Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 107
Filtrar
1.
Inj Prev ; 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: State opioid prescribing cap laws, mandatory prescription drug monitoring programme query or enrolment laws and pill mill laws have been implemented across US states to curb high-risk opioid prescribing. Previous studies have measured the impact of these laws on opioid use and overdose death, but no prior work has measured the impact of these laws on fatal crashes in a multistate analysis. METHODS: To study the association between state opioid prescribing laws and fatal crashes, 13 treatment states that implemented a single law of interest in a 4-year period were identified, together with unique groups of control states for each treatment state. Augmented synthetic control analyses were used to estimate the association between each state law and the overall rate of fatal crashes, and the rate of opioid-involved fatal crashes, per 100 000 licensed drivers in the state. Fatal crash data came from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System. RESULTS: Results of augmented synthetic control analyses showed small-in-magnitude, non-statistically significant changes in all fatal crash outcomes attributable to the 13 state opioid prescribing laws. While non-statistically significant, results attributable to the laws varied in either direction-from an increase of 0.14 (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.60) fatal crashes per 100 000 licensed drivers attributable to Ohio's opioid prescribing cap law, to a decrease of 0.30 (95% CI, -1.17 to 0.57) fatal crashes/100 000 licensed drivers attributable to Mississippi's pill mill law. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that state-level opioid prescribing laws are insufficient to help address rising rates of fatally injured drivers who test positive for opioids. Other options will be needed to address this continuing injury problem.

2.
Prev Med ; 165(Pt A): 107314, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384853

RESUMEN

Gun-related deaths and gun purchases were at record highs in 2020. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, public protests against police violence, and a tense political environment, which may influence policy preferences, we aimed to understand the current state of support for gun policies in the U.S. We fielded a national public opinion survey in January 2019 and January 2021 using an online panel to measure support for 34 gun policies among U.S. adults. We compared support over time, by gun ownership status, and by political party affiliation. Most respondents supported 33 of the 34 gun regulations studied. Support for seven restrictive policies declined from 2019 to 2021, driven by reduced support among non-gun owners. Support declined for three permissive policies: allowing legal gun carriers to bring guns onto college campuses or K-12 schools and stand your ground laws. Public support for gun-related policies decreased from 2019 to 2021, driven by decreased support among Republicans and non-gun owners.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Armas de Fuego , Adulto , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Políticas , Propiedad
3.
Prev Med ; 164: 107242, 2022 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087625

RESUMEN

Gun-related deaths and gun purchases were at record highs in 2020. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, public protests against police violence, and a tense political environment, which may influence policy preferences, we aimed to understand the current state of support for gun policies in the U.S. We fielded a national public opinion survey in January 2019 and January 2021 using an online panel to measure support for 34 gun policies among U.S. adults. We compared support over time, by gun ownership status, and by political party affiliation. Most respondents supported 33 of the 34 gun regulations studied. Support for seven restrictive policies declined from 2019 to 2021, driven by reduced support among non-gun owners. Support declined for three permissive policies: allowing legal gun carriers to bring guns onto college campuses or K-12 schools and stand your ground laws. Public support for gun-related policies decreased from 2019 to 2021, driven by decreased support among Republicans and non-gun owners.

4.
Am J Prev Med ; 62(6): 878-884, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597567

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Low wages are associated with an increased risk of occupational injuries. Increasing the minimum wage is one way to increase workers' wages; however, a previous study found that higher state minimum wage was associated with an increase in nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses. This study aims to examine the association between state minimum-wage laws and fatal occupational injuries. METHODS: Fatal occupational injury data (2003-2017) for the 50 U.S. states were obtained from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. State minimum-wage law information was obtained from Temple's LawAtlas website. Linear and Poisson regression models were used to analyze the association between state minimum-wage laws and the rates of fatal occupational injury per 100,000 workers. All data were analyzed in 2020. RESULTS: Having a state minimum wage higher than the federal minimum had no statistically significant association with fatal occupational injury rate, (-4.0%, 95% CI= -9.1, 1.5). State minimum wage amount was also not associated with fatal occupational injuries (-4.0%, 95% CI= -9.1, 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although previous research suggested that state minimum-wage laws were associated with increased rates of nonfatal occupational injuries, these findings indicate that these laws are not associated with an increased risk of fatal occupational injuries. Concerns that raising the minimum wage will lead to worse workplace safety may be unfounded.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Ocupacionales , Accidentes de Trabajo , Humanos , Renta , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Salarios y Beneficios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo
5.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0241512, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34460821

