Prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium among clients of two sexual health centres in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations (QRAMs) in Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) among clients of two sexual health centres (SHCs) in the Netherlands. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2018 and 2019, 669 clients with MG were included from two previous studies: 375 male clients with urethritis from the SHC in Amsterdam; and 294 clients (male and female) from the SHC in Amsterdam and The Hague. Urogenital and anal samples (705 in total) that tested positive for MG by nucleic acid amplification tests were selected. OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of QRAM was detected by an MG-QRAM PCR targeting four mutations in the parC gene and investigated by sequence analysis of relevant regions of the gyrA and parC genes. Possible risk factors for the presence of QRAM were investigated. RESULTS: We found QRAM in 58 of 669 (9%) clients with an MG infection: 36 of 375 (10%) in the study population of men with urethritis and 22 of 294 (7%) in the study population of other clients (including both men and women; p=0.334). Most prevalent mutations in the parC gene were S83I and D87N, occurring in 31 of 60 (52%) and 20 of 60 (33%) samples, respectively. Factors associated with the presence of QRAM were: men who have sex with men (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.9) and Asian origin (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.6). Multidrug resistance (QRAM plus macrolide resistance-associated mutations) was found in 46 of 669 (7%) clients. CONCLUSIONS: Nine per cent of MG-positive clients from two Dutch SHCs had QRAM. New treatment strategies and antibiotics are needed to treat symptomatic patients with multidrug-resistant MG.

Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma genitalium Impairs Clinical Improvement of Male Urethritis After Empirical Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is associated with urethritis in men and could play a role in clinical outcome. We examined clinical improvement of symptoms in men receiving empirical treatment for urethritis and correlated the outcome with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), MG, and MG macrolide resistance-associated mutations (MRAM) status. METHODS: At the sexually transmitted infection clinic in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, empirical treatment for gonococcal urethritis is 1 g ceftriaxone and for nongonococcal urethritis 1 g azithromycin. In 2018 to 2019, we tested urine samples of men with urethritis for CT, NG, and MG using transcription-mediated amplification assays. Mycoplasma genitalium-positive samples were tested for MRAM using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Two weeks after receiving therapy, men were sent a text message inquiring after clinical improvement. RESULTS: We evaluated 2505 cases of urethritis. The positivity rates of NG, CT, and MG were 26% (648 of 2489), 29% (726 of 2489), and 23% (522 of 2288), respectively. In 768 of 2288 of the cases (34%), no causative agent was detected. Most cases were infected with a single pathogen: NG, 417 of 2288 (18%); CT, 486 of 2288 (21%); and MG, 320 of 2288 (14%). The prevalence of MRAM among MG-positives was 74% (327 of 439). For 642 (25.6%) cases, we could evaluate clinical improvement after treatment of whom 127 (20%) indicated no improvement; 9% (15 of 174) in NG cases, 18% (35 of 195) in CT cases, 14% (4 of 28) in MG wild-type cases, and 40% (38 of 94) in MG-MRAM cases. Clinical improvement in MG-MRAM cases was significantly lower compared with all other groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of MG-MRAM is associated with lack of clinical improvement in azithromycin-treated nongonococcal urethritis.

High prevalence and resistance rates of Mycoplasma genitalium among patients visiting two sexually transmitted infection clinics in the Netherlands.

Mycoplasma genitalium is a well-known cause of urethritis in men and has been associated with cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and adverse obstetric outcomes in women. In this cross-sectional study, we determined the current prevalence of M. genitalium infection and the rate of macrolide resistance in M. genitalium isolates, in patients visiting two large Dutch sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics, to evaluate whether the recommendations in Dutch guidelines should be revised. In addition, risk factors for M. genitalium were identified. In total, 3225 patients were included. M. genitalium prevalence rates were 13.8% for all patients; 20.1% for men who have sex with men, 8.2% for men who have sex with women, and 12.6% for women. Macrolide resistance-associated mutations were detected in 66% of the patients infected with M. genitalium. Age, educational level, country of origin, number of sexual partners, HIV-positivity, infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and urethral symptoms in men were independently associated with M. genitalium infection. In conclusion, we found very high prevalence rates and macrolide resistance rates of M. genitalium in patients visiting STI clinics.

Evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium using a newly developed qPCR assay.

