Can Visceral Adiposity Index Serve as a Simple Tool for Identifying Individuals with Insulin Resistance in Daily Clinical Practice?

Background and objectives: The visceral adiposity index (VAI), estimating visceral adiposity dysfunction through a simple formula, could serve as a useful tool for identifying individuals at higher cardiometabolic risk. Its relationship with insulin resistance (IR), assessed using the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), and metabolic syndrome (MetS) components remains unclear. The study aimed to investigate the association of VAI with both HOMA-IR and MetS. Materials and Methods: After undergoing anthropometric and biochemical studies, 783 individuals were divided into three groups according to a number of present MetS components. The VAI cut-offs signaling MetS and HOMA-IR were determined by maximizing the sum of the sensitivity and specificity. Correlation analysis was performed to explore the associations between VAI and other tested parameters. A logistic stepwise regression analysis was applied to identify statistically significant determinants of HOMA-IR. Given the variability of reference values, two thresholds of HOMA-IR were applied, namely 2.0 and 3.8. Results: VAI increased significantly between the groups with a rising number of MetS components. The VAI cut-off for MetS was 2.37, with a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.78. The same cut-off point identified subjects with HOMA-IR = 3.8, with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.66. The VAI cut-off for HOMA-IR = 2.0 was 1.89, with a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.68. The strongest correlations of VAI were noted with HOMA-IR (r = 0.51) and insulin (r = 0.49), respectively, while the strongest correlation of HOMA-IR was with waist circumference (r = 0.54). Not one of the routine parameters was a significant predictor in the regression analysis. Conclusions: The obtained results show an existing association of VAI with HOMA-IR. The high sensitivity and specificity of the cut-offs may allow the application of VAI in common clinical practice.

A case of autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia caused by a new variant in the LDL receptor adaptor protein 1 gene.

We report a new variant in the LDLRAP1 gene associated with autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia in a woman of central European ancestry.

Association of serum adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and apolipoprotein B /apolipoprotein A1 ratio with intima media thickness of common carotid artery in dyslipidemic patients.

BACKGROUND: Diseases caused by atherosclerosis play the most important role in mortality and morbidity worldwide. Serum adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (A-FABP) seems to be a new promising marker to determine the risk of atherosclerosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate relationships between serum A-FABP levels in studied individuals and to assess the possibility of modeling the intima media thickness of the common carotid artery (C-IMT) using A-FABP levels and other observed characteristics. METHODS: Seventy two Caucasian individuals were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: dyslipidemic patients with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS+, n=17; MetS-, n= 34) and controls (n=21). RESULTS: There was confirmed the well-established risk profile of individuals with MetS (unfavorable lipid and lipoprotein profile, as well as increased parameters of insulin resistence and C-IMT). A-FABP concentrations in this group were significantly higher in comparison with both MetS- and controls. CONCLUSION: Using multiple linear regression models of C-IMT values for all individual data, healthy controls and dyslipidemic patients without metabolic syndrome (MetS-) A-FABP levels were not revealed as an important predictor of C-IMT in our model. In contrast, age, gender, waist circumference, nonHDL cholesterol levels and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio were important repressors of C- IMT in study individuals. This finding may be attributed to the overwhelming effect of other more robust risk factors for atherosclerosis in these individuals.

[Diabetic dyslipidemia and microvascular complications of diabetes]. / Diabetická dyslipidemie a mikrovaskulární komplikace diabetu.

Diabetic dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors for atherosclerosis. Although its participation in diabetic microvascular complications is not that dominant, dyslipidemia may play an important role in formation and progression of these complications. Pathophysiological mechanisms by which diabetic dyslipidemia affects the etiopathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and diabetic foot are presented. The data from clinical studies and treatment possibilities for particular microvascular complications using lipid-lowering therapy are discussed.Key words: diabetes mellitus - diabetic foot - dyslipidemia - nephropathy - neuropathy - retinopathy.

[Familial combined hyperlipidemia - the most common genetic dyslipidemia in population and in patients with premature atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease]. / Familiární kombinovaná hyperlipidemie - nejcastejsí familiární dyslipidemie v bezné populaci i u pacientu s casným výskytem aterotrombotických kardiovaskulárních príhod.

