Implementation of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an important role in the management of symptomatic patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). While studies have investigated the feasibility and efficacy of virtual PR (VPR), it is important to understand the experiences of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) during the rapid digital health transformation that occurred in the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and HCPs who participated in VPR during the pandemic. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CRD patients and HCPs. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach and a team-based inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants included 11 HCPs (7 female; 29-55 years) and 19 CRD patients (11 male; 62-83 years; 15 COPD, 4 COPD/ILD). Three major themes and 10 subthemes were identified: i) the pandemic response: a 'trial by fire' (navigating uncertainty, emotional impact of change, shifting practice amid complexity); ii) beyond the emergency: navigating a 'new normal' (eligibility and assessment for VPR, virtual exercise, virtual education and resources, clinical supervision and patient safety); and iii) care beyond boundaries: the implications of using technology for PR (benefits and limitations of technology, psychosocial implications, VPR in the future). CONCLUSION: The pivot to VPR was acknowledged as positive by both patients and HCPs although both groups were mindful of the implementation challenges. These findings provide insight into the experience of HCPs and patients in introducing VPR in response to the pandemic and will inform future implementation of VPR for individuals with CRD.

The effect of digital interventions on related health literacy and skills for individuals living with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are a leading cause of death and disease burden globally. Digital interventions could be an approach to improve patients' ability to find, evaluate, and use health information. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine the effect of digital interventions on digital health literacy for patients living with chronic disease. Secondary objectives were to provide an overviewof the design and delivery characteristics of interventions that impact digital health literacy in people with chronic disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials examining digital health literacy (and related components) for individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, osteoarthritis, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and HIV were identified. This review was conducted following the PRIMSA guidelines. Certainty was assessed using GRADE and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.1. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022375967). RESULTS: 9386 articles were identified and 17 articles representing 16 unique trials were included. Studies evaluated 5138 individuals with one or more chronic conditions (50% women, ages 42 ± 7-71 ± 12 years). The most targeted conditions were cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and HIV. Interventions included: skills training, websites, electronic personal health records, remote patient monitoring, and education. The effects of the interventions were related to: (i) digital health literacy, (ii) health literacy, (iii) health information skills, (iv) technology skills and access, and (v) self-management and participation in care. A meta-analysis of three studies identified the effect of digital interventions was better than usual care for eHealth literacy (1.22 [CI 0.55, 1.89], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of the effects of digital interventions on related health literacy is limited. Existing studies reflect the heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcome measures. There is a need for further studies on the effects of digital interventions on related health literacy for individuals with chronic conditions.

Peer Support for Individuals with Major Limb Loss: a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Major limb loss can have profound physical and psychosocial implications for individuals, impacting their quality of life and well-being. Despite the effectiveness of peer support in improving outcomes for various chronic conditions, its impact on individuals with major limb loss remains understudied. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to explore the existing literature on peer support for individuals with major limb loss. Specifically, exploring how the literature defines peer support; examining its implementation, identifying outcomes measured in peer support interventions, assessing the benefits for individuals with major limb loss, and identifying barriers associated with peer support provision. STUDY DESIGN: This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, analysing relevant literature to identify evidence, definitions, and key factors related to peer support for individuals with major limb loss. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search in January 2023 utilized databases: MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Embase, and CINAHL. After a two-phase screening process, articles meeting specific criteria were included. Thematic and descriptive numerical analyses were applied to the extracted data. FINDINGS: Twenty-two articles were reviewed. Peer support was described as an opportunity to provide education, advice, and encouragement between individuals with lived experiences. Across the two intervention-based studies investigating peer support programs, outcome measures included physical, psychological, social, and quality of life. Qualitative studies described perceived benefits as improved psychosocial well-being and the opportunity to exchange knowledge. Perceived barriers included a lack of formal training and male-dominated groups, which deterred individuals with amputation from participating. CONCLUSION: The evidence from the findings of the review sheds light on the current understanding of peer support for individuals with amputation. Due to the limited number of studies available, future research is necessary to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of peer support interventions tailored to this population.