Shifting the narrative from living at risk to living with risk: validating and pilot-testing a clinical decision support tool: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: When there are safety concerns, healthcare professionals (HCPs) may disregard older adults' wishes to return or remain at home. A paradigm shift is needed for HCPs to move from labelling older adults as living at risk to helping them live with risk. The Living with Risk: Decision Support Tool (LwR:DST) was developed to support older adults and HCPs with difficult decision-making regarding living with risk. The study objectives were to: (1) validate, and (2) pilot-test the LwR:DST in hospital and community settings. METHODS: The study was conducted across Canada during the pandemic. The LwR:DST's content was validated with quantitative and qualitative data by: (1) 71 HCPs from hospital and community settings using the Delphi method, and (2) 17 older adults and caregivers using focus groups. HCPs provided feedback on the LwR:DST's content, format and instruction manual while older adults provided feedback on the LwR:DST's communication step. The revised LwR:DST was pilot-tested by 14 HCPs in one hospital and one community setting, and 17 older adults and caregivers described their experience of HCPs using this approach with them. Descriptive and thematic analysis were performed. RESULTS: The LwR:DST underwent two iterations incorporating qualitative and quantitative data provided by HCPs, older adults and caregivers. The quantitative Delphi method data validated the content and the process of the LwR:DST, while the qualitative data provided practical improvements. The pilot-testing results suggest that using the LwR:DST broadens HCPs' clinical thinking, structures their decision-making, improves their communication and increases their competence and comfort with risk assessment and management. Our findings also suggest that the LwR:DST improves older adults' healthcare experience by feeling heard, understood and involved. CONCLUSIONS: This revised LwR:DST should help HCPs systematically identify frail older adults' risks when they remain at or return home and find acceptable ways to mitigate these risks. The LwR:DST induces a paradigm shift by acknowledging that risks are inherent in everyday living and that risk-taking has positive and negative consequences. The challenges involved in integrating the LwR:DST into practice, i.e., when, how and with whom to use it, will be addressed in future research.

Implementation, Feasibility, and Acceptability of MATCH to Prevent Iatrogenic Disability in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Question of Geriatric Care Program?

Senior adults (>age 65) represent almost 20% of the population but account for 48% of hospital bed occupancy. In older adults, hospitalization often results in functional decline (i.e., iatrogenic disability) and, consequently, the loss of autonomy. Physical activity (PA) has been shown to counteract these declines effectively. Nevertheless, PA is not implemented in standard clinical practice. We previously showed that MATCH, a pragmatic, specific, adapted, and unsupervised PA program, was feasible and acceptable in a geriatric assessment unit (GAU) and a COVID-19 geriatric unit. This feasibility study aims to confirm that this tool could be implemented in other geriatric care programs, notably a geriatric rehabilitation unit (GRU) and a post-acute care unit (PACU), in order to reach the maximum number of older patients. Eligibility and consent were assessed by the physician for all the patients admitted to the three units (GAU, GRU, and PACU). The rehabilitation therapist taught each participant one of the five PA programs based on their mobility score on the decisional tree. Implementation (eligibility (%): patients eligible/number admitted and delay of implementation: number of days until prescription); feasibility (adherence (%): number sessions completed/number sessions prescribed and walking time (%): total walking time/time prescribed time); and acceptability (healthcare team (%): tool adequacy (yes/no) and patient: System Usability Scale questionnaire (SUS: x/100)) were evaluated and analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA or Fisher's exact test. Eligibility was different between the units (GRU = 32.5% vs. PACU = 26.6% vs. GAU = 56.0%; p < 0.001), but the time before implementation was similar (days: GRU = 5.91 vs. PACU = 5.88 vs. GAU = 4.78; p > 0.05). PA adherence (GRU = 83.5% vs. PACU = 71.9% vs. GAU = 74.3%) and walking time (100% in all units) were similar (p > 0.05). Patients (SUS: GRU = 74.6 vs. PACU = 77.2 vs. GAU = 77.2; p > 0.05) and clinicians (adequacy (yes; %): GRU = 78.3%; PACU = 76.0%; GAU = 72.2%; p > 0.05) found MATCH acceptable. Overall, MATCH was implementable, feasible, and acceptable in a GAU, GRU, and PACU. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results and evaluate the health benefits of MATCH compared with usual care.

