[Influence of photosynthetic parameters on leaf longevity].

Higher plants show a wide range of leaf lifespan (LL) variability. LL is calculated as a sum of functional LL(f) (corresponding to the time of active photosynthesis and CO2 accumulation in the leaf) and nonfunctional LL(n) (the time of photosynthetic activity absence). For evergreen species of boreal zones, LL(n) corresponds to the period of winter rest. Photosynthetic potential of leaf (PPL), interpreted as the maximum possible amount of CO2 that can be fixed during its life, can be estimated on the basis of maximum photosynthesis rate (P(a)) dynamics during LL(f); the maximum (P(a max)) being achieved in mature leaf. Photosynthetic potential depends on LL(f) more strongly than on P(a max). The PPL/LL(f) ratio is indicative of the rate of PPL realization over leaf lifespan. As LL(f) shows strong positive correlation with LL, the latter parameter can also characterize the rate of PPL realization. Long LL(f) in evergreen species provides higher PPL, which is advantageous by comparison with deciduous ones. In evergreen species, the PPL itself is realized slower than in deciduous ones. The increase in LL(f) and LL is accompanied by the increase in leaf constructional cost (LCC(a)) as well as the decrease in photosynthesis rate. At that, photosynthesis rate per unit of dry weight (P(m)) decreases much faster than that per unit of leaf area (P(a)). Apparently, when considering dry leaf weight, the apoplast share seems to be much higher in long-living leaves of evergreen species than in short-living leaves of deciduous species. The leaf payback (LP) may be stabilized by unidirectional shifts in PPL and LCC(a). Species with short/long LL(f) and high/low PPL realization rate are typical for early/late succession stages and for habitats with the environmental conditions favorable/adverse for photosynthesis and growth. If the conditions for photosynthesis and growth are favorable, high PPL realization rate provides advantage in competition. The PPL realization rate is coupled with the rate of leaf senescence.

[The analysis of the causes of variability of the relationship between leaf dry mass and area in plants].

The lamina dry mass: area ratio (LMA - Leaf Mass per Area) is a quite variable trait. Leaf dry mass consists of symplast mass (a set of all leaf protoplasts) and apoplast mass (a set of all cell walls in a leaf). The ratio between symplast and apoplast masses is positively related to any functional trait of leaf calculated per unit of dry mass. The value of this ratio is defined by cells size and their number per unit of leaf area, number of mesophyll cells layers and their differentiation between palisade and spongy ones, and also by density of cells packing. The LMA value is defined by leaf thickness and density. The extent and direction of variability in both leaf traits define the extent and direction of variability in LMA. Negative correlation between leaf thickness and density reduces the level of LMA variability. As a consequence of this correlation the following pattern emerges: the thinner a leaf, the denser it is. Changes in the traits that define the LMA value take place both within a species under the influence of environmental factors and between species that differ in leaf structure and functions. Light is the most powerful environmental factor that influences the LMA, increase in illumination leading to increase in LMA. This effect occurs during leaf growth at the expense of structural changes associated with the reduction of symplast/apoplast mass ratio. Under conditions of intense illumination, LMA may increase due to accumulation of starch. With regard to the majority of leaf functions, the mass of starch may be ascribed to apoplast. Starch accumulation in leaves is observed also under conditions of elevated CO2 concentration in the air. Under high illumination, however, LMA increases also due to increased apoplast contribution to leaf dry mass. Scarce mineral nutrition leads to LMA increase due to lowering of growth zones demands for phothosyntates and, therefore, to increase in starch content of leaves. High level of mineral nutrition during leaf growth period leads to LMA increase at the expense of mesophyll thickening where components of photosynthesis system are located. When additional environmental factors are involved, starch accumulation may be partly responsible for increase in LMA. LMA increase at the expense of starch accumulation, unlike that at the expense of mesophyll thickening, is accompanied by increased leaf density. Under conditions of water deficiency LMA increases, which in mature leaf may be caused by starch accumulation. LMA increase during leaf growth period under conditions of water deficiency is associated with decrease in the symplast/apoplast mass ratio.

[Possible ways of negative influence of acid gases on plants]. / Vozmozhnye puti negativnogo vliianiia kislykh gazov na rasteniia.

The degree of negative influence of acid gases on plants is considered in dependence of their solubility in water. The linkage of water in the processes of hydration of gases forming acids can decrease the chemical potential of water in leaf apoplast. It causes the decrease in water inflow into leaf symplast. The more solubility of acid gases in water and the higher their concentration in the air, the lower water inflow from apoplast to symplast. At high concentration of toxicant water chemical potential in leaf apoplast is lower, than in symplast, and the water flows out into apoplast, i.e. plasmolis takes place. Plasmolis leads to the increase in toxicant concentration in leaf symplast and finally to the necrosis of cells. When air with acid gases are dissolving in apoplast water, "concentrating" of acid gases takes place because the acid components are more soluble in water than the main components of the air (nitrogen and oxygen). The lower acid dissociation in apoplast water, the higher speed of receipt from apoplast to symplast and even to inner cell compartments through cell membranes. It can explain why sulfur dioxide and fluoric hydrogen forming weak acids, are more toxic than nitric dioxide. Exogenous acids producing the hydrogen ions negatively influence on different metabolic processes of plants.