Defining clinically relevant outcome thresholds for pain and function after osteochondral autograft transplantation of the knee.

PURPOSE: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for measures of pain and function at 2, 5 and 10 years after osteochondral autograft transplantations (OATs). METHODS: Patients undergoing OATs of the knee were identified from a prospectively maintained cartilage surgery registry. Baseline demographic, injury and surgical factors were collected. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) were collected at baseline, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Marx activity scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. The MCIDs were quantified for each metric utilizing a distribution-based method equivalent to one-half the standard deviation of the mean change in outcome score. The percentage of patients achieving MCID as a function of time was assessed. RESULTS: Of 63 consecutive patients who underwent OATs, 47 (74.6%) patients were eligible for follow-up (surgical date before October 2021) and had fully completed preoperative PROMs. A total of 39 patients (83%) were available for a minimum 2-year follow-up, with a mean (±standard deviation) follow-up of 5.8 ± 3.4 years. The MCIDs were determined to be 9.3 for IKDC, 2.5 for Marx, 7.4 for KOS-ADLS and 12.9 for pain. At 2 years, 78.1% of patients achieved MCID for IKDC, 77.8% for Marx, 75% for KOS-ADLS and 57.9% for pain. These results were generally maintained through 10-year follow-ups, with 75% of patients achieving MCID for IKDC, 80% for Marx, 80% for KOS-ADLS and 69.8% for pain. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients achieved a clinically relevant outcome improvement after OATs of the knee, with results sustained through 10-year follow-up. Patients who experience clinically relevant outcome improvement after OATs in the short term continue to experience sustained benefits at longer-term follow-up. These data provide valuable prognostic information when discussing patient candidacy and the expected trajectory of recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Currently Available Large Language Models Do Not Provide Musculoskeletal Treatment Recommendations That are Concordant With Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

PURPOSE: To determine whether leading, commercially-available LLMs provide treatment recommendations concordant with evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). METHODS: All CPGs concerning the management of rotator cuff tears(n=33) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries(n=15) were extracted from the AAOS. Treatment recommendations from Chat-generative pretrained transformer version-4 [ChatGPT-4; OpenAI], Gemini (Google), Mistral-7B (Mistral AI), and Claude-3 (Anthropic) were graded by two blinded physicians as being "concordant," "discordant," or "indeterminate" (i.e., neutral response without definitive recommendation) with respect to AAOS CPGs. The overall concordance between LLM and AAOS recommendations were quantified, while the comparative overall concordance of recommendations amongst the four LLMs was evaluated through the Fischer's-exact test. RESULTS: Overall 135(70.3%) responses were concordant, 43(22.4%) indeterminate, and 14(7.3%) discordant. Inter-rater reliability for concordance classification was excellent (Kappa=0.92). Concordance with AAOS CPGs was most frequently observed with ChatGPT-4 (n=38, 79.2%), and least frequently with Mistral-7B (n=28,58.3%). Indeterminate recommendations were most frequently observed with Mistral-7B (n=17,35.4%) and least frequently with Claude-3 (n=8, 6.7%). Discordant recommendations were most frequently observed with Gemini (n=6,12.5%) and least frequently with ChatGPT-4 (n=1,2.1%). Overall, no statistically significant differences in concordant recommendations was observed across LLMs (p=0.12). Only 20 (10.4%) of all recommendations were transparent and provided references with full bibliographic details or links to specific peer-reviewed content to support recommendations. CONCLUSION: Among leading commercially-available LLMs, more than one-in-four recommendations concerning the evaluation and management of rotator cuff and ACL injuries do not reflect current evidenced-based CPGs. Although ChatGPT-4 demonstrated the highest performance, clinically significant rates of recommendations without concordance or supporting evidence were observed. Only 10% of responses by LLMs were transparent, precluding users from fully interpreting the sources from which recommendations were provided. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While leading LLMs generally provide recommendations concordant with CPGs, a substantial error-rate exists, and the proportion of recommendations that do not align with these CPGs suggest that LLMs are not trustworthy clinical support tools at this time. Each off-the-shelf, closed-source LLM has strengths and weaknesses. Future research should evaluate and compare multiple LLMs to avoid bias associated with narrow evaluation of few models as observed in current literature.

