Pre- and postmatch hop test outcomes in soccer players returning to performance after lower extremity injury.

BACKGROUND: Most soccer injuries concern the lower extremity with a higher injury rate during the second half of matches. In advising safe return to sport, hop tests are usually assessed at the point of return to sport under non-fatigued conditions. No studies exist investigating hop test outcomes before and after a match in soccer players returning to performance after lower extremity injury and non-injured teammates. The objective is to assess differences in hop test outcomes before and after a match in and between soccer players returning to performance after lower extremity injury and their non-injured teammates. METHODS: A repeated-measures design was used to measure outcomes on five hop tests before and after a soccer match. For analyzing differences in hop tests before and after a match, paired sample t-tests were used. Independent t-tests were used to analyze differences between soccer players after injury and non-injured teammates. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Hop tests were completed by 61 amateur soccer players after injury and 121 non-injured teammates. Differences in hop tests before and after the match within both groups had negligible to small effect sizes (d=0.00-0.49), except for the figure of 8- and 30-seconds side hop in the injured leg of RTPf soccer players (d=0.56 and d=0.71 respectively). Differences between both groups were negligible to small (d=0.00-0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Soccer players returning to performance after a lower extremity injury showed similar scores on hop tests than their non-injured teammates. More demanding sport-specific performance test and measurement of quality of movement are additionally recommended for safe return to sport decision-making.

The Non-injured Leg Can Be Used as a Reference for the Injured Leg in Single-legged Hop Tests.

BACKGROUND: Single-legged hop tests are frequently used in substantiating return to sport decisions following lower extremity injury. Evidence for using the non-injured leg as a reference for the injured leg in the return to sport decision-making at the criterion-based point of return to sport following lower extremity injury is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare absolute values in single-legged hop tests between the non-injured leg of athletes returning to high-impact sports after lower extremity injury and the matched leg of healthy athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-nine athletes returning to high-impact sports after lower extremity injury and 169 matched healthy athletes executed five single-legged hop tests. Differences between athletes returning to high-impact sports after lower extremity injury and matched healthy athletes on five single-legged hop tests were analyzed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the non-injured leg of athletes returning to sport and the matched leg of healthy athletes. Effect sizes ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 indicating negligible effects. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can use the non-injured leg as a reference for the injured leg in single-legged hop tests for deciding on return to high-impact sports after lower extremity injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Association between Functional Performance and Return to Performance in High-Impact Sports after Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review.

After lower extremity injury, only half of the injured athletes return to their pre-injury sports level. Even though functional performance tests are often used to make return to sport decisions, it is unknown whether functional performance is associated with return to performance after such injuries. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, critically appraise, and analyze studies that investigated the association of functional performance tests with return to performance after lower extremity injuries in athletes participating in high-impact sports. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched for relevant studies. Articles were independently screened by two authors and data were obtained from each included study using a data extraction form. Two authors independently scored methodological quality using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. A qualitative best evidence synthesis was conducted. Eight studies reported the association of functional performance with return to performance after lower extremity injuries, involving 1,246 athletes after anterior or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. No studies were found on the association of functional performance with return to performance for lower extremity injuries other than after anterior or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. All included studies had a high risk of bias. Two studies found significant but small associations for selected hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Low evidence of association between functional performance and return to performance was present after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for the triple hop for distance, the 6-meter timed hop, the side hop in female athletes, and for the combination of the single and crossover hop for distance. In athletes after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the vertical jump showed a significant but small association with return to performance. There is no high-quality evidence that functional performance is associated with return to performance after lower extremity injuries in athletes practicing high-impact sports. Low quality evidence suggests small associations after anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. No evidence exists for lower extremity injuries other than after anterior or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Therefore, research on functional performance associated with return to performance is recommended in high-quality prospective cohort studies including athletes with any type of lower extremity injury.

TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF THE DUTCH INJURY PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS TO RETURN TO SPORT SCALE (I-PRRS).

BACKGROUND: In facilitating and predicting successful return to sport (RTS), not only are physical factors important, but also the athlete's psychological status. No questionnaire in the Dutch language exists for measuring psychological readiness for RTS after injuries in general. PURPOSE: To translate and validate the Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport scale into the Dutch language. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, validation study. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight athletes, returning to high impact sports after lower extremity injuries, completed the Dutch I-PRRS twice. Another 162 athletes who visited their physical therapist for initial intake also completed the questionnaire. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, reproducibility, construct validity, and divergent validity were analyzed. RESULTS: The I-PRRS was successfully translated into Dutch and showed no floor or ceiling effects. It had good internal consistency (0.85) and good test-retest reproducibility (ICC 0.74, 95% CI 0.43-0.86) where the lower bound of 95% CI indicates at least fair reproducibility. The SEM was 2.02 and the MDC 5.58 points. There was a significant fair correlation between total scores on the I-PRRS and TSK (rs = 0.41, p<0.001). Athletes who RTS and those who initially visited their physical therapist differed significantly on all items and on total scores (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The I-PRRS was successfully translated into Dutch and can be administered to athletes with lower extremity injuries who have clearance to RTS. The MDC of 5.58 on the total score indicated that with a score below six, there is no noticeable change outside the measurement error. For measuring and monitoring psychological readiness for RTS, the use of the Dutch I-PRRS is recommended for Dutch physical therapists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.