Functional Decline After Nonhospitalized Injuries in Older Patients: Results From the Canadian Emergency Team Initiative Cohort in Elders.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cumulative incidence of functional decline over 6 months following emergency department (ED) assessments of nonhospitalized injuries and to identify its main determinants. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort of older adults discharged home following assessment for injuries in 8 Canadian EDs. Participants were assessed at 3 time points: baseline in the ED, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome, functional decline, was defined as a 2-points loss from baseline on the Older American Resources Scale (OARS). Other measures included demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, frailty, cognition, mobility status, etc. Cumulative incidences were estimated using proportions with 95% confidence intervals. Log-binomial regressions and the "least absolute shrinkage and selection operator" (LASSO) were used to identify significant functional decline determinants. RESULTS: Among 2,919 participants, 403 (13.8%) were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 76.2±7.6 years, 65.3% were women, 9% were frail, and 40.0% prefrail. Main injury mechanisms were falls (65.5%) and motor vehicle accidents (18.6%). The cumulative incidence of functional decline over 6 months was 17.0% (95% confidence interval 12.5% to 23.0%). Occasional use of walking devices, less than 5 outings/week, frailty, and older age were significant baseline determinants of functional decline. CONCLUSION: A significant 17% of older adults with "minor" injuries experience a persistent functional decline over 6 months following their ED visit. Four frailty-related determinants were identified: occasional use of a walking device, less than 5 outings/week, frailty, and older age. Further work is needed to assess if these can help ED clinicians screen seniors at risk and initiate interventions at discharge.

Front-line emergency department nurses' and physicians' assessments of processes of elder-friendly care for quality improvement.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric emergency department (ED) care has gained increasing importance and interest due to increasing visits in seniors. AIM: Among ED front-line nurses and physicians, to assess and compare ratings of elder-friendly care process indicators, variability in ratings, and concurrent validity of ratings. METHODS: Four Quebec EDs' full-time registered nurses and physicians rated their geriatric care using 9 subscales. Nurse and physician subscale scores were compared. Inter-rater variability within disciplines and variability between nurses and physicians were measured. Associations between the subscale scores and perceived overall quality of care were tested. RESULTS: 38 nurses and 36 physicians completed the survey (83% of 89 eligible). Scores differed by discipline for 3 of 9 subscales computed; nurses had higher mean scores on Protocols, Family-Centered Discharge, and Staff Education. Very high variation for Staff Education was found within disciplines. Variations for Family-Centered Discharge differed significantly between nurses and physicians. Almost all subscale scores were significantly positively associated with perceived overall quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: ED nurses and physicians rate geriatric care components similarly except for protocols, discharge processes, and continuing education. The subscales have concurrent validity. Results suggest a need for improvement in continuing educational strategies with a particular attention to discharge processes.

Understanding the positive outcomes of discharge planning interventions for older adults hospitalized following a fall: a realist synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Older adults hospitalized following a fall often encounter preventable adverse events when transitioning from hospital to home. Discharge planning interventions developed to prevent these events do not all produce the expected effects to the same extent. This realist synthesis aimed to better understand when, where, for whom, why and how the components of these interventions produce positive outcomes. METHODS: Nine indexed databases were searched to identify scientific papers and grey literature on discharge planning interventions for older adults (65+) hospitalized following a fall. Manual searches were also conducted. Documents were selected based on relevance and rigor. Two reviewers extracted and compiled data regarding intervention components, contextual factors, underlying mechanisms and positive outcomes. Preliminary theories were then formulated based on an iterative synthesis process. RESULTS: Twenty-one documents were included in the synthesis. Four Intervention-Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations were developed as preliminary theories, based on the following intervention components: 1) Increase two-way communication between healthcare providers and patients/caregivers using a family-centered approach; 2) Foster interprofessional communication within and across healthcare settings through both standardized and unofficial information exchange; 3) Provide patients/caregivers with individually tailored fall prevention education; and 4) Designate a coordinator to manage discharge planning. These components should be implemented from patient admission to return home and be supported at the organizational level (contexts) to trigger knowledge, understanding and trust of patients/caregivers, adjusted expectations, reduced family stress, and sustained engagement of families and professionals (mechanisms). These optimal conditions improve patient satisfaction, recovery, functional status and continuity of care, and reduce hospital readmissions and fall risk (outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Since transitions are critical points with potential communication gaps, coordinated interventions are vital to support a safe return home for older adults hospitalized following a fall. Considering the organizational challenges, simple tools such as pictograms and drawings, combined with computer-based communication channels, may optimize discharge interventions based on frail patients' needs, habits and values. Empirically testing our preliminary theories will help to develop effective interventions throughout the continuum of transitional care to enhance patients' health and reduce the economic burden of avoidable care.