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is the most frequent genetic dyslipidemia (DLP) with high risk of early atherosclerosis manifestation. It is characterized by elevated both triglycerides 1.5 mmol/l and apolipoprotein B 1.2 g/l (hyper-TG/hyper-ApoB fenotype), with at least two affected family members. Despite the fact that plasmatic levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C are usually lower than in familial hypercholesterolemia and full expression of DLP in FCH occurs in adulthood, risk of premature manifestation of atherosclerosis is similar in both these familial DLP. It is probably due to the presence of other atherogenic lipid and non-lipid risk factors, such as increased levels of triglyceride rich lipoprotein remnants, presence of small dense LDL, reduction of HDL-C, presence of insulin resistance with impaired glucose homeostasis, hepatic steatosis, arterial hypertension, hyperuricemia and presence of increased markers of systemic inflammation. The term "familial" usually implicates a monogenic trait. However, FCH is almost always nonmendelian. According to recent knowledge FCH is mostly polygenic with variable presence of large effect mutations, accumulation of several small-effect polymorphisms and some environmental influences. Therefore, FCH is rather a syndrome with common clinical presentation but multigenic causes. The term "familial combined hyperlipidemia" is embedded in clinical practice and so it is not necessary to abandon it, as it nearly urges to examination of first degree relatives. This might help to identify a great number of risk subjects who deserve appropriate management.Key words: apolipoprotein B - familial combined hyperlipidemia - genetics - insulin resistance - premature atherosclerosis - triglycerides.

Pulse wave analysis and diabetes mellitus. A systematic review.

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary cause of death in diabetic patients and one of the explanations may be increased arterial stiffness. Arterial stiffness assessment using pulse wave analysis, is a predictive factor of CV events. The aim of this paper is to review the current knowledge of relations between diabetes mellitus and pulse wave analysis. A MEDLINE search was performed to retrieve both original and review articles addressing the relations and influences on arterial stiffness in diabetics. Pulse wave analysis is considered as a gold standard in CV risk evaluation for patients at risk, especially diabetics. Arterial stiffness assessment may be helpful for choosing more aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, particularly in younger patients to reduce the incidence of CV disease in these patients.

Apolipoprotein B vs non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Association with endothelial hemostatic markers and carotid intima-media thickness.

BACKGROUND: Both apolipoprotein B (apoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are accepted as alternative risk factors or targets for lipid-lowering therapy, which correlate more strongly with cardiovascular events than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the differences in plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and of von Willebrand factor (vWF) as endothelial hemostatic markers and carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) as a morphologic marker for atherosclerotic vascular disease among dyslipidemic individuals with apoB levels higher, estimated or lower based on regression equation of apoB vs non-HDL-C. METHODS: A total of 594 dyslipidemic subjects without atherosclerotic manifestation were divided into 3 groups (according to tertiles of apoB levels above, within, and below the line of identity): H-apoB (n = 200), E-apoB (n = 194), and L-apoB (n = 200). PAI-1, vWF, C-IMT and lipids, anthropometric parameters, markers of insulin resistance, and inflammation were measured. Differences in variables between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a strong association between apoB and non-HDL-C. The correlations of apoB and of non-HDL-C with markers of endothelial damage and C-IMT were very similar. Despite these facts, individuals with higher apoB levels had significantly higher levels of PAI-1 compared with individuals with estimated (P < .05) or lower apoB (P < .001). There were no significant differences in vWF, C-IMT, markers of insulin resistance, obesity, and inflammation. CONCLUSION: Individuals with apoB higher than predicted by non-HDL-C had significantly higher levels of PAI-1, which may contribute to the increased risk of future atherothrombotic events.

[PCSK9 inhibitors - new possibilities in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: For which patients will be indicated?Czech atherosclerosis society statement]. / PCSK9 inhibitory - nové moznosti v lécbe hypercholesterolemie: U koho budou indikovány?Stanovisko Ceské spolecnosti pro aterosklerózu.

First line drug for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia are statins, which reduce LDL-cholesterol up to 50 %; such reduction is sufficient for most patients to achieve the target values. The exceptions are patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and patients with statin intolerance. To achieve target LDL-cholesterol in these two groups of patients will be possible with new drugs - PCSK9 inhibitors, which decrease LDL-cholesterol by an additional 50-60 %. The first two PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab) already had been approved for clinical use by European regulatory authorities. The primary indication for combination statin with PCSK9 inhibitor should be undoubtedly patients with a confirmed diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, who are treated in the Czech Republic primarily in specialized centers of MedPed project. Furthermore, this treatment should be available for other patients at very high risk of cardiovascular diseases, who cannot achieve target LDL-cholesterol (eg. for statins intolerance).

