Health Disparities in Presentation, Treatment, Genomic Testing, and Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Patients.

BACKGROUND: There are few conflicting results regarding the treatment and outcomes of Hispanic patients with pancreatic cancer. This study comprehensively evaluated the differences in baseline characteristics, treatments, genomic testing, and outcomes among Hispanic (H) and Non-Hispanic (NH) patients with early-stage (ES) and late-stage (LS) pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis from 2013 to 2020 of 294 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; data collected included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, response, germline and somatic genetic testing, and survival outcomes. Excluded those with insufficient data. Univariate comparisons used parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate to evaluate for differences between H and NH groups. Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate the difference in frequency. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis assessed the survival. RESULTS: The analysis included 198 patients who had a late-stage disease and 96 patients with early-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Among the early-stage patients, the median age at diagnosis was 60.7 years in the H versus 66.7 years in the NH (p = 0.03). No other differences were observed in baseline characteristics, treatments offered, and median overall survival (NH 25 vs. H 17.7 months, p = 0.28). Performance status, negative surgical margins, and adjuvant therapy were clinically significant and univariable with improved OS (p < 0.05), regardless of ethnicity. Hispanic patients with early pancreatic cancer were noted to be at a greater risk of death with a statistically significant hazard ratio of 3.1 (p = 0.005, 95% CI, 1.39-6.90). Among the late-stage patients, Hispanic patients with ≥ 3 predisposing risk factors for pancreatic cancer were 44% vs. 25% of NH (p = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristic treatments, progression-free, and median overall survivals (NH 10.0 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.4577). In the late-stage genomic testing, germline testing performed in NH 69.4% vs. H 43.9% (p = 0.003) revealed no difference among groups. For the somatic testing, the pathogenic variants with actionable mutations were 2.5% of NH and 17.6% of H patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Hispanic patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma present at a younger age and with more risk factors in the late stage. These patients have significantly lower overall survival compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts. Hispanic patients in our study were 2.9 less likely to receive germline screening and more like to have somatic genetic actionable pathogenic variants. Overall, only a minority of all patients were enrolled in a pancreatic cancer clinical trial or offered genomic testing, highlighting a critical need and missed opportunity in advancing progress and improving outcomes for this disease, mainly in the underrepresented Hispanic population.

Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and low molecular weight heparin in gastrointestinal cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancer (GICA) is associated with a higher incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to other solid tumors, moreover, recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB) complications during anticoagulation treatment have an associated increase rate. GICA-VTE remains a challenging clinical scenario with MB concerns for utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), especially with active cancer therapies. AIM: To evaluate patient risk factors, effectiveness (VTE) and safety (MB) of DOACs and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with active GICA-VTE. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving DOACs and LMWH with GICA and symptomatic or incidental VTE treated at comprehensive cancer center from November 2013 to February 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria included active GI cancer diagnosed at any stage or treatment +/- 6 mo of VTE diagnosis, whom were prescribed 6 mo or more of DOACs or LMWH. The Chi-squared test was used for overall and the Fisher exact test for pairwise comparisons of the proportions of patients experiencing recurrent VTE and MB events. Odds ratios were used to compare the relative odds of the occurrence of the outcome given exposure to the risk factor. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were prescribed anticoagulation, in which 106 fulfilled inclusion criteria apixaban (27.3%), rivaroxaban (34.9%) and enoxaparin (37.7%), and 38 were excluded. Patients median age was 66.5 years at GICA diagnosis and 67 years at CAVTE event, with 62% males, 80% Caucasian, 70% stage IV, pancreatic cancer (40.5%), 30% Khorana Score (≥ 3 points), and 43.5% on active chemotherapy. Sixty-four percent of patients completed anticoagulation therapy (range 1 to 43 mo). Recurrent VTE at 6 mo was noted in 7.5% (n = 3), 6.8% (n = 2) and 2.7% (n = 1) of patients on enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively (all P = NS). MB at 6 mo were 5% (n = 2) for enoxaparin, 6.8% (n = 2) for apixaban and 21.6% (n = 8) for rivaroxaban (overall P = 0.048; vs LMWH P = 0.0423; all other P = NS). Significant predictors of a primary or secondary outcome for all anticoagulation therapies included: Active systemic treatment (OR = 5.1, 95%CI: 1.3-19.3), high Khorana Score [≥ 3 points] (OR = 5.5, 95%CI: 1.7-17.1), active smoker (OR = 6.7, 95%CI: 2.1-21.0), pancreatic cancer (OR = 6.8, 95%CI: 1.9-23.2), and stage IV disease (OR = 9.9, 95%CI: 1.2-79.1). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban compared to apixaban and enoxaparin had a significantly higher risk of MB on GICA-VTE patients with equivocal efficacy.