Absence of detectable SARS-CoV-2 replication in ex vivo cultured cornea and cornea-derived epithelial cells.

PURPOSE: To study the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 to infect human corneal cells and tissues under standard corneal culture conditions using explants of COVID-19 donors and primary cornea-derived epithelial cells. METHODS: Cornea isolated from deceased COVID-19 donors was cultured for 4 weeks, and SARS-CoV-2 replication was monitored by qRT-PCR. Furthermore, primary corneal epithelial cells from healthy donors were cultured ex vivo and infected with SARS-CoV-2 and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as a control. Infection status was assessed by western blotting and reporter gene expression using green fluorescent protein-expressing viral strains. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptor expression levels in cornea and epithelial cells were assessed by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: We did not detect SARS-CoV-2 replication in 10 corneas isolated from deceased COVID-19 patients and cultured for 4 weeks, indicating absence of infection under natural conditions. Furthermore, high-titer SARS-CoV-2 infection of ex vivo cultured cornea-derived epithelial cells did not result in productive virus replication. In contrast, the same cells were highly permissive for HCMV. This phenotype could potentially be explained by low ACE2 and TMPRSS2 transcriptional activity in cornea and cornea-derived epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that cornea and limbal epithelial cells are refractory to productive SARS-CoV-2 infection. This could be due to the absence of robust receptor expression levels necessary for viral entry. This study adds further evidence to support the very low possibility of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from an infected corneal transplant donor to a recipient in corneal organ cultures.

Comprehensive Analysis of Human Cytomegalovirus- and HIV-Mediated Plasma Membrane Remodeling in Macrophages.

The plasma membrane (PM) must be overcome by viruses during entry and release. Furthermore, the PM represents the cellular communication compartment and the immune system interface. Hence, viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies to remodel the PM, for instance to avoid immune sensing and clearance of infected cells. We performed a comprehensive analysis of cell surface dysregulation by two human-pathogenic viruses, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), in primary macrophages, which are classical antigen-presenting cells and orchestrators of the immune system. Scanning ion conductance microscopy revealed a loss of roughness and an overall smooth phenotype of HCMV-infected macrophages, in contrast to HIV-1 infection. This phenotype was also evident on the molecular level. When we screened for cell surface receptors modulated by HCMV, 42 of 332 receptors tested were up- or downregulated, whereas HIV-1 affected only 7 receptors. In particular CD164, CD84, and CD180 were targeted by HCMV. Mechanistically, HCMV induced transcriptional silencing of these receptors in an interferon (IFN)-independent manner, and expression was reduced not only by lab-adapted HCMV but also by clinical HCMV isolates. Altogether, our plasma membrane profiling of human macrophages provides clues to understand how viruses evade the immune system and identified novel cell surface receptors targeted by HCMV. IMPORTANCE The PM is a key component that viruses have to cope with. It is a barrier for infection and egress and is critically involved in antiviral immune signaling. We hence asked the question how two immunomodulatory viruses, HIV-1 and HCMV, dysregulate this compartment in infected macrophages, relevant in vivo targets of both viruses. We employed a contact-free microscopic technique to image the PM of infected cells and performed a phenotypic flow cytometry-based screen to identify receptor modulations on a molecular level. Our results show that HIV-1 and HCMV differentially manipulate the PM of macrophages. While HIV-1-mediated changes are relatively subtle, HCMV induces major alterations of the PM. We identify novel immune receptors manipulated by HCMV and define mechanisms of how HCMV interferes with receptor expression. Altogether, our study reveals differential strategies of how two human-pathogenic viruses manipulate infected cells and identifies potential novel pathways of HCMV immune evasion.