Experiences of an Emergency Department Visit Among Older Adults and Their Families: Qualitative Findings From a Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits are critical events for older adults, but little is known regarding their experiences, particularly about their physical needs, the involvement of accompanying family members, and the transition back to the community. OBJECTIVE: To explore experiences of an ED visit among patients aged 75 and older. METHODS: In a mixed-methods study, a cohort of patients aged 75 and older (or a family member) discharged from the ED back to the community was recruited from 4 urban EDs. A week following discharge, structured telephone interviews supplemented with open-ended questions were conducted. A subsample (76 patients, 32 family members) was purposefully selected. Verbatim transcripts of responses to the open-ended questions were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Experiences related to physical needs included comfort, equipment supporting mobility and autonomy, help when needed, and access to drink and food. Family members required opportunities to provide patient support and greater involvement in their care. At discharge, patients/families required adequate discharge education, resolution of their health problem, information on medications, and greater certainty about planned follow-up medical and home care services. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest several areas that could be targeted to improve patient and family perceptions of the care at an ED visit.

[Overview of the assessment practices of occupational therapists working in Quebec]. / Portrait des pratiques évaluatives des ergothérapeutes œuvrant au Québec.

BACKGROUND.: In occupational therapy practice, client assessments are essential for establishing treatment priorities and determining the effectiveness of interventions. However, occupational therapists' assessment practices are not well documented. PURPOSE.: This work aimed to provide an overview of the assessment practices of Quebec occupational therapists based on the person-environment-occupation components and clienteles. METHOD.: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online survey that was sent to occupational therapists in Quebec. FINDINGS.: In paediatrics, occupational therapists tend to use standardized tools to assess physical and neurological abilities. Adult assessment focuses mainly on physical abilities and productivity. For seniors, assessment focuses mainly on functional aspects (physical abilities, personal care, and home safety) and screening for cognitive difficulties. IMPLICATIONS.: Occupational therapy assessment mostly focuses on physicial abilities. To ensure a holistic approach, more occupational and environmental components should be included in the assessment practices.

DESCRIPTION.: L'évaluation du client est primordiale dans la pratique de l'ergothérapie, notamment pour établir les priorités de traitement et pour vérifier l'efficacité des interventions. Les pratiques évaluatives des ergothérapeutes sont cependant peu documentées. BUT.: Dresser un portrait des pratiques évaluatives des ergothérapeutes du Québec selon les dimensions personne-environnement-occupation et les clientèles. MÉTHODOLOGIE.: Une enquête transversale a été réalisée à l'aide d'un sondage en ligne envoyé aux ergothérapeutes du Québec. RÉSULTATS.: En pédiatrie, les ergothérapeutes utilisent majoritairement des outils standardisés des aptitudes physiques et neurologiques. L'évaluation d'adultes cible principalement les aptitudes physiques et la productivité. Auprès des aînés, l'évaluation repose surtout sur les aspects fonctionnels, particulièrement les aptitudes physiques, les soins personnels et la sécurité à domicile, et sur le dépistage des difficultés cognitives. IMPLICATIONS POUR LA PRATIQUE.: L'évaluation ergothérapique serait généralement axée sur les aptitudes physiques. Pour assurer une approche holistique, l'occupation et l'environnement devraient être davantage considérés dans l'évaluation.

