Pemigatinib in previously treated solid tumors with activating FGFR1-FGFR3 alterations: phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket trial.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations drive oncogenesis in multiple tumor types. Here we studied pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral FGFR1-FGFR3 inhibitor, in the phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket study of FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) in cohorts A (fusions/rearrangements, n = 49) and B (activating non-kinase domain mutations, n = 32). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival in cohorts A and B, and safety. Exploratory end points included ORR of cohort C (kinase domain mutations, potentially pathogenic variants of unknown significance, n = 26) and analysis of co-alterations associated with resistance and response. ORRs for cohorts A, B and C were 26.5% (13/49), 9.4% (3/32) and 3.8% (1/26), respectively. Tumors with no approved FGFR inhibitors or those with alterations not previously confirmed to be sensitive to FGFR inhibition had objective responses. In cohorts A and B, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 and 3.7 months, median duration of response was 7.8 and 6.9 months and median overall survival was 17.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (84%) and stomatitis (53%). TP53 co-mutations were associated with lack of response and BAP1 alterations with higher response rates. FGFR1-FGFR3 gatekeeper and molecular brake mutations led to acquired resistance. New therapeutic areas for FGFR inhibition and drug failure mechanisms were identified across tumor types. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03822117 .

Modified study designs to expand treatment options in personalised oncology: a multistakeholder view.

Personalised oncology, whereby patients are given therapies based on their molecular tumour profile, is rapidly becoming an essential part of optimal clinical care, at least partly facilitated by recent advances in next-generation sequencing-based technology using liquid- and tissue-based biopsies. Consequently, clinical trials have shifted in approach, from traditional studies evaluating cytotoxic chemotherapy in largely histology-based populations to modified, biomarker-driven studies (e.g. basket, umbrella, platform) of molecularly guided therapies and cancer immunotherapies in selected patient subsets. Such modified study designs may assess, within the same trial structure, multiple cancer types and treatments, and should incorporate a multistakeholder perspective. This is key to generating complementary, fit-for-purpose and timely evidence for molecularly guided therapies that can be used as proof-of-concept to inform further study designs, lead to approval by regulatory authorities and be used as confirmation of clinical benefit for health technology assessment bodies. In general, the future of cancer clinical trials requires a framework for the application of innovative technologies and dynamic design methodologies, in order to efficiently transform scientific discoveries into clinical utility. Next-generation, modified studies that involve the joint efforts of all key stakeholders will offer individualised strategies that ultimately contribute to globalised knowledge and collective learning. In this review, we outline the background and purpose of such modified study designs and detail key aspects from a multistakeholder perspective. We also provide methodological considerations for designing the studies and highlight how insights from already-ongoing studies may address current challenges and opportunities in the era of personalised oncology.

Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations.

BACKGROUND: BRAF V600 mutations occur in various nonmelanoma cancers. We undertook a histology-independent phase 2 "basket" study of vemurafenib in BRAF V600 mutation-positive nonmelanoma cancers. METHODS: We enrolled patients in six prespecified cancer cohorts; patients with all other tumor types were enrolled in a seventh cohort. A total of 122 patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive cancer were treated, including 27 patients with colorectal cancer who received vemurafenib and cetuximab. The primary end point was the response rate; secondary end points included progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: In the cohort with non-small-cell lung cancer, the response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20 to 67) and median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 10.8). In the cohort with Erdheim-Chester disease or Langerhans'-cell histiocytosis, the response rate was 43% (95% CI, 18 to 71); the median treatment duration was 5.9 months (range, 0.6 to 18.6), and no patients had disease progression during therapy. There were anecdotal responses among patients with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, anaplastic thyroid cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, salivary-duct cancer, ovarian cancer, and clear-cell sarcoma and among patients with colorectal cancer who received vemurafenib and cetuximab. Safety was similar to that in prior studies of vemurafenib for melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF V600 appears to be a targetable oncogene in some, but not all, nonmelanoma cancers. Preliminary vemurafenib activity was observed in non-small-cell lung cancer and in Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans'-cell histiocytosis. The histologic context is an important determinant of response in BRAF V600-mutated cancers. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01524978.).

A phase I study of single-agent nilotinib or in combination with imatinib in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: To study the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib as a single agent or in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A phase I intercohort dose-escalation trial was done in patients who received either (a) single agent nilotinib 400 mg twice daily or (b) escalating doses of nilotinib (200 mg once daily, 400 mg qd, or 400 mg bid) plus imatinib 400 mg bid (10- and 14-hour interval daily), or (c) nilotinib 400 mg bid plus imatinib 400 mg qd. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor assessments were done. RESULTS: Oral clearance (CL/F) of nilotinib was similar across the combination groups (mean CL/F, 19.1-25.6 L/h), and lower than in the single-agent cohort (mean CL/F, 35.6 L/h). A linear relationship between nilotinib daily dose and peak concentration was observed in the combination cohorts. Observed adverse events (AE) were mostly nonhematologic. Frequently reported AEs were rash (40%), fatigue (38%), abdominal pain (36%), and nausea (36%). Severe AEs (grade 3 or 4) included abdominal pain (13%) and rash (9%), the latter mainly with the combination. Thirty-eight patients had stable disease and two patients achieved partial response with a median progression-free survival of 134 days for the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: Nilotinib alone or in combination with imatinib was well tolerated overall and showed clinical activity in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. This phase I trial identified single-agent nilotinib 400 mg bid or combined with imatinib 400 mg qd as possible phase II doses for further evaluation.