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is a sexually transmitted bacterium in which macrolide resistance is rapidly increasing, limiting treatment options. We validated a new assay to detect the presence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in MG (MG-MRAM). In 2018, symptomatic and asymptomatic clients visiting sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinics in Amsterdam or The Hague were tested for MG using transcription mediated amplification (TMA) assays. The sensitivity to detect MG of the newly developed MG-MRAM qPCR was compared to the MgPa qPCR, both in relation to the TMA assay. For the sensitivity and specificity to detect relevant mutations the MG-MRAM qPCR was compared to 23SrRNA sequencing analysis. The qPCR was subsequently used to determine the presence of MG-MRAM at different anatomical locations and to identify risk factors for MG-MRAM. MG-positive clients (402) providing 493 MG-positive samples were included. In total 309/493 (62.7%) samples from 291 (72.4%) clients were successfully typed with the MG-MRAM qPCR. The MG-MRAM qPCR had a sensitivity of 98.6% (95%CI 91.1%-99.9%) and specificity of 94.1% (95%CI 78.9%-99.0%) to detect MG-MRAM compared to sequencing analysis. Infection with MG-MRAM was detected in 193/291 (66.3%) clients: in 129/178 (72.5%) men and 64/113 (56.6%) women (p = 0.005). Prevalence of MG-MRAM was significantly higher in men, clients with a higher education, HIV-positive clients and clients with >10 sexual partners in the previous six months, but in multivariable analysis no factor was significantly associated with MG-MRAM presence. Since MG-MRAM prevalence was very high, testing for MG-MRAM is essential if treatment for MG is considered, and can be performed with this sensitive and specific qPCR test in routine diagnostics.

[A girl with desquamation of hands and feet]. / Een meisje met vervellende handen en voeten.

A 3-year-old girl presented with desquamation of hands and feet, preceded by sore throat and subfebrile temperature. She developed exanthema with typical skip lesions and orange hyperkeratosis. The diagnosis 'classic juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris' was made. The girl was successfully treated with acitretin.

Why CCR2 and CCR5 blockade failed and why CCR1 blockade might still be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monocytes from healthy donors (HD; n = 8) or from RA patients (for CCR2 and CCR5 antibody n = 8; for CCR1 blockade n = 13) were isolated from peripheral blood and pre-incubated with different concentrations of either anti-CCR1, anti-CCR2, or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies (or medium or isotype controls). In addition, a small molecule CCR1 antagonist (BX471) was tested. Chemotaxis was induced by CCL2/MCP-1 (CCR2 ligand), CCL5/RANTES (CCR1 and CCR5 ligand), or by a mix of 5 RA synovial fluids (SFs), and cellular responses compared to chemotaxis in the presence of medium alone. Anti-CCR2 antibody treatment blocked CCL2/MCP-1-induced chemotaxis of both HD and RA monocytes compared to isotype control. Similarly, anti-CCR5 antibody treatment blocked CCL5/RANTES-induced chemotaxis of RA monocytes. While neither CCR2 nor CCR5 blocking antibodies were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis, even when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, both anti-CCR1 antibodies and the CCR1 antagonist were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The RA synovial compartment contains several ligands for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 as well as other chemokines and receptors involved in monocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation. The results suggest that CCR2 and CCR5 are not critical for the migration of monocytes towards the synovial compartment in RA. In contrast, blockade of CCR1 may be effective. Conceivably, CCR1 blockade failed in clinical trials, not because CCR1 is not a good target, but because very high levels of receptor occupancy at all times may be needed to inhibit monocyte migration in vivo.

[An infant without nails]. / Een neonaat zonder nagels.

A 2-week-old boy, born after an uncomplicated pregnancy of consanguineous parents, was seen with congenital absence of all nails on fingers and toes. After 6 weeks marginal nail growth was seen. Because there were no other congenital abnormalities, this was considered to be anonychia congenita; probably caused by a recessive defect of the R-spondin 4-coding gene.

CCR5 blockade in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), a chemokine receptor expressed on T cells and macrophages, and its ligands are found in inflamed synovial tissue (ST) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The rationale for testing CCR5 blockade in patients with RA was supported by the effects of a CCR5 antagonist in collagen-induced arthritis in rhesus monkeys. The effects of CCR5 blockade in patients with active RA were explored. METHODS: In this phase Ib randomised, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with an oral CCR5 inhibitor (SCH351125) in patients with active RA was evaluated. Clinical efficacy was assessed using European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria. ST biopsies were taken before and after 28 days of treatment, and analysed for CCR5+ cells. In a subset of patients, MRIs of an inflamed joint were obtained before and after treatment. RESULTS: In all, 32 patients were included; 20 received SCH351125 and 12 placebo. Three patients who received SCH351125 did not complete the study due to adverse events; none of these were serious. No improvement was observed in the active treatment group compared to placebo. Results were consistent for clinical evaluation, ST analysis and MRI. CONCLUSION: This proof of concept study does not support the use of CCR5 blockade as a therapeutic strategy in patients with active RA.