The influence of apolipoprotein A5 T-1131C and apolipoprotein E common genetic variants on the levels of hemostatic markers in dyslipidemic patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships of the T-1131C (rs662799) polymorphism variants of apolipoprotein A5 (Apo A5) gene and variants of apolipoprotein E (Apo E) gene common polymorphism (rs429358, rs7412) to selected hemostatic markers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined 590 asymptomatic dyslipidemic patients, subsequently divided into MetS+ (n=146) and MetS- (n=444) groups according to the criteria for identification of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). We compared variant frequencies and differences in levels of hemostatic markers according to Apo A5, Apo E and Apo A5/Apo E common variants. RESULTS: The -1131C Apo A5 minor variant was associated with elevated tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in comparison to TT genotype (p<0.001), but not in the MetS+ group. The analysis of Apo A5/Apo E common variants in all subjects revealed that the presence of -1131C minor allele has always been associated with higher levels of tPA in comparison with T allele, regardless of Apo E genotype. Also the presence of minor Apo E2 allele led to elevated tPA concentrations in both T and C carriers. In addition, common -1131C/E2 variant was associated with the highest tPA levels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a remarkable association especially between the -1131C Apo A5 variant and increased tPA levels in asymptomatic dyslipidemic patients.

Genetic variants of apolipoprotein A5 T-1131C and apolipoprotein E common polymorphisms and their relationship to features of metabolic syndrome in adult dyslipidemic patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the relationships of the T-1131C (rs662799) polymorphism variants of apolipoprotein A5 (Apo A5) gene and variants of apolipoprotein E (Apo E) gene common polymorphism (rs429358, rs7412) to signs of metabolic syndrome (MetS). DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined 590 asymptomatic dyslipidemic patients divided into MetS+ (n=146) and MetS- (n=444) groups according to criteria of NCEP ATPIII Panel. We evaluated genotype frequencies and differences in MetS features between individual groups. Logistic regression analysis was used for the evaluation of Apo A5/Apo E variants as possible risk factors for MetS. RESULTS: We found no statistical differences between genotype and allele frequencies for both Apo A5 and Apo E polymorphisms between MetS+ and MetS- groups. In all subjects and MetS- group, we confirmed well-known association of the -1131C Apo A5 minor allele with elevated triglycerides (TG, p<0.001). The Apo E gene E2 and E4 variants were associated with higher levels of TG (p<0.01) in comparison to E33 common variant. However, no statistical differences were observed in MetS+ subjects, regardless of significantly higher TG levels in this group. Apo A5/Apo E variant analysis in all dyslipidemic patients revealed significant increase of TG levels in all subgroups in comparison to common -1131T/E3 variant carriers, the most in -1131C/E4 variant subgroup. Logistic regression analysis models showed no association of Apo A5, Apo E and all Apo A5/Apo E variants with metabolic syndrome, even after adjustment for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Our study refined the role of Apo A5 and Apo E genetic variants in the group of adult dyslipidemic patients. We demonstrate that except of TG, Apo A5 T-1131C (rs662799) and Apo E (rs429358, rs7412) polymorphisms have no remarkable effect on MetS characteristics.

Positive association of adiponectin with soluble thrombomodulin, von Willebrand factor and soluble VCAM-1 in dyslipidemic subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Both decreased and increased risk of cardiovascular events/mortality have been reported with high adiponectin levels. Only a few studies have reported an association of adiponectin with markers of hemostasis/endothelial dysfunction which might explain the reported discrepancies. DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the association of total adiponectin with von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), adhesion molecules sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1, lipids and markers of insulin resistance (IR) in 308 asymptomatic dyslipidemic subjects and healthy controls. Subjects were divided into 4 dyslipidemic phenotypes (DLP): DLP1 (TG < 1.5 mmol/L + ApoB < 1.2 g/L), DLP2 (TG ≥ 1.5 + ApoB < 1.2), DLP3 (TG < 1.5 + ApoB ≥ 1.2) and DLP4 (TG ≥ 1.5 + ApoB ≥ 1.2). The results were evaluated also according to the presence (+) and absence (-) of metabolic syndrome (MS). RESULTS: In hyperlipidemic subjects (DLP2-4), PAI-1, t-PA and sICAM-1 correlated with markers of IR but only t-PA correlated inversely with adiponectin. In contrast positive association of adiponectin with vWF, sTM and sVCAM-1 was found but none of these parameters correlated with markers of insulin resistance. In multiple regression analysis, adiponectin remained independently associated with vWF [in DLP3, DLP4, DLP2-4, MS(-)], with sTM [in DLP2, DLP4, DLP2-4, MS(+)] and with sVCAM-1 [in DLP2, DLP3, DLP4, DLP2-4, MS(+)]. In healthy controls (DLP1), no association between adiponectin and markers of hemostasis/endothelial dysfunction was found. CONCLUSION: The independent positive association of adiponectin with vWF, sTM and sVCAM-1 deserves further evaluation in connection with the risk of atherothrombotic cardiovascular events.

