RESUMEN
Background Current research is limited in exploring the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on the discharge location within elective spine surgery. Further understanding of the influence of SDOH on disposition is necessary to improve outcomes. This study explores how SDOH influence discharge disposition for patients undergoing one- or two-level posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). Methods This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Patients who underwent TLIF/PLIF between 2017 and 2020 at a single academic medical center were identified. The chart review gathered demographics, perioperative characteristics, intra/post-operative complications, discharge disposition, and 90-day outcomes. Discharge dispositions included subacute nursing facility (SNF), home with self-care (HSC), home with health services (HHS), and acute rehab facility (ARF). Demographic, perioperative, and disposition outcomes were analyzed by chi-square analysis and one-way ANOVA based on gender, race, and income quartiles. Results Propensity score matching for significant demographic factors isolated 326 patients. The rate of discharge to SNF was higher in females compared to males (25.00% vs 10.56%; p=0.001). Men were discharged to home at a higher rate than women (75.4% vs 61.95%; p=0.010). LatinX patients had the highest rate of home discharge, followed by Asians, Caucasians, and African Americans (83.33% vs 70.31% vs 66.45% vs 65.90%; p<0.001). The post hoc Tukey test demonstrated statistically significant differences between Asians and all other races in the context of age and BMI. Additionally, patients discharged to SNF showed the highest Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, followed by those at ARF, HHS, and HSC (4.36 vs 4.05 vs 2.87 vs 2.37; p<0.001). The estimated median income for the cohort ranged from $52,000 to $250,001, with no significant differences in income seen across comparisons. Conclusion Discharge disposition following one- or two-level TLIF/PLIF shows significant association with gender and race. No association was seen when comparing discharge rates among zip code-level median income quartiles.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Studies investigating complications between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are limited. Therefore, we investigated whether octogenarians are at greater odds of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS) (2) readmission rates, (3) medical complications, and (4) hardware complications compared to non-octogenarians following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective query of the PearlDiver database isolated 1,775,460 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2005 to 2014. Patients aged 80 and above represented the study cohort (n = 295,908) and patients 65 to 79 represented the control cohort (n = 1,479,552). Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio according to gender and medical comorbidities. Pearson's Chi Square and logistic regression were used to analyze the primary outcomes of the study which included 90-day medical complications, 90-day readmission rates, 2-year implant-related complications, and in-hospital LOS. A p-value less than 0.001 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Octogenarians were found to have significantly higher incidence and odds of 90-day readmission rates (10.59 vs. 9.35%; OR: 1.15, p < 0.0001) and significantly longer in-hospital LOS (3.69 days ± 1.95 vs. 3.23 days ± 1.83, p < 0.0001) compared to controls. Octogenarians also had equal incidence and odds of developing any medical complication (1.26 vs. 1.26%; OR: 0.99, p = 0.99) and lower incidence and odds (1.67 vs. 1.93%; OR: 0.86, p < 0.001) of implant-related complications compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Octogenarians undergoing primary TKA have similar odds of medical related complications and lower odds of implant-related complications compared to non-octogenarian patients, whereas readmission rates and in-hospital LOS are greater.