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tobacco policies, including clean indoor air laws and cigarette taxes, increase smoking cessation in part by stimulating the use of cessation treatments. We explored whether the associations between tobacco policies and treatment use varies across sociodemographic groups. METHODS: We used data from 62,165 U.S. adult participants in the 2003 and 2010/11 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) who reported smoking cigarettes during the past-year. We built on prior structural equation models used to quantify the degree to which smoking cessation treatment use (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, counseling/support groups, quitlines, and internet resources) mediated the association between clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and recent smoking cessation. In the current study, we added selected moderators to each model to investigate whether associations between tobacco polices and smoking cessation treatment use varied by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and health insurance status. RESULTS: Associations between clean indoor air laws and the use of prescription medication and nicotine replacement therapies varied significantly between racial/ethnic, age, and education groups in 2003. However, none of these moderation effects remained significant in 2010/11. Higher cigarette excise taxes in 2010/2011 were associated with higher odds of using counseling among older adults and higher odds of using prescription medications among younger adults. No other moderator reached statistical significance. Smoking cessation treatments did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking cessation in 2003 and were not included in these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic differences in associations between clean indoor air laws and smoking cessation treatment use have decreased from 2003 to 2010/11. In most cases, policies appear to stimulate smoking cessation treatment use similarly across varied sociodemographic groups.


Asunto(s)
Nicotiana/efectos adversos , Política Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Uso de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Contaminación del Aire Interior/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis de Mediación , Impuestos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Estados Unidos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 47: 58-65, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773299

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: From 2009 to 2016, >21,000 children died and an estimated 118,000 suffered non-fatal injuries from firearms in the United States. Limited data is available on resource utilization by injury intent. We use hospital charges as a proxy for resource use and sought to: 1) estimate mean charges for initial ED and inpatient care for acute firearm injuries among children in the U.S.; 2) compare differences in charges by firearm injury intent among children; and 3) evaluate trends in charges for pediatric firearm injuries over time, including within intent subgroups. METHODS: In this repeated cross-sectional analysis of the 2009-2016 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we identified firearm injury cases among children aged ≤19 years using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM external cause of injury codes (e-codes). Injury intent was categorized using e-codes as unintentional, assault-related, self-inflicted, or undetermined. Linear regressions utilizing survey weighting were used to examine associations between injury intent and healthcare charges, and to evaluate trends in mean charges over time. RESULTS: Among 21,951 unweighted cases representing 102,072 pediatric firearm-related injuries, mean age was 16.6 years, and a majority were male (88.2%) and publicly insured (51.5%). Injuries were 53.9% assault-related, 37.7% unintentional, 1.8% self-inflicted, and 6.7% undetermined. Self-inflicted injuries had higher mean charges ($98,988) than assault-related ($52,496) and unintentional ($28,618) injuries (p < 0.001). Self-inflicted injuries remained associated with higher mean charges relative to unintentional injuries, after adjusting for patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and injury severity (p = 0.015). Mean charges for assault-related injuries also remained significantly higher than charges for unintentional injuries in multivariable models (p < 0.001). After adjusting for inflation, mean charges for pediatric firearm-related injuries increased over time (p-trend = 0.018) and were 23.1% higher in 2016 versus 2009. Mean charges increased over time among unintentional injuries (p-trend = 0.002), but not among cases with assault-related or self-inflicted injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Self-inflicted and assault-related firearm injuries are associated with higher mean healthcare charges than unintentional firearm injuries among children. Mean charges for pediatric firearm injuries have also increased over time. These findings can help guide prevention interventions aimed at reducing the substantial burden of firearm injuries among children.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Intención , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad
7.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(5): 457-460, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732719