Mechanisms of hypertension associated with BAY 43-9006.

PURPOSE: BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib) is an inhibitor of Raf kinase, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2, and angiogenesis in tumor xenografts. The current study investigated the incidence, severity, and mechanism of blood pressure (BP) elevation in patients treated with BAY 43-9006. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients received BAY 43-9006 400 mg orally twice daily. BP and heart rate were measured at baseline and then every 3 weeks for 18 weeks. VEGF, catecholamines, endothelin I, urotensin II, renin, and aldosterone were measured at baseline and after 3 weeks of therapy. We assessed vascular stiffness at baseline, after 3 to 6 weeks of therapy, and again after 9 to 10 months of therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen (75%) of 20 patients experienced an increase of > or = 10 mmHg in systolic BP (SBP), and 12 (60%) of 20 patients experienced an increase of > or = 20 mmHg in SBP compared with their baseline value, with a mean change of 20.6 mmHg (P < .0001) after 3 weeks of therapy. There were no statistically significant changes in humoral factors, although there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between decreases in catecholamines and increases in SBP, suggesting a secondary response to BP elevation. Measures of vascular stiffness increased significantly during the period of observation. CONCLUSION: Treatment with BAY 43-9006 is associated with a significant and sustained increase in BP. The lack of significant change in circulating factors suggests that these humoral factors had little role in the increase in BP.

Gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the expanded access protocol experience at the University of Pennsylvania.

Gefitinib (Iressa; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) is an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with favorable toxicity and antitumor activity in pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC treated at our institution as part of an expanded access protocol; 112 patients with advanced NSCLC were entered. All patients had failed at least one previous chemotherapy regimen, or were not suitable for any systemic chemotherapy because of poor performance status (PS), or were ineligible for other clinical trials. Therapy consisted of gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily; 10.5% (95% CI 5.3-17.9%) of patients achieved partial/minimal response (PR/MR) and 29.5% (95% CI 21.0-39.2%) had stable disease (SD), resulting in a disease control rate (PR/MR+SD) of 40% (95% CI 31-50%). The median duration of treatment for all patients was 12 weeks (range 2-116 weeks) and for patients achieving disease control 28 weeks (range 8-116). Nine patients received gefitinib for more than 1 year. Median survival was 30 weeks. Symptoms were improved in 36% of evaluable patients, and 64% of patients who achieved disease control experienced improvement of their disease related symptoms. Adverse events were generally mild and consisted mostly of skin rash (48%) and diarrhea (38%). A statistically significant association was observed between disease control and skin rash (p = < 0.001), nonsmoking status (p = 0.048), and symptom improvement (p = 0.001). The disease control rate was not statistically associated with histology, PS, gender, or number of prior treatments. In addition, longer survival was significantly associated with skin rash (p = < 0.001) and symptom improvement (p = < 0.001). Gefitinib demonstrated relevant clinical activity and a favorable toxicity profile in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. The development of toxicity was associated with a favorable response. In addition, a history of never having smoked seems to predict a higher efficacy of gefitinib.

Phase I study of the novel taxane CT-2103 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: CT-2103 (Cell Therapeutics, Seattle, Wash.) is a water-soluble macromolecular conjugate of paclitaxel to a polyglutamate backbone, designed to enhance tumor permeability and to improve intratumoral delivery of paclitaxel. Preclinical studies indicate that CT-2103 has substantial antitumor efficacy in xenograft tumor models. METHODS: We performed a phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of CT-2103 when administered as short intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Seven patients received a total of 16 cycles (range 1-3) of CT-2103 at doses of 235 and 270 mg/m(2). Two of five patients treated at 235 mg/m(2) and one of two patients treated at 270 mg/m(2) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Four patients experienced a marked increase in PTT within 30 min of the start of infusion. Neuropathy was more severe than expected. Two patients developed grade 3 neuropathy that prompted a 50% dose reduction of CT-2103 and persisted for 8 months in one, and over a year in the other. Three patients experienced grade 1 or 2 neuropathy. Neurotoxicity was cumulative and prevented patients from receiving prolonged administration of CT-2103. CONCLUSIONS: The unexpectedly high rate of cumulative toxicity observed in our study needs to be taken into consideration in future trials of CT-2103. Prior taxane use may not be a predictor of severe neurotoxicity.

Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Monoclonal antibodies have been developed to target specific proteins involved in the development and progression of cancer. These reagents have the advantage of exquiste specificity, and as currently engineered, low toxicity. The impact monoclonal antibody therapy has recently been demonstrated in colorectal cancer, in which two pathways critical to carcinogenesis have been targeted. The targets are the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway and angiogenesis. Antibodies directed to proteins in both pathways have shown significant activity especially in combination with chemotherapy, and studies in the adjuvant setting are in progress. We review the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of colorectal cancer with particular attention to edrecolomab (Mab 17-1A), bevacizumab (Avastin), cetuximab (IMC-C225), ABX-EGF and EMD 72000. Additional compounds are in earlier stages of development, and the future of this approach in solid tumours is promising.