Preventing emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations of older adults with cognitive impairment compared with the general senior population: what do we know about avoidable incidents? Results from a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Older cognitively impaired adults present a higher risk of hospitalisation and mortality following a visit to the emergency department (ED). Better understanding of avoidable incidents is needed to prevent them and the associated ED presentations in community-dwelling adults. This study aimed to synthetise the actual knowledge concerning these incidents leading this population to ED presentation, as well as possible preventive measures to reduce them. DESIGN: A scoping review was performed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. METHODS: Scientific and grey literature published between 1996 and 2017 were examined in databases (Medline, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Ageline, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations/theses, Evidence-based medecine (EBM) Reviews, Healthstar), online library catalogues, governmental websites and published statistics. Sources discussing avoidable incidents leading to ED presentations were included and then extended to those discussing hospitalisation and mortality due to a lack of sources. Data (type, frequency, severity and circumstances of incidents, preventive measures) was extracted using a thematic chart, then analysed with content analysis. RESULTS: 67 sources were included in this scoping review. Five types of avoidable incidents (falls, burns, transport accidents, harm due to self-negligence and due to wandering) emerged, and all but transport accidents were more frequent in cognitively impaired seniors. Differences regarding circumstances were only reported for burns, as scalding was the most prevalent mechanism of injury for this population compared with flames for the general senior population. Multifactorial interventions and implications of other professionals (eg, pharmacist, firefighters) were reported as potential interventions to reduce avoidable incidents. However, few preventive measures were specifically tested in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Primary research that screens for cognitive impairment and involves actors (eg, paramedics) to improve our understanding of avoidable incidents leading to ED visits is greatly needed. This knowledge is essential to develop preventive measures tailored to the needs of older cognitively impaired adults.

How Older Adults Experience an Emergency Department Visit: Development and Validation of Measures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and validate measures of experiences of an emergency department (ED) visit suitable for use by older adults or their family members. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged 75 years and older who were discharged home was recruited at 4 EDs. At 1 week after the visit, patients or family members were interviewed by telephone to assess problems experienced at the visit. Twenty-six questions based on 6 domains of care found in the literature were developed: 16 questions were administered to all patients; 10 questions were administered to bed patients only. Scales were developed with multiple correspondence analysis. Regression analyses were used to validate the scales, using 2 validation criteria: perceived overall quality of care and willingness to return to the same ED. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients completed the 1-week interview, 197 ambulatory and 215 bed patients; family members responded for 75 patients. Two scales were developed, assessing personal care and communication (8 questions; α=.63) and waiting times (2 questions; α=.79). Both scales were significantly independently associated with perceived overall quality of care and willingness to return to the same ED. CONCLUSION: Two scales assessing important aspects of ED care experienced by older adults are ready for further evaluation in other settings.

Elder-Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care. DESIGN: Four-step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal component analysis and clinical judgment, (4) reliability and validity assessment. SETTING: Province of Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Lead ED nurses and physicians at 76 Quebec EDs who participated in a 2013/14 survey (66% of 116 adult nonpsychiatric EDs in the province). MEASUREMENTS: Geriatric care items (n = 62) grouped into seven preliminary content areas (screening and assessment, clinical protocols, discharge planning, staffing, physical environment, continuing education, quality assessment), lead nurse and physician perceptions of the quality of ED geriatric care, institutional prioritization of geriatric care, and ED type. RESULTS: Thirteen subscales were developed; most were associated with ED type and quality indicators. CONCLUSION: Thirteen subscales for geriatric ED services are proposed for evaluation in various ED settings.