RESUMEN

The gap between evidence and policy is a challenge that can be bridged through strategic outreach and translation efforts. We developed and disseminated the Resource for State Policy Makers (the Resource) to lessen the information gap between state policy makers and injury prevention researchers in Maryland. Our goal was to produce and disseminate a resource for policy makers that could be replicated by public health professionals in other states and regions. The Maryland Department of Health assumed production of the Resource in 2017, with assistance from our team. Several states and regions have replicated the Resource for their own jurisdictions. This experience provides an informative case example of one approach to increasing the role of evidence in policy making.


Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo , Política de Salud , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Investigadores , Violencia/prevención & control
8.
Am J Public Health ; 110(10): 1546-1552, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816544

RESUMEN

Objectives. To estimate and compare the effects of state background check policies on firearm-related mortality in 4 US states.Methods. Annual data from 1985 to 2017 were used to examine Maryland and Pennsylvania, which implemented point-of-sale comprehensive background check (CBC) laws for handgun purchasers; Connecticut, which adopted a handgun purchaser licensing law; and Missouri, which repealed a similar law. Using synthetic control methods, we estimated the effects of these laws on homicide and suicide rates stratified by firearm involvement.Results. There was no consistent relationship between CBC laws and mortality rates. There were estimated decreases in firearm homicide (27.8%) and firearm suicide (23.2%-40.5%) rates associated with Connecticut's law. There were estimated increases in firearm homicide (47.3%), nonfirearm homicide (18.1%), and firearm suicide (23.5%) rates associated with Missouri's repeal.Conclusions. Purchaser licensing laws coupled with CBC requirements were consistently associated with lower firearm homicide and suicide rates, but CBC laws alone were not.Public Health Implications. Our results contribute to a body of research showing that CBC laws are not associated with reductions in firearm-related deaths unless they are coupled with handgun purchaser licensing laws.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Ambiente , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estados Unidos
9.
Prev Med ; 135: 106094, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32305579

RESUMEN

After the school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida in 2018, there was an increase in gun violence prevention-related advocacy. While much of this recent political activity and engagement was led by young adults, little is known about support for specific gun policies within this age group. This study uses data from two nationally representative surveys fielded in 2017 and 2019 to compare public support for gun policies: (1) between young adults age 18-29 years and adults age 30 and older, and (2) between young adults in 2017 and young adults in 2019, before and after the Parkland shooting. Relative to adults age 30 and older, young adults had lower support for 16 of 20 gun violence prevention policies examined. Public support was largely unchanged between 2017 and 2019 among survey respondents ages 18-29; however, support for requiring a safety test for concealed carry decreased significantly among young adults between 2017 and 2019. Despite owning fewer guns and finding gun violence prevention important generally, young adults appear to have lower support for policies that regulate guns compared to older adults.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/prevención & control , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Políticas , Opinión Pública , Adulto , Femenino , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Florida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Prev Med ; 136: 106098, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333928

