Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel chemoprotector BNP7787 in combination with cisplatin and attempt to eliminate the hydration schedule.

BNP7787 (disodium 2,2'-dithio-bis-ethane sulphonate; Tavocept) is a novel agent developed to protect against cisplatin (cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum(II))-associated chronic toxicities. In this study, we determined the recommended dose of BNP7787 when preceding a fixed dose of cisplatin, the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and the possible reduction of saline hydration. Patients with advanced solid tumours received BNP7787 in escalating doses of 4.1-41 g m(-2) as a 15-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) as a 60-min i.v. infusion together with pre- and postcisplatin saline hydration in a volume of 2200 ml; cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. PK was carried out using BNP7787, cisplatin and the combination. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in stage I of the study to determine the recommended dose of BNP7787. No dose-limiting toxicity was reached. The highest dose level of 41 g m(-2) resulted in a low incidence of grade 2 toxicities, being nausea and vomiting, dry mouth or bad taste and i.v. injection site discomfort. Doses of BNP7787 > or = 18.4 g m(-2) did not show a drug interaction between BNP7787 and cisplatin. In stage II of the study, patients received a fixed dose of BNP7787 of 18.4 g m(-2) preceding cisplatin and were entered in prespecified reduced saline hydration steps. A total of 21 patients in cohorts of six to nine patients received reduced saline hydration of 1600 ml (step A), 1000 ml (step B) and 500 ml (step C). In step C, two out of six evaluable patients experienced grade 1 nephrotoxicity. Cisplatin acute toxicities in all 46 patients were as expected. Only five patients complained of paresthesias grade 1 and six developed slight audiometric changes. Partial tumour response was observed in four patients and stable disease in 15 patients. In conclusion, BNP7787 was tolerated well up to doses of 41 g m(-2). The recommended dose of 18.4 g m(-2) enabled safe reduction of the saline hydration schedule for cisplatin to 1000 ml. Further studies will assess whether BNP7787 offers protection against platinum-related late side effects.

Pharmacokinetic behaviour of the chemoprotectants BNP7787 and mesna after an i.v. bolus injection in rats.

In preclinical studies, BNP7787 (disodium 2,2'-dithio-bis-ethane sulphonate), the disulphide form of mesna, has demonstrated selective protection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity due to conversion into mesna inactivating toxic platinum species. Mesna (sodium 2-mercapto ethane sulphonate), however, can affect the antitumour activity of cisplatin, while BNP7787 does not interfere with the antitumour activity. To understand the difference in interference with cisplatin-induced antitumour activity between BNP7787 and mesna as well to characterise the selective nephroprotection by BNP7787, the pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and mesna, each given i.v. 1000 mg x kg(-1), were determined in plasma, kidney, liver, red blood cells (RBC), skeletal muscle and tumour of Fischer rats bearing subcutaneously implanted WARD colon tumours. The following results were obtained: (1). high concentrations of BNP7787 and mesna were observed in the plasma and kidney after administration of BNP7787 or mesna, except for mesna in plasma after BNP7787 administration; (2). in all other sampled compartments, the AUC values of both compounds were at least 5.5-fold lower than the corresponding values in kidney; (3). the AUC of mesna in plasma after mesna administration was comparable to the AUC of mesna in kidney after a dose of BNP7787 that can completely prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats; (4). the AUC of mesna in plasma was five-fold higher relative to the AUC of mesna following BNP7787 administration (P<0.01). In conclusion, the five-fold higher AUC of mesna in plasma after mesna administration and the fact that mesna is more reactive with (hydrated) cisplatin than its disulphide form BNP7787 represent a plausible explanation as to why mesna administration can reduce the antitumour activity of cisplatin. After BNP7787 administration, the distribution of BNP7787 and mesna was restricted to the kidney, which confirmed the selective protection of the kidney by BNP7787.

BNP7787, a novel protector against platinum-related toxicities, does not affect the efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin in human tumour xenografts.