Changes in Emergency Department Geriatric Services in Quebec and Correlates of These Changes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in geriatric emergency department (ED) services from 2006 (T1) to 2013/14 (T2), associated factors, and outcomes. DESIGN: Two-wave survey design. SETTING: Province of Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Lead nurses and physicians at 57 EDs that participated in both the T1 and T2 surveys. INTERVENTION: Changes over time in ED geriatric services, observed naturalistically. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questionnaires assessed: ED geriatric services (11 items) and nursing and geriatric staffing resources. Key administrative data indicators for ED bed visits for T1 and T2 for ages 75 and over included: volume of ED visits; length of ED stay; admission rate; and 30-day return visits. RESULTS: There was a significant overall increase in the number ED geriatric services, from mean 2.8 (SD 2.2) at T1 to mean 6.0 (SD 2.0) at T2. EDs were clustered into 3 groups based on their T1 and T2 geriatric service scores: "early adopters" (n = 12); "late adopters" (n = 27); "non-adopters" (n = 18). Group membership was associated with three T1 variables: availability of a geriatric nurse clinician, a lower ratio of nurses to ED beds, and longer ED stays. There were significant overall increases between T1 and T2 in number of ED bed visits and ED length of stay among those aged 75 and over, decreases in hospitalization rates, but no change in ED return visits. There were no differential changes in the key indicators among the three ED clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ED geriatric services improved in Quebec from 2006 to 2013/14. EDs with a geriatric nurse clinician, relatively fewer nursing resources, and longer ED stays improved more quickly.

Measuring Frailty Can Help Emergency Departments Identify Independent Seniors at Risk of Functional Decline After Minor Injuries.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to (i) describe frailty in the subgroup of independent community-dwelling seniors consulting emergency departments (EDs) for minor injuries, (ii) examine the association between frailty and functional decline 3 months postinjury, (iii) ascertain the predictive accuracy of frailty measures and emergency physicians' for functional decline. METHOD: Prospective cohort in 2011-2013 among 1,072 seniors aged 65 years or older, independent in basic daily activities, evaluated in Canadian EDs for minor injuries.Frailty was assessed at EDs using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty scale (CSHA-CFS) and the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture frailty index (SOF). Functional decline was defined as a loss ≥2/28 on the Older American Resources Services scale 3 months postinjury. Generalized mixed models were used to explore differences in functional decline across frailty levels. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to ascertain the predictive accuracy of frailty measures and emergency physicians' clinical judgment. RESULTS: The SOF and CSHA-CFS were available in 342 and 1,058 participants, respectively. The SOF identified 55.6%, 32.7%, 11.7% patients as robust, prefrail, and frail. These CSHA-CFS (n = 1,058) proportions were 51.9%, 38.3%, and 9.9%. The 3-month incidence of functional decline was 12.1% (10.0%-14.6%). The Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the CSHA-CFS and the emergency physicians' were similar (0.548-0.777), while the SOF was somewhat higher (0.704-0.859). CONCLUSION: Measuring frailty in community-dwelling seniors with minor injuries in EDs may enhance current risk screening for functional decline. However, before implementation in usual care, feasibility issues such as inter-rater reliability and acceptability of frailty tools in the EDs have to be addressed.

Preventing avoidable incidents leading to a presentation to the emergency department (ED) by older adults with cognitive impairment: protocol for a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with cognitive impairment represent a large portion (21-42%) of people (65+) who consult at an emergency department (ED). Because this sub-group is at higher risk for hospitalisation and mortality following an ED visit, awareness about 'avoidable' incidents should be increased in order to prevent presentations to the ED due to such incidents. This study aims to synthetise the actual knowledge related to 'avoidable' incidents (ie, traumatic injuries, poisoning and other consequences of external causes) (WHO, 2016) leading to ED presentations in older people with cognitive impairment. METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be performed. Scientific and grey literature (1996-2016) will be searched using a combination of key words pertaining to avoidable incidents, ED presentations, older adults and cognitive impairment. A variety of databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Ageline, SCOPUS, ProQuest Dissertations/theses, EBM Reviews, Healthstar), online library catalogues, governmental websites and published statistics will be examined. Included sources will pertain to community-dwelling older adults presenting to the ED as a result of an avoidable incident, with the main focus on those with cognitive impairment. Data (eg, type, frequency, severity, circumstances of incidents, preventive measures) will be extracted and analysed using a thematic chart and content analysis. DISCUSSION AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will provide a picture of the actual knowledge on the subject and identify knowledge gaps in existing literature to be filled by future primary researches. Findings will help stakeholders to develop programmes in order to promote safe and healthy environments and behaviours aimed at reducing avoidable incidents in seniors, especially those with cognitive impairment.