Prehypertension in dyslipidemic individuals; relationship to metabolic parameters and intima-media thickness.

INTRODUCTION: Like hypertension, prehypertension is associated with cardiovascular disease. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate: a) the prevalence of prehypertension/hypertension in individuals with various dyslipidemic phenotypes; b) the relation between blood pressure (BP) and other risk factors for atherosclerosis; c) atherogenic potential of prehypertension by the assessment of intima-media thickness of the arteria carotis communis (IMT). METHODS: 667 clinically asymptomatic subjects were divided into four dyslipidemic phenotypes (DLP) according to apolipoprotein B (apoB) and triglycerides (TG): DLP1 (n=198, normo-apoB/normo-TG), DLP2 (n=179, normo-apoB/hyper-TG), DLP3 (n=87, hyper-apoB/normo-TG), DLP4 (n=203, hyper-apoB/hyper-TG). DLP1 served as a control group. RESULTS: There was significantly higher prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in subjects with dyslipidemia (DLP2 43.0%, 41.3%; DLP3 42.5%, 29.9%; DLP4 42.4%, 47.8%) than in normolipidemic individuals (DLP1 32.8%, 20.2%). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP + DBP) correlated with age, total cholesterol, TG, non-HDL-cholesterol, body mass index and waist circumference; SBP additionally with C-peptide, fasting glycemia; DBP additionally with apoB, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. The IMT of hypertensive and of prehypertensive subjects was higher than that of subjects with normal BP in all DLPs. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of prehypertension was higher in all dyslipidemic patients. The common prevalence of prehypertension/hypertension was highest in the hypertriglyceridemic subjects. Prehypertensive and hypertensive patients had higher IMT than normotensive individuals in all DLPs.

Relationship between serum adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and endothelial/hemostatic markers in dyslipidemic subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Some findings support the role of serum adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP) as a key pro-inflammatory mediator that links obesity with cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association of A-FABP with endothelial/hemostatic markers [von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA), soluble intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (s-ICAM-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (s-VCAM-1)] in asymptomatic dyslipidemic subjects. DESIGN: We examined 105 dyslipidemic patients (with apolipoprotein B concentration ≥1.2 g/l and/or triglyceride (TG) concentration ≥1.5 mmol/l) without clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis and 50 normolipidemic healthy subjects, who served as a control group. Except of endothelial/hemostatic markers, anthropometric and lipid parameters, markers of insulin resistance and inflammation were assessed. RESULTS: In dyslipidemic patients, A-FABP positively correlated with age (p<0.05), TG (p<0.05), insulin (p<0.05), homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index (p<0.05), body mass index (p<0.001), waist circumference (p<0.05), high sensitivity C reactive protein (p<0.01), and vWF (p<0.05) and negatively with male gender (p<0.05). There were no correlations between A-FABP and PAI-1, t-PA, s-VCAM-1 or s-ICAM-1. By using linear multivariate regression analysis the positive association between A-FABP and vWF was independent of age, gender, insulin resistance, and visceral obesity. CONCLUSION: Study displayed an independent positive association of A-FABP with vWF in clinically asymptomatic dyslipidemic subjects. Contribution of A-FABP in the process of endothelial dysfunction could help to explain the role of obesity in cardiovascular damage.

In vivo oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) aopp and tas after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized one year study comparing cyclosporine A and tacrolimus based regiments.