RESUMEN

The role of smoking cessation treatments in the link between clean indoor air laws and cigarette taxes with smoking cessation is not known. This study examined whether the use of smoking cessation treatments mediates the association between clean indoor air laws and cigarette excise taxes, on the one hand, and recent smoking cessation, on the other hand. Using data on 62,165 adult participants in the 2003 and 2010-2011 Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement who reported smoking cigarettes in the past year, we employed structural equation models to quantify the degree to which smoking cessation treatments (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, counseling/support groups, quitlines, and internet-based resources) mediate the association between clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes and recent smoking cessation. Recent smoking cessation was associated with clean indoor air laws in 2003 and with both clean indoor air laws and excise taxes in 2010-2011. Smoking cessation treatments explained between 29% to 39% of the effect of clean indoor air laws and taxes on recent smoking cessation. While clean indoor air laws remained significantly associated with the recent smoking cessation over the first decade of the 2000s, excise taxes gained a more prominent role in later years of that decade. The influence of these policies was partly mediated through the use of smoking cessation treatments, underscoring the importance of policies that make these treatments more widely available.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Humanos , Análisis de Mediación , Fumar , Impuestos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Estados Unidos
11.
Inj Prev ; 26(1): 93-95, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31492689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there are differences in support for handgun purchaser licensing. METHODS: We used data from four waves of online, national polling on gun policy. To estimate differences in support for licensing across groups, we categorised respondents by whether they personally owned a gun, lived in a state with handgun purchaser licensing or lived in a state regulating private sales without a licensing system. RESULTS: Eighty-four per cent of adults living in states with licensing supported the policy compared with 74% in states without the law (p<0.001). Seventy-seven per cent of gun owners living in states with licensing supported the policy vs 59% of gun owners in states without licensing (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Support for licensing among gun owners living in states with these laws, many of whom have presumably gone through the process, was much higher than gun owners in states without such laws.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Opinión Pública , Política Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
12.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 38(10): 1727-1734, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498657

RESUMEN

Gun policy is a prominent topic of debate in the 2020 US election cycle. Tracking evolving public attitudes about gun policy is critical in this context. Using data from the National Survey of Gun Policy fielded in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 by the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, we examined trends in support for more than two dozen gun policies over time by gun ownership status and political party affiliation, and across states. Most policies that we considered had majority support across the study period. We identified increases in public support over time for licensing and universal background checks of handgun purchasers, stronger regulation of gun dealers, and extreme risk protection orders. Gun owners and non-gun owners were highly supportive of requiring tests to demonstrate safe handling before carrying a concealed weapon, but there were large differences in support for other concealed carry policies by gun ownership status. A new item included in the 2019 survey showed that 84 percent of Americans supported requiring first-time gun purchasers to take a safety course. While gun policy continues to be characterized as highly polemical, large majorities of both gun owners and non-gun owners strongly support a range of measures to strengthen US gun laws.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Concesión de Licencias/estadística & datos numéricos , Propiedad , Opinión Pública , Política Pública/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/tendencias , Política , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
J Law Med Ethics ; 47(2): 283-291, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31298090

RESUMEN

Bicycle helmets protect against head injury. Mandatory helmet laws likely increase their use. Although 21 states and Washington, DC have mandatory helmet laws for youth (variously defined) bicyclists, no U.S. state has a mandatory helmet law that applies to all ages; however, some localities have all-age helmet laws for bicyclists. This study abstracted local helmet laws applicable to all-ages to examine their elements.


Asunto(s)
Ciclismo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/prevención & control , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Am J Public Health ; 109(8): 1107-1110, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219716

RESUMEN

Objectives. To learn about local health policymakers' experiences and responses to preemption-the ability of a higher level of government to limit policy activity at a lower level. Methods. Between March and June 2018, we conducted an anonymous Web-based survey of mayors and health officials in US cities with populations of 150 000 or more. We used descriptive statistics to analyze multiple-choice responses. We analyzed open text responses qualitatively. Results. Survey response rates were 28% (mayors) and 32% (health officials). Nearly all respondents found preemption to be an obstacle to local policymaking. When faced with preemption, 72% of health officials and 60% of mayors abandoned or delayed local policymaking efforts. Conclusions. Preemption is viewed as an impediment across a range of public health issues and may stifle local policy activity (i.e., have a chilling effect). Those working at the local level should consider the potential for preemption whenever seeking to address public health concerns in their communities. Public Health Implications. Local governments should engage with advocates, practitioners, and public health lawyers to learn about successful and failed efforts to meet public health objectives when faced with preemption.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Política , Gobierno Estatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
15.
Ann Epidemiol ; 30: 50-56, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744830