Understanding How ChatGPT May Become a Clinical Administrative Tool Through an Investigation on the Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Concerning Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.

Background: The consumer availability and automated response functions of chat generator pretrained transformer (ChatGPT-4), a large language model, poise this application to be utilized for patient health queries and may have a role in serving as an adjunct to minimize administrative and clinical burden. Purpose: To evaluate the ability of ChatGPT-4 to respond to patient inquiries concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and compare these results with the performance of Google. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Google Web Search was used as a benchmark, as it is the most widely used search engine worldwide and the only search engine that generates frequently asked questions (FAQs) when prompted with a query, allowing comparisons through a systematic approach. The query "ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction" was entered into Google, and the top 10 FAQs, answers, and their sources were recorded. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to perform a Google search of FAQs with the same query and to record the sources of answers for comparison. This process was again replicated to obtain 10 new questions requiring numeric instead of open-ended responses. Finally, responses were graded independently for clinical accuracy (grade 0 = inaccurate, grade 1 = somewhat accurate, grade 2 = accurate) by 2 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons (D.W.A, J.S.D.) blinded to the search engine and answer source. Results: ChatGPT-4 used a greater proportion of academic sources than Google to provide answers to the top 10 FAQs, although this was not statistically significant (90% vs 50%; P = .14). In terms of question overlap, 40% of the most common questions on Google and ChatGPT-4 were the same. When comparing FAQs with numeric responses, 20% of answers were completely overlapping, 30% demonstrated partial overlap, and the remaining 50% did not demonstrate any overlap. All sources used by ChatGPT-4 to answer these FAQs were academic, while only 20% of sources used by Google were academic (P = .0007). The remaining Google sources included social media (40%), medical practices (20%), single-surgeon websites (10%), and commercial websites (10%). The mean (± standard deviation) accuracy for answers given by ChatGPT-4 was significantly greater compared with Google for the top 10 FAQs (1.9 ± 0.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.6; P = .001) and top 10 questions with numeric answers (1.8 ± 0.4 vs 1 ± 0.8; P = .013). Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 is capable of providing responses with clinically relevant content concerning UCL injuries and reconstruction. ChatGPT-4 utilized a greater proportion of academic websites to provide responses to FAQs representative of patient inquiries compared with Google Web Search and provided significantly more accurate answers. Moving forward, ChatGPT has the potential to be used as a clinical adjunct when answering queries about UCL injuries and reconstruction, but further validation is warranted before integrated or autonomous use in clinical settings.

Contemporary Patterns of Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Rheumatologic Disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Rheumatologic diseases encompass a group of disabling conditions that often require expensive clinical treatments and limit an individual's ability to work and maintain a steady income. The purpose of this study was to evaluate contemporary patterns of financial toxicity among patients with rheumatologic disease and assess for any associated demographic factors. METHODS: The cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey was queried from 2013 to 2018 for patients with rheumatologic disease. Patient demographics and self-reported financial metrics were collected or calculated including financial hardship from medical bills, financial distress, food insecurity, and cost-related medication (CRM) nonadherence. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess for factors associated with increased financial hardship. RESULTS: During the study period, 20.2% of 41,502 patients with rheumatologic disease faced some degree of financial hardship due to medical bills, 55.0% of whom could not pay those bills. Rheumatologic disease was associated with higher odds of financial hardship from medical bills (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.36; p < 0.001) with similar trends for patients suffering from financial distress, food insecurity, and CRM nonadherence (p < 0.001 for all). Financial hardship among patients with rheumatologic disease was associated with being younger, male, Black, and uninsured ( p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: In this nationally representative study, we found that a substantial proportion of adults with rheumatologic disease in the United States struggled with paying their medical bills and suffered from food insecurity and CRM nonadherence. National health care efforts and guided public policy should be pursued to help ease the burden of financial hardship for these patients.

