Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 30(3): 426-30, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611849

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report outcome of eyes with recalcitrant and naive eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex) injection. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter data analysis of eyes with DME treated with Ozurdex implant and with minimum follow-up of at least one year after the first implant. Data collected included demographic details, history of presenting illness, past treatment history, clinical examination details including visual acuity at presentation, and follow-up with imaging and treatment details. Paired sample t-test was used to measure mean differences between pre- and post-implant values obtained at baseline and last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 79 eyes (62 subjects) were included. Sixty-four eyes had been previously treated; 15 eyes were naive. Among the previously treated eyes, mean interval between first Ozurdex injection and any previous treatment was 7.69±8.2 months. In naive eyes, the visual acuity improved from baseline 0.58±0.25 to 0.44±0.33 logMAR at last follow-up (P=0.05). In eyes that had been previously treated, the improvement was from 0.65±0.34 at baseline to 0.48±0.35 logMAR (P=0.01). Mean treatment-free interval was 6.5±4.5 months. Nine eyes were steroid responder with controlled intraocular pressure (IOP), none showed any spike in IOP during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Ozurdex implant could be a good alternative for recalcitrant as well as naive eyes with DME. The visual gain after initial implant injection was fairly maintained, with additional treatment usually after 6 months in naive eyes. Ozurdex appeared safe even in steroid responders with good control of IOP with antiglaucoma medications.


Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Implantes de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/fisiopatología , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 18(6): 934-40, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18988165

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To verify the efficacy of nonvisible micropulse diode laser irradiation in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with CSC for a total of 24 eyes with a disease duration longer than 3 months were included in a prospective study. Patients underwent Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) examination, dilated ophthalmoscopy, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography before treatment and during follow- up. Treatment with a micropulse diode laser was given with a duty cycle of 15%. Multiple spots were placed over and adjacent to the area of retinal pigment epithelium leak or decompensation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 14 months (range 3-36 months). Powers used ranged from 1 to 2 W (mean 1.35 W). Mean number of spots was 215 (range 90-400). Fourteen eyes were treated once, nine eyes received two to three treatments, and one eye had five treatments during a follow-up of 3 years. Subretinal fluid was resolved or improved in two third of cases 1 month after laser treatment, and in three-quarters at the end of follow-up. Mean retinal thickness was 328 microm, 197 microm, and 168 microm before, 1 month after irradiation, and at the end of follow-up, respectively. No evidence of RPE or retinal changes due to laser treatment were discernible in most of the eyes. Median VA was 20/32 (range 20/100-20/20) before treatment and 20/25 (range 20/200-20/20) at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nonvisible micropulse diode laser may have efficacy in the treatment of CSC. A randomized study with larger series is needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Coroides/cirugía , Coagulación con Láser/métodos , Láseres de Semiconductores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de la Retina/cirugía , Adulto , Permeabilidad Capilar , Enfermedades de la Coroides/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Coroides/fisiopatología , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Rayos Infrarrojos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oftalmoscopía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades de la Retina/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Retina/fisiopatología , Epitelio Pigmentado de la Retina/patología , Epitelio Pigmentado de la Retina/cirugía , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA