A multicentric experience with open surgical repair and endovascular exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyse early and follow-up results of the treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) performed with open surgical repair or with endovascular exclusion with endografts in a multicentric retrospective registry involving seven Italian vascular centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data concerning 178 open surgical interventions (OR group) and 134 endovascular exclusions (ER group) for PAAs performed between January 2000 and December 2011. Early and follow-up results were analysed in terms of mortality, graft patency, reintervention and limb preservation. RESULTS: OR patients were more frequently symptomatic (64%, 115 cases) than patients in the ER group (34%, 51 cases; p < 0.001), had more frequently acute limb ischaemia (23% and 6.5%, respectively; p < 0.001) and had more frequently a run-off score <2 (39% and 26%, respectively, p = 0.03). In the OR group there were no perioperative deaths; six thromboses (3.3%) and one amputation occurred. In the ER group mortality was 1.5%; 13 thromboses (9.7%) and one amputation (0.5%) occurred. Mean duration of follow-up was 30.6 ± 27.5 months. In the OR group primary and secondary patency, freedom from reintervention and limb preservation rates at 48 months were 63.5% (standard error (SE) 0.05), 76.5% (SE 0.05), 72.5% (SE 0.06) and 89.7% (SE 0.05), respectively. The corresponding figures in the ER group were 73.4% (SE 0.04), 85% (SE 0.04), 75% (SE 0.04) and 97% (SE 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicentric retrospective registry, open and endovascular treatment of PAAs are used in different patients with regard to clinical and anatomical characteristics. Both treatments are feasible and safe, providing satisfactory early and long-term results.

Results from an Italian multicentric registry comparing heparin-bonded ePTFE graft and autologous saphenous vein in below-knee femoro-popliteal bypasses.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate early and follow-up results of below-knee bypasses performed with a bioactive heparin-treated ePTFE graft in patients with peripheral arterial obstructive disease (PAOD) in a multicentric retrospective registry involving seven Italian vascular centers and to compare them with those obtained in patients operated on with autologous saphenous vein (ASV) in the same centres in the same period of time. METHODS: Over a nine-year period, ending in 2010, a heparin bonded prosthetic graft (Propaten Gore-Tex, W.L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was implanted in 556 patients undergoing below-knee revascularization for PAOD (HePTFE group). In the same period of time 394 below-knee bypasses with ipsilateral ASV were performed (ASV group). Data concerning these interventions were retrospectively collected in a multicenter registry with a dedicated database. Early (<30 days) results were analyzed in terms of graft patency, major amputation rates and mortality. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of primary and secondary graft patency, limb salvage and survival. RESULTS: Among patients of HePTFE group, 413 had critical limb ischemia (74%); the corresponding figure for ASV group was 84% (332 interventions, P<0.001). Eighty-nine patients in HePTFE group (16%) and 207 patients in ASV group (52.5%; P<0.001) had distal tibial anastomosis. Patients in HePTFE group had more frequently adjunctive procedures performed at distal anastomotic sites in order to improve run-off status. Thirty-day death rate was 1.9% in HePTFE group and 0.5% in ASV group (P=0.08). The rates of perioperative thromboses and amputations were 6% and 3.5% in HePTFE group, and 5% and 1.7% in ASV group, without significant differences between the two groups. Mean duration of follow-up was 28.5±22.1 months; 921 patients (97%) had at least one postoperative clinical and ultrasonographic control. Estimated 48-month survival rates were 81% in HePTFE group and 74% in ASV group (P=0.7, log rank 0.1). Primary patency rate at 48 months was significantly better in ASV group (61%) than in HePTFE group (44.5%; P=0.004, log rank 8.1). The rates of secondary patency at 48 months were 57% in HePTFE group and 67.5% in ASV group (P=0.1, log rank 1.9); the corresponding values in terms of limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia were 77% and 79.5% (P=0.3, log rank 0.9), respectively. CONCLUSION: Data from this large, retrospective registry confirmed that the indexed heparin-bonded ePTFE graft provides satisfactory early and mid-term results in patients undergoing surgical below-knee revascularization. While autologous saphenous vein maintains its superiority in terms of primary patency, secondary patency and limb salvage rates are comparable.