Current Concepts on the Management of Shoulder Instability in Throwing Athletes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management of shoulder instability in throwing athletes remains a challenge given the delicate balance between physiologic shoulder laxity facilitating performance and the inherent need for shoulder stability. This review will discuss the evaluation and management of a throwing athlete with suspected instability with a focus on recent findings and developments. RECENT FINDINGS: The vast majority of throwing athletes with shoulder instability experience subtle microinstability as a result of repetitive microtrauma rather than episodes of gross instability. These athletes may present with arm pain, dead arms or reduced throwing velocity. Recent literature reinforces the fact that there is no "silver bullet" for the management of these athletes and an individualized, tailored approach to treatment is required. While initial nonoperative management remains the hallmark for treatment, the results of rehabilitation protocols are mixed, and some patients will ultimately undergo surgical stabilization. In these cases, it is imperative that the surgeon be judicious with the extent of surgical stabilization as overtightening of the glenohumeral joint is possible, which can adversely affect athlete performance. Managing shoulder instability in throwing athletes requires a thorough understanding of its physiologic and biomechanical underpinnings. Inconsistent results seen with surgical stabilization has led to a focus on nonoperative management for these athletes with surgery reserved for cases that fail to improve non-surgically. Overall, more high quality studies into the management of this challenging condition are warranted.

The Large Language Model ChatGPT-4 Exhibits Excellent Triage Capabilities and Diagnostic Performance for Patients Presenting With Various Causes of Knee Pain.

PURPOSE: To provide a proof-of-concept analysis of the appropriateness and performance of ChatGPT-4 to triage, synthesize differential diagnoses, and generate treatment plans concerning common presentations of knee pain. METHODS: Twenty knee complaints warranting triage and expanded scenarios were input into ChatGPT-4, with memory cleared prior to each new input to mitigate bias. For the 10 triage complaints, ChatGPT-4 was asked to generate a differential diagnosis that was graded for accuracy and suitability in comparison to a differential created by 2 orthopaedic sports medicine physicians. For the 10 clinical scenarios, ChatGPT-4 was prompted to provide treatment guidance for the patient, which was again graded. To test the higher-order capabilities of ChatGPT-4, further inquiry into these specific management recommendations was performed and graded. RESULTS: All ChatGPT-4 diagnoses were deemed appropriate within the spectrum of potential pathologies on a differential. The top diagnosis on the differential was identical between surgeons and ChatGPT-4 for 70% of scenarios, and the top diagnosis provided by the surgeon appeared as either the first or second diagnosis in 90% of scenarios. Overall, 16 of 30 diagnoses (53.3%) in the differential were identical. When provided with 10 expanded vignettes with a single diagnosis, the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 increased to 100%, with the suitability of management graded as appropriate in 90% of cases. Specific information pertaining to conservative management, surgical approaches, and related treatments was appropriate and accurate in 100% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4 provided clinically reasonable diagnoses to triage patient complaints of knee pain due to various underlying conditions that were generally consistent with differentials provided by sports medicine physicians. Diagnostic performance was enhanced when providing additional information, allowing ChatGPT-4 to reach high predictive accuracy for recommendations concerning management and treatment options. However, ChatGPT-4 may show clinically important error rates for diagnosis depending on prompting strategy and information provided; therefore, further refinements are necessary prior to implementation into clinical workflows. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although ChatGPT-4 is increasingly being used by patients for health information, the potential for ChatGPT-4 to serve as a clinical support tool is unclear. In this study, we found that ChatGPT-4 was frequently able to diagnose and triage knee complaints appropriately as rated by sports medicine surgeons, suggesting that it may eventually be a useful clinical support tool.

The Number of Patients Lost to Follow-Up May Exceed the Fragility Index of a Randomized Controlled Trial Without Reversing Statistical Significance: A Systematic Review and Statistical Model.

