Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 87(1): 141-149, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28478030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) may be managed by endoscopic transmural drainage and endoscopic transmural necrosectomy, with stent placement at endoscopic drainage sites. The optimal stent choice is yet to be determined. We compared outcomes after endoscopic management of WON using either large-caliber fully covered self-expandable metal stents (LC-SEMSs) or double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPSs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes among patients who received LC-SEMSs or DPPSs before endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for WON. RESULTS: Among 94 patients included, WON resolution rates did not differ between the DPPS (36 patients) and LC-SEMS (58 patients) groups, whether concomitant percutaneous drainage was considered a failure (75% vs 82.8%; P = .36) or not (91.7% vs 94.8%; P = .55). Of 75 patients (80%) successfully treated without percutaneous drainage, 37 (49%) underwent endoscopic transmural drainage without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy. WON was more likely to resolve without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy in the LC-SEMS group than the DPPS group (60.4% vs 30.8%; P = .01). WON resolution without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy remained more likely with LC-SEMSs (odds ratio, 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-15.5]) after adjusting for patient age and size and location of WON. Rates of adverse events were similar except for clinically significant bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention, which was higher with DPPSs than LC-SEMSs (14% vs 2%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Management of pancreatic WON with LC-SEMSs appears to decrease both the need for repeated necrosectomy procedures and the risk of intervention-related hemorrhage.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentación , Drenaje/instrumentación , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Plásticos , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Adulto , Anciano , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Ultrasonografía
2.
Clin Endosc ; 50(1): 42-50, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28147472

RESUMEN

Despite advances in lifestyle interventions, anti-obesity medications, and metabolic surgery, the issue of health burden due to obesity continues to evolve. Interest in endoscopic bariatric techniques has increased over the years, as they have been shown to be efficacious, reversible, relatively safe, and cost effective. Further, these techniques offer a therapeutic window for some patients who may otherwise be unable to undergo bariatric surgery. This article aims to review the literature on the safety and efficacy of currently offered endoscopic bariatric techniques, as well as those that are in the pipeline of end-development and regulatory approval.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...