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be affected by carotid restenosis. The data from randomized trials show that the highest incidence of restenosis after CEA occurs from 12 to 18 months after surgery. The optimal CEA technique to reduce perioperative complications and restenosis rates is still undefined. This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis in patients who undergo eversion CEA. Previously published perioperative results of this study did not show statistically significant differences in study endpoints between the eversion and standard techniques. METHODS: From October 1994 to March 1997, 1353 patients with surgical indications for carotid stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo eversion (n = 678) or standard CEA (n = 675; primary closure, 419; patch, 256). Withdrawal from the assigned treatment occurred in 1.6% of the patients (in 13 assigned to eversion CEA, and in nine assigned to standard CEA). The clinical and duplex scan follow-up examination was 99% complete, and the mean follow-up interval was 33 months (range, 12 to 55 months). The primary outcomes were perioperative and late major stroke and death, carotid restenosis (stenosis >/= 50% of the lumen diameter detected at duplex scanning), and carotid occlusion. The primary evaluation of study outcomes was conducted on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Restenosis was found at duplex scanning in 56 patients (19 in the eversion group, and 37 in the standard group). Within the standard group, the restenosis rates were 7.9% in the primary closure population and 1.5% in the patched population. Of the patients with restenosis, 36% underwent cerebral angiography that confirmed restenosis in all cases. The cumulative restenosis risk at 4 years was significantly lower in the group that underwent treatment with eversion CEA as compared with the standard group (3.6% vs 9.2%; P =.01), with an absolute risk reduction of 5. 6% and a relative risk reduction of 62%. Eighteen patients would have had to undergo treatment with eversion CEA to prevent one restenosis during the 4-year period. The incidence rate of ipsilateral stroke was 3.3% in the eversion population and 2.2% in the standard group. There were no significant differences in the cumulative risks of ipsilateral stroke (3.9% for eversion, and 2.2% for standard; P =.2) and death (13.1% for eversion, and 12.7% for standard; P =.7)) in the two groups. Of the 18 variables that were examined for their influence on restenosis, eversion CEA (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6; P =.0004) and patch CEA (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.6; P =. 002) were negative independent predictors of restenosis with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. CONCLUSION: The EVEREST (EVERsion carotid Endarterectomy versus Standard Trial) showed that eversion CEA is safe, effective, and durable. No statistically significant differences were found in late outcome between the eversion and standard techniques at the available follow-up examination.

A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: study design and preliminary results: the Everest Trial.

PURPOSE: The EVEREST Trial was designed to determine whether the surgical technique influences the durability and complications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The current report focuses on the study design and preliminary results. METHODS: EVEREST is a randomized multicenter trial. A total of 1353 patients with carotid stenosis requiring surgical treatment were randomly assigned to received standard (n = 675) or eversion (n = 678) CEA. Primary end points included carotid occlusion, major stroke, death, and restenosis rate. RESULTS: The rate of perioperative major stroke and death (1.3 for each study group) and the incidence of early carotid occlusion (0.6% for eversion vs 0.4% for standard) were similar. No significant differences were found between eversion and standard CEA with respect to incidence of perioperative transient ischemic accident, minor stroke, cranial nerve injuries, neck hematoma, myocardial infarction, or surgical defects as detected with intraoperative quality controls. Clamping time was significantly shorter for eversion CEA compared with patch standard procedures (31.7 +/- 15.9 vs 34.5 +/- 14.4 minutes, p = 0.02). A shunt was inserted in 11% of patients undergoing eversion CEAs and in 16% of patients undergoing standard procedures. Overall 30-day events occurred in 13.3% of the eversion group and in 11.4% of the standard group (p = 0.3). At a mean follow-up of 14.9 months (range, 1 to 38 months), 16 (2.4%) restenoses occurred in the eversion group and 28 (4.1%) occurred in the standard group (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.1; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of the EVEREST Trial suggest that eversion CEA is a safe and rapid procedure with low major complication rates. No significant differences in restenosis rates were observed between eversion and standard CEA at the available follow-up. Longer-term results are necessary to assess whether the eversion technique influences the durability of CEA.

[Carotid endarterectomy using the classical technique and by eversion]. / Endoarteriectomia carotidea con tecnica classica e per eversione.

After a brief introduction on the history of the surgical treatment of carotid stenosis the authors illustrate both the classical endarterectomy and the eversion endarterectomy. The constant search for a technique which could be of easy execution and also reduce the risk of complication (especially late ones, such as restenosis), brought the authors to adopt the eversion endarterectomy with reimplantation of internal carotid artery. From 1990 through 1995, 1034 carotid endarterectomies were performed, of which 611 with eversion technique and 423 with others techniques. The average follow-up was 38 months. The eversion endarterectomy group had lower neurological morbidity and mortality rates, both early and late. Even more important, they had a lower incidence rate of hemodynamically relevant restenosis (0.37% in the eversion endarterectomy group vs 1.97% in the other group).

[Differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid]. / Considerazioni sul carcinoma differenziato della tiroide.

Experience in differentiated thyroid carcinoma surgery is presented. It is considered that, although these neoplasias are not very aggressive, they should be treated radically with a combination of surgery and radioisotopes.