PURPOSE: To (1) analyze trends in the publishing of statistical fragility index (FI)-based systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature, including the prevalence of misleading or inaccurate statements related to the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and patients lost to follow-up (LTF), and (2) determine whether RCTs with relatively "low" FIs are truly as sensitive to patients LTF as previously portrayed in the literature. METHODS: All FI-based studies published in the orthopaedic literature were identified using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases. All articles involving application of the FI or reverse FI to study the statistical fragility of studies in orthopaedics were eligible for inclusion in the study. Study characteristics, median FIs and sample sizes, and misleading or inaccurate statements related to the FI and patients LTF were recorded. Misleading or inaccurate statements-defined as those basing conclusions of trial fragility on the false assumption that adding patients LTF back to a trial has the same statistical effect as existing patients in a trial experiencing the opposite outcome-were determined by 2 authors. A theoretical RCT with a sample size of 100, P = .006, and FI of 4 was used to evaluate the difference in effect on statistical significance between flipping outcome events of patients already included in the trial (FI) and adding patients LTF back to the trial to show the true sensitivity of RCTs to patients LTF. RESULTS: Of the 39 FI-based studies, 37 (95%) directly compared the FI with the number of patients LTF. Of these 37 studies, 22 (59%) included a statement regarding the FI and patients LTF that was determined to be inaccurate or misleading. In the theoretical RCT, a reversal of significance was not observed until 7 patients LTF (nearly twice the FI) were added to the trial in the distribution of maximal significance reversal. CONCLUSIONS: The claim that any RCT in which the number of patients LTF exceeds the FI could potentially have its significance reversed simply by maintaining study follow-ups is commonly inaccurate and prevalent in orthopaedic studies applying the FI. Patients LTF and the FI are not equivalent. The minimum number of patients LTF required to flip the significance of a typical RCT was shown to be greater than the FI, suggesting that RCTs with relatively low FIs may not be as sensitive to patients LTF as previously portrayed in the literature; however, only a holistic approach that considers the context in which the trial was conducted, potential biases, and study results can determine the merits of any particular RCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons may benefit from re-examining their interpretation of prior FI reviews that have made claims of substantial RCT fragility based on comparisons between the FI and patients LTF; it is possible the results are more robust than previously believed.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Alternative Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Statistical Fragility Index-Based Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Based in part on the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that suggest a beneficial effect over alternative treatment options, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is widespread and increasing. However, the extent to which these studies are vulnerable to slight variations in the outcomes of patients remains unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the statistical fragility of conclusions from RCTs that reported outcomes of patients with knee OA who were treated with PRP versus alternative nonoperative management strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: All RCTs comparing PRP with alternative nonoperative treatment options for knee OA were identified. The fragility index (FI) and reverse FI were applied to assess the robustness of conclusions regarding the efficacy of PRP for knee OA. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the minimum number of patients from ≥1 trials included in the meta-analysis for which a modification on the event status would change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect. RESULTS: In total, this analysis included outcomes from 1993 patients with a mean ± SD age of 58.0 ± 3.8 years. The mean number of events required to reverse significance of individual RCTs (FI) was 4.57 ± 5.85. Based on random-effects meta-analyses, PRP demonstrated a significantly higher rate of successful outcomes when compared with hyaluronic acid (P = .002; odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.33-3.62), as well as higher rates of patient-reported symptom relief (P = .019; OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.24), not requiring a reintervention after the initial injection treatment (P = .002; OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.33-3.53), and achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain improvement (P = .007; OR, 6.19; 95% CI, 1.63-23.42) when compared with all alternative nonoperative treatments. Overall, the mean number of events per meta-analysis required to change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect was 8.67 ± 4.50. CONCLUSION: Conclusions drawn from individual RCTs evaluating PRP for knee OA demonstrated slight robustness. On meta-analysis, PRP demonstrated a significant advantage over hyaluronic acid as well as improved symptom relief, lower rates of reintervention, and more frequent achievement of the MCID for pain improvement when compared with alternative nonoperative treatment options. Statistically significant pooled treatment effects evaluating PRP for knee OA are more robust than approximately half of all comparable meta-analyses in medicine and health care. Future RCTs and meta-analyses should consider reporting FIs and fragility quotients to facilitate interpretation of results in their proper context.

Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Not Needed to Identify Collapse When Using the Association Research Circulation Osseous Staging System.

Background: The 2019 Revised Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) Staging Criteria for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH) only requires plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose and stage ONFH; however, the effectiveness of the 2019 ARCO criteria in the absence of computed tomography (CT) scans has not been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether CT scanning is a necessary modality for diagnosing/staging ONFH using the ARCO staging system. More specifically, do CT scans help differentiate pre- and post-collapse lesions more than MRI scans? Methods: A study was conducted on 228 ONFH patients diagnosed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, at a single academic medical center. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by the senior author and other contributors. The ONFH classification was compared between the 2 scans to determine if CT scans were able to further differentiate staging of collapsed lesions vs MRI scans. Results: A diagnosis of ONFH was made by MRI first in 57% (129/228) while 21% (48/228) used MRI and CT simultaneously. Only 22% (51/228) of cases were diagnosed by CT scans first. There were no cases where collapse was found by a CT scan that were not diagnosed by standard x-rays and/or MRIs. Conclusions: CT scans are not a useful adjunct for diagnosing or treating ONFH and are not necessary if MRI is ordered when using the Revised ARCO Staging System for ONFH diagnosis.

Survival analyses and their applications in orthopaedics.

Survival analyses are a powerful statistical tool used to analyse data when the outcome of interest involves the time until an event. There is an array of models fit for this goal; however, there are subtle differences in assumptions, as well as a number of pitfalls, that can lead to biased results if researchers are unaware of the subtleties. As larger amounts of data become available, and more survival analyses are published every year, it is important that healthcare professionals understand how to evaluate these models and apply them into their practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to present an overview of survival analyses, including required assumptions and important pitfalls, as well as examples of their use within orthopaedic surgery.

Trends in Outpatient Cervical Spine Surgery: Are There Emerging Disparities?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) assess disparities in relative utilization of outpatient cervical spine surgery between White and Black patients from 2010 to 2019 and (2) to measure how these racial differences have evolved over time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although outpatient spine surgery has become increasingly popularized over the last decade, it remains unknown how racial disparities in surgical utilization have translated to the outpatient setting and whether restrictive patterns of access to outpatient cervical spine procedures may exist. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Relative utilization of outpatient (same-day discharge) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (OP-ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (OP-CDR) were assessed and trended over time between races. Multivariable regressions were subsequently utilized to adjust for baseline patient factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo OP-ACDF or OP-CDR surgery when compared with White patients ( P <0.03 for both OP-ACDF and OP-CDR). From 2010 to 2019, a persisting disparity over time was found in outpatient utilization for both ACDF and CDR ( e.g. White vs. Black OP-ACDF: 6.0% vs. 3.1% in 2010 compared with 16.7% vs. 8.5% in 2019). These results held in all adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting racial disparities in outpatient spine surgery and demonstrates an emerging disparity in outpatient cervical spine utilization among Black patients. These restrictive patterns of access to same-day outpatient hospital and surgery centers may contribute to broader disparities in the overall utilization of major spine procedures that have been previously reported. Renewed interventions are needed to both understand and address these emerging inequalities in outpatient care before they become more firmly established within our orthopedic and neurosurgery spine delivery systems.

Puncture Capsulotomy Technique for Hip Arthroscopy: Midterm Functional Outcomes.

