RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Reform of cancer care delivery seeks to control costs while improving quality. Texas Oncology collaborated with Aetna to conduct a payer-sponsored program that used evidence-based treatment pathways, a disease management call center, and an introduction to advance care planning to improve patient care and reduce total costs. METHODS: From June 1, 2013, to May 31, 2016, 746 Medicare Advantage patients with nine common cancer diagnoses were enrolled. Patients electing for patient support services were telephoned by oncology nurses who assessed symptoms and quality of life and introduced advance care planning. Shared cost savings were determined by comparing the costs of drugs, hospitalization, and emergency room use for 509 eligible patients in the study group with a matched cohort of 900 Medicare Advantage patients treated by non-Texas Oncology providers. Physician adherence to treatment pathways and performance and quality metrics were evaluated. RESULTS: During the 3 years of the study, the cumulative cost savings were $3,033,248, and savings continued to increase each year. Drug cost savings per patient per treatment month were $1,874 (95% CI, $1,373 to $2,376; P < .001) after adjusting for age, diagnosis, and study year. Solid tumors contributed most of the savings; hematologic cancers showed little savings. For years 1, 2, and 3, adherence to treatment pathways was 81%, 84%, and 90%, patient satisfaction with patient support services was 94%, 93%, and 94%, and hospice enrollment was 55%, 57%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A practice-based program supported by a payer sponsor can reduce costs while maintaining high adherence to treatment pathways and patient satisfaction in older patients.
Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica/economía , Medicare , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Ahorro de Costo , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs of: 1) chemotherapy treatment across clinical, demographic, and geographic variables; and 2) various cancer care-related cost categories between patients receiving chemotherapy in a community oncology versus a hospital outpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the calendar years 2008 to 2010 from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were analyzed. During 2010, the data set contained approximately 45 million unique commercially insured patients with 70,984 cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. These patients were assigned to cohorts depending on whether they received chemotherapy at a community oncology or hospital outpatient setting. METHODS: Cost data for 9 common cancer types were extracted from the database and analyzed on a per member per month basis to normalize costs; costs included amounts paid by the payer and patient payment. Community oncology and hospital outpatient setting chemotherapy treatment costs were categorized and examined according to cancer diagnosis, patient demographics, and geographic location. RESULTS: Patients receiving chemotherapy treatment in the community oncology clinic had a 20% to 39% lower mean per member per month cost of care, depending on diagnosis, compared with those receiving chemotherapy in the hospital outpatient setting. This cost differential was consistent across cancer type, geographic location, patient age, and number of chemotherapy sessions. Various cost categories examined were also higher for those treated in the hospital outpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of care for patients receiving chemotherapy was consistently lower in the community oncology clinic compared with the hospital outpatient setting, controlling for the clinical, demographic, and geographic variables analyzed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Innovent Oncology Program aims to improve the value of cancer care delivered to patients. McKesson Specialty Health and Texas Oncology (TXO) collaborated with Aetna to launch a pilot program. The study objectives were to evaluate the impact of Innovent on Level I Pathway compliance, implement the Patient Support Services program, and measure the rate and costs associated with chemotherapy-related emergency room (ER) visits and hospital admissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized evaluation of patients enrolled in Innovent from June 1, 2010, through May 31, 2012. Data from the iKnowMed electronic health record, the McKesson Specialty Health financial data warehouse, and Aetna claims data warehouse were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included and stratified according to disease and age groups; 76% of ordered regimens were on pathway; 24% were off pathway. Pathway adherence improved from TXO baseline adherence of 63%. Of the 221 patients, 81% enrolled in PSS. Within the breast, colorectal, and lung cancer groups, 14% and 24% of patients had an ER visit and in-patient admission (IPA; baseline) versus 10% and 18% in Innovent, respectively; average in-patient days decreased from 2.1 to 1.2 days, respectively. Total savings combined for the program was $506,481. CONCLUSION: Implementation of Innovent positively affected patient care in several ways: Fewer ER visits and IPAs occurred, in-patient days decreased, cancer-related use costs were reduced, and on-pathway adherence increased.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología Médica/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Atención al Paciente/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Rol de la Enfermera , Atención al Paciente/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Teléfono , Texas , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias/normas , Atención a la Salud/economía , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias/terapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Redes Comunitarias/economía , Conducta Cooperativa , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Oncología Médica/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Atención al Paciente/economía , Atención al Paciente/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
The Wilshire Oncology Medical Group developed a medical oncology home pilot to offer a transparent, high-quality, high-value cancer program in partnership with its largest California health plan, Anthem Blue Cross WellPoint.