate was associated with a decrease in antiplatelet resistance (44% to 31%, p < 0.01) and decreased mean ohms of resistance (5.06 ± 4.55 to 3.32 ± 4.03, p < 0.01). Prior to analysis of secondary outcomes, 217 patients were eliminated due to antiplatelet usage for longer than 3 years (n = 123 for Plavix® and n = 118 for clopidogrel). There was no statistically significant finding in prevalence of secondary events. CONCLUSION: Resistance rates to the antiplatelet, clopidogrel are significantly lower since the switch to generic formulations. Further investigation into the impact of variability between clopidogrel bisulfate formulations is needed.