Background: The most common surgical approaches in hip arthroscopy are interportal and T-capsulotomy. However, these methods may introduce capsular instability. Puncture capsulotomy preserves capsuloligamentous integrity by avoiding iatrogenic transection of the iliofemoral capsular ligament. Purpose: To present minimum 2-year functional outcomes for patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for acetabular labral tears and concomitant femoroacetabular impingement using the puncture capsulotomy technique. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral tear treatment between December 2013 and May 2019. Included were patients aged ≥18 years who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon and completed a minimum of 2 years of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) surveys. Intraoperatively, patients underwent hip arthroscopy via puncture capsulotomy to treat labral tears and any concomitant femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical outcome data consisted of PROMs. Results: A total of 163 hips were included; the mean patient follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 24-60 months; 95% CI, 28.5-32.3 months). Patients had a mean age of 37.9 years (range, 36.1-39.6 years), with a mean body mass index of 25.9 (range, 25.2-26.5). There were significant improvements in mean [95% CI] baseline to final follow-up scores for the 33-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (39.6 [36.8-42.4] vs 76.1 [72.7-79.6]), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (70.0 [67.0-73.0] vs 89.3 [87.3-91.3]), modified Harris Hip Score (60.1 [57.9-62.4] vs 84.9 [82.5-87.2]), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (41.8 [37.9-45.6] vs 75.7 [71.7-79.7]) (P < .001 for all). Additionally, the mean [95% CI] visual analog scale pain scores were noted to significantly improve throughout the duration of the postoperative period (from 6.3 [5.9-6.7] to 2.2 [1.8-2.6]; P < .001). There were no incidences of infection, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, dislocation/instability, or femoral neck fracture. At the 2-year follow-up, 81.0%, 62.0%, and 58.9% of hips achieved previously published clinically meaningful iHOT-33 thresholds for minimally clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom Score, and substantial clinical benefit, respectively. Conclusion: Puncture capsulotomy demonstrated significantly improved functional and clinically meaningful outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up, along with a minimal complication rate.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty Care: A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States; however, racial and ethnic disparities in utilizations and outcomes have been well documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated associations between race/ethnicity and several metrics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In August 2021, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases were queried. Sixty three studies investigating racial/ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations, complications, mortalities, lengths of stay (LOS), discharge dispositions, readmissions, and reoperations were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A majority of studies demonstrated disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes. Black patients exhibited higher rates of 30-day complications (THA odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.29; TKA OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), 30-day mortality (THA OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.48), prolonged LOS (THA mean difference [MD] +0.27 days, 95% CI 0.21-0.33; TKA MD +0.30 days, 95% CI 0.20-0.40), nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37-1.57; TKA OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.96), and 30-day readmissions (THA OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19; TKA OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.21) than White patients. Rates of complications (THA 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36), prolonged LOS (TKA MD +0.20 days, 95% CI 0.17-0.23), and nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45; TKA OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22-1.53) were also increased among Hispanic patients, while Asian patients experienced longer LOS (TKA MD +0.09 days, 95% CI 0.05-0.12) but fewer readmissions. Outcomes among American Indian-Alaska Native and Pacific Islander patients were infrequently reported but similarly inequitable. CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes are apparent, with minority patients often demonstrating lower rates of utilizations and worse postoperative outcomes than White patients. Continued research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of recent efforts dedicated to eliminating inequalities in TJA care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty in Octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important aspects of the transition to outpatient (OP) arthroplasty is patient selection, with guidance traditionally recommending that OP total knee arthroplasty (TKA) be reserved for patients <80 years old. However, there are limited data as to whether older age should really be considered a contraindication to OP-TKA. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of complications and readmissions following OP-TKA in patients ≥80 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019. Patients ≥80 years undergoing OP (same-day discharge) TKA were propensity matched to patients ≥80 years undergoing inpatient (IP) TKA based on age, gender, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, functional status, smoking status, anesthetic type, and medical comorbidities. There were 1,418 patients (709 IPs and 709 OPs) included. All baseline factors were successfully matched between IP-TKA versus OP-TKA (P ≥ .18 for all). Thirty-day complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission rates were identical between patients undergoing IP-TKA and OP-TKA (3.5% versus 3.5%, P = 1.0). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major complications (2.7% versus 2.0%, P = .38), reoperations (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .44), or mortalities (0.3% versus 0.3%, P = 1.0) within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Octogenarians undergoing OP-TKA had comparable complication rates to similar patients undergoing IP-TKA. OP-TKA can be performed safely in select octogenarians and age ≥80 years likely does not need to be a uniform contraindication to OP-TKA.