MLN3897 plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of an oral CCR1 antagonist in a phase IIa, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the CC chemokine receptor CCR1 antagonist MLN3897 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In this phase IIa, proof-of-concept study, patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA who had been taking MTX for >or=6 months with evidence of active disease were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg oral MLN3897 or matching placebo once daily for 12 weeks (days 1-83) while continuing to receive MTX once a week. Clinical assessments, safety monitoring, and sampling for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed throughout the study. The primary efficacy end point was the difference in the percentage of patients meeting the ACR 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) on day 84 in the MLN3897-treated group compared with that in the placebo-treated group. RESULTS: MLN3897 was well tolerated, with no evidence of systemic immunosuppression. In the intent-to-treat population, there was no significant difference in day 84 ACR20 response rates between MLN3897-treated patients and placebo-treated patients (35% versus 33%, respectively; P=0.72). Results were similar for the per-protocol population. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated no interactions between MLN3897 and MTX. MLN3897 was associated with a high degree of CCR1 occupancy (>or=90% on days 28, 56, and 84 in 82% of patients, by macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha internalization assay). CONCLUSION: MLN3897 at a concentration of 10 mg once daily had no discernible activity in patients with RA who were also receiving MTX. The results suggest that CCR1 antagonism is unlikely to be a viable strategy for the treatment of RA when used in isolation at the receptor occupancy levels reached in this study.

Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: CCR2 is a chemokine receptor expressed by monocytes, macrophages, and a subset of T cells. Its ligand, CCL2 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1), is abundantly present in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Blocking CCR2 prevents CCL2-mediated chemotaxis in vitro and modulates arthritis in animal models of RA. In this study we examined the effects of CCR2 blockade on synovial inflammation in RA. METHODS: The study was designed as a phase IIa clinical trial with a human CCR2 blocking antibody (MLN1202) in patients with active RA. Thirty-two patients received 3 infusions, over a period of 6 weeks, with either placebo (n = 9) or anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody at 0.5 mg/kg (n = 7), 1.5 mg/kg (n = 7), or 4.0 mg/kg (n = 9). Safety was monitored with laboratory tests, immunotoxicity assessments, and documenting of adverse events, and European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria were used to assess clinical improvement. Synovial tissue was obtained at baseline and after 43 days of treatment, for pharmacodynamic analysis using immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess changes within the groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. Treatment with CCR2 blocking antibody reduced the levels of free CCR2 on CD14+ monocytes by at least 57% and up to 94% (P < 0.001), demonstrating the biologic activity of the compound. However, there was no reduction in the levels or expression of any of the synovial biomarkers. Accordingly, no clinical improvement was observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-CCR2 blocking antibody did not result in amelioration of synovial inflammation in active RA. The results do not support the notion that blockade of CCR2 may be sufficient to induce clinical improvement in RA.

Chemokines: their role in rheumatoid arthritis.

Chemokines are small proteins that can act on cells that express matching receptors. They are best known for their role in migration of cells, especially immune cells. Chemokine/chemokine-receptor pairs are often functionally categorized into three groups: inflammatory, homeostatic, and angiogenic/angiostatic, although functions sometimes overlap. Interfering with the interaction between chemokines and their receptors is currently under investigation as a therapeutic strategy in rheumatoid arthritis.

An index for renal outcome in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze the predictive value of clinical, serological, and histological parameters for renal outcome in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis by multivariate analysis and create an index valid for clinical use. METHODS: Data from 160 patients with Wegener's granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, and idiopathic rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis without immune deposits (renal-limited vasculitis) were collected. The Cockcroft formula was used to assess renal function expressed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of renal biopsy (t = 0) and 1 year later (t = 1). Other clinical parameters were age, sex, and diagnosis. ANCA test results were scored as cytoplasmic ANCA/antiproteinase 3 (anti-PR3) or perinuclear ANCA/antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) positive or negative. Histological data included normal glomeruli, fibrinoid necrosis, extracapillary proliferation, granulomas, interstitial edema, focal and diffuse infiltrates, fibrosis, tubular cylinders/casts, tubular atrophy, tubular necrosis, sclerosis, mesangial proliferation, mesangial matrix expansion, arteriosclerosis, and infiltrates in arterioles. In a separate analysis, we explored whether there were histological differences between patients with anti-PR3 and anti-MPO ANCA test results. RESULTS: Forty percent of the variation in renal function at the time of biopsy can be explained by the presence or absence of tubular atrophy, normal glomeruli, fibrinoid necrosis, extracapillary proliferation, and age. Renal function at the time of biopsy is the best predictor for renal function at t = 1 in patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Together with normal glomeruli, fibrinoid necrosis, and age, it explains more than 60% of the variation in GFR at t = 1. ANCA subtype has no independent contribution in predicting patient prognosis. Results translated into a clinically relevant index: GFR at t = 1 = 36.96 + 0.65* (GFR at t = 0) + 10.52 (if normal glomeruli present) + 7.72 (if fibrinoid necrosis present) - 0.42* (age). CONCLUSION: The index created with results from this study provides an indication of renal outcome in patients diagnosed with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.