AIMS: Restoration of renal function after kidney transplantation (KT) is expected to improve oxidative stress (OS). However, little is known about the influence of calcineurin inhibitors on oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL) after KT. The aim of this study was to evaluate ox-LDLs and related markers of OS, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and total antioxidant status (TAS) in patients after KT on either cyclosporin A (CyA) or tacrolimus (Tac) treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-center 12 month study evaluating time-dependent changes in biomarkers of OS before and after KT. Twenty nine patients (mean age 54.4 ± 11.1; 55% male and 45% female) were treated with CyA (Group A) and twenty four patients (mean age 52.9 ± 9.9; 75% male and 25% female) were treated with Tac (Group B). The ox-LDL, AOPP, TAS, lipid metabolism parameters, creatinine and glomerular filtration were assessed on day 1 before KT and on days 1 and 7, and in months 1, 3, 6 and 12 after KT. RESULTS: Over the 12 months, the ox-LDL for group A changed from 69.2±32.9 to 65.1±17.1 U/L (P=0.665), while AOPP significantly decreased from 233.0±159.6 to 156.5±90.1 µmol/L (P=0.025) and TAS from 1.87±0.31 to 1.68±0.20 mmol/L (P=0.030). For group B the ox-LDL changed from 62.9±29.7 to ± 61.4±14.6 U/L (P=0.168) and TAS from 1.87±0.51 to 1.68±0.20 mmol/L (P=0.168), while AOPP significantly decreased from 180.5±90.0 to 123.9±37.7 µmol/L (P=0.019). CONCLUSION: AOPP is more sensitive than ox-LDL for assessing OS after KT. TAS values appear to be insufficiently sensitive for monitoring OS in patients after KT.

Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg compared to rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled despite prior statin monotherapy.

AIMS: This post hoc analysis compared the effects of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (EZE/SIMVA) or rosuvastatin 10 mg (ROSUVA) in uncontrolled high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients with/without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) despite statin monotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 618) at high risk for coronary vascular disease with elevated LDL-C ≥100 and ≤190 mg/dL despite use of statins were randomized 1:1 to double-blind EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg or ROSUVA 10 mg for 6 weeks. Patients were classified as having T2DM based on ≥1 of the following: diagnosis of T2DM, antidiabetic medication, or FPG ≥126 mg/dL. This analysis evaluated percent changes from baseline in lipids among patients with (n = 182) and without T2DM (n = 434). RESULTS: EZE/SIMVA was more effective than ROSUVA at lowering LDL-C, TC, non-HDL-C, and apo B in the overall study population and within both subgroups. Numerically, greater between-treatment reductions in LDL-C, TC, non-HDL-C, and apo B were seen in patients with T2DM versus those without T2DM. A significant interaction (P= 0.015) was seen for LDL-C indicating that patients with T2DM achieved larger between-group reductions versus those without T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg versus ROSUVA 10 mg provided superior lipid reductions in patients with/without T2DM.

Lipid-altering efficacy of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk patients with and without metabolic syndrome.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a clustering of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk factors. This post-hoc analysis compared the effects of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg in a cohort of 618 high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients with (n=368) and without (n=217) MetS who had previously been on statin monotherapy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to double-blind ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks. Least squares mean percent change from baseline and 95% confidence intervals in lipid efficacy parameters were calculated for the population and within subgroups. Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin was significantly more effective than rosuvastatin at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, non- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (all p<0.001). No significant differences in treatment effects were seen between the presence and absence of MetS. In this post-hoc analysis of high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients the lipid-reducing effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin were not altered significantly by the presence of MetS.

Total adiponectin levels in dyslipidemic individuals: relationship to metabolic parameters and intima-media thickness.

INTRODUCTION: Adiponectin is adipocytokin with anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects. However, studies examining the relationship between adiponectin and cardiovascular diseases have shown inconsistent results. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma levels of adiponectin in clinically asymptomatic subjects with various dyslipidemic phenotypes. The associations between adiponectin and risk factors for atherosclerosis, markers of insulin resistance, and the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (IMT) were also evaluated. METHODS: 234 asymptomatic subjects were divided into four dyslipidemic phenotypes (DLP) according to apolipoprotein B (apoB) and triglycerides (TG): DLP1 (n=58, apoB<1.2 g/l and TG<1.5 mmol/l), DLP2 (n=47, apoB<1.2 g/l and TG≥1.5 mmol/l), DLP3 (n=31, apoB≥1.2 g/l and TG<1.5 mmol/l) and DLP4 (n=98, apoB≥1.2 g/l and TG≥1.5 mmol/l). DLP1 (normo-apoB/normo-TG) served as a control group. RESULTS: Significant differences in adiponectin levels between normolipidemic phenotype - DLP1 (16.1[10.3-20.8] mg/l) and hypertriglyceridemic phenotypes - DLP2 (9.5[6.8-13.0] mg/l, p<0.01) and DLP4 (10.1[7.4-16.8] mg/l, p<0.01) after adjustment for age, sex and body mass index were found. Adiponectin correlated positively with highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1), negatively with triglycerides, apoB/apoA1, highsensitivity C-reactive protein, insulin, homeostasis model assessment and waist circumference. ApoA1 and insulin were detected as independent predictors for adiponectin levels in multivariate regression analysis. Adiponectin did not correlate with IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with hypertriglyceridemic phenotypes showed decreased adiponectin levels in comparison with normolipidemic subjects. Adiponectin was associated with lipid parameters, markers of insulin resistance, chronic inflammation and visceral obesity. But no association between adiponectin and IMT was found.