Complications and predictors of morbidity for hip fracture surgery in patients with chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are at increased risk of complications after a fracture of the hip, there remains little information about the risk factors for acute postoperative complications and their overall outcome.The aim of this study was to describe inpatient postoperative complications and identify predictors of postoperative morbidity. METHODS: Patients with CLD who had been treated for a fracture of the hip between April 2005 and August 2019 were identified from a retrospective search of an intramural trauma registry based in the Northeastern United States. Medical records were reviewed for baseline demographics, preoperative laboratory investigations, and outcomes. RESULTS: The trauma registry contained 110 patients with CLD who had undergone surgery for a fracture of the hip. Of these, patients with a platelet-count of ⩽100,000/µL were 3.81 (95% CI, 1.59-9.12) times more likely to receive a transfusion than those with a platelet-count of >100,000/µL. Those with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of >9 were 5.54 (2.33-13.16) times more likely to receive a transfusion and 3.97 (1.06-14.81) times more likely to develop postoperative delirium than those with a MELD score of ⩽9.Of patients without chronic kidney disease, those with a creatinine of ⩾1.2 mg/dL were 6.80 (1.79-25.87) times more likely to develop acute renal failure (ARF) than those with a creatinine of <1.2 mg/dL. In a multivariable model, as MELD score was increased, the odds of developing a composite postoperative complication, which included transfusion, ARF, delirium, or deep wound infection, were 1.29 (1.01-1.66). Other tools used to assess surgical risks, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser, and American Society of Anesthesiologist scores, were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLD who undergo surgery for a hip fracture have a high rate of postoperative complications which can be predicted by the preoperative laboratory investigations identified in this study and MELD scores, but not by other common comorbidity indices.

Evidence-Based Hamstring Injury Prevention and Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Hamstring injuries are common among athletes. Considering the potentially prolonged recovery and high rate of recurrence, effective methods of prevention and risk factor management are of great interest to athletes, trainers, coaches, and therapists, with substantial competitive and financial implications. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature concerning evidence-based hamstring training and quantitatively assess the effectiveness of training programs in (1) reducing injury incidence and (2) managing injury risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A computerized search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus with manual screening of selected reference lists was performed in October 2020. Randomized controlled trials investigating methods of hamstring injury prevention and risk factor management in recreational, semiprofessional, and professional adult athletes were included. RESULTS: Of 2602 articles identified, 108 were included. Eccentric training reduced the incidence of hamstring injury by 56.8% to 70.0%. Concentric hamstring strength increased with eccentric (mean difference [MD], 14.29 N·m; 95% CI, 8.53-20.05 N·m), concentric, blood flow-restricted, whole-body vibration, heavy back squat, FIFA 11+ (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), and plyometric training methods, whereas eccentric strength benefited from eccentric (MD, 26.94 N·m; 95% CI, 15.59-38.30 N·m), concentric, and plyometric training. Static stretching produced greater flexibility gains (MD, 10.89°; 95% CI, 8.92°-12.86°) than proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (MD, 9.73°; 95% CI, 6.53°-12.93°) and dynamic stretching (MD, 6.25°; 95% CI, 2.84°-9.66°), although the effects of static techniques were more transient. Fascicle length increased with eccentric (MD, 0.90 cm; 95% CI, 0.53-1.27 cm) and sprint training and decreased with concentric training. Although the conventional hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio was unchanged (MD, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06), the functional H/Q ratio significantly improved with eccentric training (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16). In addition, eccentric training reduced limb strength asymmetry, while H/Q ratio and flexibility imbalances were normalized via resistance training and static stretching. CONCLUSION: Several strategies exist to prevent hamstring injury and address known risk factors. Eccentric strengthening reduces injury incidence and improves hamstring strength, fascicle length, H/Q ratio, and limb asymmetry, while stretching-based interventions can be implemented to improve flexibility. These results provide valuable insights to athletes, trainers, coaches, and therapists seeking to optimize hamstring training and prevent injury.

