Internal Hernia After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Without Preventive Closure of Mesenteric Defects: a Single Institution's Experience.

BACKGROUND: Internal herniation (IH) is a well-known complication after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB). Diagnosing and managing IH can be challenging. This retrospective cohort study aimed to achieve a greater understanding of symptomatology, diagnostic tools, complications, risk of IH recurrence, and symptom relief in IH patients. METHODS: We included patients who underwent LGB surgery at our institution between 2011 and 2015. Mesenteric defects were not preventively closed during LGB. We focused on LGB patients who underwent surgical intervention(s) for suspected IH during a 7-year study period. We studied patient characteristics, (predictive) symptoms and signs, abdominal imaging, operative findings, post-operative course, and risk of (recurrent) IH. RESULTS: A total of 1588 patients were included. In total, 243 patients underwent IH-related diagnostic laparoscopy. Radiating pain to the back (OR 2.45, p = .03), post-prandial pain (OR 3.23, p = .00), and leukocytosis (OR 15.53, p = .01) were identified as predictors of IH. The estimated risk of IH-related diagnostic laparoscopy was 16% at 3 years post-LGB, and the risk of confirmed IH was 12%. The estimated risk of diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected recurrent IH was 10% at 5 years post-LGB. In patients who underwent secondary mesenteric defects closure, post-operative symptom relief was reported in 84%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a considerable risk of developing IH after LGB without preventive closure of the mesenteric defects. We emphasize the value of diagnostic laparoscopy to achieve symptom relief in patients with suspicion of IH. Preoperative diagnosis of IH can be improved by being watchful of specific symptoms and signs which can predict the intra-operative presence of IH.

Implementation of the small bites closure of abdominal midline incisions in clinical practice is correlated with a reduction in surgical site infections.

BACKGROUND: Small steps wound closure of midline laparotomy has been reported to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia development in two randomized controlled trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of implementing the small steps wound closure technique in clinical practice with regards to the development of incisional ventral hernia (IVH) and surgical site infections (SSI) in clinical practice. METHODS: Implementation of the small steps wound closure technique using the small tissue bites technique as the standard closure technique for abdominal midline incisions in our clinical practice was done in March 2015. For this study, all patients from June 2013 until June 2016 with a midline laparotomy, either long or small in case of specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery, in either elective or emergency setting were included. Conventional large bite wound closure was compared to small steps wound closure with regards to the development of SSI, IVH as well as burst abdomen. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were included. The small steps suture technique was used in 136 (42%) of the patients, whereas the conventional large bites suture technique was used in 191 patients (58%). A total of 54 patients in the large bites group developed SSI (28%) compared to 23 (17%) patients in the small steps group (p = 0.02). A total number of 10 patients (7%) developed IVH in the small steps group compared to 27 patients (14%) in the large bites group (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Implementation of small bites wound closure of abdominal midline incisions in clinical practice was correlated with a reduction in surgical site infections.