Switching from statin monotherapy to ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin modifies the relationships between apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol in patients at high risk of coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relationships between apolipoprotein B (Apo B), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-HDL-C in high-risk patients treated with lipid-lowering therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: This post-hoc analysis calculated LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels corresponding to an Apo B of 0.9 g/L following treatment with 1) statin monotherapy (baseline) and 2) ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg or rosuvastatin 10mg (study end). The percentages of patients reaching LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B targets were calculated at study end. RESULTS: After switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin, the LDL-C and non-HDL-C corresponding to Apo B=0.9 g/L were closer to the more aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals (1.81 and 2.59 mmol/L, respectively). Only slightly >50% of the patients who reached minimum recommended LDL-C or non-HDL-C at study end also had an Apo B level <0.9 g/L with both treatments. CONCLUSION: The use of Apo B for monitoring the efficacy of lipid-altering therapy would likely lead to more stringent criteria for lipid lowering.

Prothrombotic markers in asymptomatic dyslipidemic subjects.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma levels of prothrombotic markers--von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)--in asymptomatic subjects with dyslipidemia. Asymptomatic subjects with dyslipidemia and their relatives (n = 234) were assessed for lipids and prothrombotic markers. Individuals were divided into four dyslipidemic phenotypes (DLP) according to apolipoprotein B (apoB) and triglycerides (TG): DLP1 (n = 58, apoB < 1.2 g/l and TG < 1.5 mmol/l), DLP2 (n = 47, apoB < 1.2 g/l and TG ≥ 1.5 mmol/l), DLP3 (n = 31, apoB ≥ 1.2 g/l and TG < 1.5 mmol/l) and DLP4 (n = 98, apoB ≥ 1.2 g/l and TG ≥ 1.5 mmol/l). Associations between prothrombotic markers and risk factors for atherosclerosis, markers of insulin resistance, and the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (IMT) were assessed too. Significant differences in PAI-1 between normolipidemic phenotype--DLP1 (62.5 (35.9-82.9) ng/ml) and hypertriglyceridemic phenotypes--DLP2 (82.2 (61.1-122.1) ng/ml, p < 0.01) and DLP4 (91.4 (63.5-111.8) ng/ml, p < 0.001) after adjustment for age, sex and body mass index, were found. Levels of t-PA were different only between DLP1 and DLP4 (1.9 (0.9-3.3) ng/ml vs. 5.3 (2.5-8.6) ng/ml, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences of vWF between DLPs. PAI-1 and t-PA correlated with lipid parameters, markers of insulin resistance, blood pressure and obesity. VWF was independently associated with IMT, which was increased in DLP4. Individuals with hypertriglyceridemic phenotypes showed increased levels of PAI-1 in comparison with normolipidemic subjects. The elevation of t-PA was presented only in patients with simultaneously elevated TG and apoB. The significant increase of IMT confirmed in the patients with DLP4 reveals individuals with the highest risk for atherosclerosis manifestation.

Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients stratified by prior statin treatment potency.

OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis compared the lipid-altering efficacy of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg (EZ/Simva) versus Rosuvastatin 10 mg (Rosuva) in patients stratified by statin potency/dose prior to randomization. METHODS: Patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite prior statin treatment (n=618) were randomized 1:1 to EZ/Simva 10/20 mg or Rosuva 10 mg for 6 weeks. Percent change from baseline in lipids and attainment of lipid targets were assessed within each subgroup (low potency n=369, high potency n=249). Consistency of the treatment effect across subgroups was evaluated by testing for treatment-by-subgroup interaction. No multiplicity adjustments were made. RESULTS: Significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction occurred for LDL-C (p=0.013), total cholesterol (p=0.025), non-HDL-C (p=0.032), and apolipoprotein B (p=0.016) with greater between-treatment differences in favor of EZ/Simva observed in patients from the high potency stratum vs low potency stratum. Individual and triple target attainment was higher for Eze/Simva compared with Rosuva in both strata. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Rosuva, switching to EZ/Simva provided greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B and higher target attainment in patients on prior statin treatment, regardless of potency, although patients treated with higher potency statins prior to randomization experienced greater between treatment differences in favor of EZ/Simva. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00479713.