16S rRNA PCR followed by restriction endonuclease digestion: a rapid approach for genus level identification of important enteric bacterial pathogens.

The study describes a rapid approach for detection of common enteric bacterial pathogens, which involves partial amplification of the 16S rRNA gene by PCR using a colony from selective medium followed by restriction enzyme (RE) digestion using the EcoRI, HindIII and SalI enzymes. On the basis of RE digestion analysis different genera namely, Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Yesinia and Listeria were differentiated.

Human 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase/inosine 5'-monophosphate cyclohydrolase. A bifunctional protein requiring dimerization for transformylase activity but not for cyclohydrolase activity.

The bifunctional enzyme aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase/inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase (ATIC) is responsible for catalysis of the last two steps in the de novo purine pathway. Gel filtration studies performed on human enzyme suggested that this enzyme is monomeric in solution. However, cross-linking studies performed on both yeast and avian ATIC indicated that this enzyme might be dimeric. To determine the oligomeric state of this protein in solution, we carried out sedimentation equilibrium analysis of ATIC over a broad concentration range. We find that ATIC participates in a monomer/dimer equilibrium with a dissociation constant of 240 +/- 50 nM at 4 degrees C. To determine whether the presence of substrates affects the monomer/dimer equilibrium, further ultracentrifugation studies were performed. These showed that the equilibrium is only significantly shifted in the presence of both AICAR and a folate analog, resulting in a 10-fold reduction in the dissociation constant. The enzyme concentration dependence on each of the catalytic activities was studied in steady state kinetic experiments. These indicated that the transformylase activity requires dimerization whereas the cyclohydrolase activity only slightly prefers the dimeric form over the monomeric form.

Structure and functional relationships in human pur H.

1. The human pur H (ATIC) gene encoding a bifunctional protein, hPurH, which carries the penultimate and final enzymatic activities of the purine nucleotide synthesis pathway, AICARFT & IMPCH, has been cloned and sequenced. The gene product, hPurH has been overexpressed in E. coli, purified to homogeneity and crystallized. 2. The human pur H gene lies on chromosome 2, between band q34 and q35. There is at least one intron of 278 bp near the 5' end. 3. Truncation mutant studies demonstrate two non-overlapping functional domains in the protein arranged as indicated in Figure 5. The existence of a linker or interaction region between the catalytic domains remains to be established. 4. Cleland-type kinetic inhibition experiments indicate that the AICARFT reaction is of the ordered, sequential type with the reduced folate cofactor binding first. 5. The reaction has a broad pH optimum in the alkaline range, with a maximum at about pH 8.2. 6. Preliminary transient phase kinetic studies show the presence of a "burst" indicating that a late step in the reaction sequence is rate limiting. 7. A PurH crystal structure is that of a dimer, with a putative single binding site for the reduced folate cofactor formed using elements from each of the monomer subunits. Probable binding sites for AICAR and FAICAR can be identified on each monomer. 8. Equilibrium sedimentation studies show hPurH apoprotein to be a monomer:dimer equilibrium mixture with a kD of 0.55 uM. 9. The crystal structure has permitted identification of a number of candidate amino acid residues likely to be involved in catalysis and/or substrate binding. Among these, we have thus far completed studies on two, Lysine 265 and Histidine 266. These appear to be critically involved in the AICARFT reaction, although whether their role(s) are in catalysis or binding remains to be determined.

Evaluation of indapamide 1.25 mg once daily in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of indapamide 1.25 mg once daily as monotherapy in elderly patients (65 years and older) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Two hundred and seventy-nine (279) elderly patients were enrolled in a washout period, during which patients received single-blind placebo for 4 weeks. Patients demonstrating supine diastolic pressures between 95 mm Hg and 114 mm Hg at the end of the 4-week placebo washout period were entered into the 8-week double-blind treatment period. Two hundred and four (204) patients qualified for the study and were randomized to the double-blind treatment; 103 patients received indapamide 1.25 mg and 101 patients received placebo for 8 weeks. Overall, 177 patients (92 indapamide and 85 placebo) completed the study. The primary efficacy criterion was the mean change in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from double-blind baseline to the end of 8 weeks of therapy. By week 8 of the double-blind treatment period, indapamide 1.25 mg produced a statistically significant (P = 0.0037) decrease in supine DBP of 8.2 mm Hg compared to a decrease of 5.3 mm Hg produced in the placebo group. Additionally, indapamide 1.25 mg was statistically (P = 0.0028) more effective than placebo in reducing supine systolic BP (SBP) (-10.1 vs -4.2 mm Hg). The incidence of drug-related adverse events during the double-blind treatment period was similar between the two treatment groups. A low dose of indapamide, 1.25 mg, given once daily for 8 weeks was effective as monotherapy with respect to BP reduction in an elderly population with mild to moderate hypertension. Indapamide 1.25 mg was safe and generally well tolerated in this elderly patient population.

Conversion from 2.5 mg to 1.25 mg indapamide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Indapamide is an effective antihypertensive drug with diuretic and vasodilating activities. The common starting dose has been 2.5 mg to 5 mg. A lower dose formulation (1.25 mg) is now available. The safety and efficacy of switching patients from indapamide 2.5 mg to indapamide 1.25 mg was evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-eight adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were enrolled in a washout period, during which patients received single-blind placebo for 4 weeks. All 378 patients qualified for the study and received open-label treatment with indapamide 2.5 mg for 8 weeks. Of the 378 patients, 265 responded to indapamide 2.5 mg and were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either indapamide 1.25 mg (n = 132) or 2.5 mg (n = 133) for 8 weeks. Overall, 245 of the 378 patients who were initially enrolled completed the study. The primary efficacy variable was the number of patients in each treatment group who maintained a supine diastolic blood pressure of < or = 90 mm Hg (treatment success) by the end of the double-blind period (week 16). RESULTS: Treatment with indapamide 1.25 mg once daily was as efficacious as the 2.5-mg once-daily dose. No significant difference was observed for the percentage of patients who achieved treatment success between the patients switched from indapamide 2.5 to 1.25 mg (74%) and the control group maintained on indapamide 2.5 mg (70%). The incidence of drug-related adverse events during the double-blind period was similar between the two treatment groups. The mean change from pretreatment baseline to endpoint in serum potassium was -0.2 mEq/L (-0.2 mmol/L) in the indapamide 1.25 mg treatment group, compared with -0.4 mEq/L (-0.4 mmol/L) in the indapamide 2.5 mg treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Indapamide 1.25 mg given once daily for 8 weeks was as effective as 2.5 mg once daily in reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.