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In 1991, California implemented a law that mandated a background check for all firearm purchases with limited exceptions (comprehensive background check or CBC policy) and prohibited firearm purchase and possession for persons convicted within the past 10 years of certain violent crimes classified as misdemeanors (MVP policy). We evaluated the population effect of the simultaneous implementation of CBC and MVP policies in California on firearm homicide and suicide. METHODS: Quasi-experimental ecological study using the synthetic control group methodology. We included annual firearm and nonfirearm mortality data for California and 32 control states for 1981-2000, with secondary analyses up to 2005. RESULTS: The simultaneous implementation of CBC and MVP policies was not associated with a net change in the firearm homicide rate over the ensuing 10 years in California. The decrease in firearm suicides in California was similar to the decrease in nonfirearm suicides in that state. Results were robust across multiple model specifications and methods. CONCLUSIONS: CBC and MVP policies were not associated with changes in firearm suicide or homicide. Incomplete and missing records for background checks, incomplete compliance and enforcement, and narrowly constructed prohibitions may be among the reasons for these null findings.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Aplicación de la Ley , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , California/epidemiología , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/prevención & control , Humanos , Suicidio , Violencia/prevención & control , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control
16.
Inj Prev ; 25(Suppl 1): i2-i4, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331990

RESUMEN

The effectiveness of laws depends on circumstances affecting their enforcement. To assess such circumstances for comprehensive background check (CBC) and straw purchase laws for firearm sales, we examined prosecutions for CBC and straw purchase violations in Pennsylvania and CBC violations in Maryland. We generated pre-post variables and conducted t-tests to assess differences in the mean number of prosecutions filed following changes to the legal environments. The annual number of prosecutions for straw purchase violations increased significantly in Pennsylvania following the passage of a law that strengthened penalties for these violations (difference in means = +1310.86, P=0.003). The annual number of prosecutions for CBC violations decreased significantly in Maryland following a court decision that narrowed the definition of a firearm transfer making enforcement more difficult (difference in means = -20.52, P=0.026). Our findings suggest enforcement is likely influenced by the penalties associated with violating these laws and the interpretation of the language of the laws.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Concesión de Licencias/tendencias , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública/tendencias , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley , Estudios Longitudinales , Maryland , Pennsylvania
17.
Subst Use Misuse ; 54(2): 345-349, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Opioid-related injuries and deaths continue to present challenges for public health practitioners. Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) are a prevalent policy option intended to address problematic opioid pain reliever (OPR) prescribing, but previous research has not thoroughly characterized their unintended consequences. OBJECTIVES: To examine state actors' perceptions of the unintended consequences of PDMPs. METHODS: We conducted 37 interviews with PDMP staff, law enforcement officials, and administrative agency employees in Florida, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Ohio from May 2015 to June 2016. RESULTS: We identified six themes from the interviews. Perceived negative unintended consequences included: access barriers for those with medical needs, heroin use as OPR substitute and related deaths, and need for adequate PDMP security infrastructure and management. Perceived positive unintended consequences were: community formation and problem awareness, proactive population-level OPR monitoring, and increased knowledge about population-level drug diversion. Conclusions/Importance: State actors perceive a range of both negative and positive unintended consequences of PDMPs. Our findings suggest that there may be unintended risks of PDMPs that states should address, but also opportunities to maximize certain benefits.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Dependencia de Heroína , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados , Concienciación , Florida , Humanos , Kentucky , Aplicación de la Ley , New Jersey , Ohio , Investigación Cualitativa
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 169(10): 740, 2018 11 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30452572
19.
J Urban Health ; 95(5): 773-776, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30117057

RESUMEN

The authors would like to publish this erratum to correct estimates generated from regression analyses due to errors discovered in the coding of some state laws.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...