Association Between Surgical Opioid Prescriptions and Opioid Initiation by Opioid-naïve Spouses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical opioid prescriptions are associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by operative patients' spouses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adverse effects of surgical opioids on operative patients have been well described. Whether risks of surgical opioids extend to operative patients' family members is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of opioid-naïve, married patients undergoing 1 of 11 common surgeries from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2017. The adjusted association between surgical opioid prescriptions and opioid initiation by the operative patient's spouse in the 6-months after surgery was assessed. Secondary analyses assessed how this association varied with postoperative time. RESULTS: There were 318,022 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 48.8 ±9.3 years; 49.5% women). Among the 50,833 (16.0%) patients that did not fill a surgical opioid prescription, 2152 (4.2%) had spouses who filled an opioid prescription within 6-months of their surgery. In comparison, among the 267,189 (84.0%) patients who filled a surgical opioid prescription, 15,026 (5.6%) had spouses who filled opioid prescriptions within 6-months of their surgery [unadjusted P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.43, P < 0.001]. Associated risks were only mildly elevated in postoperative month 1 (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.04) before increasing to a peak in postoperative month 3 (aOR 1.57,95% CI 1.391.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical opioid prescriptions were associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by spouses of operative patients, suggesting that risks associated with surgical opioids may extend beyond the surgical patient. These findings may highlight the importance of preoperative counseling on safe opioid use, storage, and disposal for both patients and their partners.

Multivariable regression: understanding one of medicine's most fundamental statistical tools.

Multivariable regression is a fundamental tool that drives observational research in orthopaedic surgery. However, regression analyses are not always implemented correctly. This study presents a basic overview of regression analyses and reviews frequent points of confusion. Topics include linear, logistic, and time-to-event regressions, causal inference, confounders, overfitting, missing data, multicollinearity, interactions, and key differences between multivariable versus multivariate regression. The goal is to provide clarity regarding the use and interpretation of multivariable analyses for those attempting to increase their statistical literacy in orthopaedic research.

Inappropriate prescribing of opioids for patients undergoing surgery.

In response to the opioid epidemic in the United States, states have passed policies aimed at regulating how opioids are prescribed by physicians. For such policies to be effective, however, opioids must be prescribed to the patients for whom they are intended. Whether opioid prescriptions are written for those who are not intended to consume them is empirically difficult to show. In a commercially insured population, we examined opioid prescriptions written for and filled by spouses of patients undergoing outpatient surgery on the day of a patient's surgery compared with the surrounding days. Because patients may be unable to fill prescriptions themselves immediately after surgery, surgeons may prescribe opioids to a patient's spouse, which would be clinically inappropriate. Among 450,125 opioid-naïve couples studied, for patients who did not fill perioperative opioid prescriptions themselves, the rate of spousal fills on the day of surgery (DOS) was 2.39 fills per 1,000 surgeries compared with 0.44 fills on all other perioperative days (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 5.5, 95% CI, 4.6-6.5). Increases in spousal opioid fills were not present for patients that filled opioid prescriptions themselves. These findings suggest intentional, clinically inappropriate prescribing of opioids.

Comparative Outcomes and Surgical Timing for Operative Fragility Hip Fracture Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic had wide-reaching effects on healthcare delivery, including care for hip fractures, a common injury among older adults. This study characterized factors related to surgical timing and outcomes, length-of-stay, and discharge disposition among patients treated for operative hip fractures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to historical controls. A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted from 16 March-20 May 2020 with a consecutive series of 64 operative fragility hip fracture patients at three tertiary academic medical centers. Historical controls were matched based on sex, surgical procedure, age, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and time-to-surgery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, length-of-stay, discharge disposition, and time to obtain a COVID-19 test result. There was no difference in 30-day mortality, complication rates, length-of-stay, anesthesia type, or time-to-surgery, despite a mean time to obtain a final preoperative COVID-19 test result of 17.6 h in the study group. Notably, 23.8% of patients were discharged to home during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to 4.8% among controls (p = 0.003). On average, patients received surgical care within 48 h of arrival during the COVID-19 pandemic. More patients were discharged to home rather than a facility with no change in complications, suggesting an opportunity for increased discharge to home.