BNP7787 (2',2'-dithio-bis-ethane sulphonate sodium), a water-soluble disulphide, is chemically and mechanistically different from other sulphur-containing chemoprotective agents. Presently, BNP7787 is under investigation for its protective properties with regard to the side-effects of platinum compounds. In this study, we evaluated BNP7787, mesna and amifostine for their effects on the antitumour activity of platinum compounds. Continuous exposure to BNP7787 did not affect the antiproliferative effects of cisplatin or carboplatin, but the efficacy of both compounds was reduced in the presence of mesna in vitro in two human ovarian cancer cell lines. BNP7787 or amifostine combined with cisplatin or carboplatin given in standard schedules for the treatment of nude mice bearing well-established OVCAR-3 xenografts did not interfere with platinum-induced inhibition of tumour growth. Of interest, BNP7787 or amifostine co-administered with carboplatin was significantly more effective than carboplatin alone (P<0.01). In the presence of amifostine, doses of cisplatin and carboplatin could be safely increased by factors of 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. Unlike in a previous study of BNP7787 in tumour-bearing rats, BNP7787 did not protect against additional weight loss following treatment with higher doses of cisplatin in OVCAR-3-bearing mice. Pharmacokinetics of (mixed) disulphides including BNP7787 and extractable mesna in deproteinised plasma revealed a rapid disappearance of BNP7787 and an AUC(5-60) value of mesna 9-fold lower than that calculated after an equivalent dose of mesna by weight. We can conclude that BNP7787 does not interfere with the antitumour activity of platinum compounds in vitro and in vivo. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the protection of normal tissues by BNP7787 when combined with cisplatin.

Quantification of BNP7787 (dimesna) and its metabolite mesna in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

A sensitive and accurate assay was developed and validated to determine BNP7787 (dimesna), a new protector against cisplatin-induced toxicities, and its metabolite mesna in plasma and urine of patients. Both analytes were measured as mesna in deproteinized plasma or in urine diluted with mobile phase using high-performance liquid chromatography with an electrochemical detector provided with a wall-jet gold electrode. The assays for BNP7787 and mesna in deproteinized plasma were linear over the range of 1.6-500 microM and 0.63-320 microM, respectively. In plasma, the mean recovery of BNP7787 over the whole concentration range was 100.6% and of mesna 94.6%. The lower limits of quantitation (LLQs) of BNP7787 and mesna in deproteinized plasma were 1.6 microM and 0.63 microM, respectively. For both compounds the within- and between-day accuracy and precision of the assay was better than 12%. The assays for BNP7787 and mesna in urine were linear over the range of 0.8-1200 microM and 0.63-250 microM, respectively. In urine, the mean recovery of BNP7787 over the whole concentration range was 94.1% and of mesna 93.1%. The LLQ of BNP7787 in urine was 0.8 microM and of mesna 1.6 microM. The within- and between-day accuracy and precision of the assay for BNP7787 and mesna was lower than 15%. The stability of mesna in urine increased with an increasing concentration of mesna, lower temperature and addition of EDTA (1 g/l) and hydrochloric acid (0.2 M). BNP7787 in urine was stable for at least 24 h at temperatures in the range of -20 degrees C up to 37 degrees C and independent of the concentration. The developed assays are currently applied for samples of patients with solid tumors participating in a phase I trial of BNP7787 in combination with cisplatin.

P-glycoprotein system as a determinant of drug interactions: the case of digoxin-verapamil.

Digoxin, which has a very narrow therapeutic window, is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the treatment of congestive heart failure. In some cases of atrial fibrillation digoxin is used in combination with verapamil. Verapamil can increase the plasma concentration of digoxin up to 60-90%. So far the precise mechanism of this pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction is not known. Many studies suggest that verapamil reduces the renal clearance of digoxin. The energy-dependent membrane-bound transport enzyme, P-glycoprotein, may also be involved. Reports from oncology research show that verapamil can interact with P-glycoprotein as a modulator. Also taking into account that digoxin, like many anticancer drugs, is a substrate for P-glycoprotein, it is likely that P-glycoprotein modulation accounts for the digoxin-verapamil interaction. Current knowledge suggest that the non-competitive digoxin-verapamil interaction is due to inhibition of P-glycoprotein activity by verapamil resulting in a decreased renal tubular elimination of digoxin.