Development of a functional status assessment of seniors visiting emergency department.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and initial piloting of a Functional Status Assessment of Seniors in Emergency Department (FSAS-ED). The methodology of development of the tool included (1) specifying the underlying construct based on the conceptual framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), (2) deciding on an interview-based format appropriate for addressing functioning pre- and post-ED, (3) developing an initial 63-item pool and reviewing it through a consensus group with seven experts, (4) piloting the prototype with 23 subjects (mean age=76 years) and (5) subsequently revising its rating scales. The final 40 items tool consists of three theoretically derived components. First, activity and participation (n=23 items) address nine ICF domains using a 4-level scale combining levels of difficulty and help required. Second, body functions (n=10 items) cover eight ICF domains with a 3-level scale of impairment. And third, environmental factors (n=7 items) address four ICF domains assessed as facilitators or barriers. In conclusion, the FSAS-ED provides a clinical assessment of senior's functional status that is feasible to use in ED. It has potential utility for identifying unmet needs and obstacles for a safe return to the community.

Item analysis of the functional status assessment of seniors in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: To report some psychometric properties of the functional status assessment of seniors in the emergency department (FSAS-ED) at item level. This 40-item tool addresses the person's functional status prior to and following the decision to consult in ED. METHOD: A sample of 150 community-living elderly individuals who consulted the ED was recruited. Two evaluators administered the FSAS-ED in the ED and scored it independently. Three measurement properties were considered relevant for the item analysis: response distribution, inter-rater reliability and the ability to indicate a change between before and following the decision to consult ED. Criteria related to these properties were established to classify items as being excellent, acceptable or weak. RESULTS: The response distributions were excellent or acceptable for 36 items (90%). Results pertaining to inter-rater reliability showed 39 excellent or acceptable items (97.5%). Comparison of the responses between before and following the decision to consult to ED showed 24 (60%) excellent or acceptable items and 16 (40%) weak items; the latter were related to communication and cognitive skills. CONCLUSIONS: At the item level, the FSAS-ED provides reliable and clinically relevant information about the functional status of older adults consulting ED.

[Description of the practice of occupational therapy in emergency rooms in Quebec]. / Description de la pratique des ergothérapeutes du Québec en salle d'urgence.

INTRODUCTION: Occupational therapists intervene in emergency departments, but the nature and scope of this practice is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the professional practice of Quebec's occupational therapists in emergency departments. METHODS: Questionnaires covering the general context of practice, nature of interventions, assessment tools, models of practice and the satisfaction of working in emergency departments were sent by mail to the members of l'Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec. RESULTS: Occupational therapists have been working in emergency departments in several socio-administrative regions of Quebec and their work experience ranges from 1 to 11 years. They spend over 90% percent of their time with older adults and are members of interdisciplinary teams. They assess diverse areas of functioning and 75% of them use in-house assessment tools. The challenges encountered affect two thirds of the respondants who describe their satistaction level toward the practice as being neutral or unsatisfied. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The respondants have confirmed the emergence of occupational therapy in emergency departments and the need to develop better tools in order to address the problems met in their practice.

Standardized screening and assessment of older patients in the emergency department: a survey of implementation in Quebec.

Cost-effective methods have been developed to help busy emergency department (ED) staff cope with the growing number of older patients, including quick screening and assessment tools to identify those at high risk and note their specific needs. This survey, from a sample of key informants from all EDs (n = 111) in the province of Quebec (participation rate of 88.2%), investigated the implementation of these tools and barriers to implementation. Questionnaires (administered either by telephone or by self-completion) included characteristics of the ED, characteristics of the respondent, use of tools, and method of implementation. Barriers to the implementation of these tools included lack of resources for screening and follow-up, misunderstandings of the difference between screening and assessment tools, and need for adaptation of the tools to the local context. Education of staff and pre-implementation adaptation and testing are needed for successful implementation.